Abstract

Introduction: Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has been established as a therapy for patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) who are at high surgical risk. Failure to implant a TEER device and the occurrence of residual or recurrent MR ≥3+ are well documented but data regarding outcomes of redo-TEER following initial failure are sparse.

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of redo-TEER following initial failed intervention.

Methods

We included 16 patients who underwent redo-TEER for symptomatic MR ≥3+ from July 2016 to December 2022. Acute results were assessed by echocardiography prior to discharge and safety was evaluated clinically, according to the occurrence of procedure-related adverse events. Mid- and long-term outcomes were evaluated at three months and one year respectively. Data were obtained retrospectively by chart review. Mortality data were drawn from the national death registry.

Results

Reasons for redo-TEER include device failure without detachment in nine (56%) patients, device failure due to single leaflet detachment in four (25%) patients and initial implantation failure in three (19%) patients. Median time from index procedure was 167 days (range: 19 – 1457 days). Technical (implantation of a TEER device) and procedural (MR ≤2+ at discharged) success were achieved in 94% and 87.5% of patients undergoing repeat intervention respectively. MR grade was reduced to 1+ in 71% of patients who had successful TEER. No intra-procedural mortality or life-threatening complications were noted. Mean post-TEER hospitalization length was 1.8 ± 1.3 days. No deaths were noted during the first year following redo-TEER. Echocardiography at three months and one year demonstrated MR ≤2+ for all patients in whom TEER was successful. At three months and one-year follow-up, respectively 67% and 50% of patients who underwent successful intervention were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I or II and only one had been hospitalized for heart failure.

Conclusion

Repeat mitral TEER following initial procedural failure is safe and has high acute and mid-term success rates. More research is needed to better characterise patients likely to benefit from repeated intervention.

This content is only available as a PDF.

Author notes

Funding Acknowledgements: None.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)