Introduction

The pathogenesis of infective endocarditis (IE) is a complex process which can include tissue damage to the valves during bacteraemia, pathogen adherence leading to the formation of non-bacterial thrombotic vegetations, platelet aggregation at sites of tissue damage, and a variety of biological interactions between pathogens and host matrix molecules (e.g. platelets).1,2 In the past few decades, the incidence of IE has increased significantly, which may be the result of an aging population, delayed diagnosis of valvular heart disease, and even new methods of valve implantation, including transcatheter therapies. The incidence of IE of the right heart has also increased due to the prevalence of intravenous drug use. Overall, the epidemiological profile of IE in China remains inadequately characterized, and the precise epidemiology differs between geographic location and study populations. For example, in Europe, the incidence of IE is reported to be 3–10 episodes/100 000 person-years and increases with age—the peak incidence being 14.5 episodes/100 000 person-years in patients between 70 and 80 years of age, with a male : female ratio of ≥2 : 1. Over the course of the 20th century, due to effective antibiotic treatment, the major cause of IE has changed from rheumatic valve disease, which mainly affects young adults, to a variety of other aetiologies. In many locations, the most common pathogen of IE has changed from Streptococcus to Staphylococcus. In the USA, staphylococcal infection has become the most prevalent, and, in China, case reports show that Streptococcus and Staphylococcus are the most common pathogens.3–6 Despite advances in its management, IE is still considered a severe disease with a high mortality rate and poor prognosis.

This consensus is written by the Chinese Society of Cardiology, and the Heart Failure Group is responsible for the implementation of its recommendations. Importantly, this document is the first version of a consensus on the management of IE in China. It is based on advanced scientific principles and evidence-based medicine, and it is written with the goal of benefiting patients and informing clinicians. The Heart Failure Group studied the most recent domestic and international guidelines relevant to IE, including those published by the European Society of Cardiology and the British Institute of Antibiotics, as well as the diagnostic criteria proposed by the Chinese Academy of Pediatrics. After review and analysis of related studies, a consensus was reached after vigorous discussion. The Heart Failure Group organized a taskforce to draft these guidelines, including experts in infectious disease, cardiology, cardiac surgery, radiology, clinical laboratory medicine, and pathology. The recommendations herein have undergone both a nationwide commenting period and a 2-year revising period. We are convinced that the publication of this consensus statement will positively impact the diagnosis and treatment of adult IE.

According to international standards, this consensus statement designates recommendation and evidence levels for therapeutic strategies, including the efficacy of antibiotic regimens. The Classes of Recommendation are defined as follows: Class I, evidence and/or general agreement that a given treatment or procedure is beneficial, useful, and effective; Class II, conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of the given treatment or procedure (Class IIa represents weight of evidence/opinion that is in favour of usefulness/efficacy, while Class IIb represents usefulness/efficacy that is less well-established by evidence/opinion); Class III, evidence or general agreement that the given treatment or procedure is not useful/effective and may even be harmful in certain situations. The Levels of Evidence are defined as follows: Level of Evidence A, data derived from multiple randomized clinical trials or meta-analyses; Level of Evidence B, data derived from a single randomized clinical trial or large non-randomized studies; Level of Evidence C, consensus of opinion of the experts and/or small studies, retrospective studies, or registries.

The prevention of infective endocarditis

The primary focus of preventive are aimed at the association between bacteraemia and structural heart diseases. Bacteraemia is a prerequisite for the occurrence of IE, and patients with structural heart abnormalities are highly susceptible to IE if they become bacteraemia.

To prevent and reduce the incidence of bacteraemia in patients with structural heart disease, general measures include emphasizing the importance of good oral hygiene and regular dental examinations, as well as skin hygiene, so as to prevent secondary infection caused by skin or mucosal injury. It is recommended to try to avoid traumatic examinations and operations and to strictly follow aseptic technique if possible.

Antibiotic prophylaxis

Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended when a high-risk procedure is performed in the patients with any of the following conditions: valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease (CHD), hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, rheumatological disorders requiring glucocorticoid or immunosuppressive therapy,1,2,7–10 and drug addicts.1

Patient populations and surgical operations requiring prophylaxis

Specific patient populations and operations requiring prophylaxis include: (i) patients with a prosthetic valve or prosthetic material used for cardiac valve repair; (ii) patients with previous IE; (iii) patients with cyanotic CHD, either without surgical repair or with residual defects, palliative shunts or conduits; CHD with complete repair with prosthetic material, whether placed by surgery or by percutaneous technique, up to 6 months after the procedure; and in the setting of a residual defect which persists at the site of implantation of prosthetic material or a device, either by cardiac surgery or percutaneous technique.1,11

Examinations and routine procedures requiring prophylaxis

The reported incidence of transient bacteraemia after dental procedures is highly variable and ranges from 10 to 100%. Therefore, antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended 30 min before certain procedures (see Table 1).1,11 Antibiotic prophylaxis for other procedures should refer to regulations published by the health department. There is no compelling evidence that bacteraemia may result from common procedures involving the respiratory tract (e.g. bronchoscopy, laryngoscopy, or transnasal/endotracheal intubation), gastrointestinal tract (e.g. upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, and transesophageal echocardiogram) or urogenital tract (e.g. cystoscopy or catheterization). Therefore, antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended in patients undergoing these procedures.

Table 1

Recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental procedures

SituationAntibioticsDosage
AdultsChildren
No allergy to penicillinAmoxicillin or ampicillin2 g po or iv50 mg/kg po or iv
Allergy to penicillin or ampicillinClinadamycin600 mg po or iv20 mg/kg po or iv
SituationAntibioticsDosage
AdultsChildren
No allergy to penicillinAmoxicillin or ampicillin2 g po or iv50 mg/kg po or iv
Allergy to penicillin or ampicillinClinadamycin600 mg po or iv20 mg/kg po or iv
Table 1

Recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental procedures

SituationAntibioticsDosage
AdultsChildren
No allergy to penicillinAmoxicillin or ampicillin2 g po or iv50 mg/kg po or iv
Allergy to penicillin or ampicillinClinadamycin600 mg po or iv20 mg/kg po or iv
SituationAntibioticsDosage
AdultsChildren
No allergy to penicillinAmoxicillin or ampicillin2 g po or iv50 mg/kg po or iv
Allergy to penicillin or ampicillinClinadamycin600 mg po or iv20 mg/kg po or iv

Diagnosis of infective endocarditis

Clinical features of infective endocarditis

The clinical presentation of IE is diverse and can be complicated. Infection may lead to valvular ulceration or perforation, valvular insufficiency, or decreased tenacity of the heart valve, leading to the formation of a luminal tumour-like bulge that may impede blood flow and, in some cases, perforation of the bulging valve which will exacerbate regurgitation.12 When infection spreads to neighbouring tissues, valvular abscesses may occur. An abscess located at the root of the aortic valve may compress the coronary artery and lead to angina pectoris or myocardial infarction. An abscess located at the proximal end of the mitral valve may spread to the left atrial wall, atrial septum, left ventricle, or even more distally. Pathogens proliferating in the blood stream may result in bacteraemia or septicaemia. Meanwhile, the proliferation of pathogens may induce antibody production and lead to immune-mediated diseases, including polyangiitis, focal, or systemic glomerular nephritis, arthritis, and pericarditis. Embolic events are a frequent complication related to the shedding of cardiac vegetations, with spread most common to the brain, spleen, lung, heart, and kidney. Clinical manifestations are related to the size of the emboli, the diameter of the blocked blood vessel, the existence of end-organ collateral circulation, and whether the vegetation contains pathogens or not. Micro-emboli may not demonstrate overt clinical symptoms and may only be discovered at the time of autopsy. Large emboli can cause organ ischaemia or even necrosis. Infective emboli may lead to local infection with progression to abscess formation. Alternatively, embolization can result in infective vasculitis and angioma formation, most commonly involving the cerebral arteries, mesenteric artery, splenic artery, coronary artery, and pulmonary artery.

Clinical manifestations of infective endocarditis

Clinical manifestations are highly variable. Fever is the most common symptom, which is typically associated with chills, decreased appetite, and weight loss. Heart murmurs are also frequent. Other symptoms include those arising from vascular and immune system disorders and embolization to the brain, lungs, and spleen.13 Clinical presentations among the elderly and immunosuppressed patients are usually less typical,14 and fever is less commonly observed.

Clinical presentation of IE: (A) New regurgitant heart murmur. (B) Embolic events of unknown origin. (C) Sepsis of unknown origin (especially if associated with an IE causative organism). (D) Fever. In the latter case, IE should be suspected if fever is associated with: (i) intra-cardiac prosthetic material (e.g. prosthetic valve, pacemaker, implantable defibrillator, and surgical baffle/conduit); (ii) a prior history of IE; (iii) previous valvular or CHD; (iv) a predisposition for IE (e.g. immunocompromised state or IV drug use); (v) predisposition and/or recent invasive intervention with associated bacteraemia; (vi) evidence of congestive heart failure; (vii) the presence of a new conduction disturbance by EKG or echocardiography; (viii) positive blood cultures with a typical IE causative organism or positive serology for chronic Q fever(microbiological findings may precede cardiac manifestations); (ix) the presence of vascular or immunologic abnormalities indicative of an embolic event, including Roth spots, splinter haemorrhages, Janeway lesions, and Osler's nodes; (x) focal or non-specific neurological symptoms and signs that may suggest a CNS embolic event; (xi) evidence of pulmonary embolism/infiltration (right-sided IE); (xii) peripheral abscesses (renal, splenic, cerebral, and vertebral).

Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of infective endocarditis

  1. Blood cultures: Blood cultures remain the cornerstone of diagnosis and provide live bacteria for susceptibility testing. Blood samples should be obtained using strict aseptic technique before antibiotic therapy is administered.15Figure 1 shows the detection algorithm.16

    Blood-culture-negative IE occurs in 2.5–31% of all cases, often delaying diagnosis and the initiation of treatment, with profound impact on clinical outcomes.17 This circumstance arises most commonly as a consequence of prior antibiotic administration, and may necessitate antibiotic withdrawal and repeat blood cultures in these situations. Another common scenario is infection by fastidious organisms with limited proliferation under conventional culture conditions.18 This is particularly common in IE affecting patients with prosthetic valves, indwelling venous lines, pacemakers, renal failure, or immune-compromised states. Detection methods should be modified when blood-culture-negative IE is suspected (see Table 2).

  2. Echocardiography: The sensitivity of transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography (TTE/TEE) are 40–63% and 90–100%, respectively. The findings on echocardiography that are major criteria for the diagnosis of IE include the observation of vegetations, abscess, and new dehiscence of prosthetic valves (Table 3). Figure 2 illustrates the preferred detection algorithm with regard to echocardiography.

  3. Histological/immunological techniques: Pathological examination of resected valvular tissue or embolic fragments remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of IE and can also be helpful in guiding antimicrobial treatment. Electron microscopy has a high sensitivity and may help to characterize new microorganisms, but it is not recommended time-consuming and expensive. Direct immunofluorescence or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay may also allow the detection of microorganisms,19 but their significance remains uncertain.

Culture of homogenized valvular tissue is required for patients who have undergone surgery for IE in order to accurately identify the responsible pathogens. For tissue culture-negative patients, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can be used for the rapid and reliable detection of fastidious pathogens in these patients.20,21 Although there are several advantages to PCR, including a high sensitivity, inherent limitations to this technique include a lack of reliable application to whole blood samples. Although PCR positivity has been proposed as a major diagnostic criterion for IE, the technique seems unlikely to supersede blood cultures as a primary diagnostic tool.

Table 2

Pathogen detection in culture-negative infective endocarditis

PathogensMethods
Brucella spp.Blood culture; serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
C. burnetiiSerology (an IgG anti-Phase I antibody titer >1 : 800); tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Bartonella spp.Blood culture; serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Tropheryma whippleiTissue histology; PCR detection
Mycoplasma spp.Serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Legionella spp.Blood culture; serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
PathogensMethods
Brucella spp.Blood culture; serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
C. burnetiiSerology (an IgG anti-Phase I antibody titer >1 : 800); tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Bartonella spp.Blood culture; serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Tropheryma whippleiTissue histology; PCR detection
Mycoplasma spp.Serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Legionella spp.Blood culture; serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Table 2

Pathogen detection in culture-negative infective endocarditis

PathogensMethods
Brucella spp.Blood culture; serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
C. burnetiiSerology (an IgG anti-Phase I antibody titer >1 : 800); tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Bartonella spp.Blood culture; serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Tropheryma whippleiTissue histology; PCR detection
Mycoplasma spp.Serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Legionella spp.Blood culture; serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
PathogensMethods
Brucella spp.Blood culture; serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
C. burnetiiSerology (an IgG anti-Phase I antibody titer >1 : 800); tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Bartonella spp.Blood culture; serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Tropheryma whippleiTissue histology; PCR detection
Mycoplasma spp.Serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Legionella spp.Blood culture; serology; tissue cell culture; immunohistochemistry; PCR detection
Table 3

Role of echocardiography in infective endocarditis

RecommendationsClassLevel
Diagnosis
 TTE is recommended as the first-line imagining modality in suspected IEIB
 TEE is recommended in patients with high clinical suspicion of IE and a normal TTEIB
 Repeat TTE/TEE within 7–10 days is recommended in the case of an initially negative examination when clinical suspicion of IE remains highIB
 TEE should be considered in the majority of adult patients with suspected IE, even in cases with positive TTE, owing to its better sensitivity and specificity, particularly for the diagnosis of abscesses and measurement of vegetation sizeIIaC
 TEE is not indicated in patients with a good-quality negative TTE and low clinical suspicion of IEIIIC
Follow-up under medical therapy
 Repeat TTE and TEE are recommended as soon as a new complication of IE is suspected (new murmur, embolism, persisting fever, heart failure, and atrioventricular block)IB
 Repeat TTE and TEE should be considered during follow-up of uncomplicated IE, in order to detect new silent complications and to monitor vegetation size. The timing and mode (TTE or TEE) of repeat examination depend on the initial findings, type of microorganism, and initial response to therapyIIaB
Intra-operative echocardiography
 Intra-operative echocardiography is recommended in all cases of IE requiring surgeryIC
Following completion of therapy
 TTE is recommended at the completion of antibiotic therapy for evaluation of cardiac and valve morphology and functionIC
RecommendationsClassLevel
Diagnosis
 TTE is recommended as the first-line imagining modality in suspected IEIB
 TEE is recommended in patients with high clinical suspicion of IE and a normal TTEIB
 Repeat TTE/TEE within 7–10 days is recommended in the case of an initially negative examination when clinical suspicion of IE remains highIB
 TEE should be considered in the majority of adult patients with suspected IE, even in cases with positive TTE, owing to its better sensitivity and specificity, particularly for the diagnosis of abscesses and measurement of vegetation sizeIIaC
 TEE is not indicated in patients with a good-quality negative TTE and low clinical suspicion of IEIIIC
Follow-up under medical therapy
 Repeat TTE and TEE are recommended as soon as a new complication of IE is suspected (new murmur, embolism, persisting fever, heart failure, and atrioventricular block)IB
 Repeat TTE and TEE should be considered during follow-up of uncomplicated IE, in order to detect new silent complications and to monitor vegetation size. The timing and mode (TTE or TEE) of repeat examination depend on the initial findings, type of microorganism, and initial response to therapyIIaB
Intra-operative echocardiography
 Intra-operative echocardiography is recommended in all cases of IE requiring surgeryIC
Following completion of therapy
 TTE is recommended at the completion of antibiotic therapy for evaluation of cardiac and valve morphology and functionIC

TEE, transoesophageal echocardiography; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography.

Table 3

Role of echocardiography in infective endocarditis

RecommendationsClassLevel
Diagnosis
 TTE is recommended as the first-line imagining modality in suspected IEIB
 TEE is recommended in patients with high clinical suspicion of IE and a normal TTEIB
 Repeat TTE/TEE within 7–10 days is recommended in the case of an initially negative examination when clinical suspicion of IE remains highIB
 TEE should be considered in the majority of adult patients with suspected IE, even in cases with positive TTE, owing to its better sensitivity and specificity, particularly for the diagnosis of abscesses and measurement of vegetation sizeIIaC
 TEE is not indicated in patients with a good-quality negative TTE and low clinical suspicion of IEIIIC
Follow-up under medical therapy
 Repeat TTE and TEE are recommended as soon as a new complication of IE is suspected (new murmur, embolism, persisting fever, heart failure, and atrioventricular block)IB
 Repeat TTE and TEE should be considered during follow-up of uncomplicated IE, in order to detect new silent complications and to monitor vegetation size. The timing and mode (TTE or TEE) of repeat examination depend on the initial findings, type of microorganism, and initial response to therapyIIaB
Intra-operative echocardiography
 Intra-operative echocardiography is recommended in all cases of IE requiring surgeryIC
Following completion of therapy
 TTE is recommended at the completion of antibiotic therapy for evaluation of cardiac and valve morphology and functionIC
RecommendationsClassLevel
Diagnosis
 TTE is recommended as the first-line imagining modality in suspected IEIB
 TEE is recommended in patients with high clinical suspicion of IE and a normal TTEIB
 Repeat TTE/TEE within 7–10 days is recommended in the case of an initially negative examination when clinical suspicion of IE remains highIB
 TEE should be considered in the majority of adult patients with suspected IE, even in cases with positive TTE, owing to its better sensitivity and specificity, particularly for the diagnosis of abscesses and measurement of vegetation sizeIIaC
 TEE is not indicated in patients with a good-quality negative TTE and low clinical suspicion of IEIIIC
Follow-up under medical therapy
 Repeat TTE and TEE are recommended as soon as a new complication of IE is suspected (new murmur, embolism, persisting fever, heart failure, and atrioventricular block)IB
 Repeat TTE and TEE should be considered during follow-up of uncomplicated IE, in order to detect new silent complications and to monitor vegetation size. The timing and mode (TTE or TEE) of repeat examination depend on the initial findings, type of microorganism, and initial response to therapyIIaB
Intra-operative echocardiography
 Intra-operative echocardiography is recommended in all cases of IE requiring surgeryIC
Following completion of therapy
 TTE is recommended at the completion of antibiotic therapy for evaluation of cardiac and valve morphology and functionIC

TEE, transoesophageal echocardiography; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography.

Microbiological diagnosis of infective endocarditis.
Figure 1

Microbiological diagnosis of infective endocarditis.

Indications for echocardiography in suspected infective endocarditis.
Figure 2

Indications for echocardiography in suspected infective endocarditis.

Diagnostic criteria

Modified Duke criteria are now recommended for diagnostic classification.22 Diagnosis of IE is considered definitive in the presence of (i) two major criteria; (ii) one major and three minor criteria; (iii) five minor criteria. Diagnosis of IE is possible in the presence of (i) one major and one minor criteria and (ii) three minor criteria.

Major criteria

(i) Blood-cultures positive for IE: (a) the presence of typical microorganisms consistent with IE from two separate blood cultures, which include Viridans streptococci, Streptococcus bovis, HACEK group, Staphylococcus aureus, or community-acquired enterococci, in the absence of a separate primary focus; (b) microorganisms consistent with IE from persistently positive blood cultures (at least two positive blood cultures from blood samples drawn >12 h apart; or all of three or a majority of ≥4 separate blood cultures, with the first and last sample drawn at least 1 h apart); (c) a single positive blood culture for Coxiella burnetii or phase I IgG antibody titer >1 : 800. (ii) Evidence of endocardial involvement by (a) Echocardiography positive for IE with vegetation, abscess, or new partial dehiscence of prosthetic valve; (b) new valvular regurgitation.

Minor criteria

(i) Predisposition (including a predisposing heart condition or history of injection drug use). (ii) Fever (with a temperature >38°C). (iii) Vascular phenomena (including major arterial emboli, septic pulmonary infarcts, mycotic aneurysm, intra-cranial haemorrhages, conjunctival haemorrhages, or Janeway lesions). (iv) Immunologic phenomena (including glomerulonephritis, Osler's nodes, Roth's spots, or positive rheumatoid factor). (v) Microbiological evidence (defined as either a positive blood culture that does not meet a major criterion or serological evidence of active infection with an organism consistent with IE).

Antimicrobial therapy for infective endocarditis

Successful treatment of IE relies on the eradication of pathogens using antimicrobial drugs. The principles of antimicrobial therapy include: (i) the application of bactericidal agents, (ii) the combination of two cooperative antimicrobial drugs, (iii) large dosage of therapy to guarantee effective tissue concentration, (iv) intravenous delivery of therapy, (v) prolongation of therapy (4–6 weeks). In the case of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), treatment should last for at least 6–8 weeks in order to reduce the rate of recurrence. Antimicrobial administration should be applied according to pharmacokinetics. Fractionation and intravenous therapy is recommended for large doses of penicillin to prevent central nervous system toxicity, such as penicillin encephalopathy.1,2,23 Surgery is recommended for some patients, in order to remove infected tissue or drain abscesses, thus eliminating the focus of infection.

Empirical therapy of suspected infective endocarditis

For patients who are diagnosed with possible IE and in unstable condition, empirical therapy is recommended before positive blood culture reports are obtained. The initial choice of empirical treatment depends on several considerations including the severity of infection, the location of the affected valves, and the risk of uncommon or drug-resistant pathogen infection. There are two main types of IE, native valve endocarditis (NVE) and PVE. Empirical therapy should cover the most common pathogens of IE. See Table 4 for recommended empirical therapy.

Table 4

Empirical treatment regimens for endocarditis (pending blood-culture results)

AntimicrobialDose/routeComments
1. NVE, indolent presentation
 Amoxicillin and2 g q4 h ivIf patient is stable, ideally await blood cultures
Better activity against enterococci and many HACEK microorganisms compared with Benzylpenicillin
Use Regimen 2 if genuine penicillin allergy
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg ABWThe role of gentamicin is controversial before culture results are available
2. NVE, severe sepsis (no risk factors for enterobacteriaceae, pseudomonas)
 Vancomycin andDosed according to local guidelinesIn severe sepsis, staphylococci (including methicillin-resistant staphylococci) need to be covered
If allergic to vancomysin, replace with daptomycin 6 mg/kg q12 h iv
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg IBW q12 h ivIf there are concerns about nephrotoxicity/acute kidney injury, use ciprofloxacin in place of gentamicin
3. NVE, severe sepsis and risk factors for multi-resistant enterobacteriaceae, pseudomonas
 Vancomycin andDosed according to local guidelines, ivWill provide cover against staphylococci (including methicillin-resistant staphylococci), streptococci, enterococci, HACEK, Enterobacteriaceae, and P. aeruginosa
 Meropenem2 g q8 h iv
4. PVE pending blood cultures or with negative blood cultures
 Vancomycin and1 g q12 h iv
 Gentamycin and1 mg/kg q12 h ivUse lower dose of rifampicin in severe renal impairment
 Rifampicin300–600 mg q12 h po/iv
AntimicrobialDose/routeComments
1. NVE, indolent presentation
 Amoxicillin and2 g q4 h ivIf patient is stable, ideally await blood cultures
Better activity against enterococci and many HACEK microorganisms compared with Benzylpenicillin
Use Regimen 2 if genuine penicillin allergy
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg ABWThe role of gentamicin is controversial before culture results are available
2. NVE, severe sepsis (no risk factors for enterobacteriaceae, pseudomonas)
 Vancomycin andDosed according to local guidelinesIn severe sepsis, staphylococci (including methicillin-resistant staphylococci) need to be covered
If allergic to vancomysin, replace with daptomycin 6 mg/kg q12 h iv
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg IBW q12 h ivIf there are concerns about nephrotoxicity/acute kidney injury, use ciprofloxacin in place of gentamicin
3. NVE, severe sepsis and risk factors for multi-resistant enterobacteriaceae, pseudomonas
 Vancomycin andDosed according to local guidelines, ivWill provide cover against staphylococci (including methicillin-resistant staphylococci), streptococci, enterococci, HACEK, Enterobacteriaceae, and P. aeruginosa
 Meropenem2 g q8 h iv
4. PVE pending blood cultures or with negative blood cultures
 Vancomycin and1 g q12 h iv
 Gentamycin and1 mg/kg q12 h ivUse lower dose of rifampicin in severe renal impairment
 Rifampicin300–600 mg q12 h po/iv

ABW, actual body weight; IBW, ideal body weight.

Table 4

Empirical treatment regimens for endocarditis (pending blood-culture results)

AntimicrobialDose/routeComments
1. NVE, indolent presentation
 Amoxicillin and2 g q4 h ivIf patient is stable, ideally await blood cultures
Better activity against enterococci and many HACEK microorganisms compared with Benzylpenicillin
Use Regimen 2 if genuine penicillin allergy
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg ABWThe role of gentamicin is controversial before culture results are available
2. NVE, severe sepsis (no risk factors for enterobacteriaceae, pseudomonas)
 Vancomycin andDosed according to local guidelinesIn severe sepsis, staphylococci (including methicillin-resistant staphylococci) need to be covered
If allergic to vancomysin, replace with daptomycin 6 mg/kg q12 h iv
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg IBW q12 h ivIf there are concerns about nephrotoxicity/acute kidney injury, use ciprofloxacin in place of gentamicin
3. NVE, severe sepsis and risk factors for multi-resistant enterobacteriaceae, pseudomonas
 Vancomycin andDosed according to local guidelines, ivWill provide cover against staphylococci (including methicillin-resistant staphylococci), streptococci, enterococci, HACEK, Enterobacteriaceae, and P. aeruginosa
 Meropenem2 g q8 h iv
4. PVE pending blood cultures or with negative blood cultures
 Vancomycin and1 g q12 h iv
 Gentamycin and1 mg/kg q12 h ivUse lower dose of rifampicin in severe renal impairment
 Rifampicin300–600 mg q12 h po/iv
AntimicrobialDose/routeComments
1. NVE, indolent presentation
 Amoxicillin and2 g q4 h ivIf patient is stable, ideally await blood cultures
Better activity against enterococci and many HACEK microorganisms compared with Benzylpenicillin
Use Regimen 2 if genuine penicillin allergy
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg ABWThe role of gentamicin is controversial before culture results are available
2. NVE, severe sepsis (no risk factors for enterobacteriaceae, pseudomonas)
 Vancomycin andDosed according to local guidelinesIn severe sepsis, staphylococci (including methicillin-resistant staphylococci) need to be covered
If allergic to vancomysin, replace with daptomycin 6 mg/kg q12 h iv
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg IBW q12 h ivIf there are concerns about nephrotoxicity/acute kidney injury, use ciprofloxacin in place of gentamicin
3. NVE, severe sepsis and risk factors for multi-resistant enterobacteriaceae, pseudomonas
 Vancomycin andDosed according to local guidelines, ivWill provide cover against staphylococci (including methicillin-resistant staphylococci), streptococci, enterococci, HACEK, Enterobacteriaceae, and P. aeruginosa
 Meropenem2 g q8 h iv
4. PVE pending blood cultures or with negative blood cultures
 Vancomycin and1 g q12 h iv
 Gentamycin and1 mg/kg q12 h ivUse lower dose of rifampicin in severe renal impairment
 Rifampicin300–600 mg q12 h po/iv

ABW, actual body weight; IBW, ideal body weight.

Therapy for staphylococcal endocarditis

See Table 5 for recommended therapy. Therapeutic regimen should be determined by the susceptibility of the pathogen to methicillin. As over 90% of Staphylococcus are resistant to methicillin, oxacillin, and cloxacillin combined with aminoglycosides are recommended for empirical treatment.

Table 5

Summary of treatment recommendations for staphylococcal endocarditis

AgentDose/routeDuration (weeks)Comment
NVE, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus spp.
 Flucloxacillin2 g every 4–6 h iv4Use q4 h regimen if weight >85 kg
NVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤2 mg/L) rifampicin-susceptible Staphylococcus or penicillin allergy
 Vancomycin and1 g iv q12 h4Or dose according to local guidelines. Modify dose according to renal function and maintain pre-dose level 15–20 mg/L
 Rifampicin300–600 mg q12 h po4Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
NVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-resistant (MIC >2 mg/L), daptomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤1 mg/L) Staphylococcus spp. or patient unable to tolerate vancomycin
 Daptomycin and6 mg/kg q24 h iv4Monitor creatine phosphokinase weekly. Adjust dose according to renal function
 Rifampicin or300–600 mg q12 h po4Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg iv q12 h4
PVE, methicillin, rifampicin-susceptible Staphylococcus spp.
 Flucloxacillin and2 g every 4–6 h iv6Use q4 h regimen if weight >85 kg
 Rifampicin and300–600 mg q12 h po6Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg iv, q12 h6
PVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤2 mg/L), Staphylococcus spp., or penicillin allergy
 Vancomycin and1 g iv q12 h6Or dose according to local guidelines. Modify dose according to renal function and maintain pre-dose level 15–20 mg/L
 Rifampicin and300–600 mg q12 h po6Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2Continue gentamicin for the full course if there are no signs or symptoms of toxicity
PVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-resistant (MIC >2 mg/L), daptomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤1 mg/L) Staphylococcus spp., or patient unable to tolerate vancomycin
 Daptomycin and6 mg/kg q24 h iv6Increase daptomycin dosing interval to 48 h if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Rifampicin and300–600 mg q12 h po6Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2Continue gentamicin for the full course if there are no signs or symptoms of toxicity
AgentDose/routeDuration (weeks)Comment
NVE, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus spp.
 Flucloxacillin2 g every 4–6 h iv4Use q4 h regimen if weight >85 kg
NVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤2 mg/L) rifampicin-susceptible Staphylococcus or penicillin allergy
 Vancomycin and1 g iv q12 h4Or dose according to local guidelines. Modify dose according to renal function and maintain pre-dose level 15–20 mg/L
 Rifampicin300–600 mg q12 h po4Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
NVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-resistant (MIC >2 mg/L), daptomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤1 mg/L) Staphylococcus spp. or patient unable to tolerate vancomycin
 Daptomycin and6 mg/kg q24 h iv4Monitor creatine phosphokinase weekly. Adjust dose according to renal function
 Rifampicin or300–600 mg q12 h po4Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg iv q12 h4
PVE, methicillin, rifampicin-susceptible Staphylococcus spp.
 Flucloxacillin and2 g every 4–6 h iv6Use q4 h regimen if weight >85 kg
 Rifampicin and300–600 mg q12 h po6Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg iv, q12 h6
PVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤2 mg/L), Staphylococcus spp., or penicillin allergy
 Vancomycin and1 g iv q12 h6Or dose according to local guidelines. Modify dose according to renal function and maintain pre-dose level 15–20 mg/L
 Rifampicin and300–600 mg q12 h po6Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2Continue gentamicin for the full course if there are no signs or symptoms of toxicity
PVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-resistant (MIC >2 mg/L), daptomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤1 mg/L) Staphylococcus spp., or patient unable to tolerate vancomycin
 Daptomycin and6 mg/kg q24 h iv6Increase daptomycin dosing interval to 48 h if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Rifampicin and300–600 mg q12 h po6Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2Continue gentamicin for the full course if there are no signs or symptoms of toxicity
Table 5

Summary of treatment recommendations for staphylococcal endocarditis

AgentDose/routeDuration (weeks)Comment
NVE, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus spp.
 Flucloxacillin2 g every 4–6 h iv4Use q4 h regimen if weight >85 kg
NVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤2 mg/L) rifampicin-susceptible Staphylococcus or penicillin allergy
 Vancomycin and1 g iv q12 h4Or dose according to local guidelines. Modify dose according to renal function and maintain pre-dose level 15–20 mg/L
 Rifampicin300–600 mg q12 h po4Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
NVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-resistant (MIC >2 mg/L), daptomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤1 mg/L) Staphylococcus spp. or patient unable to tolerate vancomycin
 Daptomycin and6 mg/kg q24 h iv4Monitor creatine phosphokinase weekly. Adjust dose according to renal function
 Rifampicin or300–600 mg q12 h po4Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg iv q12 h4
PVE, methicillin, rifampicin-susceptible Staphylococcus spp.
 Flucloxacillin and2 g every 4–6 h iv6Use q4 h regimen if weight >85 kg
 Rifampicin and300–600 mg q12 h po6Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg iv, q12 h6
PVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤2 mg/L), Staphylococcus spp., or penicillin allergy
 Vancomycin and1 g iv q12 h6Or dose according to local guidelines. Modify dose according to renal function and maintain pre-dose level 15–20 mg/L
 Rifampicin and300–600 mg q12 h po6Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2Continue gentamicin for the full course if there are no signs or symptoms of toxicity
PVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-resistant (MIC >2 mg/L), daptomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤1 mg/L) Staphylococcus spp., or patient unable to tolerate vancomycin
 Daptomycin and6 mg/kg q24 h iv6Increase daptomycin dosing interval to 48 h if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Rifampicin and300–600 mg q12 h po6Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2Continue gentamicin for the full course if there are no signs or symptoms of toxicity
AgentDose/routeDuration (weeks)Comment
NVE, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus spp.
 Flucloxacillin2 g every 4–6 h iv4Use q4 h regimen if weight >85 kg
NVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤2 mg/L) rifampicin-susceptible Staphylococcus or penicillin allergy
 Vancomycin and1 g iv q12 h4Or dose according to local guidelines. Modify dose according to renal function and maintain pre-dose level 15–20 mg/L
 Rifampicin300–600 mg q12 h po4Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
NVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-resistant (MIC >2 mg/L), daptomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤1 mg/L) Staphylococcus spp. or patient unable to tolerate vancomycin
 Daptomycin and6 mg/kg q24 h iv4Monitor creatine phosphokinase weekly. Adjust dose according to renal function
 Rifampicin or300–600 mg q12 h po4Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg iv q12 h4
PVE, methicillin, rifampicin-susceptible Staphylococcus spp.
 Flucloxacillin and2 g every 4–6 h iv6Use q4 h regimen if weight >85 kg
 Rifampicin and300–600 mg q12 h po6Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg iv, q12 h6
PVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤2 mg/L), Staphylococcus spp., or penicillin allergy
 Vancomycin and1 g iv q12 h6Or dose according to local guidelines. Modify dose according to renal function and maintain pre-dose level 15–20 mg/L
 Rifampicin and300–600 mg q12 h po6Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2Continue gentamicin for the full course if there are no signs or symptoms of toxicity
PVE, methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-resistant (MIC >2 mg/L), daptomycin-susceptible (MIC ≤1 mg/L) Staphylococcus spp., or patient unable to tolerate vancomycin
 Daptomycin and6 mg/kg q24 h iv6Increase daptomycin dosing interval to 48 h if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Rifampicin and300–600 mg q12 h po6Use lower dose of rifampicin if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
 Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2Continue gentamicin for the full course if there are no signs or symptoms of toxicity

Therapy of streptococcal endocarditis

See Table 6 for recommended therapy. Regimens against Streptococcus viridians differ according to the susceptibility of pathogens to penicillin. Streptococcus viridians infections are classified according to the susceptibility of the cultured strain as susceptible (penicillin MIC ≤0.125 mg/L), relatively resistant (MIC 0.125–0.5 mg/L), and fully resistant (MIC >0.5 mg/L). For infection by resistant strains, a combination therapy of gentamicin and vancomycin or teicoplanin is recommended in the cases of either NVE or PVE.

Table 6

Summary of treatment recommendations for streptococcal endocarditis

RegimenAntimicrobialDose and routeDuration (weeks)Comment
Treatment options for streptococci (penicillin MIC ≤0.125 mg/L)
1.Benzylpenicillin1.2 g q4 h iv4–6Preferred narrow-spectrum regimen, particularly for patients at risk of C. difficile or high risk of nephrotoxicity
Monotherapy
2.Ceftriaxone2 g once a day iv/im4–6Not advised for patients at risk of C. difficile infection; suitable for OPAT
Monotherapy
3.Benzylpenicillin1.2 g q4 h iv2Not advised for patients with PVE, extra-cardiac foci of infection, any indications for surgery, high risk of nephrotoxicity or at risk of C. difficile
and Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv2
4.Ceftriaxone and2 g once a day iv/im2Not advised for patients with PVE, extra-cardiac foci of infection, any indications for surgery, high risk of nephrotoxicity or at risk of C. difficile
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv2
Treatment of streptococci (penicillin MIC >0.125 to ≤0.5 mg/L)
5.Benzylpenicillin and2.4 g q4 h iv4–6Preferred regimen, particularly for patients at risk of C. difficile
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv2
Treatment of Abiotrophia and Granulicatella spp. (nutritionally variant streptococci)
6.Benzylpenicillin and2.4 g q4 h iv4–6Preferred regimen, particularly for patients at risk of C. difficile
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv4–6
Treatment of streptococci penicillin MIC >0.5 mg/L
Treatment of streptococci in patients with significant penicillin allergy
7.Vancomycin and Gentamicin1 g q12 h4–6Or dosed according to local guidelines
1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2
8Teicoplanin and10 mg/kg q12 h × 3 doses, and followed by 10 mg/kg qd4–6Preferred option when high risk of nephrotoxicity
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2
RegimenAntimicrobialDose and routeDuration (weeks)Comment
Treatment options for streptococci (penicillin MIC ≤0.125 mg/L)
1.Benzylpenicillin1.2 g q4 h iv4–6Preferred narrow-spectrum regimen, particularly for patients at risk of C. difficile or high risk of nephrotoxicity
Monotherapy
2.Ceftriaxone2 g once a day iv/im4–6Not advised for patients at risk of C. difficile infection; suitable for OPAT
Monotherapy
3.Benzylpenicillin1.2 g q4 h iv2Not advised for patients with PVE, extra-cardiac foci of infection, any indications for surgery, high risk of nephrotoxicity or at risk of C. difficile
and Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv2
4.Ceftriaxone and2 g once a day iv/im2Not advised for patients with PVE, extra-cardiac foci of infection, any indications for surgery, high risk of nephrotoxicity or at risk of C. difficile
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv2
Treatment of streptococci (penicillin MIC >0.125 to ≤0.5 mg/L)
5.Benzylpenicillin and2.4 g q4 h iv4–6Preferred regimen, particularly for patients at risk of C. difficile
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv2
Treatment of Abiotrophia and Granulicatella spp. (nutritionally variant streptococci)
6.Benzylpenicillin and2.4 g q4 h iv4–6Preferred regimen, particularly for patients at risk of C. difficile
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv4–6
Treatment of streptococci penicillin MIC >0.5 mg/L
Treatment of streptococci in patients with significant penicillin allergy
7.Vancomycin and Gentamicin1 g q12 h4–6Or dosed according to local guidelines
1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2
8Teicoplanin and10 mg/kg q12 h × 3 doses, and followed by 10 mg/kg qd4–6Preferred option when high risk of nephrotoxicity
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2
Table 6

Summary of treatment recommendations for streptococcal endocarditis

RegimenAntimicrobialDose and routeDuration (weeks)Comment
Treatment options for streptococci (penicillin MIC ≤0.125 mg/L)
1.Benzylpenicillin1.2 g q4 h iv4–6Preferred narrow-spectrum regimen, particularly for patients at risk of C. difficile or high risk of nephrotoxicity
Monotherapy
2.Ceftriaxone2 g once a day iv/im4–6Not advised for patients at risk of C. difficile infection; suitable for OPAT
Monotherapy
3.Benzylpenicillin1.2 g q4 h iv2Not advised for patients with PVE, extra-cardiac foci of infection, any indications for surgery, high risk of nephrotoxicity or at risk of C. difficile
and Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv2
4.Ceftriaxone and2 g once a day iv/im2Not advised for patients with PVE, extra-cardiac foci of infection, any indications for surgery, high risk of nephrotoxicity or at risk of C. difficile
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv2
Treatment of streptococci (penicillin MIC >0.125 to ≤0.5 mg/L)
5.Benzylpenicillin and2.4 g q4 h iv4–6Preferred regimen, particularly for patients at risk of C. difficile
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv2
Treatment of Abiotrophia and Granulicatella spp. (nutritionally variant streptococci)
6.Benzylpenicillin and2.4 g q4 h iv4–6Preferred regimen, particularly for patients at risk of C. difficile
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv4–6
Treatment of streptococci penicillin MIC >0.5 mg/L
Treatment of streptococci in patients with significant penicillin allergy
7.Vancomycin and Gentamicin1 g q12 h4–6Or dosed according to local guidelines
1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2
8Teicoplanin and10 mg/kg q12 h × 3 doses, and followed by 10 mg/kg qd4–6Preferred option when high risk of nephrotoxicity
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2
RegimenAntimicrobialDose and routeDuration (weeks)Comment
Treatment options for streptococci (penicillin MIC ≤0.125 mg/L)
1.Benzylpenicillin1.2 g q4 h iv4–6Preferred narrow-spectrum regimen, particularly for patients at risk of C. difficile or high risk of nephrotoxicity
Monotherapy
2.Ceftriaxone2 g once a day iv/im4–6Not advised for patients at risk of C. difficile infection; suitable for OPAT
Monotherapy
3.Benzylpenicillin1.2 g q4 h iv2Not advised for patients with PVE, extra-cardiac foci of infection, any indications for surgery, high risk of nephrotoxicity or at risk of C. difficile
and Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv2
4.Ceftriaxone and2 g once a day iv/im2Not advised for patients with PVE, extra-cardiac foci of infection, any indications for surgery, high risk of nephrotoxicity or at risk of C. difficile
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv2
Treatment of streptococci (penicillin MIC >0.125 to ≤0.5 mg/L)
5.Benzylpenicillin and2.4 g q4 h iv4–6Preferred regimen, particularly for patients at risk of C. difficile
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv2
Treatment of Abiotrophia and Granulicatella spp. (nutritionally variant streptococci)
6.Benzylpenicillin and2.4 g q4 h iv4–6Preferred regimen, particularly for patients at risk of C. difficile
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv4–6
Treatment of streptococci penicillin MIC >0.5 mg/L
Treatment of streptococci in patients with significant penicillin allergy
7.Vancomycin and Gentamicin1 g q12 h4–6Or dosed according to local guidelines
1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2
8Teicoplanin and10 mg/kg q12 h × 3 doses, and followed by 10 mg/kg qd4–6Preferred option when high risk of nephrotoxicity
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv≥2

Therapy of enterococcal endocarditis

See Table 7 for recommended therapy. Enterococci are highly resistant to antibiotics in general, and eradication requires prolonged administration of synergistic bactericidal combinations of antimicrobial agents. Enterococcus faecalis is sometimes susceptible to ampicillin and penicillin, though the susceptibility is lower than that of S. viridians, while Enterococcus faecium has ever lower susceptibility.

Table 7

Summary of treatment recommendations for enterococcal endocarditis

RegimenAntimicrobialDose and routeDuration (weeks)Comment
1.Amoxicillin or2 g q4 h iv4–6For amoxicillin-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L), penicillin MIC 4 mg/L and gentamicin-susceptible (MIC 128 mg/L) isolates
Penicillin and2.4 g q4 h iv4–6Duration 6 weeks for PVE
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv4–6
2.Vancomycin and1 g q12 h iv or dosed according to local guidelines4–6For penicillin-allergic patient or amoxicillin- or penicillin-resistant isolate; ensure vancomycin MIC 4 mg/L
Gentamicin1 mg/kg IBW q12 h iv4–6Duration 6 weeks for PVE
3.Teicoplanin and10 mg/kg q24 h iv4–6Alternative to Regimen 2, see comments for Regimen 2
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv4–6Ensure teicoplanin MIC ≤2 mg/L
4.Amoxicillin2 g q4 h iv≥6For amoxicillin-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) and high-level gentamicin resistant (MIC ≥128 mg/L) isolates
RegimenAntimicrobialDose and routeDuration (weeks)Comment
1.Amoxicillin or2 g q4 h iv4–6For amoxicillin-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L), penicillin MIC 4 mg/L and gentamicin-susceptible (MIC 128 mg/L) isolates
Penicillin and2.4 g q4 h iv4–6Duration 6 weeks for PVE
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv4–6
2.Vancomycin and1 g q12 h iv or dosed according to local guidelines4–6For penicillin-allergic patient or amoxicillin- or penicillin-resistant isolate; ensure vancomycin MIC 4 mg/L
Gentamicin1 mg/kg IBW q12 h iv4–6Duration 6 weeks for PVE
3.Teicoplanin and10 mg/kg q24 h iv4–6Alternative to Regimen 2, see comments for Regimen 2
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv4–6Ensure teicoplanin MIC ≤2 mg/L
4.Amoxicillin2 g q4 h iv≥6For amoxicillin-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) and high-level gentamicin resistant (MIC ≥128 mg/L) isolates
Table 7

Summary of treatment recommendations for enterococcal endocarditis

RegimenAntimicrobialDose and routeDuration (weeks)Comment
1.Amoxicillin or2 g q4 h iv4–6For amoxicillin-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L), penicillin MIC 4 mg/L and gentamicin-susceptible (MIC 128 mg/L) isolates
Penicillin and2.4 g q4 h iv4–6Duration 6 weeks for PVE
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv4–6
2.Vancomycin and1 g q12 h iv or dosed according to local guidelines4–6For penicillin-allergic patient or amoxicillin- or penicillin-resistant isolate; ensure vancomycin MIC 4 mg/L
Gentamicin1 mg/kg IBW q12 h iv4–6Duration 6 weeks for PVE
3.Teicoplanin and10 mg/kg q24 h iv4–6Alternative to Regimen 2, see comments for Regimen 2
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv4–6Ensure teicoplanin MIC ≤2 mg/L
4.Amoxicillin2 g q4 h iv≥6For amoxicillin-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) and high-level gentamicin resistant (MIC ≥128 mg/L) isolates
RegimenAntimicrobialDose and routeDuration (weeks)Comment
1.Amoxicillin or2 g q4 h iv4–6For amoxicillin-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L), penicillin MIC 4 mg/L and gentamicin-susceptible (MIC 128 mg/L) isolates
Penicillin and2.4 g q4 h iv4–6Duration 6 weeks for PVE
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv4–6
2.Vancomycin and1 g q12 h iv or dosed according to local guidelines4–6For penicillin-allergic patient or amoxicillin- or penicillin-resistant isolate; ensure vancomycin MIC 4 mg/L
Gentamicin1 mg/kg IBW q12 h iv4–6Duration 6 weeks for PVE
3.Teicoplanin and10 mg/kg q24 h iv4–6Alternative to Regimen 2, see comments for Regimen 2
Gentamicin1 mg/kg q12 h iv4–6Ensure teicoplanin MIC ≤2 mg/L
4.Amoxicillin2 g q4 h iv≥6For amoxicillin-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) and high-level gentamicin resistant (MIC ≥128 mg/L) isolates

Infective endocarditis caused by G ram-negative bacteria

Combination therapy of penicillins or cephalosporins with anti-pseudomonal activity and aminoglycosides is recommended (e.g. combination of piperacillin and gentamycin or tobramycin, and combination of ceftazidime and aminoglycosides). Selection of appropriate antimicrobial treatment is based on susceptibility testing, as susceptibility differs between Gram-negative bacteria. Long-term therapy (≥6 weeks) is recommended.

HACEK Gram-negative bacilli infection may also cause IE. In the past, HACEK-related species have been susceptible to ampicillin. Recently, however, the prevalence of β-lactamase-producing strains has increased, and third generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone and cefotaxime are now recommended. As for strains that do not produce β-lactamase, combined therapy of amoxicillin or ampicillin, and aminoglycosides is recommended. The recommended duration of therapy is 4 weeks for NVE and 6 weeks for PVE. If gentamycin is chosen as a component of the initial therapeutic strategy, the recommended duration is 2 weeks. Ciprofloxacin may be chosen as a possible substitute.

Infective endocarditis due to other pathogens

Candida endocarditis: Initial treatment with an echinocandin or lipid-associated amphotericin is first line. Many authorities recommend the addition of flucytosine to amphotericin B.34 Initial duration of therapy is 6–10 weeks. When patients are stabilized and blood cultures become negative, it is recommended that patients with susceptible organisms undergo oral therapy with fluconazole 400–800 mg qd. Surgical valve replacement is highly desirable if clinically indicated, and antimicrobial therapy should last for 6 weeks after operative treatment. For those with valvular abscess or other complications, the duration of antimicrobial therapy should be extended.

  1. Q fever: C. burnetii is the causative microorganism of Q fever. Primary manifestations of Q fever are fever, headache, myalgias, and interstitial lung disease, and some patients present chronic symptoms. Infective endocarditis is the most common manifestation of chronic infection.24 Patients likely to develop Q-fever IE are those with predisposing valvular damage or prosthetic heart valves.25Coxiella burnetii is the most common cause of culture-negative IE,26 and typically vegetation of the valve can be detected. Higher doses have been recommended in patients whose phase I antibody titers are slow to decrease.27

    Recommended therapy includes prompt administration of antibiotics and surveillance of antibody titers until cure. Possible antibiotic regimens include (i) doxycycline 100 mg q12 h po, combined with hydroxychloroquine 200 mg q8 h po, for a duration of at least 18 months and up to 3 years according to some guidelines and (ii) doxycycline 100 mg q12 h po, combined with ciprofloxacin 200 mg q12 h po, for at least. Surveillance of antibody titers of C. burnetii should be conducted every 6 months during the treatment period and after 3 months once in the following 2 years. The criterion of cure is considered to be phase I IgG antibody titers <1 : 800 and phase I IgA and IgM titers <1 : 50.28

  2. Bartonella endocarditis: Bartonella spp. are facultative intra-cellular Gram-negative aerobic bacteria that are a common causative pathogen for blood-culture-negative IE. Bartonella quintana is the most common pathogen, followed by B. henselae. Bartonella quintana can cause trench fever and IE and is transmitted by the body louse. Predisposing factors to infection include homelessness, immune disorder, drug abuse, and alcoholism.29Bartonella henselae rarely cause IE. Infective endocarditis is a feature of chronic Bartonella infection.30

    Recommended therapy includes combined gentamycin and β-lactams or doxycycline for treatment.31 Gentamicin 1 mg/kg q8 h iv (duration 4 weeks) should be combined with amoxicillin 2 g q4 h or ceftriaxone 2 g qd iv (duration 6 weeks). The blood concentration of gentamicin should be monitored throughout treatment.

  3. Fungal endocarditis: Fungi cause endocarditis in 1–6% of cases.32 The most common pathogens are Candida and Aspergillus spp., followed by Histoplasma, Cryptococcus and other budding fungi. Diagnosis of fungal endocarditis is rather difficult. If IE is suspected, and, whenever blood cultures show negative results, fungal endocarditis should be included in the differential diagnosis. For Candida endocarditis, blood cultures are positive in 83–95% of cases. Blood cultures are also frequently positive in Cryptococcus and yeast fungus infections.33 For fungal endocarditis, the duration of treatment is long, the prognosis is relatively poor, and the recurrence rate is high.

Aspergillus endocarditis: Initial treatment should be with voriconazole for at least 4 weeks, with therapeutic drug monitoring. Lipid-associated amphotericin B is a possible substitution for patients who are intolerant to voriconazole. Long-term oral therapy with voriconazole is recommended for at least 2 years. Surgical valve replacement is mandatory for survival.

Endocarditis due to other fungi: For other pathogenic fungi, drug selection is as above and determined according to susceptibility testing.35

Surgical management of infective endocarditis

Indications and timing of surgery

In general, surgical management of IE is reserved for left-sided disease. Approximately 50–56% of left-sided IE affects the mitral valve, and 35–49% affects the aortic valve.36,37 In ∼15% of cases, both valves are affected. Half of patients require surgery because of severe complications.38 Indications for early phase surgery (during antimicrobial therapy) include heart failure, uncontrolled infection, and prevention of embolism (Table 8).1,23,39 Early phase surgery is associated with high risk. Age alone is not considered a contraindication.

  1. Heart failure: Heart failure is an indication for surgery in most IE cases,23 and acute heart failure is the main reason for emergency surgery in patients with IE.39 This includes severe acute regurgitation or valve obstruction causing refractory pulmonary oedema/shock, severe acute regurgitation or valve obstruction with persistent heart failure or echocardiographic signs of poor haemodynamic tolerance, and severe regurgitation in the absence of heart failure.

  2. Uncontrolled infection, including persisting infections (>7 days), infections caused by multi-resistant microorganisms, and locally uncontrolled infections.

  3. Prevention of embolism: Most embolic events occur before hospitalization, and prevention of embolization is currently difficult.40 The first week of antimicrobial therapy is the most frequent period for embolic events, and this is considered the best time for surgery in order to prevent complications of embolic events. Evidence shows that risk is clearly related to the size and mobility of vegetations,13 but the decision to operate in the early phase is a difficult one and should take into account previous embolism, other complications of IE, the size and mobility of the vegetation, and duration of antibiotic therapy.39,41,42 The general condition of the patient and complications should be evaluated on an individual basis.4,13,40–43

Table 8

Indications and timing of surgery in left-sided native valve infective endocarditis

Recommendations : indications for surgeryTimingClassLevel
Heart failure
 Aortic or mitral IE with severe acute regurgitation or valve obstruction causing refractory pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shockEmergencyIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with fistula into a cardiac chamber or pericardium causing refractory pulmonary oedema or shockEmergencyIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with severe acute regurgitation or valve obstruction and persisting heart failure or echocardiographic signs of poor haemodynamic tolerance (early mitral closure or pulmonary hypertension)UrgentIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with severe regurgitation and no HFElectiveIIaB
Uncontrolled infection
 Locally uncontrolled infection (abscess, fase aneurysm, fistula, and enlarging vegetation)UrgentIB
 Persisting fever and positive blood cultures >7–10 daysUrgentIB
 Infection caused by fungi or multi-resistant organismsUrgent/electiveIB
Prevention of embolism
 Aortic or mitral IE with large vegetations (>10 mm) following one or more embolic episodes despite appropriate antibiotic therapyUrgentIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with large vegetations (>10 mm) and other predictors of complicated course (heart failure, persistent infection, and abscess)UrgentIC
 Isolated very large vegetations (>15 mm)UrgentIIbC
Recommendations : indications for surgeryTimingClassLevel
Heart failure
 Aortic or mitral IE with severe acute regurgitation or valve obstruction causing refractory pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shockEmergencyIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with fistula into a cardiac chamber or pericardium causing refractory pulmonary oedema or shockEmergencyIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with severe acute regurgitation or valve obstruction and persisting heart failure or echocardiographic signs of poor haemodynamic tolerance (early mitral closure or pulmonary hypertension)UrgentIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with severe regurgitation and no HFElectiveIIaB
Uncontrolled infection
 Locally uncontrolled infection (abscess, fase aneurysm, fistula, and enlarging vegetation)UrgentIB
 Persisting fever and positive blood cultures >7–10 daysUrgentIB
 Infection caused by fungi or multi-resistant organismsUrgent/electiveIB
Prevention of embolism
 Aortic or mitral IE with large vegetations (>10 mm) following one or more embolic episodes despite appropriate antibiotic therapyUrgentIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with large vegetations (>10 mm) and other predictors of complicated course (heart failure, persistent infection, and abscess)UrgentIC
 Isolated very large vegetations (>15 mm)UrgentIIbC

Emergency: surgery performed within 24 h; urgent: within a few days; elective: after at least 1 or 2 weeks of antibiotic therapy.

Table 8

Indications and timing of surgery in left-sided native valve infective endocarditis

Recommendations : indications for surgeryTimingClassLevel
Heart failure
 Aortic or mitral IE with severe acute regurgitation or valve obstruction causing refractory pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shockEmergencyIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with fistula into a cardiac chamber or pericardium causing refractory pulmonary oedema or shockEmergencyIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with severe acute regurgitation or valve obstruction and persisting heart failure or echocardiographic signs of poor haemodynamic tolerance (early mitral closure or pulmonary hypertension)UrgentIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with severe regurgitation and no HFElectiveIIaB
Uncontrolled infection
 Locally uncontrolled infection (abscess, fase aneurysm, fistula, and enlarging vegetation)UrgentIB
 Persisting fever and positive blood cultures >7–10 daysUrgentIB
 Infection caused by fungi or multi-resistant organismsUrgent/electiveIB
Prevention of embolism
 Aortic or mitral IE with large vegetations (>10 mm) following one or more embolic episodes despite appropriate antibiotic therapyUrgentIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with large vegetations (>10 mm) and other predictors of complicated course (heart failure, persistent infection, and abscess)UrgentIC
 Isolated very large vegetations (>15 mm)UrgentIIbC
Recommendations : indications for surgeryTimingClassLevel
Heart failure
 Aortic or mitral IE with severe acute regurgitation or valve obstruction causing refractory pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shockEmergencyIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with fistula into a cardiac chamber or pericardium causing refractory pulmonary oedema or shockEmergencyIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with severe acute regurgitation or valve obstruction and persisting heart failure or echocardiographic signs of poor haemodynamic tolerance (early mitral closure or pulmonary hypertension)UrgentIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with severe regurgitation and no HFElectiveIIaB
Uncontrolled infection
 Locally uncontrolled infection (abscess, fase aneurysm, fistula, and enlarging vegetation)UrgentIB
 Persisting fever and positive blood cultures >7–10 daysUrgentIB
 Infection caused by fungi or multi-resistant organismsUrgent/electiveIB
Prevention of embolism
 Aortic or mitral IE with large vegetations (>10 mm) following one or more embolic episodes despite appropriate antibiotic therapyUrgentIB
 Aortic or mitral IE with large vegetations (>10 mm) and other predictors of complicated course (heart failure, persistent infection, and abscess)UrgentIC
 Isolated very large vegetations (>15 mm)UrgentIIbC

Emergency: surgery performed within 24 h; urgent: within a few days; elective: after at least 1 or 2 weeks of antibiotic therapy.

Mortality, morbidity, and complications of surgery

The rate of operative mortality in IE lies between 5 and 15%,1,44 although domestic research reports it to be 4.1%. When surgery must be performed within the first week of antimicrobial therapy, in-hospital mortality is 15%, with risks of recurrence and non-infective post-operative valvular dysfunction occurring in 12 and 7% of surgical patients,45 respectively. In less complex cases, where disease is limited to the valve structures alone (allowing complete excision of infected tissue), mortality should be similar to routine valve surgery. The mortality rate of mitral annuloplasty is 2.3%, and the long-term infection rate is 1.8%, which significantly exceeds that of mitral valve replacement.46 Causes of death are often multi-factorial, but the major causes of death include multi-organ failure, heart failure, intractable sepsis, coagulopathy, and stroke.47

Immediate post-operative complications are relatively common, and among the most frequent are: severe coagulopathy requiring treatment with clotting factors, re-exploration of the chest for bleeding or tamponade, acute renal failure requiring haemodialysis, stroke, low cardiac output syndrome, pneumonia, and atrioventricular block following radical resection of an aortic root abscess with need for pacemaker implantation.47 A pre-operative ECG demonstrating left bundle branch block predicts the need for a post-operative permanent pacemaker.48

Complications of infective endocarditis

Neurological complications

Neurological events develop in 20–40% of all patients with IE and are mainly the consequence of vegetation embolism. The clinical spectrum of these complications is wide and includes ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, transient ischaemic attacks, silent cerebral embolism, symptomatic or asymptomatic infectious aneurysm, brain abscess, meningitis, toxic encephalopathy, and seizure.

Staphylococcus aureus causes higher overall rates of neurological complications than other organisms.49 Ischaemic stoke is not a contraindication to surgery, but the timing of surgery in these patients remains controversial.50 If cerebral haemorrhage has been excluded, surgery is indicated for patients with heart failure, uncontrolled infection, abscess, or persistent high embolic risk.51 In patients with intra-cranial haemorrhage, the neurological prognosis is worse, and surgery must be postponed for at least 1 month. Neurosurgery or interventional therapy is recommended if intra-cranial aneurysms grow or are at higher risk of rupture.

Acute renal failure

Acute renal failure is a common complication of IE which occurs in ∼30% of patients.52 Causes are often multi-factorial and include: (i) immune complex and vasculitic glomerulonephritis; (ii) renal infarction; (iii) haemodynamic impairment, particularly in cases associated with heart failure, severe sepsis, or cardiac surgery; (iv) antibiotic toxicity (acute interstitial nephritis), notably related to aminoglycosides, vancomycin (which has synergistic toxicity with aminoglycosides), and even high dose penicillin; (v) nephrotoxicity of contrast agents used during radiologic imaging.

Rheumatic complications

Musculoskeletal symptoms (e.g. arthralgia, myalgia, and back pain) are frequent during IE, and rheumatic complications may be the first manifestations of the disease. Peripheral arthritis occurs in ∼14% and spondylodiscitis in 3–15% of cases. In one study, IE was diagnosed in 30.8% of patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computer tomography (CT) of the spine should be performed in IE patients with back pain.

Splenic abscess

Splenic infarction occurs in 40% cases, of which 5% of cases may progress to splenic abscess.53Streptococcus virdans and S. aureus are the most frequent pathogens, and Enterococcus spp. are also causative pathogens. Gram-negative bacteria and fungi are not commonly observed in splenic abscesses. Persistent or recurrent fever and bacteraemia are suggestive of abscess formation, and these patients should be evaluated by abdominal CT, MRI, and/or ultrasound. Sensitivity of abdominal CT and MRI is 90–95%. Splenectomy may be considered for splenic rupture or large abscesses which respond poorly to antibiotics alone. Percutaneous drainage is an alternative for high-risk surgical candidates.

Myocarditis and pericarditis

Cardiac failure may also be due to myocarditis. Ventricular arrhythmias can indicate myocardial involvement and imply a poor prognosis. Myocardial involvement is best assessed using TTE. Pericarditis may be associated with an abscess, myocarditis, or bacteraemia (often as a result of S. aureus infection). When infection affects the bicuspid valve or the tricuspid valve, purulent pericarditis must be considered. Purulent pericarditis is a rare occurrence and may necessitate surgical drainage. Additionally, ruptured pseudo-aneurysms or fistulae may communicate with the pericardium, with fatal consequences.

Assessment on admission and follow-up at discharge

Assessment on admission

The in-hospital mortality rate of IE has been reported to be 9.6–26%.1 Quick identification of high-risk patients can facilitate the initiation of increased monitoring and aggressive treatment. The main factors that affect prognosis include the background clinical status of the patient, whether co-morbidities exist, and the species of pathogen. When there is >1 risk factor present in each of the three aspects mentioned above, the risk of death or disability can be >70%. For example, IE with heart failure, paravalvular abscess, and pathogen of S. aureus is at the greatest risk of mortality. Surgery in this patient would be necessary even if the infection has not been controlled.54

  • Elements of a patient's background clinical status can indicate a poor prognosis, including the following: a history of heart disease, valve replacement, intra-cardiac devices, insulin-independent diabetes mellitus, renal diseases and pulmonary diseases, old age, autoimmune diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.), malignant tumours (colon cancers, etc.), persistent fever after conventional antibiotic therapy, or persistent positive blood cultures over 10 days.

  • Co-morbidities that portend a worse prognosis include the following: cardiovascular failure, structural heart disease,2 renal failure, strokes, multi-organ embolism, aneurysm, septic shock, locally uncontrolled infections (myocardial or paravalvular abscesses, false aneurysms), and large vegetations (>10 mm).

  • The infectious organism associated with a patient's disease can suggest a more dire clinical course, which include: S. aureus, fungus, gram-negative bacillus, some rarely seen microorganisms difficult to identify by blood culture (Aerococcus urinae, etc.), and especially co-infection with HIV.

Follow-up after discharge

The prognosis of IE is greatly affected by the presence of late complications. Common complications include the recurrence of infection, cardiac failure, valvular damage requiring replacement, and death.

  • Recurrence: The rate of recurrence of IE is reported to be between 2.7 and 22.5%. Recurrence is defined as relapsing disease or later reinfection. Relapse is indicated if the pathogen is the same as with the former IE, while reinfection is used to describe a situation when the second IE is caused by another pathogen. It is hard to determine whether the new IE is relapse or reinfection when the pathogen detected in recurrent patients is the same as the last one. Molecular methods for typing of the pathogen may help in most cases. When there is difficulty in determining the pathogens or performing molecular typing, the time interval between the two episodes can help to distinguish the aetiology. Generally, the time to relapse is shorter than the time to reinfection. Recurrence occurring within 6 months of the first infection is usually due to relapse, and those occurring after 6 months are mostly reinfections. Thus, it is suggested that isolations of IE be preserved over 1 year.55

  • Factors that increase the risk of recurrence include: (i) inappropriate antimicrobial therapy (drug types, doses, and duration of therapy); (ii) infection by resistant pathogens such as Brucella, Legionella, Chlamydia, Mycoplasma, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Bartonella, Coxiella bumetii, or fungi; (iii) multiple microbial infection in intravenous drug users; (iv) patients who receives empiric therapy with negative blood cultures; (v) the development of paravalvular infection; (vi) PVE; (vii) persistent appearance of a metastasis focus; (viii) resistance to conventional treatment regimens; (ix) positive valve cultures.

  • Reinfections are mostly found in intravenous drug users (especially within 1 year after the first infection), patients with PVE, and patients who remain on haemodialysis with multiple risk factors for IE. Reinfected patients are at a higher risk of death, and often in need of valve replacement.56 Antibiotics should be selected based on the pathogen and results of antimicrobial susceptibility test when recurrence is due to insufficient duration of therapy or inadequate selection of drugs. An additional 4–6 weeks of antimicrobial therapy is also needed.

  • Heart failure and valve replacement: In a patient whose infection has been well controlled, if heart failure progresses due to destruction of the valves, indications for surgery are the same as those in traditional valvular diseases.

  • Long-term mortality: Long-term mortality after discharge is mainly determined by age, co-morbidities, and cardiac function. In patients who do not undergo surgery, these factors affect mortality rate more than reinfection rate.57,58 Only 6.5% of long-term mortality is caused by reinfection.57

  • Follow-up: Patients should be educated about symptoms and signs of IE. They should be alerted to the possibility of IE recurrence and present to the hospital if they develop fever, chills or other signs of infection. Blood cultures should be obtained before antimicrobial therapy. Preventive actions should be performed in high-risk patients. In order to monitor heart function, clinical assessment of cardiac function and TTE should be performed when antimicrobial therapy is finished and on regular follow-ups, especially during the first year of follow-up. Clinical assessment, blood tests including WBC counts and CRP, and TTE are recommended on the first, third, sixth, and twelfth month after the completion of antimicrobial therapy.

Special types of infective endocarditis

Prosthetic valve endocarditis

Prosthetic valve endocarditis is a type of IE that occurs in prosthetic or repaired native valves. Prosthetic valve endocarditis occurs at an incidence of 0.3 to 1.2% per year and is similar with mechanical and bioprosthetic valves. Studies show that PVE accounts for 10 to 30% of IE cases in Europe.1 This percentage is closer to 2 to 4% in China3,9 but has increased to 13.9% recently.8 Prosthetic valve endocarditis is different from NVE in its microbiological profile, extent of pathological changes, diagnosis, and clinical outcome.

  • Microbiology: PVE is mainly caused by coagulase-negative staphylococcus, Gram-negative bacilli and fungi.8

  • Pathological changes: Early-stage PVE, such as in perioperative infection cases, typically involves the junction of the suture ring and the annuloplasty ring, leading to paravalvular abscess, thus resulting in seam cracking, pseudoaneurysm, and fistula formation. Late-stage PVE, for instance with bioprosthetic valves, often compromises prosthetic valve leaflets, leading to valve perforation and rupture.

  • Diagnosis: Clinical manifestations can be atypical. The basic features of infection and abnormality of mechanical valve structure and function on echocardiography are necessary to diagnose PVE, and TEE is more accurate than TTE.

  • Prognosis: In-hospital mortality rate is ∼20–40% abroad,1 but domestic data demonstrate a mortality rate of 13.5% with regard to PVE.8 Complications like heart failure and stroke as well as staphylococcal infection are the most powerful predictive factors for a poor prognosis.

Infective endocarditis associated with intra-cardiac electronic device

This type of IE is mainly caused by pathogenic bacteria introduced directly during the process of device placement. Other sources of infection occurs by retrograde infection along the electrode catheter or by transmission from other infectious foci to the endocardium and head of the electrode through the bloodstream.59,60

  • Microbiology: S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococcus are common pathogens.61,62 However, with the widespread adoption of broad-spectrum antibiotics and the growing population of intravenous drug abusers, the elderly and people of low immunity, cases of Gram-negative bacteria, multi-resistant bacteria, and fungal infection have also been reported.63 Infectious foci are typically distributed in the subcutaneous tissue, pocket, blood vessels, right atrium, right ventricle, tricuspid valve, apex of the electrode, or vena cava.

  • Diagnosis: TTE, especially TEE, and blood cultures form the foundation for definitive diagnosis.64 CT and radioisotope scanning of the lung may help to find pulmonary septic emboli.

  • Treatment: See above section for information on antibiotic therapy of IE associated with electronic intra-cardiac devices.

  • Removal of the intra-cardic electronic device: The intra-cardic electronic device, including the pulse transmitter and electrode catheter, should be removed entirely as expected. Transvenous catheter removal is also recommended. If this is difficult to accomplish, there is serious damage to the tricuspid valve, or an associated lesion is >25 mm, surgery must be considered.

  • Partial treatment of abscess: Treatment of an abscess may include the following: (i) removal of dead tissue and local granulation tissue clearly (under general anesthesia if necessary); (ii) a complete stop to any bleeding, preferably with the use of a radioknife (in some instances, thrombin can be applied to an oozing wound), (iii) washing of the pocket after exhaustive debridement and haemostasis. The suggested order for the washing of wounds is: hydrogen peroxide → metronidazole → gentamicin → saline, each for at least two or three times.

Infective endocarditis of the right atrium

Infective endocarditis of the right atrium represents 5–10% of the total number of IE events, mainly occurring in intravenous drug abusers.

  • Microbiology: The most common cause is of IE of the right atrium is S. aureus (60–90%). Other aetiologies include Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Gram-negative bacilli, fungi, enterococcus, among others. The pathological changes chiefly involve the tricuspid valve, often the pulmonary valve, and rarely the left heart valves.65

  • Diagnosis: Clinical manifestations include persistent fever, bacteraemia, and multiple pulmonary bacterial emboli, occurring secondary to pulmonary arterial hypertension and severe valvular regurgitation and stenosis. The prognosis is relatively good. Factors contributing to poor prognosis include vegetations >20 mm, fungal infection and severe immunosuppression status of HIV patients (CD4 <200 mL−1).66,67

  • Treatment: Empirical choice of antibiotics depends on the suspected microbial species, drug and solvent used by the addict, as well as the involved site of the heart lesion. The course of antibiotic therapy can be reduced to 2 weeks if the following conditions are fulfilled: (i) the infection is due to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, (ii) there is an adequate response to treatment, (iii) there is an absence of extra-cardiac infection or abscess, (iv) there are no intra- or extra-cardiac complications, (v) there is no involvement of a prosthetic or left heart valve involvement, (vi) vegetation length is <20 mm, and (vii) severe immunosuppression is absent (CD4 >200 mL−1). Surgical treatment can usually be avoided. The indications for surgical treatment are: (i) severe tricuspid valve regurgitation leading to right heart failure that is refractory to diuretic drugs; (ii) difficulty eradicating pathogenic bacteria or fungi, or bacteraemia persisting after an adequate antibiotic regimen for 7 days; (iii) length of tricuspid valve vegetation >20 mm, causing repeated pulmonary embolism, regardless of the presence of right heart failure.68

Infective endocarditis associated with congenital heart disease

Congenital heart diseases are the main cause of IE in young adults and account for 8–15% of cases of IE according to data from our country.69 Worldwide, the reported proportion of CHD in patients with IE varies between 2 and 18%, with a consistent minor male dominance.1,70

  • Type of CHD vs. the degree of IE: Types of CHD conferring increased risk include patent ductus arteriosus, malformation of the aortic valve, mitral insufficiency, ventricular septal defect, coarctation of the aorta, Marfan's syndrome with aortic valve insufficiency, and tetralogy of Fallot. Secondary types of CHD are mitral valve prolapse, simple mitral valve stenosis, obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, primum atrial septal defect, artificial intra-cardiac device and prior history of IE. Simple pulmonary artery valvular disease, ostium secundum defect, and heart diseases cured by operation (without artificial implantation, >6 months after surgery) are less dangerous. The risk of IE increases in patients who suffer from complex cardiac abnormalities.71

  • Microbiology: The pathogenic profile remains the same as with acquired diseases. Staphylococci and streptococci are the most common pathogens.72 Infection by other agents have also been described (see Infective endocarditis of the right atrium for further information).

  • Diagnosis and treatment: The diagnosis, treatment, and surgical indications are identical to other causes.

  • Prevention: Prevention can be accomplished in the following ways: (i) by raising awareness in clinicians to screen for certain types of high-risk CHD, (ii) by promoting good oral and skin hygiene, (iii) by properly observing strict aseptic methods in any venous catheterization or invasive operation, (iv) by limiting the use of preventive antibiotics use to patients and operations of high risk, and (v) through complete surgical repair of CHD to reduce future risk of IE.73,74

Pregnant patients with infective endocarditis

The incidence rate of IE during pregnancy is ∼0.006%,75 while that of pregnant women with cardiac valve disease or CHD is 0.5%.76 The fatality rate of pregnant women with IE is 33%, while that of foetus is 29%. The most common complication is cardiac dysfunction due to valve insufficiency, followed by arterial embolism.77Conflict of interest: none declared.

  • Diagnosis: The criteria for diagnosis of IE in pregnant women are the same as those in the non-pregnant population. Preventive antibiotics should be administered to high-risk pregnant women receiving treatment in the department of stomatology. Foetal heart rates should be monitored when necessary during diagnostic procedures, for example, when pregnant women undergo TEE under sedation.78

  • Treatment: The principles are similar as with non-pregnant patients, but the impact of antibiotics on the foetus should be taken into consideration. The choice of antibacterial drugs is not only based on susceptibility results but also on the foetal toxicity. Surgical valve operation and termination of pregnancy are suggested if the disease cannot be controlled by medical therapy. Thirteen to 28 weeks of gestation is the best time for surgery. For women >26 weeks pregnant, it is recommended to perform valve surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass after caesarean delivery.

References

1

Habib
G
,
Hoen
B
,
Tornos
P
,
Thuny
F
,
Prendergast
B
,
Vilacosta
I
,
Moreillon
P
,
de Jesus Antunes
M
,
Thilen
U
,
Lekakis
J
,
Lengyel
M
,
Muller
L
,
Naber
CK
,
Nihoyannopoulos
P
,
Moritz
A
,
Zamorano
JL
.
Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009): the Task Force on the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and the International Society of Chemotherapy (ISC) for Infection and Cancer
.
Eur Heart J
2009
;
30
:
2369
2413
.

2

Gould
FK
,
Denning
DW
,
Elliott
TS
,
Foweraker
J
,
Perry
JD
,
Prendergast
BD
,
Sandoe
JA
,
Spry
MJ
,
Watkin
RW
,
Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
.
Guidelines for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of endocarditis in adults: a report of the Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
.
J Antimicrob Chemother
2012
;
67
:
269
289
.

3

Chen
SB
,
Huang
MR
,
Li
YF
,
Ou
X
,
Jin
M
,
Han
L
,
Zhu
XY
,
Jin
Y
,
Chen
PX
,
Wang
XY
,
Zhou
QD
,
Li
T
,
Zhu
WH
,
Yu
MH
,
Li
SL
,
Sheng
F
,
Huang
M
,
Sun
JH
.
Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for infective endocarditis: an analysis of 216 pathologically proven patients
.
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi
2003
;
41
:
738
742
.

4

Liu
ZY
,
Gao
CQ
,
Li
BJ
,
Jiang
SL
,
Xiao
JS
,
Ren
CL
.
Surgical treatment and clinical diagnosis of infective endocarditis: report of 60 cases
.
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2007
;
14
:
181
183
.

5

Zhou
QX
,
Wu
ZX
,
Huang
F
,
Wang
HB
,
He
T
,
Zeng
HS
.
Characteristics analysis of infective endocarditis (Report of 119 cases)
.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology
2007
;
23
:
274
276
.

6

Wang
HL
,
Sheng
RY
.
A clinical analysis of 70 cases of infective endocarditis
.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi
2004
;
43
:
33
36
.

7

Xiong
CM
,
Cheng
XS
,
Yang
FL
.
Clinical analysis of 215 cases of infective endocarditis
.
Chin Circ J
2001
;
16
:
203
204
.

8

Sun
XL
,
Wang
GG
.
Analysis of bacterium and clinical feature in prosthetic valve endocarditis and native valve endocarditis
.
Chin Circ J
2009
;
24
:
194
197
.

9

Qian
J
,
Gao
RL
,
Xiong
CM
,
Song
LF
.
Clinical analysis of 93 cases of pathologically confirmed infective endocarditis and comparison between two international diagnostic criteria
.
Chin J Cardiol
2003
;
31
:
745
748
.

10

Sun
XL
,
Zhang
J
,
Wang
GG
,
Zhuang
XF
.
Clinical characteristics of 22 cases of fungal infective endocarditis
.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
2013
;
93
:
569
573
.

11

Wilson
W
,
Taubert
KA
,
Gewitz
M
,
Lockhart
PB
,
Baddour
LM
,
Levison
M
,
Bolger
A
,
Cabell
CH
,
Takahashi
M
,
Baltimore
RS
,
Newburger
JW
,
Strom
BL
,
Tani
LY
,
Gerber
M
,
Bonow
RO
,
Pallasch
T
,
Shulman
ST
,
Rowley
AH
,
Burns
JC
,
Ferrieri
P
,
Gardner
T
,
Goff
D
,
Durack
DT
,
American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group
.
Prevention of infective endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Association: a guideline from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group
.
Circulation
2007
;
116
:
1736
1754
.

12

Silver
MD
,
Silver
MM
.
Valvular heart disease: conditions causing regurgitation
. In:
Silver
MD
,
Gotlieb
AI
,
Achoen
FJ
(eds),
Cardiovascular Pathology
, 3rd ed.
New York
:
Churchill Livingstone
,
2001
,
449
461
.

13

Thuny
F
,
Di Salvo
G
,
Belliard
O
,
Avierinos
JF
,
Pergola
V
,
Rosenberg
V
,
Casalta
JP
,
Gouvernet
J
,
Derumeaux
G
,
Iarussi
D
,
Ambrosi
P
,
Calabro
R
,
Riberi
A
,
Collart
F
,
Metras
D
,
Lepidi
H
,
Raoult
D
,
Harle
JR
,
Weiller
PJ
,
Cohen
A
,
Habib
G
.
Risk of embolism and death in infective endocarditis: prognostic value of echocardiography: a prospective multicenter study
.
Circulation
2005
;
112
:
69
75
.

14

Perez de Isla
L
,
Zamorano
J
,
Lennie
V
,
Vazquez
J
,
Ribera
JM
,
Macaya
C
.
Negative blood culture infective endocarditis in the elderly: long-term follow-up
.
Gerontology
2007
;
53
:
245
249
.

15

Raoult
D
,
Casalta
JP
,
Richet
H
,
Khan
M
,
Bernit
E
,
Rovery
C
,
Branger
S
,
Gouriet
F
,
Imbert
G
,
Bothello
E
,
Collart
F
,
Habib
G
.
Contribution of systematic serological testing in diagnosis of infective endocarditis
.
J Clin Microbiol
2005
;
43
:
5238
5242
.

16

Baron
EJ
,
Scott
JD
,
Tompkins
LS
.
Prolonged incubation and extensive subculturing do not increase recovery of clinically significant microorganisms from standard automated blood cultures
.
Clin Infect Dis
2005
;
41
:
1677
1680
.

17

Lamas
CC
,
Eykyn
SJ
.
Blood culture negative endocarditis: analysis of 63 cases presenting over 25 years
.
Heart
2003
;
89
:
258
262
.

18

Brouqui
P
,
Raoult
D
.
New insight into the diagnosis of fastidious bacterial endocarditis
.
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol
2006
;
47
:
1
13
.

19

Watkin
RW
,
Lang
S
,
Lambert
PA
,
Littler
WA
,
Elliott
TS
.
The serological diagnosis of staphylococcal infective endocarditis
.
J Infect
2006
;
53
:
301
307
.

20

Millar
BC
,
Moore
JE
.
Current trends in the molecular diagnosis of infective endocarditis
.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
2004
;
23
:
353
365
.

21

Breitkopf
C
,
Hammel
D
,
Scheld
HH
,
Peters
G
,
Becker
K
.
Impact of a molecular approach to improve the microbiological diagnosis of infective heart valve endocarditis
.
Circulation
2005
;
111
:
1415
1421
.

22

Li
JS
,
Sexton
DJ
,
Mick
N
,
Nettles
R
,
Fowler
VG
Jr
,
Ryan
T
,
Bashore
T
,
Corey
GR
.
Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis
.
Clin Infect Dis
2000
;
30
:
633
638
.

23

Baddour
LM
,
Wilson
WR
,
Bayer
AS
,
Fowler
VG
Jr
,
Bolger
AF
,
Levison
ME
,
Ferrieri
P
,
Gerber
MA
,
Tani
LY
,
Gewitz
MH
,
Tong
DC
,
Steckelberg
JM
,
Baltimore
RS
,
Shulman
ST
,
Burns
JC
,
Falace
DA
,
Newburger
JW
,
Pallasch
TJ
,
Takahashi
M
,
Taubert
KA
,
Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association, Infectious Diseases Society of America
.
Infective endocarditis: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association: endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America
.
Circulation
2005
;
111
:
e394
e434
.

24

Raoult
D
,
Marrie
T
,
Mege
J
.
Natural history and pathophysiology of Q fever
.
Lancet Infect Dis
2005
;
5
:
219
226
.

25

Fenollar
F
,
Thuny
F
,
Xeridat
B
,
Lepidi
H
,
Raoult
D
.
Endocarditis after acute Q fever in patients with previously undiagnosed valvulopathies
.
Clin Infect Dis
2006
;
42
:
818
821
.

26

Raoult
D
,
Tissot-Dupont
H
,
Foucault
C
,
Gouvernet
J
,
Fournier
PE
,
Bernit
E
,
Stein
A
,
Nesri
M
,
Harle
JR
,
Weiller
PJ
.
Q fever 1985–1998. Clinical and epidemiologic features of 1,383 infections
.
Medicine (Baltimore)
2000
;
79
:
109
123
.

27

Lecaillet
A
,
Mallet
MN
,
Raoult
D
,
Rolain
JM
.
Therapeutic impact of the correlation of doxycycline serum concentrations and the decline of phase I antibodies in Q fever endocarditis
.
J Antimicrob Chemother
2009
;
63
:
771
774
.

28

Raoult
D
,
Houpikian
P
,
Tissot Dupont
H
,
Riss
JM
,
Arditi-Djiane
J
,
Brouqui
P
.
Treatment of Q fever endocarditis: comparison of 2 regimens containing doxycycline and ofloxacin or hydroxychloroquine
.
Arch Intern Med
1999
;
159
:
167
173
.

29

Maurin
M
,
Birtles
R
,
Raoult
D
.
Current knowledge of Bartonella species
.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
1997
;
16
:
487
506
.

30

Breathnach
AS
,
Hoare
JM
,
Eykyn
SJ
.
Culture-negative endocarditis: contribution of bartonella infections
.
Heart
1997
;
77
:
474
476
.

31

Rolain
JM
,
Brouqui
P
,
Koehler
JE
,
Maguina
C
,
Dolan
MJ
,
Raoult
D
.
Recommendations for treatment of human infections caused by Bartonella species
.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2004
;
48
:
1921
1933
.

32

Falcone
M
,
Barzaghi
N
,
Carosi
G
,
Grossi
P
,
Minoli
L
,
Ravasio
V
,
Rizzi
M
,
Suter
F
,
Utili
R
,
Viscoli
C
,
Venditti
M
,
Italian Study on E
.
Candida infective endocarditis: report of 15 cases from a prospective multicenter study
.
Medicine (Baltimore)
2009
;
88
:
160
168
.

33

Ellis
ME
,
Al-Abdely
H
,
Sandridge
A
,
Greer
W
,
Ventura
W
.
Fungal endocarditis: evidence in the world literature, 1965–1995
.
Clin Infect Dis
2001
;
32
:
50
62
.

34

Baddley
JW
,
Benjamin
DK
Jr
,
Patel
M
,
Miro
J
,
Athan
E
,
Barsic
B
,
Bouza
E
,
Clara
L
,
Elliott
T
,
Kanafani
Z
,
Klein
J
,
Lerakis
S
,
Levine
D
,
Spelman
D
,
Rubinstein
E
,
Tornos
P
,
Morris
AJ
,
Pappas
P
,
Fowler
VG
Jr
,
Chu
VH
,
Cabell
C
,
International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study Group (ICE-PCS)
.
Candida infective endocarditis
.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
2008
;
27
:
519
529
.

35

Bhatti
S
,
Vilenski
L
,
Tight
R
,
Smego
RA
Jr
.
Histoplasma endocarditis: clinical and mycologic features and outcomes
.
J Infect
2005
;
51
:
2
9
.

36

Lopez
J
,
Revilla
A
,
Vilacosta
I
,
Sevilla
T
,
Villacorta
E
,
Sarria
C
,
Pozo
E
,
Rollan
MJ
,
Gomez
I
,
Mota
P
,
San Roman
JA
.
Age-dependent profile of left-sided infective endocarditis: a 3-center experience
.
Circulation
2010
;
121
:
892
897
.

37

Murdoch
DR
,
Corey
GR
,
Hoen
B
,
Miro
JM
,
Fowler
VG
Jr
,
Bayer
AS
,
Karchmer
AW
,
Olaison
L
,
Pappas
PA
,
Moreillon
P
,
Chambers
ST
,
Chu
VH
,
Falco
V
,
Holland
DJ
,
Jones
P
,
Klein
JL
,
Raymond
NJ
,
Read
KM
,
Tripodi
MF
,
Utili
R
,
Wang
A
,
Woods
CW
,
Cabell
CH
,
International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study I
.
Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study
.
Arch Intern Med
2009
;
169
:
463
473
.

38

Tornos
P
,
Iung
B
,
Permanyer-Miralda
G
,
Baron
G
,
Delahaye
F
,
Gohlke-Barwolf
C
,
Butchart
EG
,
Ravaud
P
,
Vahanian
A
.
Infective endocarditis in Europe: lessons from the Euro heart survey
.
Heart
2005
;
91
:
571
575
.

39

Thuny
F
,
Beurtheret
S
,
Mancini
J
,
Gariboldi
V
,
Casalta
JP
,
Riberi
A
,
Giorgi
R
,
Gouriet
F
,
Tafanelli
L
,
Avierinos
JF
,
Renard
S
,
Collart
F
,
Raoult
D
,
Habib
G
.
The timing of surgery influences mortality and morbidity in adults with severe complicated infective endocarditis: a propensity analysis
.
Eur Heart J
2011
;
32
:
2027
2033
.

40

HE
DQ
,
Cheng
ZX
,
Zhang
EY
,
Xiao
XJ
,
Dong
L
,
Yang
J
,
An
Q
,
Shi
YK
.
Clinical analysis of enbolism of infective endocarditis
.
Chin J Clin Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg
2007
;
14
:
350
353
.

41

Dong
C
,
Sun
LZ
,
Wang
SY
,
Sun
HS
,
Hu
SS
.
Surgical treatment of active infective endocarditis
.
Chin J Surg
2005
;
43
:
358
361
.

42

Fu
J
,
Tao
L
,
Chen
XF
,
Yu
HD
,
Shang
YQ
,
Zhu
XD
.
The timing of surgical treatment for infective endocarditis
.
Chin J Clin Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg
2003
;
10
:
147
148
.

43

Wang
ZN
,
Zhang
BR
,
Xu
ZY
,
Hao
JH
,
Zou
LJ
,
Mei
J
,
Xu
JB
.
Surgical interventions for complex native valve endocarditis
.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi
2004
;
42
:
657
660
.

44

Byrne
JG
,
Rezai
K
,
Sanchez
JA
,
Bernstein
RA
,
Okum
E
,
Leacche
M
,
Balaguer
JM
,
Prabhakaran
S
,
Bridges
CR
,
Higgins
RS
.
Surgical management of endocarditis: the society of thoracic surgeons clinical practice guideline
.
Ann Thorac Surg
2011
;
91
:
2012
2019
.

45

Thuny
F
,
Beurtheret
S
,
Gariboldi
V
,
Mancini
J
,
Avierinos
JF
,
Riberi
A
,
Casalta
JP
,
Gouriet
F
,
Tafanelli
L
,
Giorgi
R
,
Collart
F
,
Raoult
D
,
Habib
G
.
Outcome after surgical treatment performed within the first week of antimicrobial therapy during infective endocarditis: a prospective study
.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis
2008
;
101
:
687
695
.

46

Feringa
HH
,
Shaw
LJ
,
Poldermans
D
,
Hoeks
S
,
van der Wall
EE
,
Dion
RA
,
Bax
JJ
.
Mitral valve repair and replacement in endocarditis: a systematic review of literature
.
Ann Thorac Surg
2007
;
83
:
564
570
.

47

David
TE
,
Gavra
G
,
Feindel
CM
,
Regesta
T
,
Armstrong
S
,
Maganti
MD
.
Surgical treatment of active infective endocarditis: a continued challenge
.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2007
;
133
:
144
149
.

48

Jassal
DS
,
Neilan
TG
,
Pradhan
AD
,
Lynch
KE
,
Vlahakes
G
,
Agnihotri
AK
,
Picard
MH
.
Surgical management of infective endocarditis: early predictors of short-term morbidity and mortality
.
Ann Thorac Surg
2006
;
82
:
524
529
.

49

Thuny
F
,
Avierinos
JF
,
Tribouilloy
C
,
Giorgi
R
,
Casalta
JP
,
Milandre
L
,
Brahim
A
,
Nadji
G
,
Riberi
A
,
Collart
F
,
Renard
S
,
Raoult
D
,
Habib
G
.
Impact of cerebrovascular complications on mortality and neurologic outcome during infective endocarditis: a prospective multicentre study
.
Eur Heart J
2007
;
28
:
1155
1161
.

50

Hasbun
R
,
Vikram
HR
,
Barakat
LA
,
Buenconsejo
J
,
Quagliarello
VJ
.
Complicated left-sided native valve endocarditis in adults: risk classification for mortality
.
JAMA
2003
;
289
:
1933
1940
.

51

Ruttmann
E
,
Willeit
J
,
Ulmer
H
,
Chevtchik
O
,
Hofer
D
,
Poewe
W
,
Laufer
G
,
Muller
LC
.
Neurological outcome of septic cardioembolic stroke after infective endocarditis
.
Stroke
2006
;
37
:
2094
2099
.

52

Majumdar
A
,
Chowdhary
S
,
Ferreira
MA
,
Hammond
LA
,
Howie
AJ
,
Lipkin
GW
,
Littler
WA
.
Renal pathological findings in infective endocarditis
.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
2000
;
15
:
1782
1787
.

53

Ting
W
,
Silverman
NA
,
Arzouman
DA
,
Levitsky
S
.
Splenic septic emboli in endocarditis
.
Circulation
1990
;
82
:
IV105
IV109
.

54

San Roman
JA
,
Lopez
J
,
Vilacosta
I
,
Luaces
M
,
Sarria
C
,
Revilla
A
,
Ronderos
R
,
Stoermann
W
,
Gomez
I
,
Fernandez-Aviles
F
.
Prognostic stratification of patients with left-sided endocarditis determined at admission
.
Am J Med
2007
;
120
:
369 e361
367
.

55

Chu
VH
,
Sexton
DJ
,
Cabell
CH
,
Reller
LB
,
Pappas
PA
,
Singh
RK
,
Fowler
VG
Jr
,
Corey
GR
,
Aksoy
O
,
Woods
CW
.
Repeat infective endocarditis: differentiating relapse from reinfection
.
Clin Infect Dis
2005
;
41
:
406
409
.

56

Mansur
AJ
,
Dal Bo
CM
,
Fukushima
JT
,
Issa
VS
,
Grinberg
M
,
Pomerantzeff
PM
.
Relapses, recurrences, valve replacements, and mortality during the long-term follow-up after infective endocarditis
.
Am Heart J
2001
;
141
:
78
86
.

57

Martinez-Selles
M
,
Munoz
P
,
Estevez
A
,
del Castillo
R
,
Garcia-Fernandez
MA
,
Rodriguez-Creixems
M
,
Moreno
M
,
Bouza
E
,
Group
GS
.
Long-term outcome of infective endocarditis in non-intravenous drug users
.
Mayo Clin Proc
2008
;
83
:
1213
1217
.

58

Heiro
M
,
Helenius
H
,
Hurme
S
,
Savunen
T
,
Metsarinne
K
,
Engblom
E
,
Nikoskelainen
J
,
Kotilainen
P
.
Long-term outcome of infective endocarditis: a study on patients surviving over one year after the initial episode treated in a Finnish teaching hospital during 25 years
.
BMC Infect Dis
2008
;
8
:
49
.

59

Baddour
LM
,
Bettmann
MA
,
Bolger
AF
,
Epstein
AE
,
Ferrieri
P
,
Gerber
MA
,
Gewitz
MH
,
Jacobs
AK
,
Levison
ME
,
Newburger
JW
,
Pallasch
TJ
,
Wilson
WR
,
Baltimore
RS
,
Falace
DA
,
Shulman
ST
,
Tani
LY
,
Taubert
KA
,
Aha
.
Nonvalvular cardiovascular device-related infections
.
Circulation
2003
;
108
:
2015
2031
.

60

Da Costa
A
,
Lelievre
H
,
Kirkorian
G
,
Celard
M
,
Chevalier
P
,
Vandenesch
F
,
Etienne
J
,
Touboul
P
.
Role of the preaxillary flora in pacemaker infections: a prospective study
.
Circulation
1998
;
97
:
1791
1795
.

61

Klug
D
,
Lacroix
D
,
Savoye
C
,
Goullard
L
,
Grandmougin
D
,
Hennequin
JL
,
Kacet
S
,
Lekieffre
J
.
Systemic infection related to endocarditis on pacemaker leads: clinical presentation and management
.
Circulation
1997
;
95
:
2098
2107
.

62

Sohail
MR
,
Uslan
DZ
,
Khan
AH
,
Friedman
PA
,
Hayes
DL
,
Wilson
WR
,
Steckelberg
JM
,
Jenkins
SM
,
Baddour
LM
.
Infective endocarditis complicating permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infection
.
Mayo Clin Proc
2008
;
83
:
46
53
.

63

Baddour
LM
,
Epstein
AE
,
Erickson
CC
,
Knight
BP
,
Levison
ME
,
Lockhart
PB
,
Masoudi
FA
,
Okum
EJ
,
Wilson
WR
,
Beerman
LB
,
Bolger
AF
,
Estes
NA
III
,
Gewitz
M
,
Newburger
JW
,
Schron
EB
,
Taubert
KA
,
American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever E
,
Kawasaki Disease C
,
American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in Young, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care, American Heart Association
.
Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association
.
Circulation
2010
;
121
:
458
477
.

64

Wang
FZ
,
Ma
J
,
Huang
DJ
,
Huang
CX
,
Cao
KJ
,
Hua
W
,
Shen
FR
,
Wu
LQ
,
Su
YG
,
Yang
JF
,
Wang
JF
,
Chen
SL
,
Chen
KP
,
Zhang
S
.
Current knowledge and recommendation of transvenous endocardial lead extraction(update 2011)
.
Chin J Cardiac Arrhythmias
2011
;
15
:
198
204
.

65

Akinosoglou
K
,
Apostolakis
E
,
Koutsogiannis
N
,
Leivaditis
V
,
Gogos
CA
.
Right-sided infective endocarditis: surgical management
.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
2012
;
42
:
470
479
.

66

San Roman
JA
,
Vilacosta
I
,
Lopez
J
,
Revilla
A
,
Arnold
R
,
Sevilla
T
,
Rollan
MJ
.
Role of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in right-sided endocarditis: one echocardiographic modality does not fit all
.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
2012
;
25
:
807
814
.

67

Kamaledeen
A
,
Young
C
,
Attia
RQ
.
What are the differences in outcomes between right-sided active infective endocarditis with and without left-sided infection?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
2012
;
14
:
205
208
.

68

DiNubile
MJ
.
Short-course antibiotic therapy for right-sided endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus in injection drug users
.
Ann Intern Med
1994
;
121
:
873
876
.

69

Wang
JY
.
Internal medicine
. 1st ed.
Beijing: The Publishing House of People's Health
;
2005
.

70

Niwa
K
,
Nakazawa
M
,
Tateno
S
,
Yoshinaga
M
,
Terai
M
.
Infective endocarditis in congenital heart disease: Japanese national collaboration study
.
Heart
2005
;
91
:
795
800
.

71

Gabriel
HM
,
Heger
M
,
Innerhofer
P
,
Zehetgruber
M
,
Mundigler
G
,
Wimmer
M
,
Maurer
G
,
Baumgartner
H
.
Long-term outcome of patients with ventricular septal defect considered not to require surgical closure during childhood
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
2002
;
39
:
1066
1071
.

72

Di Filippo
S
,
Delahaye
F
,
Semiond
B
,
Celard
M
,
Henaine
R
,
Ninet
J
,
Sassolas
F
,
Bozio
A
.
Current patterns of infective endocarditis in congenital heart disease
.
Heart
2006
;
92
:
1490
1495
.

73

Moons
P
,
De Volder
E
,
Budts
W
,
De Geest
S
,
Elen
J
,
Waeytens
K
,
Gewillig
M
.
What do adult patients with congenital heart disease know about their disease, treatment, and prevention of complications? A call for structured patient education
.
Heart
2001
;
86
:
74
80
.

74

Gersony
WM
,
Hayes
CJ
,
Driscoll
DJ
,
Keane
JF
,
Kidd
L
,
O'Fallon
WM
,
Pieroni
DR
,
Wolfe
RR
,
Weidman
WH
.
Bacterial endocarditis in patients with aortic stenosis, pulmonary stenosis, or ventricular septal defect
.
Circulation
1993
;
87
:
I121
I126
.

75

Montoya
ME
,
Karnath
BM
,
Ahmad
M
.
Endocarditis during pregnancy
.
South Med J
2003
;
96
:
1156
1157
.

76

Avila
WS
,
Rossi
EG
,
Ramires
JA
,
Grinberg
M
,
Bortolotto
MR
,
Zugaib
M
,
da Luz
PL
.
Pregnancy in patients with heart disease: experience with 1,000 cases
.
Clin Cardiol
2003
;
26
:
135
142
.

77

Dajani
AS
,
Taubert
KA
,
Wilson
W
,
Bolger
AF
,
Bayer
A
,
Ferrieri
P
,
Gewitz
MH
,
Shulman
ST
,
Nouri
S
,
Newburger
JW
,
Hutto
C
,
Pallasch
TJ
,
Gage
TW
,
Levison
ME
,
Peter
G
,
Zuccaro
G
Jr
.
Prevention of bacterial endocarditis. Recommendations by the American Heart Association
.
JAMA
1997
;
277
:
1794
1801
.

78

Regitz-Zagrosek
V
,
Blomstrom Lundqvist
C
,
Borghi
C
,
Cifkova
R
,
Ferreira
R
,
Foidart
JM
,
Gibbs
JS
,
Gohlke-Baerwolf
C
,
Gorenek
B
,
Iung
B
,
Kirby
M
,
Maas
AH
,
Morais
J
,
Nihoyannopoulos
P
,
Pieper
PG
,
Presbitero
P
,
Roos-Hesselink
JW
,
Schaufelberger
M
,
Seeland
U
,
Torracca
L
,
ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines
.
ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
.
Eur Heart J
2011
;
32
:
3147
3197
.

Author notes

The guideline (article in Chinese) also appeared in Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2014;42(10):806–816. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2014.10.004.