Abstract

Aims

The aim of this study was to identify determinants of in-hospital and mid-term outcomes after isolated tricuspid valve surgery (ITVS) and more specifically the impact of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) mechanism and clinical presentation.

Methods and results

Among 5661 consecutive adult patients who underwent a tricuspid valve (TV) surgery at 12 French tertiary centres in 2007–2017 collected from a mandatory administrative database, we identified 466 patients (8% of all tricuspid surgeries) who underwent an ITVS. Most patients presented with advanced disease [47% in New York Heart Association (NYHA) III/IV, 57% with right-sided heart failure (HF) signs]. Tricuspid regurgitation was functional in 49% (22% with prior left-sided heart valve surgery and 27% isolated) and organic in 51% (infective endocarditis in 31% and other causes in 20%). In-hospital mortality and major complications rates were 10% and 31%, respectively. Rates of survival and survival free of HF readmission were 75% and 62% at 5 years. Patients with functional TR incurred a worse in-hospital mortality than those with organic TR (14% vs. 6%, P = 0.004), but presentation was more severe. Independent determinants of outcomes were NYHA Class III/IV [odd ratios (OR) = 2.7 (1.2–6.1), P = 0.01], moderate/severe right ventricular dysfunction [OR = 2.6 (1.2–5.8), P = 0.02], lower prothrombin time [OR = 0.98 (0.96–0.99), P = 0.008], and with borderline statistical significance, right-sided HF signs [OR = 2.4 (0.9–6.5), P = 0.06] while TR mechanism was not [OR = 0.7 (0.3–1.8), P = 0.88].

Conclusion

Isolated TV surgery was associated with high mortality and morbidity, both in hospital and during follow-up, predicted by the severity of the presentation but not by TR mechanism. Our results suggest that TV intervention should be performed earlier in the course of the disease.

See page 4318 for the editorial comment on this article (doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa740)

Introduction

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a frequent condition that has been overlooked compared to left-sided valve diseases. Epidemiological studies suggest that moderate or severe TR affects over 1.6 million individuals in the USA.1  ,  2 Multiple studies, in various settings such as heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), tricuspid flail, or isolated functional TR, have shown that the presence and severity of TR are associated with an increased risk of mortality and of cardiovascular (CV) events.3–8 In a recent meta-analysis, moderate/severe TR was associated with more than a two-fold increased cardiac mortality independently of pulmonary pressures, LVEF, and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction.9 Despite its high prevalence, TR is often left untreated and the number of tricuspid valve (TV) surgeries, mostly performed at the time of mitral valve surgery, remains remarkably low.10

Isolated tricuspid valve surgery (ITVS) is reputed to be a high-risk surgery with a 10% in-hospital mortality rate that had remained constant across studies and time despite improvement in surgical techniques and post-operative management.10–12 However, most studies relied on small single-centre studies or on administrative databases with limited clinical, biological, and echocardiographic information and limited follow-up. Thus, determinants of outcome after ITVS have remained so far elusive. In a previous study, using the French Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d’Information (PMSI), a mandatory administrative database, congestive heart failure (CHF) at presentation was associated with mortality and major complications rates.12 However, granularity was limited and we were not able to account for the severity of the clinical presentation and echocardiographic features. In addition, TR mechanism may be either functional or organic and encompass multiple aetiologies. Consequently, patients referred for ITVS represent a heterogeneous population. Impact of TR aetiology on outcome remained unclear and data are very limited.

In the present study, relying on in depth characterization of patients’ medical history, functional status, laboratory, and echocardiography results, we aimed to evaluate the determinants of in-hospital and mid-term outcomes after ITVS according to TR mechanism and aetiology and more specifically the impact of the severity of the clinical presentation.

Methods

Study design

Using the local PMSI database,13 we collected all consecutive cases of TV surgery performed in adult patients at 12 French tertiary centres between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017 (Supplementary material online, Figure S1). Tricuspid valve interventions were identified using Common Classification of Medical Procedures classification (DBKA004, DBMA008, or DBMA012).14 All healthcare institutions in France are mandated to transfer information regarding their activity into the PMSI database and the PMSI database is therefore considered exhaustive. Among all TV surgery cases performed in these centres, we excluded congenital TRs and patients who underwent a combined TV surgery, meaning a TV surgery concomitant with other cardiac surgery such as mitral valve surgery, coronary artery bypass graft, or atrial septal defect closure. Finally, we excluded all redo TV surgery either on native or prosthetic valves and our study population consisted of all patients who underwent an isolated non-congenital TV surgery performed on native valve. Clinical presentation, laboratory results, echocardiography, and immediate and mid-term outcome were retrospectively collected locally at each centre. The study was approved by each local institutional review board.

Patients’ characteristics

Information regarding clinical presentation, past medical history, and laboratory results were retrospectively collected from patients’ charts. Glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the Cockcroft–Gault formula according to sex. Surgical risk scores [logistic EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)] were calculated; mitral valve repair intervention was used for the STS as there is no dedicated score for ITVS.15  ,  16 The Charlson index was used to assess for patients’ comorbidities.

All echocardiographic reports before intervention were reviewed and when needed measurements were retrospectively performed on digitally stored images. Tricuspid regurgitation aetiology was first classified as functional (no intrinsic tricuspid disease) or organic (due to abnormalities of the tricuspid leaflets or chordae). Functional TR was then subdivided into functional TR after left-sided valve surgery or isolated functional TR, and organic into endocarditis and other aetiologies including carcinoid diseases or traumatic. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured visually or using the biplane method of discs (modified Simpson’s rule). Right ventricular size was visually assessed as normal, mildly, moderately or severely enlarged. The RV basal diameter and the tricuspid annulus (TA) diameter (TA) were measured in diastole in the apical four-chamber view.17 Right ventricular function was semi-quantitatively assessed using an integrative approach based on visual assessment, tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and Doppler tissue imaging peak systolic annular velocity S′ as recommended.18  ,  19 Pulmonary artery systolic pressure was measured using the peak systolic trans-tricuspid pressure gradient and estimated right atrial pressure according to the diameter of the inferior vena cava and its variation with respiration, applying the Bernoulli equation.

Outcome

In-hospital mortality was defined as death occurring between the intervention and hospital discharge during the same hospital stay. Major post-operative complications were defined as death, shock, tamponade, and acute renal failure requiring dialysis or prolonged (>72 h) mechanical ventilation. Lengths of stay (total and intensive care unit) were calculated as the time duration between the admission and hospital discharge. During follow-up, all-cause death and CV readmissions, defined as due to CHF, atrial fibrillation (AF), infective endocarditis, stroke, acute coronary syndrome, re-intervention (tamponade, sternum infection), or pacemaker related, were also collected based on hospital chart reviews and telephone interviews with patients or family members.

Statistics

Variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (percentile 25 and 75) for continuous variables and number of patients (percentage) for categorical variables. Trends in the number and type of TV surgery were estimated by the Mann–Kendall trend test. Comparisons between groups of TR mechanism/aetiologies were performed using ANOVA, χ  2, Student’s t-test or non-parametric Wilcoxon test as appropriate. Complication rates were expressed as percentage and 95% confidence intervals. Logistic regressions in univariate and multivariate analyses (including variables with P < 0.10 in univariate analysis) were used to assess the determinants of in-hospital death and major post-operative complications. Variables independently associated with mortality in each category (clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic) were entered into the final model. Multiple comparisons for continuous variables were tested with the Bonferroni correction. Odd ratios (OR) along with 95% confidence intervals were reported. We assessed the risks of death and CV readmission overall and according to TR mechanism/aetiology using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models. Data were analysed using JMP version 9.0 (SAS Institute) or XLSTAT (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). All tests were two-sided and a P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Trends in tricuspid valve surgery

A total of 5661 adult patients underwent a TV surgery (Supplementary material online, Figure S2) at the 12 participating French tertiary centres between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017. Among them, 466 patients (8%) had a non-congenital isolated TV surgery on native valve (Figure 1). Trends in TV surgery are presented in Figure 2. The number of TV surgery increased from 280 in 2007 to 774 in 2017 (P for trend < 0.0001). The increase in number of TV surgery performed was mainly related to a marked increase in the number of combined TV surgery (P for trend < 0.0001) although isolated TV modestly but significantly increased during the study period (P for trend = 0.0001).

Flow chart of study population. A total of 5661 adult patients underwent a tricuspid valve surgery at 12 French tertiary centres between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017. Among them, 466 had an isolated non-congenital surgery, 229 for functional tricuspid regurgitation, and 237 for organic tricuspid regurgitation. Functional tricuspid regurgitations were then subdivided into functional tricuspid regurgitation after left-sided surgery or isolated functional tricuspid regurgitation and organic into endocarditis aetiology and other aetiologies including carcinoid diseases or traumatic.
Figure 1

Flow chart of study population. A total of 5661 adult patients underwent a tricuspid valve surgery at 12 French tertiary centres between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017. Among them, 466 had an isolated non-congenital surgery, 229 for functional tricuspid regurgitation, and 237 for organic tricuspid regurgitation. Functional tricuspid regurgitations were then subdivided into functional tricuspid regurgitation after left-sided surgery or isolated functional tricuspid regurgitation and organic into endocarditis aetiology and other aetiologies including carcinoid diseases or traumatic.

Trends in tricuspid valve surgery between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017 in the 12 French tertiary centres. (A) All tricuspid valve surgery, combined tricuspid valve surgery, and isolated tricuspid valve surgery on native valve. (B) Tricuspid valve repair and tricuspid valve replacement—bioprosthetic and mechanical valves. TV, tricuspid valve.
Figure 2

Trends in tricuspid valve surgery between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017 in the 12 French tertiary centres. (A) All tricuspid valve surgery, combined tricuspid valve surgery, and isolated tricuspid valve surgery on native valve. (B) Tricuspid valve repair and tricuspid valve replacement—bioprosthetic and mechanical valves. TV, tricuspid valve.

Clinical presentation and aetiologies of isolated tricuspid valve surgery

Characteristics of the 466 patients with a non-congenital isolated TV surgery on native valve are presented in Table 1. Overall mean age was 60 ± 16 years and 229 patients (49%) were female. One hundred and eleven patients (24%) had a previous left-sided heart surgery. Close to half of the patients were severely symptomatic [47% in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional Class III/IV] and 163 (35%) were admitted for CHF within the year preceding the surgery. Right-sided HF signs were present in 264 patients (57%) in whom 39 (8%) had ascites. Chronic kidney disease was present in 154 patients (33%) and chronic liver disease in 54 patients (12%). Mean LVEF was 58 ± 9%. A moderate/severe RV dilatation was present in 54% of patients and a moderate/severe RV dysfunction in 17%. The mean systolic pulmonary artery pressure was 40 ± 11 mmHg (≥50 mmHg in 19%). The median Charlson comorbidity index was high [3.0 (1–4)], and 324 patients (70%) had a Charlson comorbidity index of ≥2.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the population overall and according to the aetiology of the tricuspid regurgitation

CharacteristicsOverall (N = 466)Functional (N = 229)Organic (N = 237)P-valueFunctional—prior left-sided heart valve surgery (N = 101)Functional—isolated (N = 128)Organic—infective endocarditis (N = 142)Organic—other (N = 95)P-value
Age (years)60 ± 1666 ± 1153 ± 18<0.000166 ± 1167 ± 1249 ± 1761 ± 15<0.0001
Female gender229 (49)137 (60)92 (39)<0.000164 (63)73 (57)43 (30)49 (52)<0.0001
Body mass index (kg/m2)25 ± 527 ± 624 ± 5<0.000126 ± 527 ± 624 ± 525 ± 5<0.0001
Hypertension190 (41)120 (52)70 (30)<0.000147 (47)73 (57)31 (22)39 (41)<0.0001
Diabetes mellitus62 (13)40 (18)22 (9)0.00919 (19)21 (16)13 (9)9 (10)0.07
Chronic lung disease51 (11)30 (13)21 (9)0.1414 (14)16 (13)13 (9)8 (8)0.52
Peripheral vascular disease16 (3)5 (2)11 (5)0.151 (1)4 (3)8 (6)3 (3)0.27
Prior stroke41 (9)24 (11)17 (7)0.2115 (15)9 (7)9 (6)8 (8)0.10
Prior left-sided heart valve surgery111 (24)101 (44)10 (4)<0.0001101 (100)0 (0)1 (1)9 (10)<0.0001
Coronary artery disease59 (13)35 (15)24 (10)0.0920 (20)15 (12)12 (9)12 (13)0.07
Chronic kidney disease154 (33)100 (44)54 (23)<0.000152 (51)48 (38)28 (20)26 (27)<0.0001
Chronic liver disease54 (12)31 (14)23 (10)0.2016 (16)15 (12)10 (7)13 (14)0.17
Liver cirrhosis11 (2)7 (3)4 (2)0.335 (5)2 (2)0 (0)4 (4)0.04
Permanent pacemaker104 (22)54 (24)50 (21)0.5226 (26)28 (22)29 (20)21 (22)0.80
Hospitalization for congestive heart failure (<1 year)163 (35)121 (53)42 (18)<0.000157 (56)64 (50)16 (11)26 (27)<0.0001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)125 ± 19126 ± 19124 ± 200.36123 ± 19127 ± 19122 ± 19127 ± 200.10
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)73 ± 1372 ± 1373 ± 140.3570 ± 1374 ± 1373 ± 1474 ± 140.16
NYHA functional Class III–IV217 (47)136 (59)81 (34)<0.000162 (61)74 (58)41 (29)40 (42)<0.0001
Right-sided heart failure signs264 (57)166 (73)98 (41)<0.000180 (79)86 (67)48 (34)50 (53)<0.0001
Ascites39 (8)29 (13)10 (4)0.00115 (15)14 (11)1 (1)9 (10)0.0005
Loop diuretics301/451 (67)194/222 (87)107/229 (47)<0.000196 (95)98/121 (81)49/136 (36)58/93 (62)<0.0001
Daily dose of loop diuretics (mg)40 (0–80)60 (40–120)0 (0–40)0.000680 (40–125)40 (20–120)0 (0–40)40 (0–80)0.003
Atrial fibrillation180 (39)142 (62)39 (17)<0.000166 (65)76 (59)17 (12)22 (23)<0.0001
Haemoglobin (g/dL)12.3 ± 2.312.5 ± 2.012.1 ± 2.50.0612.1 ± 1.912.8 ± 2.011.2 ± 2.513.4 ± 2.0<0.0001
Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min)72 ± 3961 ± 2982 ± 44<0.000160 ± 2860 ± 3093 ± 4967 ± 32<0.0001
Elevated ALT and/or AST73/393 (19)31/195 (16)42/198 (21)0.1814/91 (15)17/104 (16)31/112 (28)11/86 (13)0.03
Elevated GGT and/or ALP189/397 (48)102/195 (52)87/202 (43)0.0755/93 (59)47/102 (46)50/120 (42)37/82 (45)0.07
Total bilirubin (µmol/L)15.8 ± 11.917 ± 1315 ± 110.0719.1 ± 14.215.1 ± 11.413.3 ± 10.416.6 ± 11.20.006
Prothrombin time74 ± 2067 ± 2180 ± 16<0.000162 ± 2271 ± 1978 ± 1682 ± 16<0.0001
LV ejection fraction58 ± 957 ± 859 ± 90.0355 ± 958 ± 859 ± 1059 ± 80.02
RV basal diameter (mm)48 ± 1152 ± 1144 ± 9<0.000152 ± 751 ±1242 ± 949 ± 8<0.0001
Moderate/severe RV dilatation245/450 (54)148/222 (67)97/228 (43)<0.000162/99 (63)86/123 (70)48/135 (36)49/93 (53)<0.0001
TAPSE (mm)20 ± 718 ± 522 ± 7<0.000116 ± 419 ± 623 ± 822 ± 7<0.0001
Peak systolic annular velocity S′ (cm/s)11.9 ± 4.110.7 ± 3.113.5 ± 4.6<0.00019.5 ± 2.111.6 ± 3.513.8 ± 4.913.2 ± 4.1<0.0001
Moderate/severe RV dysfunction76/446 (17)50/221 (23)26/225 (12)0.00231/98 (32)19/123 (15)14/134 (10)12/91 (13)0.0002
Tricuspid annulus diameter in apical four-chamber view (mm)44 ± 947 ± 741 ± 9<0.000146 ± 747 ± 738 ± 944 ± 9<0.0001
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg)40 ± 1143 ± 1137 ± 10<0.000143 ± 1043 ± 1236 ± 9.139 ± 11<0.0001
Logistic EuroSCORE5.2 (3.0–9.2)5.2 (3.3–9.7)5.2 (2.6–8.8)0.787.0 (4.8–12.3)4.3 (2.7–7.6)6.0 (3.6–11.3)3.3 (1.5–6.0)<0.0001
EuroSCORE II2.7 (1.4–5.0)3.4 (1.9–6)2.0 (1.2–4.7)0.035.0 (3.6–7.5)2.1 (1.3–4.3)2.1 (1.4–5.0)1.9 (0.9–3.4)<0.0001
STS predicted risk of mortality3.0 (1.6–5.5)3.6 (2.2–6.1)2.3 (1.1–4.8)0.054.9 (3.0–7.3)3.0 (1.6–4.9)2.3 (1.0–5.1)2.3 (1.3–4.3)0.0008
Charlson comorbidity index3 (1–4)4 (2–5)2 (0–4)<0.00014 (2–4)3 (2–5)1 (0–3)3 (1–5)<0.0001
Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 2324 (70)196 (86)128 (54)<0.000186 (85)110 (86)63 (44)65 (68)<0.0001
CharacteristicsOverall (N = 466)Functional (N = 229)Organic (N = 237)P-valueFunctional—prior left-sided heart valve surgery (N = 101)Functional—isolated (N = 128)Organic—infective endocarditis (N = 142)Organic—other (N = 95)P-value
Age (years)60 ± 1666 ± 1153 ± 18<0.000166 ± 1167 ± 1249 ± 1761 ± 15<0.0001
Female gender229 (49)137 (60)92 (39)<0.000164 (63)73 (57)43 (30)49 (52)<0.0001
Body mass index (kg/m2)25 ± 527 ± 624 ± 5<0.000126 ± 527 ± 624 ± 525 ± 5<0.0001
Hypertension190 (41)120 (52)70 (30)<0.000147 (47)73 (57)31 (22)39 (41)<0.0001
Diabetes mellitus62 (13)40 (18)22 (9)0.00919 (19)21 (16)13 (9)9 (10)0.07
Chronic lung disease51 (11)30 (13)21 (9)0.1414 (14)16 (13)13 (9)8 (8)0.52
Peripheral vascular disease16 (3)5 (2)11 (5)0.151 (1)4 (3)8 (6)3 (3)0.27
Prior stroke41 (9)24 (11)17 (7)0.2115 (15)9 (7)9 (6)8 (8)0.10
Prior left-sided heart valve surgery111 (24)101 (44)10 (4)<0.0001101 (100)0 (0)1 (1)9 (10)<0.0001
Coronary artery disease59 (13)35 (15)24 (10)0.0920 (20)15 (12)12 (9)12 (13)0.07
Chronic kidney disease154 (33)100 (44)54 (23)<0.000152 (51)48 (38)28 (20)26 (27)<0.0001
Chronic liver disease54 (12)31 (14)23 (10)0.2016 (16)15 (12)10 (7)13 (14)0.17
Liver cirrhosis11 (2)7 (3)4 (2)0.335 (5)2 (2)0 (0)4 (4)0.04
Permanent pacemaker104 (22)54 (24)50 (21)0.5226 (26)28 (22)29 (20)21 (22)0.80
Hospitalization for congestive heart failure (<1 year)163 (35)121 (53)42 (18)<0.000157 (56)64 (50)16 (11)26 (27)<0.0001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)125 ± 19126 ± 19124 ± 200.36123 ± 19127 ± 19122 ± 19127 ± 200.10
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)73 ± 1372 ± 1373 ± 140.3570 ± 1374 ± 1373 ± 1474 ± 140.16
NYHA functional Class III–IV217 (47)136 (59)81 (34)<0.000162 (61)74 (58)41 (29)40 (42)<0.0001
Right-sided heart failure signs264 (57)166 (73)98 (41)<0.000180 (79)86 (67)48 (34)50 (53)<0.0001
Ascites39 (8)29 (13)10 (4)0.00115 (15)14 (11)1 (1)9 (10)0.0005
Loop diuretics301/451 (67)194/222 (87)107/229 (47)<0.000196 (95)98/121 (81)49/136 (36)58/93 (62)<0.0001
Daily dose of loop diuretics (mg)40 (0–80)60 (40–120)0 (0–40)0.000680 (40–125)40 (20–120)0 (0–40)40 (0–80)0.003
Atrial fibrillation180 (39)142 (62)39 (17)<0.000166 (65)76 (59)17 (12)22 (23)<0.0001
Haemoglobin (g/dL)12.3 ± 2.312.5 ± 2.012.1 ± 2.50.0612.1 ± 1.912.8 ± 2.011.2 ± 2.513.4 ± 2.0<0.0001
Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min)72 ± 3961 ± 2982 ± 44<0.000160 ± 2860 ± 3093 ± 4967 ± 32<0.0001
Elevated ALT and/or AST73/393 (19)31/195 (16)42/198 (21)0.1814/91 (15)17/104 (16)31/112 (28)11/86 (13)0.03
Elevated GGT and/or ALP189/397 (48)102/195 (52)87/202 (43)0.0755/93 (59)47/102 (46)50/120 (42)37/82 (45)0.07
Total bilirubin (µmol/L)15.8 ± 11.917 ± 1315 ± 110.0719.1 ± 14.215.1 ± 11.413.3 ± 10.416.6 ± 11.20.006
Prothrombin time74 ± 2067 ± 2180 ± 16<0.000162 ± 2271 ± 1978 ± 1682 ± 16<0.0001
LV ejection fraction58 ± 957 ± 859 ± 90.0355 ± 958 ± 859 ± 1059 ± 80.02
RV basal diameter (mm)48 ± 1152 ± 1144 ± 9<0.000152 ± 751 ±1242 ± 949 ± 8<0.0001
Moderate/severe RV dilatation245/450 (54)148/222 (67)97/228 (43)<0.000162/99 (63)86/123 (70)48/135 (36)49/93 (53)<0.0001
TAPSE (mm)20 ± 718 ± 522 ± 7<0.000116 ± 419 ± 623 ± 822 ± 7<0.0001
Peak systolic annular velocity S′ (cm/s)11.9 ± 4.110.7 ± 3.113.5 ± 4.6<0.00019.5 ± 2.111.6 ± 3.513.8 ± 4.913.2 ± 4.1<0.0001
Moderate/severe RV dysfunction76/446 (17)50/221 (23)26/225 (12)0.00231/98 (32)19/123 (15)14/134 (10)12/91 (13)0.0002
Tricuspid annulus diameter in apical four-chamber view (mm)44 ± 947 ± 741 ± 9<0.000146 ± 747 ± 738 ± 944 ± 9<0.0001
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg)40 ± 1143 ± 1137 ± 10<0.000143 ± 1043 ± 1236 ± 9.139 ± 11<0.0001
Logistic EuroSCORE5.2 (3.0–9.2)5.2 (3.3–9.7)5.2 (2.6–8.8)0.787.0 (4.8–12.3)4.3 (2.7–7.6)6.0 (3.6–11.3)3.3 (1.5–6.0)<0.0001
EuroSCORE II2.7 (1.4–5.0)3.4 (1.9–6)2.0 (1.2–4.7)0.035.0 (3.6–7.5)2.1 (1.3–4.3)2.1 (1.4–5.0)1.9 (0.9–3.4)<0.0001
STS predicted risk of mortality3.0 (1.6–5.5)3.6 (2.2–6.1)2.3 (1.1–4.8)0.054.9 (3.0–7.3)3.0 (1.6–4.9)2.3 (1.0–5.1)2.3 (1.3–4.3)0.0008
Charlson comorbidity index3 (1–4)4 (2–5)2 (0–4)<0.00014 (2–4)3 (2–5)1 (0–3)3 (1–5)<0.0001
Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 2324 (70)196 (86)128 (54)<0.000186 (85)110 (86)63 (44)65 (68)<0.0001

Values are number of patients (percentage), mean ± standard deviation, or median (inter-quartiles).

ALP, alkaline phosphatases; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; LV, left ventricle; NYHA, New York Heart Association; RV, right ventricle; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; STS, Society of Thoracic Surgery.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the population overall and according to the aetiology of the tricuspid regurgitation

CharacteristicsOverall (N = 466)Functional (N = 229)Organic (N = 237)P-valueFunctional—prior left-sided heart valve surgery (N = 101)Functional—isolated (N = 128)Organic—infective endocarditis (N = 142)Organic—other (N = 95)P-value
Age (years)60 ± 1666 ± 1153 ± 18<0.000166 ± 1167 ± 1249 ± 1761 ± 15<0.0001
Female gender229 (49)137 (60)92 (39)<0.000164 (63)73 (57)43 (30)49 (52)<0.0001
Body mass index (kg/m2)25 ± 527 ± 624 ± 5<0.000126 ± 527 ± 624 ± 525 ± 5<0.0001
Hypertension190 (41)120 (52)70 (30)<0.000147 (47)73 (57)31 (22)39 (41)<0.0001
Diabetes mellitus62 (13)40 (18)22 (9)0.00919 (19)21 (16)13 (9)9 (10)0.07
Chronic lung disease51 (11)30 (13)21 (9)0.1414 (14)16 (13)13 (9)8 (8)0.52
Peripheral vascular disease16 (3)5 (2)11 (5)0.151 (1)4 (3)8 (6)3 (3)0.27
Prior stroke41 (9)24 (11)17 (7)0.2115 (15)9 (7)9 (6)8 (8)0.10
Prior left-sided heart valve surgery111 (24)101 (44)10 (4)<0.0001101 (100)0 (0)1 (1)9 (10)<0.0001
Coronary artery disease59 (13)35 (15)24 (10)0.0920 (20)15 (12)12 (9)12 (13)0.07
Chronic kidney disease154 (33)100 (44)54 (23)<0.000152 (51)48 (38)28 (20)26 (27)<0.0001
Chronic liver disease54 (12)31 (14)23 (10)0.2016 (16)15 (12)10 (7)13 (14)0.17
Liver cirrhosis11 (2)7 (3)4 (2)0.335 (5)2 (2)0 (0)4 (4)0.04
Permanent pacemaker104 (22)54 (24)50 (21)0.5226 (26)28 (22)29 (20)21 (22)0.80
Hospitalization for congestive heart failure (<1 year)163 (35)121 (53)42 (18)<0.000157 (56)64 (50)16 (11)26 (27)<0.0001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)125 ± 19126 ± 19124 ± 200.36123 ± 19127 ± 19122 ± 19127 ± 200.10
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)73 ± 1372 ± 1373 ± 140.3570 ± 1374 ± 1373 ± 1474 ± 140.16
NYHA functional Class III–IV217 (47)136 (59)81 (34)<0.000162 (61)74 (58)41 (29)40 (42)<0.0001
Right-sided heart failure signs264 (57)166 (73)98 (41)<0.000180 (79)86 (67)48 (34)50 (53)<0.0001
Ascites39 (8)29 (13)10 (4)0.00115 (15)14 (11)1 (1)9 (10)0.0005
Loop diuretics301/451 (67)194/222 (87)107/229 (47)<0.000196 (95)98/121 (81)49/136 (36)58/93 (62)<0.0001
Daily dose of loop diuretics (mg)40 (0–80)60 (40–120)0 (0–40)0.000680 (40–125)40 (20–120)0 (0–40)40 (0–80)0.003
Atrial fibrillation180 (39)142 (62)39 (17)<0.000166 (65)76 (59)17 (12)22 (23)<0.0001
Haemoglobin (g/dL)12.3 ± 2.312.5 ± 2.012.1 ± 2.50.0612.1 ± 1.912.8 ± 2.011.2 ± 2.513.4 ± 2.0<0.0001
Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min)72 ± 3961 ± 2982 ± 44<0.000160 ± 2860 ± 3093 ± 4967 ± 32<0.0001
Elevated ALT and/or AST73/393 (19)31/195 (16)42/198 (21)0.1814/91 (15)17/104 (16)31/112 (28)11/86 (13)0.03
Elevated GGT and/or ALP189/397 (48)102/195 (52)87/202 (43)0.0755/93 (59)47/102 (46)50/120 (42)37/82 (45)0.07
Total bilirubin (µmol/L)15.8 ± 11.917 ± 1315 ± 110.0719.1 ± 14.215.1 ± 11.413.3 ± 10.416.6 ± 11.20.006
Prothrombin time74 ± 2067 ± 2180 ± 16<0.000162 ± 2271 ± 1978 ± 1682 ± 16<0.0001
LV ejection fraction58 ± 957 ± 859 ± 90.0355 ± 958 ± 859 ± 1059 ± 80.02
RV basal diameter (mm)48 ± 1152 ± 1144 ± 9<0.000152 ± 751 ±1242 ± 949 ± 8<0.0001
Moderate/severe RV dilatation245/450 (54)148/222 (67)97/228 (43)<0.000162/99 (63)86/123 (70)48/135 (36)49/93 (53)<0.0001
TAPSE (mm)20 ± 718 ± 522 ± 7<0.000116 ± 419 ± 623 ± 822 ± 7<0.0001
Peak systolic annular velocity S′ (cm/s)11.9 ± 4.110.7 ± 3.113.5 ± 4.6<0.00019.5 ± 2.111.6 ± 3.513.8 ± 4.913.2 ± 4.1<0.0001
Moderate/severe RV dysfunction76/446 (17)50/221 (23)26/225 (12)0.00231/98 (32)19/123 (15)14/134 (10)12/91 (13)0.0002
Tricuspid annulus diameter in apical four-chamber view (mm)44 ± 947 ± 741 ± 9<0.000146 ± 747 ± 738 ± 944 ± 9<0.0001
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg)40 ± 1143 ± 1137 ± 10<0.000143 ± 1043 ± 1236 ± 9.139 ± 11<0.0001
Logistic EuroSCORE5.2 (3.0–9.2)5.2 (3.3–9.7)5.2 (2.6–8.8)0.787.0 (4.8–12.3)4.3 (2.7–7.6)6.0 (3.6–11.3)3.3 (1.5–6.0)<0.0001
EuroSCORE II2.7 (1.4–5.0)3.4 (1.9–6)2.0 (1.2–4.7)0.035.0 (3.6–7.5)2.1 (1.3–4.3)2.1 (1.4–5.0)1.9 (0.9–3.4)<0.0001
STS predicted risk of mortality3.0 (1.6–5.5)3.6 (2.2–6.1)2.3 (1.1–4.8)0.054.9 (3.0–7.3)3.0 (1.6–4.9)2.3 (1.0–5.1)2.3 (1.3–4.3)0.0008
Charlson comorbidity index3 (1–4)4 (2–5)2 (0–4)<0.00014 (2–4)3 (2–5)1 (0–3)3 (1–5)<0.0001
Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 2324 (70)196 (86)128 (54)<0.000186 (85)110 (86)63 (44)65 (68)<0.0001
CharacteristicsOverall (N = 466)Functional (N = 229)Organic (N = 237)P-valueFunctional—prior left-sided heart valve surgery (N = 101)Functional—isolated (N = 128)Organic—infective endocarditis (N = 142)Organic—other (N = 95)P-value
Age (years)60 ± 1666 ± 1153 ± 18<0.000166 ± 1167 ± 1249 ± 1761 ± 15<0.0001
Female gender229 (49)137 (60)92 (39)<0.000164 (63)73 (57)43 (30)49 (52)<0.0001
Body mass index (kg/m2)25 ± 527 ± 624 ± 5<0.000126 ± 527 ± 624 ± 525 ± 5<0.0001
Hypertension190 (41)120 (52)70 (30)<0.000147 (47)73 (57)31 (22)39 (41)<0.0001
Diabetes mellitus62 (13)40 (18)22 (9)0.00919 (19)21 (16)13 (9)9 (10)0.07
Chronic lung disease51 (11)30 (13)21 (9)0.1414 (14)16 (13)13 (9)8 (8)0.52
Peripheral vascular disease16 (3)5 (2)11 (5)0.151 (1)4 (3)8 (6)3 (3)0.27
Prior stroke41 (9)24 (11)17 (7)0.2115 (15)9 (7)9 (6)8 (8)0.10
Prior left-sided heart valve surgery111 (24)101 (44)10 (4)<0.0001101 (100)0 (0)1 (1)9 (10)<0.0001
Coronary artery disease59 (13)35 (15)24 (10)0.0920 (20)15 (12)12 (9)12 (13)0.07
Chronic kidney disease154 (33)100 (44)54 (23)<0.000152 (51)48 (38)28 (20)26 (27)<0.0001
Chronic liver disease54 (12)31 (14)23 (10)0.2016 (16)15 (12)10 (7)13 (14)0.17
Liver cirrhosis11 (2)7 (3)4 (2)0.335 (5)2 (2)0 (0)4 (4)0.04
Permanent pacemaker104 (22)54 (24)50 (21)0.5226 (26)28 (22)29 (20)21 (22)0.80
Hospitalization for congestive heart failure (<1 year)163 (35)121 (53)42 (18)<0.000157 (56)64 (50)16 (11)26 (27)<0.0001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)125 ± 19126 ± 19124 ± 200.36123 ± 19127 ± 19122 ± 19127 ± 200.10
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)73 ± 1372 ± 1373 ± 140.3570 ± 1374 ± 1373 ± 1474 ± 140.16
NYHA functional Class III–IV217 (47)136 (59)81 (34)<0.000162 (61)74 (58)41 (29)40 (42)<0.0001
Right-sided heart failure signs264 (57)166 (73)98 (41)<0.000180 (79)86 (67)48 (34)50 (53)<0.0001
Ascites39 (8)29 (13)10 (4)0.00115 (15)14 (11)1 (1)9 (10)0.0005
Loop diuretics301/451 (67)194/222 (87)107/229 (47)<0.000196 (95)98/121 (81)49/136 (36)58/93 (62)<0.0001
Daily dose of loop diuretics (mg)40 (0–80)60 (40–120)0 (0–40)0.000680 (40–125)40 (20–120)0 (0–40)40 (0–80)0.003
Atrial fibrillation180 (39)142 (62)39 (17)<0.000166 (65)76 (59)17 (12)22 (23)<0.0001
Haemoglobin (g/dL)12.3 ± 2.312.5 ± 2.012.1 ± 2.50.0612.1 ± 1.912.8 ± 2.011.2 ± 2.513.4 ± 2.0<0.0001
Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min)72 ± 3961 ± 2982 ± 44<0.000160 ± 2860 ± 3093 ± 4967 ± 32<0.0001
Elevated ALT and/or AST73/393 (19)31/195 (16)42/198 (21)0.1814/91 (15)17/104 (16)31/112 (28)11/86 (13)0.03
Elevated GGT and/or ALP189/397 (48)102/195 (52)87/202 (43)0.0755/93 (59)47/102 (46)50/120 (42)37/82 (45)0.07
Total bilirubin (µmol/L)15.8 ± 11.917 ± 1315 ± 110.0719.1 ± 14.215.1 ± 11.413.3 ± 10.416.6 ± 11.20.006
Prothrombin time74 ± 2067 ± 2180 ± 16<0.000162 ± 2271 ± 1978 ± 1682 ± 16<0.0001
LV ejection fraction58 ± 957 ± 859 ± 90.0355 ± 958 ± 859 ± 1059 ± 80.02
RV basal diameter (mm)48 ± 1152 ± 1144 ± 9<0.000152 ± 751 ±1242 ± 949 ± 8<0.0001
Moderate/severe RV dilatation245/450 (54)148/222 (67)97/228 (43)<0.000162/99 (63)86/123 (70)48/135 (36)49/93 (53)<0.0001
TAPSE (mm)20 ± 718 ± 522 ± 7<0.000116 ± 419 ± 623 ± 822 ± 7<0.0001
Peak systolic annular velocity S′ (cm/s)11.9 ± 4.110.7 ± 3.113.5 ± 4.6<0.00019.5 ± 2.111.6 ± 3.513.8 ± 4.913.2 ± 4.1<0.0001
Moderate/severe RV dysfunction76/446 (17)50/221 (23)26/225 (12)0.00231/98 (32)19/123 (15)14/134 (10)12/91 (13)0.0002
Tricuspid annulus diameter in apical four-chamber view (mm)44 ± 947 ± 741 ± 9<0.000146 ± 747 ± 738 ± 944 ± 9<0.0001
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg)40 ± 1143 ± 1137 ± 10<0.000143 ± 1043 ± 1236 ± 9.139 ± 11<0.0001
Logistic EuroSCORE5.2 (3.0–9.2)5.2 (3.3–9.7)5.2 (2.6–8.8)0.787.0 (4.8–12.3)4.3 (2.7–7.6)6.0 (3.6–11.3)3.3 (1.5–6.0)<0.0001
EuroSCORE II2.7 (1.4–5.0)3.4 (1.9–6)2.0 (1.2–4.7)0.035.0 (3.6–7.5)2.1 (1.3–4.3)2.1 (1.4–5.0)1.9 (0.9–3.4)<0.0001
STS predicted risk of mortality3.0 (1.6–5.5)3.6 (2.2–6.1)2.3 (1.1–4.8)0.054.9 (3.0–7.3)3.0 (1.6–4.9)2.3 (1.0–5.1)2.3 (1.3–4.3)0.0008
Charlson comorbidity index3 (1–4)4 (2–5)2 (0–4)<0.00014 (2–4)3 (2–5)1 (0–3)3 (1–5)<0.0001
Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 2324 (70)196 (86)128 (54)<0.000186 (85)110 (86)63 (44)65 (68)<0.0001

Values are number of patients (percentage), mean ± standard deviation, or median (inter-quartiles).

ALP, alkaline phosphatases; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; LV, left ventricle; NYHA, New York Heart Association; RV, right ventricle; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; STS, Society of Thoracic Surgery.

Tricuspid regurgitation mechanism was functional in 229 patients (49%) and organic in 237 patients (51%). Among patients with functional TR, 101 patients (22%) had a prior left-sided heart valve surgery and 128 (27%) patients had an isolated functional TR (Figure 1). Among the 237 patients with organic disease, TR was due to infective endocarditis in 142 patients (31%) and to other causes in 95 patients (20%). Patients with functional TR were older, more frequently female and presented more often with CV risk factors and comorbidities than those with organic TR. Importantly clinical presentation was also more severe. Patients with functional TR presented more advanced signs of HF signs, worse laboratory results, and more often moderate/severe RV enlargement and dysfunction than patients with organic TR. The Charlson index was twice as high in patients with functional TR than in patients with organic TR. As expected, TV infective endocarditis affected a younger mainly male population with infrequent CV risk factors. Clinical and echocardiographic RV parameters also tended to be less severe than those of the three other groups. Comparisons of baseline characteristics between functional and organic TR and between TR aetiologies are presented in Table 1.

In-hospital outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve surgery

A TV repair was performed in 193 patients (41%) and a replacement in 273 patients (59%) (Supplementary material online, Figure S2). A TV replacement was more often performed when the TV surgery was performed isolated than concomitant with other cardiac interventions (59% vs. 4%, P < 0.0001). In most cases of ITVS, a bioprosthetic valve was used (n = 264, 57%) while a mechanical valve was implanted in only nine patients (2%). Surgery was urgent in 102 patients (22%). Overall, in-hospital mortality rate was 10% (n = 48) and major post-operative complications rate was 31% (n = 145) (Table 2 and Figure 3). In the post-operative period, 87 patients (19%) presented a cardiogenic shock, 36 patients (8%) a tamponade, and 123 (26%) acute renal failure, of whom 49 (11%) requiring dialysis, 40 (9%) a prolonged mechanical ventilation, and 84 (18%) needed a definitive pacemaker. The median intensive care unit and total lengths of stay were 4 days (2–8) and 18 days (12–29), respectively. Residual TR was rare and 98% of patients alive at discharge presented with less than moderate TR.

In-hospital mortality and major post-operative complications rates overall and according to the aetiology of the tricuspid regurgitation.
Figure 3

In-hospital mortality and major post-operative complications rates overall and according to the aetiology of the tricuspid regurgitation.

Table 2

In-hospital outcome overall and according to the aetiology of the tricuspid regurgitation

CharacteristicsOverall (N = 466)Functional (N = 229)Organic (N = 237)P-valueFunctional—prior left-sided heart valve surgery (N = 101)Functional—isolated (N = 128)Organic—infective endocarditis (N = 142)Organic—other (N = 95)P-value
Urgent surgery102 (22)14 (6)88 (37)<0.00015 (5)9 (7)83 (58)5 (5)<0.0001
TV replacement273 (57)135 (59)138 (58)0.8776 (75)59 (46)78 (55)60 (63)<0.0001
In-hospital death48 (10)33 (14)15 (6)0.00416 (16)17 (13)7 (5)8 (8)0.02
Major post-operative complications145 (31)94 (41)51 (22)<0.000148 (48)46 (36)29 (20)22 (23)<0.0001
Shock107 (23)73 (32)34 (14)<0.000139 (39)34 (27)21 (15)13 (14)0.0004
Cardiogenic shock87 (19)63 (28)24 (10)<0.000132 (32)31 (24)12 (8)12 (13)0.0001
Tamponade36 (8)26 (11)10 (4)0.00413 (13)13 (10)5 (4)5 (5)0.03
Acute renal failure123 (26)74 (32)49 (21)0.00434 (34)40 (31)32 (23)17 (18)0.01
Acute renal failure requiring dialysis49 (11)32 (14)17 (7)0.0217 (17)15 (12)11 (8)6 (6)0.02
Prolonged mechanical ventilation40 (9)24 (10)16 (7)0.1514 (14)10 (8)11 (8)5 (5)0.13
New permanent pacemaker implantation84 (18)37 (16)47 (20)0.3016 (16)21 (16)29 (20)18 (19)0.43
Length of stay in intensive care unit (days)4 (2–8)4 (2–9)3 (2–7)0.045 (3–11)4 (2–7)3 (2–7)4 (2–7)0.002
Length of stay in hospital (days)18 (12–29)17 (12–29)18 (12–29)0.3522 (15–35)15 (10–25)21 (14–37)15 (11–23)<0.0001
Tricuspid regurgitation ≤2 at discharge408 (98)192 (98)216 (97)0.6683 (98)109 (98)130 (92)86 (99)0.58
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure at discharge (mmHg)36 ± 1140 ± 1231 ± 8<0.000140 ± 1140 ± 1329 ± 833 ± 9<0.0001
CharacteristicsOverall (N = 466)Functional (N = 229)Organic (N = 237)P-valueFunctional—prior left-sided heart valve surgery (N = 101)Functional—isolated (N = 128)Organic—infective endocarditis (N = 142)Organic—other (N = 95)P-value
Urgent surgery102 (22)14 (6)88 (37)<0.00015 (5)9 (7)83 (58)5 (5)<0.0001
TV replacement273 (57)135 (59)138 (58)0.8776 (75)59 (46)78 (55)60 (63)<0.0001
In-hospital death48 (10)33 (14)15 (6)0.00416 (16)17 (13)7 (5)8 (8)0.02
Major post-operative complications145 (31)94 (41)51 (22)<0.000148 (48)46 (36)29 (20)22 (23)<0.0001
Shock107 (23)73 (32)34 (14)<0.000139 (39)34 (27)21 (15)13 (14)0.0004
Cardiogenic shock87 (19)63 (28)24 (10)<0.000132 (32)31 (24)12 (8)12 (13)0.0001
Tamponade36 (8)26 (11)10 (4)0.00413 (13)13 (10)5 (4)5 (5)0.03
Acute renal failure123 (26)74 (32)49 (21)0.00434 (34)40 (31)32 (23)17 (18)0.01
Acute renal failure requiring dialysis49 (11)32 (14)17 (7)0.0217 (17)15 (12)11 (8)6 (6)0.02
Prolonged mechanical ventilation40 (9)24 (10)16 (7)0.1514 (14)10 (8)11 (8)5 (5)0.13
New permanent pacemaker implantation84 (18)37 (16)47 (20)0.3016 (16)21 (16)29 (20)18 (19)0.43
Length of stay in intensive care unit (days)4 (2–8)4 (2–9)3 (2–7)0.045 (3–11)4 (2–7)3 (2–7)4 (2–7)0.002
Length of stay in hospital (days)18 (12–29)17 (12–29)18 (12–29)0.3522 (15–35)15 (10–25)21 (14–37)15 (11–23)<0.0001
Tricuspid regurgitation ≤2 at discharge408 (98)192 (98)216 (97)0.6683 (98)109 (98)130 (92)86 (99)0.58
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure at discharge (mmHg)36 ± 1140 ± 1231 ± 8<0.000140 ± 1140 ± 1329 ± 833 ± 9<0.0001

Values are number of patients (percentage), mean ± standard deviation, or median (inter-quartiles). Major post-operative complications were defined as death, shock, tamponade, acute renal failure requiring dialysis, or prolonged mechanical ventilation (>72 h).

TV, tricuspid valve.

Table 2

In-hospital outcome overall and according to the aetiology of the tricuspid regurgitation

CharacteristicsOverall (N = 466)Functional (N = 229)Organic (N = 237)P-valueFunctional—prior left-sided heart valve surgery (N = 101)Functional—isolated (N = 128)Organic—infective endocarditis (N = 142)Organic—other (N = 95)P-value
Urgent surgery102 (22)14 (6)88 (37)<0.00015 (5)9 (7)83 (58)5 (5)<0.0001
TV replacement273 (57)135 (59)138 (58)0.8776 (75)59 (46)78 (55)60 (63)<0.0001
In-hospital death48 (10)33 (14)15 (6)0.00416 (16)17 (13)7 (5)8 (8)0.02
Major post-operative complications145 (31)94 (41)51 (22)<0.000148 (48)46 (36)29 (20)22 (23)<0.0001
Shock107 (23)73 (32)34 (14)<0.000139 (39)34 (27)21 (15)13 (14)0.0004
Cardiogenic shock87 (19)63 (28)24 (10)<0.000132 (32)31 (24)12 (8)12 (13)0.0001
Tamponade36 (8)26 (11)10 (4)0.00413 (13)13 (10)5 (4)5 (5)0.03
Acute renal failure123 (26)74 (32)49 (21)0.00434 (34)40 (31)32 (23)17 (18)0.01
Acute renal failure requiring dialysis49 (11)32 (14)17 (7)0.0217 (17)15 (12)11 (8)6 (6)0.02
Prolonged mechanical ventilation40 (9)24 (10)16 (7)0.1514 (14)10 (8)11 (8)5 (5)0.13
New permanent pacemaker implantation84 (18)37 (16)47 (20)0.3016 (16)21 (16)29 (20)18 (19)0.43
Length of stay in intensive care unit (days)4 (2–8)4 (2–9)3 (2–7)0.045 (3–11)4 (2–7)3 (2–7)4 (2–7)0.002
Length of stay in hospital (days)18 (12–29)17 (12–29)18 (12–29)0.3522 (15–35)15 (10–25)21 (14–37)15 (11–23)<0.0001
Tricuspid regurgitation ≤2 at discharge408 (98)192 (98)216 (97)0.6683 (98)109 (98)130 (92)86 (99)0.58
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure at discharge (mmHg)36 ± 1140 ± 1231 ± 8<0.000140 ± 1140 ± 1329 ± 833 ± 9<0.0001
CharacteristicsOverall (N = 466)Functional (N = 229)Organic (N = 237)P-valueFunctional—prior left-sided heart valve surgery (N = 101)Functional—isolated (N = 128)Organic—infective endocarditis (N = 142)Organic—other (N = 95)P-value
Urgent surgery102 (22)14 (6)88 (37)<0.00015 (5)9 (7)83 (58)5 (5)<0.0001
TV replacement273 (57)135 (59)138 (58)0.8776 (75)59 (46)78 (55)60 (63)<0.0001
In-hospital death48 (10)33 (14)15 (6)0.00416 (16)17 (13)7 (5)8 (8)0.02
Major post-operative complications145 (31)94 (41)51 (22)<0.000148 (48)46 (36)29 (20)22 (23)<0.0001
Shock107 (23)73 (32)34 (14)<0.000139 (39)34 (27)21 (15)13 (14)0.0004
Cardiogenic shock87 (19)63 (28)24 (10)<0.000132 (32)31 (24)12 (8)12 (13)0.0001
Tamponade36 (8)26 (11)10 (4)0.00413 (13)13 (10)5 (4)5 (5)0.03
Acute renal failure123 (26)74 (32)49 (21)0.00434 (34)40 (31)32 (23)17 (18)0.01
Acute renal failure requiring dialysis49 (11)32 (14)17 (7)0.0217 (17)15 (12)11 (8)6 (6)0.02
Prolonged mechanical ventilation40 (9)24 (10)16 (7)0.1514 (14)10 (8)11 (8)5 (5)0.13
New permanent pacemaker implantation84 (18)37 (16)47 (20)0.3016 (16)21 (16)29 (20)18 (19)0.43
Length of stay in intensive care unit (days)4 (2–8)4 (2–9)3 (2–7)0.045 (3–11)4 (2–7)3 (2–7)4 (2–7)0.002
Length of stay in hospital (days)18 (12–29)17 (12–29)18 (12–29)0.3522 (15–35)15 (10–25)21 (14–37)15 (11–23)<0.0001
Tricuspid regurgitation ≤2 at discharge408 (98)192 (98)216 (97)0.6683 (98)109 (98)130 (92)86 (99)0.58
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure at discharge (mmHg)36 ± 1140 ± 1231 ± 8<0.000140 ± 1140 ± 1329 ± 833 ± 9<0.0001

Values are number of patients (percentage), mean ± standard deviation, or median (inter-quartiles). Major post-operative complications were defined as death, shock, tamponade, acute renal failure requiring dialysis, or prolonged mechanical ventilation (>72 h).

TV, tricuspid valve.

Factors associated with in-hospital death in univariate analysis are presented in Table 3. In-hospital mortality was associated with older age and more severe presentation based on clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic assessment such as history of CHF, severe symptoms (NYHA Class III/IV), presence of ascites, cirrhosis, dose of loop diuretics, kidney impairment, comorbidity index, and surgical risk scores and degree of RV dilatation and dysfunction. Functional TR was also associated with higher in-hospital mortality rate than organic aetiology (14% vs. 6%, P = 0.004) while history of previous left-sided heart valve surgery was not (P = 0.10). Mortality rates according to TR aetiology were 16% for functional TR after left-sided valve surgery, 13% for isolated functional TR, 5% for infective endocarditis, and 8% for organic TR of other aetiology (P = 0.02) (Figure 3). In multivariate analysis, independent determinants of in-hospital death were NYHA Class III/IV [OR = 2.7 (1.2–6.1), P = 0.01], moderate/severe RV dysfunction [OR = 2.6 (1.2–5.8), P = 0.02], lower prothrombin time [OR = 0.98 (0.96–0.99), P = 0.008], and with borderline statistical significance, presence of right CHF signs [OR = 2.4 (0.9–6.5), P = 0.06] while mechanism was not [OR = 0.7 (0.3–1.8), P = 0.88]. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure ≥50 mmHg was also of borderline statistical significance [OR = 2.5 (0.9–7.0), P = 0.08]. Independent determinants of major in-hospital complications in multivariate analysis were similar, with moderate/severe RV dysfunction [OR = 2.2 (1.2–4.1], P = 0.01], lower glomerular filtration rate [OR = 0.98 (0.96–0.99), P = 0.006], lower prothrombin time [OR = 0.98 (0.97–0.99), P = 0.02], and with borderline statistical significance, NYHA Class III/IV [OR = 1.6 (0.95–1.1), P = 0.07], AF [OR = 1.7 (0.9–3.1), P = 0.08] and moderate/severe RV dilatation [OR = 1.6 (0.95–2.6), P = 0.08]. Excluding patients with permanent pacemaker at the time of the surgery did not change our results. Our results also remained similar after the exclusion of patients with infective endocarditis or if the prothrombin time was not included into the model.

Table 3

Univariate logistic regression for predictors of in-hospital death in adult patients undergoing an isolated tricuspid valve surgery and odd ratios (95% confidence interval) for the variables entered in the final model

CharacteristicsIn-hospital death (N = 48)Discharged alive (N = 418)P-valueOdd ratios (95% CI)P-value
Age (years)68 ± 1259 ± 16<0.00011.01 (0.97–1.04)0.63
Female gender24 (50)205 (49)0.90
Body mass index (kg/m2)26 ± 625 ± 50.61
Hypertension24 (50)166 (40)0.17
Diabetes mellitus6 (13)56 (13)0.86
Chronic lung disease8 (17)43 (10)0.18
Peripheral vascular disease2 (4)14 (3)0.77
Prior stroke3 (6)38 (9)0.51
Prior left-sided heart valve surgery16 (33)95 (23)0.10
Coronary artery disease9 (19)50 (12)0.18
Chronic kidney disease20 (42)134 (32)0.18
Chronic liver disease12 (25)42 (10)0.002
Liver cirrhosis3 (6)8 (2)0.008
Prior pacemaker16 (33)88 (21)0.05
Hospitalization for congestive heart failure (<1 year)25 (52)128 (33)0.009
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)122 ± 17125 ± 200.49
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)70 ± 1473 ± 130.20
NYHA functional Class III–IV33 (69)184 (44)0.0012.7 (1.2–6.1)0.01
Right-sided heart failure signs41 (85)223 (53)<0.00012.4 (0.9–6.5)0.06
Ascites10 (21)29 (7)0.001
Loop diuretics41/47 (87)260/404 (64)0.002
Daily dose of loop diuretics (mg)80 (40–250)40 (0–80)<0.0001
Atrial fibrillation27 (56)154 (37)0.0091.5 (0.6–3.3)0.37
Haemoglobin (g/dL)11.9 ± 1.812.3 ± 2.30.21
Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min)58 ± 3073 ± 400.020.99 (0.98–1.01)0.41
Elevated ALT and/or AST11/38 (29)62/355 (18)0.08
Elevated GGT and/or ALP25/38 (26)164/359 (46)0.02
Total bilirubin (µmol/L)27.3 ± 24.014.6 ± 9.1<0.0001
Prothrombin time62 ± 1975 ± 19<0.00010.98 (0.96–0.99)0.008
Left ventricular ejection fraction54 ± 958 ± 90.005
RV basal diameter (mm)54 ± 847 ± 120.001
Moderate/severe RV dilatation33 (69)212/402 (53)0.041.38 (0.65–2.94)0.40
TAPSE (mm)17 ± 620 ± 70.01
Peak systolic annular velocity S′ (cm/s)10.7 ± 3.312.1 ± 4.10.07
Moderate/severe RV dysfunction16 (33)60/398 (15)0.0022.6 (1.2–5.8)0.02
Tricuspid annulus diameter in apical four-chamber view46 ± 844 ± 90.29
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg)45 ± 1040 ± 110.01
Functional aetiology of the tricuspid regurgitation33 (69)196 (47)0.0040.7 (0.3–1.8)0.88
Logistic EuroSCORE7.6 (4.4–15.9)5 (2.8–8.6)<0.0001
EuroSCORE II3.7 (2.5–6.7)2.5 (1.3–5)0.004
STS predicted risk of mortality4.3 (2.4–7.1)2.9 (1.6–5.2)0.005
Charlson comorbidity index4 (3–6)3 (1–4)<0.0001
Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 243 (90)280 (67)0.001
Urgent surgery9 (19)93 (22)0.58
Tricuspid valve replacement33 (69)240 (57)0.13
CharacteristicsIn-hospital death (N = 48)Discharged alive (N = 418)P-valueOdd ratios (95% CI)P-value
Age (years)68 ± 1259 ± 16<0.00011.01 (0.97–1.04)0.63
Female gender24 (50)205 (49)0.90
Body mass index (kg/m2)26 ± 625 ± 50.61
Hypertension24 (50)166 (40)0.17
Diabetes mellitus6 (13)56 (13)0.86
Chronic lung disease8 (17)43 (10)0.18
Peripheral vascular disease2 (4)14 (3)0.77
Prior stroke3 (6)38 (9)0.51
Prior left-sided heart valve surgery16 (33)95 (23)0.10
Coronary artery disease9 (19)50 (12)0.18
Chronic kidney disease20 (42)134 (32)0.18
Chronic liver disease12 (25)42 (10)0.002
Liver cirrhosis3 (6)8 (2)0.008
Prior pacemaker16 (33)88 (21)0.05
Hospitalization for congestive heart failure (<1 year)25 (52)128 (33)0.009
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)122 ± 17125 ± 200.49
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)70 ± 1473 ± 130.20
NYHA functional Class III–IV33 (69)184 (44)0.0012.7 (1.2–6.1)0.01
Right-sided heart failure signs41 (85)223 (53)<0.00012.4 (0.9–6.5)0.06
Ascites10 (21)29 (7)0.001
Loop diuretics41/47 (87)260/404 (64)0.002
Daily dose of loop diuretics (mg)80 (40–250)40 (0–80)<0.0001
Atrial fibrillation27 (56)154 (37)0.0091.5 (0.6–3.3)0.37
Haemoglobin (g/dL)11.9 ± 1.812.3 ± 2.30.21
Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min)58 ± 3073 ± 400.020.99 (0.98–1.01)0.41
Elevated ALT and/or AST11/38 (29)62/355 (18)0.08
Elevated GGT and/or ALP25/38 (26)164/359 (46)0.02
Total bilirubin (µmol/L)27.3 ± 24.014.6 ± 9.1<0.0001
Prothrombin time62 ± 1975 ± 19<0.00010.98 (0.96–0.99)0.008
Left ventricular ejection fraction54 ± 958 ± 90.005
RV basal diameter (mm)54 ± 847 ± 120.001
Moderate/severe RV dilatation33 (69)212/402 (53)0.041.38 (0.65–2.94)0.40
TAPSE (mm)17 ± 620 ± 70.01
Peak systolic annular velocity S′ (cm/s)10.7 ± 3.312.1 ± 4.10.07
Moderate/severe RV dysfunction16 (33)60/398 (15)0.0022.6 (1.2–5.8)0.02
Tricuspid annulus diameter in apical four-chamber view46 ± 844 ± 90.29
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg)45 ± 1040 ± 110.01
Functional aetiology of the tricuspid regurgitation33 (69)196 (47)0.0040.7 (0.3–1.8)0.88
Logistic EuroSCORE7.6 (4.4–15.9)5 (2.8–8.6)<0.0001
EuroSCORE II3.7 (2.5–6.7)2.5 (1.3–5)0.004
STS predicted risk of mortality4.3 (2.4–7.1)2.9 (1.6–5.2)0.005
Charlson comorbidity index4 (3–6)3 (1–4)<0.0001
Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 243 (90)280 (67)0.001
Urgent surgery9 (19)93 (22)0.58
Tricuspid valve replacement33 (69)240 (57)0.13

ALP, alkaline phosphatases; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CI, confidence interval; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; NYHA, New York Heart Association; RV, right ventricle; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; STS, Society of Thoracic Surgery.

Table 3

Univariate logistic regression for predictors of in-hospital death in adult patients undergoing an isolated tricuspid valve surgery and odd ratios (95% confidence interval) for the variables entered in the final model

CharacteristicsIn-hospital death (N = 48)Discharged alive (N = 418)P-valueOdd ratios (95% CI)P-value
Age (years)68 ± 1259 ± 16<0.00011.01 (0.97–1.04)0.63
Female gender24 (50)205 (49)0.90
Body mass index (kg/m2)26 ± 625 ± 50.61
Hypertension24 (50)166 (40)0.17
Diabetes mellitus6 (13)56 (13)0.86
Chronic lung disease8 (17)43 (10)0.18
Peripheral vascular disease2 (4)14 (3)0.77
Prior stroke3 (6)38 (9)0.51
Prior left-sided heart valve surgery16 (33)95 (23)0.10
Coronary artery disease9 (19)50 (12)0.18
Chronic kidney disease20 (42)134 (32)0.18
Chronic liver disease12 (25)42 (10)0.002
Liver cirrhosis3 (6)8 (2)0.008
Prior pacemaker16 (33)88 (21)0.05
Hospitalization for congestive heart failure (<1 year)25 (52)128 (33)0.009
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)122 ± 17125 ± 200.49
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)70 ± 1473 ± 130.20
NYHA functional Class III–IV33 (69)184 (44)0.0012.7 (1.2–6.1)0.01
Right-sided heart failure signs41 (85)223 (53)<0.00012.4 (0.9–6.5)0.06
Ascites10 (21)29 (7)0.001
Loop diuretics41/47 (87)260/404 (64)0.002
Daily dose of loop diuretics (mg)80 (40–250)40 (0–80)<0.0001
Atrial fibrillation27 (56)154 (37)0.0091.5 (0.6–3.3)0.37
Haemoglobin (g/dL)11.9 ± 1.812.3 ± 2.30.21
Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min)58 ± 3073 ± 400.020.99 (0.98–1.01)0.41
Elevated ALT and/or AST11/38 (29)62/355 (18)0.08
Elevated GGT and/or ALP25/38 (26)164/359 (46)0.02
Total bilirubin (µmol/L)27.3 ± 24.014.6 ± 9.1<0.0001
Prothrombin time62 ± 1975 ± 19<0.00010.98 (0.96–0.99)0.008
Left ventricular ejection fraction54 ± 958 ± 90.005
RV basal diameter (mm)54 ± 847 ± 120.001
Moderate/severe RV dilatation33 (69)212/402 (53)0.041.38 (0.65–2.94)0.40
TAPSE (mm)17 ± 620 ± 70.01
Peak systolic annular velocity S′ (cm/s)10.7 ± 3.312.1 ± 4.10.07
Moderate/severe RV dysfunction16 (33)60/398 (15)0.0022.6 (1.2–5.8)0.02
Tricuspid annulus diameter in apical four-chamber view46 ± 844 ± 90.29
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg)45 ± 1040 ± 110.01
Functional aetiology of the tricuspid regurgitation33 (69)196 (47)0.0040.7 (0.3–1.8)0.88
Logistic EuroSCORE7.6 (4.4–15.9)5 (2.8–8.6)<0.0001
EuroSCORE II3.7 (2.5–6.7)2.5 (1.3–5)0.004
STS predicted risk of mortality4.3 (2.4–7.1)2.9 (1.6–5.2)0.005
Charlson comorbidity index4 (3–6)3 (1–4)<0.0001
Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 243 (90)280 (67)0.001
Urgent surgery9 (19)93 (22)0.58
Tricuspid valve replacement33 (69)240 (57)0.13
CharacteristicsIn-hospital death (N = 48)Discharged alive (N = 418)P-valueOdd ratios (95% CI)P-value
Age (years)68 ± 1259 ± 16<0.00011.01 (0.97–1.04)0.63
Female gender24 (50)205 (49)0.90
Body mass index (kg/m2)26 ± 625 ± 50.61
Hypertension24 (50)166 (40)0.17
Diabetes mellitus6 (13)56 (13)0.86
Chronic lung disease8 (17)43 (10)0.18
Peripheral vascular disease2 (4)14 (3)0.77
Prior stroke3 (6)38 (9)0.51
Prior left-sided heart valve surgery16 (33)95 (23)0.10
Coronary artery disease9 (19)50 (12)0.18
Chronic kidney disease20 (42)134 (32)0.18
Chronic liver disease12 (25)42 (10)0.002
Liver cirrhosis3 (6)8 (2)0.008
Prior pacemaker16 (33)88 (21)0.05
Hospitalization for congestive heart failure (<1 year)25 (52)128 (33)0.009
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)122 ± 17125 ± 200.49
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)70 ± 1473 ± 130.20
NYHA functional Class III–IV33 (69)184 (44)0.0012.7 (1.2–6.1)0.01
Right-sided heart failure signs41 (85)223 (53)<0.00012.4 (0.9–6.5)0.06
Ascites10 (21)29 (7)0.001
Loop diuretics41/47 (87)260/404 (64)0.002
Daily dose of loop diuretics (mg)80 (40–250)40 (0–80)<0.0001
Atrial fibrillation27 (56)154 (37)0.0091.5 (0.6–3.3)0.37
Haemoglobin (g/dL)11.9 ± 1.812.3 ± 2.30.21
Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min)58 ± 3073 ± 400.020.99 (0.98–1.01)0.41
Elevated ALT and/or AST11/38 (29)62/355 (18)0.08
Elevated GGT and/or ALP25/38 (26)164/359 (46)0.02
Total bilirubin (µmol/L)27.3 ± 24.014.6 ± 9.1<0.0001
Prothrombin time62 ± 1975 ± 19<0.00010.98 (0.96–0.99)0.008
Left ventricular ejection fraction54 ± 958 ± 90.005
RV basal diameter (mm)54 ± 847 ± 120.001
Moderate/severe RV dilatation33 (69)212/402 (53)0.041.38 (0.65–2.94)0.40
TAPSE (mm)17 ± 620 ± 70.01
Peak systolic annular velocity S′ (cm/s)10.7 ± 3.312.1 ± 4.10.07
Moderate/severe RV dysfunction16 (33)60/398 (15)0.0022.6 (1.2–5.8)0.02
Tricuspid annulus diameter in apical four-chamber view46 ± 844 ± 90.29
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg)45 ± 1040 ± 110.01
Functional aetiology of the tricuspid regurgitation33 (69)196 (47)0.0040.7 (0.3–1.8)0.88
Logistic EuroSCORE7.6 (4.4–15.9)5 (2.8–8.6)<0.0001
EuroSCORE II3.7 (2.5–6.7)2.5 (1.3–5)0.004
STS predicted risk of mortality4.3 (2.4–7.1)2.9 (1.6–5.2)0.005
Charlson comorbidity index4 (3–6)3 (1–4)<0.0001
Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 243 (90)280 (67)0.001
Urgent surgery9 (19)93 (22)0.58
Tricuspid valve replacement33 (69)240 (57)0.13

ALP, alkaline phosphatases; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CI, confidence interval; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; NYHA, New York Heart Association; RV, right ventricle; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; STS, Society of Thoracic Surgery.

Mid-term outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve surgery

Follow-up was 90% complete. During an overall mean follow-up duration of 3.1 ± 2.7 years [median 2.6 years (0.8–4.9), up to 11.8 years], there were 40 additional deaths (all-cause) and 138 patients were readmitted for CV reasons including 64 patients for CHF. Overall rates of survival, survival free of CV readmission, and survival free of HF readmission were 86%, 73%, and 79% at 1 year and 75%, 44%, and 62% at 5 years, respectively (Figure 4A, Take home figure). Event rates among the 371 patients alive at 30 days and with available follow-up were 98%, 83%, and 90% at 1 year and 85%, 50%, and 70% at 5 years (Figure 4B). Survival, survival free of CV readmission, and survival free of HF readmission curves according to TR aetiology are presented in Figure 5 and were significantly worse for functional than for organic TR (all P < 0.01). Mortality and CV events according to TR aetiologies were also significantly different when subdivided into functional TR after left-sided valve surgery, isolated functional TR, organic TR due to infective endocarditis, and organic TR due to other aetiologies (all P < 0.05) (Supplementary material online, Figure S3). However, outcome of both functional groups was not different (all P > 0.40).

Overall event rates (A) and a landmark analysis for patients alive at 30 days (B). The figure displays Kaplan–Meier curves of all-cause mortality (in grey), all-cause mortality or readmission for cardiovascular reasons (in yellow), and all-cause mortality or readmission for heart failure (in brown).
Figure 4

Overall event rates (A) and a landmark analysis for patients alive at 30 days (B). The figure displays Kaplan–Meier curves of all-cause mortality (in grey), all-cause mortality or readmission for cardiovascular reasons (in yellow), and all-cause mortality or readmission for heart failure (in brown).

Event rates according to the aetiology (functional or organic) of the tricuspid regurgitation. The figure displays Kaplan–Meier curves of (A) survival (from all-cause death), (B) survival (from all-cause death) free of cardiovascular readmission, and (C) survival (from all-cause death) free of heart failure readmission for functional (in red) and organic (in purple) aetiology.
Figure 5

Event rates according to the aetiology (functional or organic) of the tricuspid regurgitation. The figure displays Kaplan–Meier curves of (A) survival (from all-cause death), (B) survival (from all-cause death) free of cardiovascular readmission, and (C) survival (from all-cause death) free of heart failure readmission for functional (in red) and organic (in purple) aetiology.

Isolated tricuspid valve surgery is associated with high mortality and morbidity, both in hospital and during follow-up, predicted by the severity of the pre-operative clinical, biological, and echocardiographic presentation but not by tricuspid regurgitation mechanism. NYHA, New York Heart Association.
Take home figure

Isolated tricuspid valve surgery is associated with high mortality and morbidity, both in hospital and during follow-up, predicted by the severity of the pre-operative clinical, biological, and echocardiographic presentation but not by tricuspid regurgitation mechanism. NYHA, New York Heart Association.

In the multivariate analysis, independent determinants of all-cause mortality were NYHA Class III/IV [HR = 1.7 (1.1–2.8), P = 0.04], presence of right CHF signs [OR = 1.8 (1.01–3.3), P < 0.05], lower prothrombin time [OR = 0.98 (0.97–0.99), P = 0.04], and with borderline statistical significance, functional aetiology [OR = 0.6 (0.3–1.1), P = 0.07], lower glomerular filtration rate [OR = 0.99 (0.98–1.01), P = 0.09], and moderate/severe RV dilatation [OR = 1.6 (0.9–2.7), P = 0.08]. Similar determinants were observed for all-cause mortality or CV readmissions {NYHA Class III/IV [OR = 1.4 (1.0–2.0), P = 0.05], presence of right CHF signs [OR = 1.8 (1.2–2.6), P = 0.002], lower prothrombin time [OR = 0.99 (0.99–0.99), P = 0.03], and moderate/severe RV dilatation [OR = 1.6 (1.1–2.3), P = 0.006]} and for all-cause mortality or HF readmissions {NYHA Class III/IV [OR = 1.7 (1.1–2.3), P = 0.02], presence of right CHF signs [OR = 1.9 (1.2–3.1), P = 0.006], and moderate/severe RV dilatation [OR = 2.0 (1.3–3.1), P = 0.002]}. Functional aetiology was not an independent determinant of mortality or (CV or HF) readmissions [OR = 0.9 (0.6–1.4), P = 0.67 and OR = 0.9 (0.5–1.3), P = 0.37, respectively].

Discussion

In this retrospective series, we collected all cases of TV surgery performed at 12 French tertiary centres between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017 and assessed the clinical, biological, and echocardiographic presentation and immediate and mid-term outcomes of ITVS. Main results of the present study can be summarized as follows: (i) although total numbers had increased over time, TV surgery remained seldom performed; (ii) TV surgery was mainly concomitant with another surgical procedure and rarely isolated; (iii) ITVS was performed in approximately half of cases for functional TR (after left-sided valve surgery in 46% and for isolated functional TR in 54%) and in the other half for organic TR (due to infective endocarditis in 60%); (iv) patients were often referred late in the course of the disease with severe symptoms, frequent impairment of liver and kidney functions, and advanced RV consequences; (v) in-hospital mortality and CV events rates were high with long in-hospital lengths of stay; (vi) although in-hospital mortality and morbidity were significantly worse for functional TR than for organic TR, outcome was more related to the severity of the clinical presentation observed in this subgroup than to TR mechanism or aetiology, which portended limited independent prognostic information; and (vii) mid-term outcomes showed substantial rates of death and readmissions also predicted by the severity of the presentation.

Using the PMSI, a mandatory French administrative database, we were able to identify all TV surgeries performed at 12 French tertiary centres over the past 10 years. Based on our previous nationwide study, these 12 centres accounted for 40% of all TV surgery performed in France.12 The number of TV surgeries increased over time, from less to 300 in 2007 to close to 800 in 2017, but remained far from the number of aortic valve replacements (>10 000/year) or mitral valve interventions (>6000/year) currently performed in France.20 The vast majority of TV interventions consisted of a TV repair performed concomitant with another procedure, mostly with left-sided valve surgery. Both the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend performance of a combined TV surgery during left-sided valve surgery in case of moderate–severe TR or TV annulus diameter >40 mm.21  ,  22 Assuming that the number of mitral valve surgeries has remained stable during the study period, the present study suggests a wider adoption of these recommendations but also suggests that a substantial number of patients with qualifying indication for combined TV interventions remain neglected.

Recent epidemiological studies have shown that TR prevalence was similar to that of aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation.2  ,  23 In the community, prevalence of significant—moderate or severe—TR was estimated to be as high as 0.55% and up to 3% after 75 years.1 Despite its high prevalence and its strong association with poor outcomes,3–5  ,  9  ,  24  ,  25 TR is often left untreated. Intervention (surgery or transcatheter) is the only curative treatment for severe TR and medical therapy should be considered as only palliative. The magnitude of the gap between the estimated TR prevalence and the observed rates of interventions for TR (∼40/years ITVS in the present study, 100–120/year at the nationwide level) is thus striking. Management of isolated severe TR often relies on two contradictory beliefs: one that severe TR is a benign condition and the other that ITVS is a high-risk surgery. In clinical practice, patients are often initially not referred for an intervention arguing that it is too early until they are deemed at too high risk and denied surgery due to a too advanced disease. The literature is fairly consistent showing that in-hospital mortality of ITVS is ∼10% and has remained stable over time.10  ,  12 The present study confirms these findings with a similar 10% in-hospital mortality rate. In addition, we also showed that mid-term mortality and CV event rates were substantial. At 5 years, one quarter of patients are dead, more than half are either dead or admitted for CV reasons, and one-third dead or admitted for HF.

Importantly, mortality rates are highly variable according to patients’ characteristics. In contrast to previous studies including ours, we were able to obtain much more details regarding TR aetiology and clinical presentation including laboratory and echocardiographic results and to evaluate the determinants of outcomes after ITVS. Most patients presented with advanced disease, severe CHF, kidney, liver, or RV dilatation/dysfunction. It is worth noting that the Charlson index in the present study was more than twice as high as the Charlson index observed in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the early days.20 Functional TR accounted for half of ITVS performed and was associated with mortality and rates twice as high as organic TR. However, the observed worse outcome in patients with functional TR was mainly due to a more severe clinical, biological, and echocardiographic pre-operative presentation. Thus, NYHA class, presence of right CHF signs, prothrombin time, or moderate/severe RV dilatation or dysfunction were important determinants of outcomes whereas TR mechanism or aetiology was not when adjusted on patients’ characteristics including infective endocarditis as these patients presented milder TR consequences. Similarly, previous left-sided heart valve surgery and TV replacement (vs. repair) were markers of advanced disease but were not independent determinants of the outcome. It is worth noting that repair rates for ITVS were similar than in the USA, but use of mechanical valves was much lower (one-third of TV replacements in the USA compared to only 3% in the present study).10 Thus, in-hospital mortality of patients with ascites and RV dysfunction were 26% and 22%, respectively. Importance of RV size and function and of their combination has also been recently highlighted in a large series of patients with functional TR.26 Results of ITVS are even more striking considering that the population was relatively young and that TV surgery is relatively simple. Interestingly, there is no dedicated surgical risk scoring for ITVS and those for mitral valve surgery markedly underestimated the observed mortality rates. Altogether, our results suggest that the paradigm should be shifted: the high mortality and morbidity observed after ITVS are more related to patients’ late referral with advanced symptoms, kidney and liver dysfunction, and RV consequences than to the surgical intervention per se.

Strengths and limitations of the present study need to be discussed. First, we retrospectively collected TV surgery cases performed at 12 French centres. However, identification of cases at these centres was performed using the PMSI, a mandatory database considered exhaustive, and we thus captured all cases done at these centres. In addition, based on our previous study, we were able to estimate that our 12 centres accounted for 40% of all ITVS performed in France insuring generalizability of our findings. Second, in contrast to previously published studies using administrative databases, which lack granularity, and with limited follow-up, we were able to provide in-depth assessment of patients’ presentation including laboratories and echocardiographic results. Such level of details, as well as our sample size, unique in the literature, enabled us to identify the mechanism of TR and determinants of in-hospital and mid-term outcomes. Third, echocardiographic evaluation relied on centres’ evaluation and not on a centralized laboratory. Assessment of RV dilatation or dysfunction was based on an integrative approach performed by each centre, and we could not provide specific thresholds for RV dilatation or dysfunction that could have guided surgical indications. Nevertheless, as an internal validation, RV basal diameter was markedly different between patients classified as presenting a moderate/severe RV dilatation compared to those who did not (54 ± 8 vs. 42 ± 10 mm, P < 0.0001), and TAPSE and Doppler tissue imaging peak systolic annular velocity S′ were markedly different between patients who presented with moderate/severe RV dysfunction compared to those who did not (13 ± 4 vs. 21 ± 6 mm and 7.6 ± 1.5 vs. 12.4 ± 3.2 cm/s, respectively, both P < 0.0001). Fourth, as a retrospective study, not all laboratory and echocardiographic parameters could be collected for all patients. However, main parameters of interest were available in the vast majority of our population. In addition, we did not collect information regarding right catheterization performance and results. It is probable that patients with high systolic pulmonary pressure would be those with the highest event rates and those who might benefit the less from the intervention. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure measured using echocardiography was of borderline statistical significance but was only available in 274 patients (59%) and may be underestimated in patients with severe/laminar TR. Fifth, TA diameter was not predictive of outcome in the overall population and in the subgroup of patients with functional TR. These findings should be interpreted in light of the baseline characteristics of our population as most patients presented with significant TA enlargement while prognostic value of TA diameter has been shown in less selected patients.26 Sixth, assessment of TR aetiology and mechanism may be challenging in few patients in particular in the presence of permanent pacemaker. However, our results remained unchanged after exclusion of the 104 patients with pacemaker. Finally, we could only infer that the high mortality and morbidity observed in the present study are related to a late surgical referral and that an earlier surgery would have improved the outcome. However, the limited impact of TR aetiology on in-hospital and mid-term outcomes compared to the weight of the clinical presentation including laboratory and echocardiographic TR consequences strongly supports this hypothesis. Future randomized controlled trials will evaluate the impact of TR correction on outcome and identify patients who will benefit the most of an intervention.

With regard to clinical implications, the present study highlights the need to prevent the occurrence of late TR after left-sided surgery and the importance of timely referral for TV interventions. As mentioned above, although debated, a more aggressive approach on TV intervention at the time of the left-sided surgery should be advocated to prevent the occurrence of late TR and the need for a repeat intervention seldom performed in real life. The high mortality and morbidity rates observed during ITVS for functional TR after left-sided valve surgery should be regarded as a strong incentive for the performance of concomitant TV surgery when indicated. On the other hand, timely referral for the intervention of patients with severe TR is also critical. Current guidelines21  ,  22 are quite vague with no Class I recommendation for intervention, but as for other valvular diseases, patients with severe TR should be referred earlier in the course of the disease avoiding the performance of TV intervention in patients with advanced disease at a desperate stage. In this regard, evaluation of RV size and function, often challenging especially in the setting of severe TR, should be refined. It is worth noting that we have illuminated only part of the problem as many patients with severe TR are often conservatively managed and denied any intervention. Thus, mortality and morbidity related to TR are likely underestimated. In a near future, the development of transcatheter therapies may represent an alternative to surgery and will further push for an early intervention if proved to be safe and efficient. As for functional mitral regurgitation,27  ,  28 patients’ selection will be critical and ‘early’ intervention before the occurrence of irreversible consequences will be key. Impact of TR correction on outcome has been recently disputed.29  ,  30 A later referral in surgical than transcatheter series may explain the contradictory results reported in the literature. Compared to our population, patients who underwent a transcatheter intervention were older (77 years), the vast majority presented with functional TR in AF (90% and 83%, respectively) with concomitant 3+/4+ mitral regurgitation while pulmonary pressure was similar. Patients referred for surgery were of similar age, similarly symptomatic than our functional TR subset but presented with higher systolic pulmonary pressures.

Conclusion

In this large multicentre series, we collected all cases of TV surgery performed at 12 French tertiary centres between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017 and assessed the clinical presentation and immediate and mid-term outcomes of ITVS. Compared to aortic or mitral valve surgery, tricuspid surgery remained uncommon and mainly performed at the time of left-sided surgery. Isolated TV surgery was rare, associated with high mortality and morbidity, both in hospital and during follow-up, predicted by the severity of the clinical presentation, while TR mechanism/aetiology had limited impact. Our results suggest adopting a more aggressive approach for TV intervention, either at the time of left-sided surgery to prevent the occurrence of late TR, or intervening earlier in the course of the disease for patients with severe isolated TR, whatever the mechanism, before the occurrence of advanced/irreversible consequences and intractable HF.

Data sharing

Data sharing with qualified researchers may be considered after submission of a proposal to Docteur Dreyfus.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal online.

Conflict of interest: B.I. received consultant fees from Edwards Lifesciences. J.-F.O. received consultant fees for Abbott Vascular, Carmat, Delacroix-Chevalier, Landanger, Medtronic, and Sorin. D.M.-Z. received consultant fees from Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors declared no conflict of interest.

References

1

Topilsky
 
Y
,
Maltais
 
S
,
Medina Inojosa
 
J
,
Oguz
 
D
,
Michelena
 
H
,
Maalouf
 
J
,
Mahoney
 
DW
,
Enriquez-Sarano
 
M.
 
Burden of tricuspid regurgitation in patients diagnosed in the community setting
.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
 
2019
;
12
:
433
442
.

2

Stuge
 
O
,
Liddicoat
 
J.
 
Emerging opportunities for cardiac surgeons within structural heart disease
.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
 
2006
;
132
:
1258
1261
.

3

Benfari
 
G
,
Antoine
 
C
,
Miller
 
WL
,
Thapa
 
P
,
Topilsky
 
Y
,
Rossi
 
A
,
Michelena
 
HI
,
Pislaru
 
S
,
Enriquez-Sarano
 
M.
 
Excess mortality associated with functional tricuspid regurgitation complicating heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
.
Circulation
 
2019
;
140
:
196
206
.

4

Messika-Zeitoun
 
D
,
Thomson
 
H
,
Bellamy
 
M
,
Scott
 
C
,
Tribouilloy
 
C
,
Dearani
 
J
,
Tajik
 
AJ
,
Schaff
 
H
,
Enriquez-Sarano
 
M.
 
Medical and surgical outcome of tricuspid regurgitation caused by flail leaflets
.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
 
2004
;
128
:
296
302
.

5

Topilsky
 
Y
,
Inojosa
 
JM
,
Benfari
 
G
,
Vaturi
 
O
,
Maltais
 
S
,
Michelena
 
H
,
Mankad
 
S
,
Enriquez-Sarano
 
M.
 
Clinical presentation and outcome of tricuspid regurgitation in patients with systolic dysfunction
.
Eur Heart J
 
2018
;
39
:
3584
3592
.

6

Koelling
 
TM
,
Aaronson
 
KD
,
Cody
 
RJ
,
Bach
 
DS
,
Armstrong
 
WF.
 
Prognostic significance of mitral regurgitation and tricuspid regurgitation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction
.
Am Heart J
 
2002
;
144
:
524
529
.

7

Nath
 
J
,
Foster
 
E
,
Heidenreich
 
PA.
 
Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survival
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 
2004
;
43
:
405
409
.

8

Neuhold
 
S
,
Huelsmann
 
M
,
Pernicka
 
E
,
Graf
 
A
,
Bonderman
 
D
,
Adlbrecht
 
C
,
Binder
 
T
,
Maurer
 
G
,
Pacher
 
R
,
Mascherbauer
 
J.
 
Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on survival in patients with chronic heart failure: unexpected findings of a long-term observational study
.
Eur Heart J
 
2013
;
34
:
844
852
.

9

Wang
 
N
,
Fulcher
 
J
,
Abeysuriya
 
N
,
McGrady
 
M
,
Wilcox
 
I
,
Celermajer
 
D
,
Lal
 
S.
 
Tricuspid regurgitation is associated with increased mortality independent of pulmonary pressures and right heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Eur Heart J
 
2019
;
40
:
476
484
.

10

Zack
 
CJ
,
Fender
 
EA
,
Chandrashekar
 
P
,
Reddy
 
YNV
,
Bennett
 
CE
,
Stulak
 
JM
,
Miller
 
VM
,
Nishimura
 
RA.
 
National trends and outcomes in isolated tricuspid valve surgery
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 
2017
;
70
:
2953
2960
.

11

De Meester
 
P
,
Van De Bruaene
 
A
,
Voigt
 
JU
,
Herijgers
 
P
,
Budts
 
W.
 
Outcome and determinants of prognosis in patients undergoing isolated tricuspid valve surgery: retrospective single center analysis
.
Int J Cardiol
 
2014
;
175
:
333
339
.

12

Dreyfus
 
J
,
Ghalem
 
N
,
Garbarz
 
E
,
Cimadevilla
 
C
,
Nataf
 
P
,
Vahanian
 
A
,
Caranhac
 
G
,
Messika-Zeitoun
 
D.
 
Timing of referral of patients with severe isolated tricuspid valve regurgitation to surgeons (from a French Nationwide Database)
.
Am J Cardiol
 
2018
;
122
:
323
326
.

15

Nashef
 
SA
,
Roques
 
F
,
Michel
 
P
,
Gauducheau
 
E
,
Lemeshow
 
S
,
Salamon
 
R.
 
European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE)
.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
 
1999
;
16
:
9
13
.

16

O'Brien
 
SM
,
Shahian
 
DM
,
Filardo
 
G
,
Ferraris
 
VA
,
Haan
 
CK
,
Rich
 
JB
,
Normand
 
SL
,
DeLong
 
ER
,
Shewan
 
CM
,
Dokholyan
 
RS
,
Peterson
 
ED
,
Edwards
 
FH
,
Anderson
 
RP.
 
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2—isolated valve surgery
.
Ann Thorac Surg
 
2009
;
88
(1 Suppl):
S23
S42
.

17

Dreyfus
 
J
,
Durand-Viel
 
G
,
Raffoul
 
R
,
Alkhoder
 
S
,
Hvass
 
U
,
Radu
 
C
,
Al-Attar
 
N
,
Ghodbhane
 
W
,
Attias
 
D
,
Nataf
 
P
,
Vahanian
 
A
,
Messika-Zeitoun
 
D.
 
Comparison of 2-dimensional, 3-dimensional, and surgical measurements of the tricuspid annulus size: clinical implications
.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
 
2015
;
8
:
e003241
.

18

Zoghbi
 
WA
,
Adams
 
D
,
Bonow
 
RO
,
Enriquez-Sarano
 
M
,
Foster
 
E
,
Grayburn
 
PA
,
Hahn
 
RT
,
Han
 
Y
,
Hung
 
J
,
Lang
 
RM
,
Little
 
SH
,
Shah
 
DJ
,
Shernan
 
S
,
Thavendiranathan
 
P
,
Thomas
 
JD
,
Weissman
 
NJ.
 
Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
 
2017
;
30
:
303
371
.

19

Zoghbi
 
WA
,
Enriquez-Sarano
 
M
,
Foster
 
E
,
Grayburn
 
PA
,
Kraft
 
CD
,
Levine
 
RA
,
Nihoyannopoulos
 
P
,
Otto
 
CM
,
Quinones
 
MA
,
Rakowski
 
H
,
Stewart
 
WJ
,
Waggoner
 
A
,
Weissman
 
NJ.
 
Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography
.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
 
2003
;
16
:
777
802
.

20

Nguyen
 
V
,
Michel
 
M
,
Eltchaninoff
 
H
,
Gilard
 
M
,
Dindorf
 
C
,
Iung
 
B
,
Mossialos
 
E
,
Cribier
 
A
,
Vahanian
 
A
,
Chevreul
 
K
,
Messika-Zeitoun
 
D.
 
Implementation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in France
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 
2018
;
71
:
1614
1627
.

21

Baumgartner
 
H
,
Falk
 
V
,
Bax
 
JJ
,
De Bonis
 
M
,
Hamm
 
C
,
Holm
 
PJ
,
Iung
 
B
,
Lancellotti
 
P
,
Lansac
 
E
,
Rodriguez Muñoz
 
D
,
Rosenhek
 
R
,
Sjögren
 
J
,
Tornos Mas
 
P
,
Vahanian
 
A
,
Walther
 
T
,
Wendler
 
O
,
Windecker
 
S
,
Zamorano
 
JL
; ESC Scientific Document Group.
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: the Task Force for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)
.
Eur Heart J
 
2017
;
38
:
2739
2791
.

22

Nishimura
 
RA
,
Otto
 
CM
,
Bonow
 
RO
,
Carabello
 
BA
,
Erwin
 
JP
,
Fleisher
 
LA
,
Jneid
 
H
,
Mack
 
MJ
,
McLeod
 
CJ
,
O’Gara
 
PT
,
Rigolin
 
VH
,
Sundt
 
TM
,
Thompson
 
A.
 
2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the Management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines
.
Circulation
 
2017
;
135
:
e1159
e1195
.

23

Nkomo
 
VT
,
Gardin
 
JM
,
Skelton
 
TN
,
Gottdiener
 
JS
,
Scott
 
CG
,
Enriquez-Sarano
 
M.
 
Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study
.
Lancet
 
2006
;
368
:
1005
1011
.

24

Prihadi
 
EA
,
van der Bijl
 
P
,
Gursoy
 
E
,
Abou
 
R
,
Mara Vollema
 
E
,
Hahn
 
RT
,
Stone
 
GW
,
Leon
 
MB
,
Ajmone Marsan
 
N
,
Delgado
 
V
,
Bax
 
JJ.
 
Development of significant tricuspid regurgitation over time and prognostic implications: new insights into natural history
.
Eur Heart J
 
2018
;
39
:
3574
3581
.

25

Topilsky
 
Y
,
Nkomo
 
VT
,
Vatury
 
O
,
Michelena
 
HI
,
Letourneau
 
T
,
Suri
 
RM
,
Pislaru
 
S
,
Park
 
S
,
Mahoney
 
DW
,
Biner
 
S
,
Enriquez-Sarano
 
M.
 
Clinical outcome of isolated tricuspid regurgitation
.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
 
2014
;
7
:
1185
1194
.

26

Dietz
 
MF
,
Prihadi
 
EA
,
van der Bijl
 
P
,
Goedemans
 
L
,
Mertens
 
BJA
,
Gursoy
 
E
,
van Genderen
 
OS
,
Ajmone Marsan
 
N
,
Delgado
 
V
,
Bax
 
JJ.
 
Prognostic implications of right ventricular remodeling and function in patients with significant secondary tricuspid regurgitation
.
Circulation
 
2019
;
140
:
836
845
.

27

Obadia
 
JF
,
Messika-Zeitoun
 
D
,
Leurent
 
G
,
Iung
 
B
,
Bonnet
 
G
,
Piriou
 
N
,
Lefevre
 
T
,
Piot
 
C
,
Rouleau
 
F
,
Carrie
 
D
,
Nejjari
 
M
,
Ohlmann
 
P
,
Leclercq
 
F
,
Saint Etienne
 
C
,
Teiger
 
E
,
Leroux
 
L
,
Karam
 
N
,
Michel
 
N
,
Gilard
 
M
,
Donal
 
E
,
Trochu
 
JN
,
Cormier
 
B
,
Armoiry
 
X
,
Boutitie
 
F
,
Maucort-Boulch
 
D
,
Barnel
 
C
,
Samson
 
G
,
Guerin
 
P
,
Vahanian
 
A
,
Mewton
 
N.
 
Percutaneous repair or medical treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation
.
N Engl J Med
 
2018
;
379
:
2297
2306
.

28

Stone
 
GW
,
Lindenfeld
 
J
,
Abraham
 
WT
,
Kar
 
S
,
Lim
 
DS
,
Mishell
 
JM
,
Whisenant
 
B
,
Grayburn
 
PA
,
Rinaldi
 
M
,
Kapadia
 
SR
,
Rajagopal
 
V
,
Sarembock
 
IJ
,
Brieke
 
A
,
Marx
 
SO
,
Cohen
 
DJ
,
Weissman
 
NJ
,
Mack
 
MJ.
 
Transcatheter mitral-valve repair in patients with heart failure
.
N Engl J Med
 
2018
;
379
:
2307
2318
.

29

Axtell
 
AL
,
Bhambhani
 
V
,
Moonsamy
 
P
,
Healy
 
EW
,
Picard
 
MH
,
Sundt
 
TM
 3rd
,
Wasfy
 
JH.
 
Surgery does not improve survival in patients with isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 
2019
;
74
:
715
725
.

30

Taramasso
 
M
,
Benfari
 
G
,
van der Bijl
 
P
,
Alessandrini
 
H
,
Attinger-Toller
 
A
,
Biasco
 
L
,
Lurz
 
P
,
Braun
 
D
,
Brochet
 
E
,
Connelly
 
KA
,
de Bruijn
 
S
,
Denti
 
P
,
Deuschl
 
F
,
Estevez-Loureiro
 
R
,
Fam
 
N
,
Frerker
 
C
,
Gavazzoni
 
M
,
Hausleiter
 
JR
,
Ho
 
E
,
Juliard
 
JM
,
Kaple
 
R
,
Besler
 
C
,
Kodali
 
S
,
Kreidel
 
F
,
Kuck
 
KH
,
Latib
 
A
,
Lauten
 
A
,
Monivas
 
V
,
Mehr
 
M
,
Muntane-Carol
 
G
,
Nazif
 
T
,
Nickening
 
G
,
Pedrazzini
 
G
,
Philippon
 
F
,
Pozzoli
 
A
,
Praz
 
F
,
Puri
 
R
,
Rodes-Cabau
 
J
,
Scha Fer
 
U
,
Schofer
 
J
,
Sievert
 
H
,
Tang
 
GHL
,
Thiele
 
H
,
Topilsky
 
Y
,
Rommel
 
KP
,
Delgado
 
V
,
Vahanian
 
A
,
Von Bardeleben
 
RS
,
Webb
 
JG
,
Weber
 
M
,
Windecker
 
S
,
Winkel
 
M
,
Zuber
 
M
,
Leon
 
MB
,
Hahn
 
RT
,
Bax
 
JJ
,
Enriquez-Sarano
 
M
,
Maisano
 
F.
 
Transcatheter versus medical treatment of symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 
2019
;
74
:
2998
3008
.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Supplementary data