-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Peter Sever, Björn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, Gareth Beevers, Mark Caulfield, Rory Collins, Sverre Kjeldsen, Arni Kristinsson, Gordon McInnes, Jesper Mehlsen, Markku Nieminem, Eoin O'Brien, Jan Östergren, on behalf of the ASCOT Steering Committee Members, Potential synergy between lipid-lowering and blood-pressure-lowering in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial, European Heart Journal, Volume 27, Issue 24, December 2006, Pages 2982–2988, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl403
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Aims A prespecified objective of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) was to assess whether any synergistic effects were apparent between the lipid-lowering and blood-pressure-lowering regimens in preventing cardiovascular events.
Methods and results A total of 19 257 hypertensive subjects were randomized to an amlodipine-based regimen or an atenolol-based regimen. Of these, 10 305 subjects with total cholesterol ≤6.5 mmol/L were further randomized to atorvastatin 10 mg daily or placebo. In this analysis, the effects of atorvastatin were compared with placebo on coronary heart disease (CHD), cardiovascular and stroke events in those assigned amlodipine-based and atenolol-based regimens. In the ASCOT lipid-lowering arm (LLA), overall, atorvastatin reduced the relative risk of the primary endpoint of non-fatal myocardial infarction and fatal CHD events by 36% (HR 0.64, CI 0.50-0.83, P=0.0005), total cardiovascular events by 21% (HR 0.79, CI 0.69–0.90, P=0.0005), and stroke by 27% (HR 0.73, CI 0.56–0.96, P=0.024). However, atorvastatin reduced the relative risk of CHD events by 53% (HR 0.47, CI 0.32–0.69, P<0.0001) among those allocated the amlodipine-based regimen, and by 16% (HR 0.84, CI 0.60–1.17, p: n.s.) among those allocated the atenolol-based regimen (P=0.025 for heterogeneity). There were no significant differences between the effects of atorvastatin on total cardiovascular events or strokes among those assigned amlodipine (HR 0.73, CI 0.60–0.88, P<0.005 and HR 0.69, CI 0.45–1.06, P: n.s., respectively) or atenolol (HR 0.85, CI 0.71–1.02, P: n.s and HR 0.76, CI 0.53–1.08, P: n.s, respectively). Differences in blood pressure and lipid parameters (placebo corrected) between the two antihypertensive treatment limbs could not account for the differences observed in CHD outcome.
Conclusion These findings of an apparent interaction between atorvastatin and an amlodipine-based regimen in the prevention of CHD events are of borderline significance, and hence generate an hypothesis that merits independent evaluation in other trials.
- antihypertensive agents
- atenolol
- atorvastatin
- myocardial infarction
- amlodipine
- hypertension
- cerebrovascular accident
- blood pressure
- heterogeneity
- cardiovascular system
- limb
- arm
- lipids
- coronary heart disease
- coronary heart disease risk
- cardiovascular event
- total cholesterol
- anglo-scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial
- prevention