Anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1RA) receptor agonists possess multiple favourable metabolic, anti-inflammatory effects and their use is associated with marked body weight reduction. More importantly, this drug class has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at high cardiovascular risk or with established cardiovascular disease. Accordingly, current guidelines recommend the use of GLP-1RA sas first-line antidiabetic therapies in patients at high cardiovascular risk.

Semaglutide is a potent GLP-1RA used in the treatment of T2DM with proven cardiovascular benefits. It is currently available in formulations for oral and subcutaneous administration.

The anti-inflammatory effect could be one of the mechanisms by which semaglutide reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or obesity. Determining the anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide was the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect randomised clinical trials that have quantified the effect of semaglutide on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels compared to placebo or a control group (other glucose-lowering drugs). The primary outcome was CRP index (final CRP/basal CRP). A random-effects model was used.

Overall, this meta-analysis shows that semaglutide therapy was associated with lower CRP index values compared to placebo (SMD -0.56; 95% CI -0.69 to -0.43, I2 92%) or when comparing semaglutide treatment versus a control group consisting of patients medicated with other glucose-lowering drugs (SMD -0.45; 95% CI -0.68 to -0.23, I 3 82%).

The stratified analysis was performed by analysing only the trials that used a placebo group as comparator, When the trials were analysed according to the different dosing schemes (subcutaneous vs. oral), the results were not statistically significantly different (oral semaglutide group: SMD -0.33; 95% CI -0.75 to 0.08, I2 95%); semaglutide subcutaneous dose group: SMD -0.69; 95% CI -0.78 to -0.60, I2 74%); interaction p = 0.098. Furthermore, when the trials were analysed according to the included populations (patients with or without T2DM), the results were similar (patients with T2DM: SMD -0.32; 95% CI -0.51 to -0.14, I2 86%); patients without T2DM: SMD -0.82; 95% CI -0.90 to -0.74, I2 58%); interaction p = < 0.0001.