-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Jean-Fançois Avierinos, Christophe Tribouilloy, Francesca Bursi, Francesco Grigioni, Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde, Noémie Resseguier, Alexis Théron, Agnes Pasquet, Julie Pradier, Elena Biagini, Andrea Barbieri, Hector Michelena, Giovanni Benfari, Dan Rusinaru, Stéphane Zaffran, David Vancraeynest, Fréderic Collart, Yohann Bohbot, Benjamin Essayagh, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, Degenerative mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet: sex-related differences in presentation, management, and outcomes, European Heart Journal, Volume 45, Issue 26, 7 July 2024, Pages 2306–2316, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae265
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Presentation, outcome, and management of females with degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) are undefined. We analysed sex-specific baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics at referral for DMR due to flail leaflets and subsequent management and outcomes.
In the Mitral Regurgitation International Database (MIDA) international registry, females were compared with males regarding presentation at referral, management, and outcome (survival/heart failure), under medical treatment, post-operatively, and encompassing all follow-up.
At referral, females (n = 650) vs. males (n = 1660) were older with more severe symptoms and higher MIDA score. Smaller cavity diameters belied higher cardiac dimension indexed to body surface area. Under conservative management, excess mortality vs. expected was observed in males [standardized mortality ratio (SMR) 1.45 (1.27–1.65), P < .001] but was higher in females [SMR 2.00 (1.67–2.38), P < .001]. Female sex was independently associated with mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.29 (1.04–1.61), P = .02], cardiovascular mortality [adjusted HR 1.58 (1.14–2.18), P = .007], and heart failure [adjusted HR 1.36 (1.02–1.81), P = .04] under medical management. Females vs. males were less offered surgical correction (72% vs. 80%, P < .001); however, surgical outcome, adjusted for more severe presentation in females, was similar (P ≥ .09). Ultimately, overall outcome throughout follow-up was worse in females who displayed persistent excess mortality vs. expected [SMR 1.31 (1.16–1.47), P < .001], whereas males enjoyed normal life expectancy restoration [SMR 0.92 (0.85–0.99), P = .036].
Females with severe DMR were referred to tertiary centers at a more advanced stage, incurred higher mortality and morbidity under conservative management, and were offered surgery less and later after referral. Ultimately, these sex-related differences yielded persistent excess mortality despite surgery in females with DMR, while males enjoyed restoration of life expectancy, warranting imperative re-evaluation of sex-specific DMR management.

Comparison of severe degenerative mitral regurgitation presentation, management, and outcome between males and females. Females vs. males are less referred to tertiary care centers, at a later stage of severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (left), display more severe outcome under medical management (top middle), and are less referred to mitral repair with later indications (bottom middle) but have similar post-operative outcome when operated. They ultimately incur excess overall mortality under medical and surgical management combined, whereas normal life expectancy is restored in males (right). Black solid line denotes observed survival, dotted lines 95% confidence interval, and straight line expected survival. MIDA, Mitral Regurgitation International Database; SMR, standardized mortality ratio.