-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Ulf Stenestrand, Stefan K. James, Johan Lindbäck, Ole Fröbert, Jörg Carlsson, Fredrik Scherstén, Tage Nilsson, Bo Lagerqvist, for the SCAAR/SWEDEHEART study group, Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: long-term follow-up in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR), European Heart Journal, Volume 31, Issue 2, January 2010, Pages 177–186, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp424
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Patients with diabetes mellitus have more extensive coronary artery disease, more disease progression, and restenosis. The use of drug-eluting stents (DES) in these patients is widespread, despite uncertain long-term safety and efficacy.
All consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus in Sweden who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were entered into the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) during 2003–06 with complete follow-up for 1–4 years (median 2.5). Patients who received at least one DES (n = 4754) were compared with those who received only bare metal stents (BMS) (n = 4956) at the index procedure. Combined outcome of death or myocardial infarction (MI) showed no difference for DES vs. BMS, relative risk (RR), 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77–1.06]. Myocardial infarction was significantly less common with DES in patients who received only one stent RR, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.66–0.96). The restenosis rate was 50% lower in DES-treated patients RR, 0.50 (95% CI, 0.35–0.70) and was associated with a higher adjusted RR of MI, RR, 5.03 (95% CI, 4.25–5.97). DES was associated with reduced restenosis rates in all subgroups of diabetic patients with the greatest benefit in stent diameters <3 mm or stent length >20 mm. The number of lesions treated with DES to prevent one restenosis ranged from 11 to 47 in various subgroups.
This real-life registry study shows that restenosis was halved by DES in diabetic patients with stable or unstable coronary disease, with similar risk of death or MI up to 4 years compared with BMS.