Abstract

Aims

Micra-AV pacing system is a leadless pacemaker (LP) implanted in the right ventricle which can provide atrio-ventricular (AV) synchronous pacing. Echocardiographic data assessing left ventricle contractility 24–48 h after Micra AV implantation are lacking. To evaluate via conventional echocardiography and speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE), which was the best pacing modality (VVI vs. VDD) able to ensure the most efficient hemodynamic performance assessed by left ventricle ejection fraction (LF-EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS).

Methods and results

We studied nine patients with high degree AV-block, enrolled in our Institution in a range of time of 5 months. All patients had first degree AV block (PQ interval between 160 and 340 ms). They were considered suitable candidates for MICRA-AV implantation according to current guidelines. Both LF-EF and GLS were performed 24–48 h after device implantation by two experienced echocardiographic physicians. The mean age of the population was 79 ± 8 years (8 were male, 89%). Risk factors more represented were hypertension and dyslipidaemia. The maximum PQ interval was 256 ± 51 ms. VDD pacing modality allows better LV-EF values than those obtained with a VVI stimulation (with a difference that was statistically significant difference, P-value = 0.008). Similarly, we obtained better GLS values during VDD pacing as respect to VVI (P-value = 0.008).

Conclusions

Left ventricle ejection fraction and LV-GLS improve early after leadless MICRA-AV implantation during VDD as compared to VVI pacing modality.

This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)