-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
P. Rio, M. Nogueira, J. Labandeiro, T. Pereira-Da-Silva, A. Timoteo, A. Fiarresga, R. Ramos, D. Cacela, L. De Sousa, R. Cruz Ferreira, Impact of antithrombotic strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome, European Heart Journal, Volume 34, Issue suppl_1, 1 August 2013, P1325, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht308.P1325
- Share Icon Share
Introduction: Recent guidelines for antithrombotic strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were recently published.
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of antithrombotic strategy in real-world AF patients with ACS, in the occurrence of adverse events at one-year follow-up (all-cause mortality, bleeding and thrombotic events).
Methods: Analysis of consecutive patients admitted with ACS included in a single centre registry. We identified patients with AF. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to antithrombotic therapy strategy: group 1 - oral anticoagulation and dual antiplatelet therapy, Group 2 - dual antiplatelet therapy; group 3: oral anticoagulation and single antiplatelet therapy; group 4: single antiplatelet therapy. Baseline patients characteristics of the 4 groups were compared and Kaplan-Meier curves were performed to analysis the occurrence of events over a one-year follow-up.
Results: We analysed 2216 patients with ACS, between 2005 and 2011, of which 140 had AF (mean age 72.7±10.6 years, 60.7% male). The in-hospital mortality was 5.8% (5.4% vs 12.1% in patients with AF, p = 0.002). In AF patients coronary angioplasty was performed in 54% patients, 38.2% with drug-eluting stent and 55.3% with bare-metal stent. The proportion of patients enrolled in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 was 17%, 56%, 13% and 14%, respectively. Mortality was 28.6%, and there were 7.1% of haemorrhagic complications and 17.1% of thrombotic events, during one-year follow-up. There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics or in risk scores (GRACE, CRUSADE, CHADS2 and HAS-BLED). In groups 1 and 2 the presence of ST elevation myocardial infarction and stent implantation were more frequent. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in group 2 (p = 0.021), with no significant differences regarding mortality, thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications, over a period of one year. Although there was no statistical difference in outcome of groups over time (log-rank, p = 0.474), group 1 showed a trend toward lower mortality.
Conclusions: Patients with AF have a substantially higher mortality compared to the global populations of ACS. Antithrombotic therapy strategy had no significant influence on the occurrence of adverse events during one-year follow-up. However, a study in a larger population is needed to confirm these results.
- acute coronary syndromes
- anticoagulation
- antiplatelet agents
- atrial fibrillation
- fibrinolytic agents
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- stents
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- thromboembolism
- hemorrhage
- follow-up
- hospital mortality
- guidelines
- mortality
- thrombus
- metallic stents
- drug-eluting stents
- adverse event
- chads2 score
- has-bled score
- dual anti-platelet therapy