Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ventricular assist device support as a bridge to transplant or recovery is a well-established therapy in children on the cardiac transplant waiting list. The goal of this study was to investigate the incidence of and the associated factors for cerebrovascular accidents in paediatric patients supported by a Berlin Heart EXCOR.

METHODS

All patients <19 years of age supported by a Berlin Heart EXCOR between January 2011 and January 2021 from the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support were included.

RESULTS

In total, 230 patients were included. A total of 140 (60.9%) patients had a diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy. 46 patients (20.0%) sustained 55 cerebrovascular accidents, with 70.9% of the episodes within 90 days after the ventricular assist device was implanted. The event rate of cerebrovascular accidents was highest in the first era (0.75). Pump thrombosis and secondary need for a right ventricular assist device were found to be associated with a cerebrovascular accident (hazard ratio 1.998, P = 0.040; hazard ratio 11.300, P = 0.037). At the 1-year follow-up, 44.4% of the patients had received a transplant, 13.1% were weaned after recovery and 24.5% had died. Event rates for mortality showed a significantly decreasing trend.

CONCLUSIONS

Paediatric ventricular assist device support is associated with important adverse events, especially in the early phase after the device is implanted. Pump thrombosis and the need for a secondary right ventricular assist device are associated with cerebrovascular accidents. Furthermore, an encouragingly high rate of recovery in this patient population was shown, and death rates declined. More complete input of data into the registry, especially concerning anticoagulation protocols, would improve the data.

INTRODUCTION

Ventricular assist devices (VAD) have become an important aspect in the treatment of children with end-stage heart failure and often act as a last resort for these severely sick children awaiting a cardiac transplant. They have proven to lower waiting list mortality [1] and do not compromise post-transplant outcomes [2]. VAD therapy can also be used as a bridge to a decision or as a bridge to recovery. The majority of children supported by a VAD are diagnosed with cardiomyopathy; however, VAD support can also be a viable option for children with end stage congenital heart disease (CHD) [2, 3]. Many of the patients have a high Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) patient profile and are on inotropes, reflecting the severity of their clinical condition [3].

In younger children, the Berlin Heart EXCOR (BHE) (Berlin Heart GmbH, Berlin, Germany) is one of the most used VADs for long-term support. It is designed to provide long-term support and obtained U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in 2008. Because of the paracorporeal position of this device, smaller patients can be treated as well. Different pump sizes are available to match the size of the patient.

Support with a BHE, however, comes with a certain incidence of adverse events. Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) are of particular concern. In adults, the incidence of CVA is estimated at around 13% at 1 year after the VAD is implanted [5]. In children supported by a BHE, the incidence is higher and has been reported to be up to 50% [6–8]. Other frequently reported adverse events are bleeding, infection and pump thrombosis [3, 4].

Despite the continued increase in usage of VAD therapy in paediatric patients, the single-centre experiences remain low. Joint efforts such as The European Registry for Paediatric Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (Paedi-EUROMACS) are needed to better understand the clinical course of these severely ill children and how to attain the best pre- and post-transplant outcomes. From the analyses of this registry, lessons can be learned to improve clinical care for VAD-supported patients. Because CVA is one of the principal complications in the clinical course of paediatric patients supported by a BHE, the goal of this study was to elucidate the incidence rates of and the associated factors for CVA in the population of patients with the BHE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For this analysis, we included all paediatric patients (<19 years old) from the EUROMACS database supported by a BHE between 2011 and January 2021. The age threshold was chosen in accordance with the first 2 Paedi-EUROMACS reports [3, 9]. Twenty-five centres are included in this database. The progress and the input of every site are monitored once every 2 months per site. We identified 2 groups within this population: patients who had a CVA after a VAD was implanted and a non-CVA group. For additional analyses we divided our population into 3 eras: era I: January 2011 through April 2014; era II: May 2014 through August 2017; era III: September 2017 through December 2020. Secondary outcomes were other major adverse events, death and a transplant. CVA and adverse events are reported according to the INTERMACS definitions [10]. CVA included transient ischaemic attacks, ischaemic stroke or intracranial haemorrhage diagnosed either by clinical acute (transient) neurological deficit conforming anatomically to arterial distribution cerebral ischaemia or by brain imaging. Early adverse events were defined as occurring within 30 days after the VAD was implanted. Most centres use the Edmonton protocol as the guideline for their antithrombotic strategy [11]. However, many centres deviate significantly from the original recommendations [12]. Precise information on which anticoagulation strategy was used is not available in the EUROMACS database. A table of missing data is presented in the supplemental material.

Ethics statement

All individual hospitals received approval from their MEC/research ethics committee in accordance with the policy of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

Statistical analyses

Continuous data are presented as median [interquartile range (IQR)] and categorical data are presented as frequencies (percentage). The Student t-test or the Mann–Whitney test was used to compare continuous variables. The χ2 test or the Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Because CVA is a competing event associated with weaning, a transplant and death, the cumulative incidence of CVA is estimated using Fine and Gray models.

Associated factors

To analyse which covariates are associated with CVA, univariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were developed. Proportional hazard assumptions were tested using Schoenfeld residuals. Infection, pump thrombosis and major bleeding are time-dependent covariates that occur during the follow-up period. To account for these phenomena, the Cox proportional hazard model was extended using time-varying covariates. Furthermore, post hoc trend analyses were performed. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation by chained equations using all baseline data. In total, 20 imputed data sets were creating using 40 iterations each. Convergence was checked using convergence plots, and imputations were visually checked using density plots.

Statistical program

All analyses were performed using International Business Machines Corporation Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA) statistics (version 24) or R (Version 4.0.3) with the packages “Survival”, “cmprsk” and “gpreg” (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Institute for Statistics and Mathematics, Vienna, Austria).

RESULTS

A total of 230 patients under 19 years of age supported by a BHE were included. Of these, 48.3% were male, and the median age was 2.0 years (IQR 0.6–8.0). A total of 31.7% of the patients were below 1 year of age, and only 14.3% were older than 10 years of age. The most common primary diagnosis was dilated cardiomyopathy (60.9%), but the aetiology differed by era (P = 0.002) (Table 1; Table 5, supplemental material).

Table 1:

Perioperative characteristics of patients with and without cardiovascular accidents

AllCVANon-CVA
(n = 230)(n = 46)(n = 184)
Male sex, n (%) 111 (48.3)20 (43.5)91 (49.5)
Age (years), median (IQR)2.0 (0.6-8.0)1.0 (0.5-4.3)3.0 (0.8-8.0)
BSA (m2), median (IQR)0.5 (0.4-0.9)0.5 (0.4-0.7)0.6 (0.4-0.9)
Primary diagnosis
 CHD, n (%) 49 (21.3)8 (17.4)41 (22.3)
 DCM, n (%) 140 (60.9)32 (69.6)108 (58.7)
 RCM, n (%) 18 (7.8)4 (8.7)14 (7.6)
 Otherb, n (%)5 (2.2)05 (2.7)
 Unknown, n (%)18 (7.8)2 (4.3)16 (8.7)
Time since first cardiac diagnosis
 Less than 1 month, n (%)81 (35.2)16 (34.8)65 (35.3)
 One month to 1 year, n (%)52 (22.6)13 (28.3)39 (21.2)
 One to 2 years, n (%)22 (9.6)8 (17.4)14 (7.6)
 Over 2 years, n (%)50 (21.7)7 (15.2)43 (23.4)
 Unknown, n (%)25 (10.9)2 (4.3)23 (12.5)
Creatinine, median (IQR)44.0 (33.0-61.0)42.0 (26.5-61.0)45.0 (34.0-61.0)
Albumin, median (IQR)528.9 (409.3-659.7)543.4 (434.7-668.0)514.4 (387.6-659.3)
NT-pro-BNP, median (IQR)20528.0 (8592.0-35000.00)28518.5 (10060.0-35302.5)17764.0 (8575.5-35000.0)
INTERMACS classification
 I, n (%) 53 (23.0)11 (23.9)42 (22.8)
 II, n (%) 113 (49.1)24 (52.2)89 (48.4)
 III-V, n (%)45 (19.6)9 (19.6)36 (19.6)
 Unknown, n (%)19 (8.3)2 (4.3)17 (9.2)
Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, n (%)7 (3.0)1 (2.2)6 (3.3)
Previous intubation, n (%) 81 (38.8)15 (33.3)66 (40.2)
Previous dialysis, n (%) 7 (3.3)1 (2.2)6 (3.7)
Previous ECMO, n (%) 44 (21.5)8 (17.8)36 (22.5)
Previous cardiac surgery, n (%) 37 (16.1)9 (20.0)28 (17.4)
Previous cardiac arrest, n (%) 29 (13.9)7 (15.6)22 (13.4)
Device strategy
 (Possible) bridge to transplant, n (%) 191 (83.0)40 (87.0)151 (82.1)
 Bridge to recovery, n (%) 20 (8.7)5 (10.9)15 (8.2)
 Unknown, n (%)19 (8.3)1 (2.2)18 (9.8)
Type of support
 LVAD, n (%) 168 (73.0)35 (76.1)133 (72.3)
 BiVAD, n (%) 54 (23.5)10 (21.7)44 (23.9)
 LVAD + RVADc, n (%) 7 (3.0)1 (2.2)6 (3.3)
 RVAD, n (%) 1 (0.4)01 (0.5)
Duration of support (days), median (IQR)143 (39-249)89 (39-222)184 (30-237)
Patients with early pump thrombosis, n (%) 31 (13.5)14 (30.4)18 (9.8)
Total episodes of early pump thrombosis502328
Patients with early major bleeding, n (%) 26 (11.3)5 (10.9)21 (11.4)
Total episodes of early major bleeding37829
Patients with early major infection, n (%) 22 (9.6)5 (10.9)17 (9.2)
Total episodes of early major infection23518
AllCVANon-CVA
(n = 230)(n = 46)(n = 184)
Male sex, n (%) 111 (48.3)20 (43.5)91 (49.5)
Age (years), median (IQR)2.0 (0.6-8.0)1.0 (0.5-4.3)3.0 (0.8-8.0)
BSA (m2), median (IQR)0.5 (0.4-0.9)0.5 (0.4-0.7)0.6 (0.4-0.9)
Primary diagnosis
 CHD, n (%) 49 (21.3)8 (17.4)41 (22.3)
 DCM, n (%) 140 (60.9)32 (69.6)108 (58.7)
 RCM, n (%) 18 (7.8)4 (8.7)14 (7.6)
 Otherb, n (%)5 (2.2)05 (2.7)
 Unknown, n (%)18 (7.8)2 (4.3)16 (8.7)
Time since first cardiac diagnosis
 Less than 1 month, n (%)81 (35.2)16 (34.8)65 (35.3)
 One month to 1 year, n (%)52 (22.6)13 (28.3)39 (21.2)
 One to 2 years, n (%)22 (9.6)8 (17.4)14 (7.6)
 Over 2 years, n (%)50 (21.7)7 (15.2)43 (23.4)
 Unknown, n (%)25 (10.9)2 (4.3)23 (12.5)
Creatinine, median (IQR)44.0 (33.0-61.0)42.0 (26.5-61.0)45.0 (34.0-61.0)
Albumin, median (IQR)528.9 (409.3-659.7)543.4 (434.7-668.0)514.4 (387.6-659.3)
NT-pro-BNP, median (IQR)20528.0 (8592.0-35000.00)28518.5 (10060.0-35302.5)17764.0 (8575.5-35000.0)
INTERMACS classification
 I, n (%) 53 (23.0)11 (23.9)42 (22.8)
 II, n (%) 113 (49.1)24 (52.2)89 (48.4)
 III-V, n (%)45 (19.6)9 (19.6)36 (19.6)
 Unknown, n (%)19 (8.3)2 (4.3)17 (9.2)
Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, n (%)7 (3.0)1 (2.2)6 (3.3)
Previous intubation, n (%) 81 (38.8)15 (33.3)66 (40.2)
Previous dialysis, n (%) 7 (3.3)1 (2.2)6 (3.7)
Previous ECMO, n (%) 44 (21.5)8 (17.8)36 (22.5)
Previous cardiac surgery, n (%) 37 (16.1)9 (20.0)28 (17.4)
Previous cardiac arrest, n (%) 29 (13.9)7 (15.6)22 (13.4)
Device strategy
 (Possible) bridge to transplant, n (%) 191 (83.0)40 (87.0)151 (82.1)
 Bridge to recovery, n (%) 20 (8.7)5 (10.9)15 (8.2)
 Unknown, n (%)19 (8.3)1 (2.2)18 (9.8)
Type of support
 LVAD, n (%) 168 (73.0)35 (76.1)133 (72.3)
 BiVAD, n (%) 54 (23.5)10 (21.7)44 (23.9)
 LVAD + RVADc, n (%) 7 (3.0)1 (2.2)6 (3.3)
 RVAD, n (%) 1 (0.4)01 (0.5)
Duration of support (days), median (IQR)143 (39-249)89 (39-222)184 (30-237)
Patients with early pump thrombosis, n (%) 31 (13.5)14 (30.4)18 (9.8)
Total episodes of early pump thrombosis502328
Patients with early major bleeding, n (%) 26 (11.3)5 (10.9)21 (11.4)
Total episodes of early major bleeding37829
Patients with early major infection, n (%) 22 (9.6)5 (10.9)17 (9.2)
Total episodes of early major infection23518
a

This table is not by any means to represent any possible association between covariates and the risk of CVA, merely to give an idea of the composition of the 2 groups.

b

Other: valvular heart disease in 3 patients, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 1 patient and cancer in 1 patient.

c

When the RVAD is placed during a second operation.

BiVAD: biventricular assist device; BSA: body surface area; CHD: congenital heart disease; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; DCM: dilated cardiomyopathy; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; INTERMACS: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support; LVAD: left ventricular assist device; RCM: restrictive cardiomyopathy; RVAD: right ventricular assist device.

Table 1:

Perioperative characteristics of patients with and without cardiovascular accidents

AllCVANon-CVA
(n = 230)(n = 46)(n = 184)
Male sex, n (%) 111 (48.3)20 (43.5)91 (49.5)
Age (years), median (IQR)2.0 (0.6-8.0)1.0 (0.5-4.3)3.0 (0.8-8.0)
BSA (m2), median (IQR)0.5 (0.4-0.9)0.5 (0.4-0.7)0.6 (0.4-0.9)
Primary diagnosis
 CHD, n (%) 49 (21.3)8 (17.4)41 (22.3)
 DCM, n (%) 140 (60.9)32 (69.6)108 (58.7)
 RCM, n (%) 18 (7.8)4 (8.7)14 (7.6)
 Otherb, n (%)5 (2.2)05 (2.7)
 Unknown, n (%)18 (7.8)2 (4.3)16 (8.7)
Time since first cardiac diagnosis
 Less than 1 month, n (%)81 (35.2)16 (34.8)65 (35.3)
 One month to 1 year, n (%)52 (22.6)13 (28.3)39 (21.2)
 One to 2 years, n (%)22 (9.6)8 (17.4)14 (7.6)
 Over 2 years, n (%)50 (21.7)7 (15.2)43 (23.4)
 Unknown, n (%)25 (10.9)2 (4.3)23 (12.5)
Creatinine, median (IQR)44.0 (33.0-61.0)42.0 (26.5-61.0)45.0 (34.0-61.0)
Albumin, median (IQR)528.9 (409.3-659.7)543.4 (434.7-668.0)514.4 (387.6-659.3)
NT-pro-BNP, median (IQR)20528.0 (8592.0-35000.00)28518.5 (10060.0-35302.5)17764.0 (8575.5-35000.0)
INTERMACS classification
 I, n (%) 53 (23.0)11 (23.9)42 (22.8)
 II, n (%) 113 (49.1)24 (52.2)89 (48.4)
 III-V, n (%)45 (19.6)9 (19.6)36 (19.6)
 Unknown, n (%)19 (8.3)2 (4.3)17 (9.2)
Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, n (%)7 (3.0)1 (2.2)6 (3.3)
Previous intubation, n (%) 81 (38.8)15 (33.3)66 (40.2)
Previous dialysis, n (%) 7 (3.3)1 (2.2)6 (3.7)
Previous ECMO, n (%) 44 (21.5)8 (17.8)36 (22.5)
Previous cardiac surgery, n (%) 37 (16.1)9 (20.0)28 (17.4)
Previous cardiac arrest, n (%) 29 (13.9)7 (15.6)22 (13.4)
Device strategy
 (Possible) bridge to transplant, n (%) 191 (83.0)40 (87.0)151 (82.1)
 Bridge to recovery, n (%) 20 (8.7)5 (10.9)15 (8.2)
 Unknown, n (%)19 (8.3)1 (2.2)18 (9.8)
Type of support
 LVAD, n (%) 168 (73.0)35 (76.1)133 (72.3)
 BiVAD, n (%) 54 (23.5)10 (21.7)44 (23.9)
 LVAD + RVADc, n (%) 7 (3.0)1 (2.2)6 (3.3)
 RVAD, n (%) 1 (0.4)01 (0.5)
Duration of support (days), median (IQR)143 (39-249)89 (39-222)184 (30-237)
Patients with early pump thrombosis, n (%) 31 (13.5)14 (30.4)18 (9.8)
Total episodes of early pump thrombosis502328
Patients with early major bleeding, n (%) 26 (11.3)5 (10.9)21 (11.4)
Total episodes of early major bleeding37829
Patients with early major infection, n (%) 22 (9.6)5 (10.9)17 (9.2)
Total episodes of early major infection23518
AllCVANon-CVA
(n = 230)(n = 46)(n = 184)
Male sex, n (%) 111 (48.3)20 (43.5)91 (49.5)
Age (years), median (IQR)2.0 (0.6-8.0)1.0 (0.5-4.3)3.0 (0.8-8.0)
BSA (m2), median (IQR)0.5 (0.4-0.9)0.5 (0.4-0.7)0.6 (0.4-0.9)
Primary diagnosis
 CHD, n (%) 49 (21.3)8 (17.4)41 (22.3)
 DCM, n (%) 140 (60.9)32 (69.6)108 (58.7)
 RCM, n (%) 18 (7.8)4 (8.7)14 (7.6)
 Otherb, n (%)5 (2.2)05 (2.7)
 Unknown, n (%)18 (7.8)2 (4.3)16 (8.7)
Time since first cardiac diagnosis
 Less than 1 month, n (%)81 (35.2)16 (34.8)65 (35.3)
 One month to 1 year, n (%)52 (22.6)13 (28.3)39 (21.2)
 One to 2 years, n (%)22 (9.6)8 (17.4)14 (7.6)
 Over 2 years, n (%)50 (21.7)7 (15.2)43 (23.4)
 Unknown, n (%)25 (10.9)2 (4.3)23 (12.5)
Creatinine, median (IQR)44.0 (33.0-61.0)42.0 (26.5-61.0)45.0 (34.0-61.0)
Albumin, median (IQR)528.9 (409.3-659.7)543.4 (434.7-668.0)514.4 (387.6-659.3)
NT-pro-BNP, median (IQR)20528.0 (8592.0-35000.00)28518.5 (10060.0-35302.5)17764.0 (8575.5-35000.0)
INTERMACS classification
 I, n (%) 53 (23.0)11 (23.9)42 (22.8)
 II, n (%) 113 (49.1)24 (52.2)89 (48.4)
 III-V, n (%)45 (19.6)9 (19.6)36 (19.6)
 Unknown, n (%)19 (8.3)2 (4.3)17 (9.2)
Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, n (%)7 (3.0)1 (2.2)6 (3.3)
Previous intubation, n (%) 81 (38.8)15 (33.3)66 (40.2)
Previous dialysis, n (%) 7 (3.3)1 (2.2)6 (3.7)
Previous ECMO, n (%) 44 (21.5)8 (17.8)36 (22.5)
Previous cardiac surgery, n (%) 37 (16.1)9 (20.0)28 (17.4)
Previous cardiac arrest, n (%) 29 (13.9)7 (15.6)22 (13.4)
Device strategy
 (Possible) bridge to transplant, n (%) 191 (83.0)40 (87.0)151 (82.1)
 Bridge to recovery, n (%) 20 (8.7)5 (10.9)15 (8.2)
 Unknown, n (%)19 (8.3)1 (2.2)18 (9.8)
Type of support
 LVAD, n (%) 168 (73.0)35 (76.1)133 (72.3)
 BiVAD, n (%) 54 (23.5)10 (21.7)44 (23.9)
 LVAD + RVADc, n (%) 7 (3.0)1 (2.2)6 (3.3)
 RVAD, n (%) 1 (0.4)01 (0.5)
Duration of support (days), median (IQR)143 (39-249)89 (39-222)184 (30-237)
Patients with early pump thrombosis, n (%) 31 (13.5)14 (30.4)18 (9.8)
Total episodes of early pump thrombosis502328
Patients with early major bleeding, n (%) 26 (11.3)5 (10.9)21 (11.4)
Total episodes of early major bleeding37829
Patients with early major infection, n (%) 22 (9.6)5 (10.9)17 (9.2)
Total episodes of early major infection23518
a

This table is not by any means to represent any possible association between covariates and the risk of CVA, merely to give an idea of the composition of the 2 groups.

b

Other: valvular heart disease in 3 patients, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 1 patient and cancer in 1 patient.

c

When the RVAD is placed during a second operation.

BiVAD: biventricular assist device; BSA: body surface area; CHD: congenital heart disease; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; DCM: dilated cardiomyopathy; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; INTERMACS: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support; LVAD: left ventricular assist device; RCM: restrictive cardiomyopathy; RVAD: right ventricular assist device.

In total, 46 patients sustained 55 CVAs. Twenty-one episodes (38.2%) occurred in the first 30 days after the VAD was implanted, and 39 events (70.9%) occurred in the first 90 days (Table 1) (Fig. 1). The cumulative incidence of CVA did not significantly differ per era, and there was no significant trend (P = 0.458) (Fig. 1; Table 2). Twenty-five of the 55 (45.5%) CVA episodes contributed to the death of a patient, with a total event rate of 0.23 per patient-year (Table 2; Table 5, supplemental material).

Cumulative incidence function plot of cardiovascular accidents stratified by era. Era I: January 2011 through April 2014; era II: May 2014 through August 2017; era III: September 2017 until January 2021. CVA: cerebrovascular accident.
Figure 1:

Cumulative incidence function plot of cardiovascular accidents stratified by era. Era I: January 2011 through April 2014; era II: May 2014 through August 2017; era III: September 2017 until January 2021. CVA: cerebrovascular accident.

Table 2:

Event rates of primary and secondary outcomes per era per patient-year

AllEra IEra IIEra IIIP-trend
(n = 230)(n = 75)(n = 79)(n = 76)
CVA0.500.750.360.440.458
 iCVA0.130.250.110.05a
 hCVA0.170.190.170.17a
 uCVA0.200.310.080.22a
 Contributed to death0.230.280.140.270.959
Pump thrombosis1.912.112.081.620.299
Major bleeding0.450.410.360.560.488
Major infection0.470.350.330.680.411
Died0.520.630.530.440.019
Transplant1.151.011.250.920.830
Recovery0.290.380.280.240.154
Ongoing0.090.030.220.253
Lost to follow-up0.050.110.020.891
AllEra IEra IIEra IIIP-trend
(n = 230)(n = 75)(n = 79)(n = 76)
CVA0.500.750.360.440.458
 iCVA0.130.250.110.05a
 hCVA0.170.190.170.17a
 uCVA0.200.310.080.22a
 Contributed to death0.230.280.140.270.959
Pump thrombosis1.912.112.081.620.299
Major bleeding0.450.410.360.560.488
Major infection0.470.350.330.680.411
Died0.520.630.530.440.019
Transplant1.151.011.250.920.830
Recovery0.290.380.280.240.154
Ongoing0.090.030.220.253
Lost to follow-up0.050.110.020.891
a

Because many episodes of cardiovascular accidents were not specified as either ischaemic or haemorrhagic, we did not perform these analyses.

CVA: cardiovascular accident; hCVA: haemorrhagic CVA; iCVA: ischaemic CVA; uCVA: unspecified CVA.

Table 2:

Event rates of primary and secondary outcomes per era per patient-year

AllEra IEra IIEra IIIP-trend
(n = 230)(n = 75)(n = 79)(n = 76)
CVA0.500.750.360.440.458
 iCVA0.130.250.110.05a
 hCVA0.170.190.170.17a
 uCVA0.200.310.080.22a
 Contributed to death0.230.280.140.270.959
Pump thrombosis1.912.112.081.620.299
Major bleeding0.450.410.360.560.488
Major infection0.470.350.330.680.411
Died0.520.630.530.440.019
Transplant1.151.011.250.920.830
Recovery0.290.380.280.240.154
Ongoing0.090.030.220.253
Lost to follow-up0.050.110.020.891
AllEra IEra IIEra IIIP-trend
(n = 230)(n = 75)(n = 79)(n = 76)
CVA0.500.750.360.440.458
 iCVA0.130.250.110.05a
 hCVA0.170.190.170.17a
 uCVA0.200.310.080.22a
 Contributed to death0.230.280.140.270.959
Pump thrombosis1.912.112.081.620.299
Major bleeding0.450.410.360.560.488
Major infection0.470.350.330.680.411
Died0.520.630.530.440.019
Transplant1.151.011.250.920.830
Recovery0.290.380.280.240.154
Ongoing0.090.030.220.253
Lost to follow-up0.050.110.020.891
a

Because many episodes of cardiovascular accidents were not specified as either ischaemic or haemorrhagic, we did not perform these analyses.

CVA: cardiovascular accident; hCVA: haemorrhagic CVA; iCVA: ischaemic CVA; uCVA: unspecified CVA.

With a univariable Cox proportional hazard regression model, our goal was to identify associated factors for developing a CVA. Pump thrombosis was found to be associated with early and late CVA combined [hazard ratio (HR) 1.998, P = 0.040]. Additionally, the secondary implant of an RVAD after an LVAD was significantly associated with an increased risk of CVA compared to an LVAD only (HR 11.300, P = 0.037). However, the large HR and extremely wide confidence intervals indicated that there are limited data to support a robust conclusion.

Secondary outcomes were other major adverse events, death and a transplant. Pump thrombosis had a total event rate of 1.91 per patient-year, with the highest event rate in the first and second eras (2.11 and 2.08 per patient-year, P = 0.299). In the third era, a remarkably low percentage of patients experienced an early pump thrombosis (5.3% compared to 17.3–19.0, P = 0.028). Pump thrombosis was associated with CVA (HR 1.998, P = 0.040). A total of 75.5% of all the major bleeds and 45.1% of the major infections occurred within 30 days after the VAD was implanted. A list of specified infections reported in our population can be found in Table 4 (supplemental material). Major infection or major bleeding was not associated with CVA (Tables 1–3) (Table 5, supplemental material).

Table 3:

Univariable Cox proportional hazard regression model: associated factors for developing a cardiovascular accident

Hazard ratio95% CIP-value
Era: II versus era I0.5660.267-1.2000.138
Era: III versus era I0.7310.372-1.4370.364
Male sex0.8990.488-1.6540.726
Age 1.0460.976-1.1220.198
BSA1.7560.754-4.0890.186
Primary diagnosis: DCM versus CHD1.8830.787-4.5040.150
Primary diagnosis: RCM versus CHD3.2620.872-12.2060.078
Creatinine0.9970.984-1.0090.588
Albumin1.0001.000-1.0000.447
NT-pro-BNP1.0001.000-1.0000.624
INTERMACS: II versus INTERMACS I1.0110.486-2.1020.976
INTERMACS: III-V versus INTERMACS I2.5620.999-6.5690.050
Previous intubation1.6620.866-3.1890.123
Previous ECMO1.0610.468-2.4080.885
Previous cardiac surgery0.7180.331-1.5580.394
Previous cardiac arrest1.1610.510-2.6420.716
Device strategy: Bridge to recovery versus bridge to transplant1.2580.491-3.2250.625
Type of support: BiVAD versus LVAD1.2380.592-2.5890.562
Type of support: LVAD + RVAD versus LVAD11.3001.172-108.9270.037
Major infectiona1.1041.420-32.2980.866
Cumulative major Infection0.2541.044-4.5630.133
Pump thrombosisa1.9981.031-3.8720.040
Major bleedinga1.1040.450-2.7070.829
Hazard ratio95% CIP-value
Era: II versus era I0.5660.267-1.2000.138
Era: III versus era I0.7310.372-1.4370.364
Male sex0.8990.488-1.6540.726
Age 1.0460.976-1.1220.198
BSA1.7560.754-4.0890.186
Primary diagnosis: DCM versus CHD1.8830.787-4.5040.150
Primary diagnosis: RCM versus CHD3.2620.872-12.2060.078
Creatinine0.9970.984-1.0090.588
Albumin1.0001.000-1.0000.447
NT-pro-BNP1.0001.000-1.0000.624
INTERMACS: II versus INTERMACS I1.0110.486-2.1020.976
INTERMACS: III-V versus INTERMACS I2.5620.999-6.5690.050
Previous intubation1.6620.866-3.1890.123
Previous ECMO1.0610.468-2.4080.885
Previous cardiac surgery0.7180.331-1.5580.394
Previous cardiac arrest1.1610.510-2.6420.716
Device strategy: Bridge to recovery versus bridge to transplant1.2580.491-3.2250.625
Type of support: BiVAD versus LVAD1.2380.592-2.5890.562
Type of support: LVAD + RVAD versus LVAD11.3001.172-108.9270.037
Major infectiona1.1041.420-32.2980.866
Cumulative major Infection0.2541.044-4.5630.133
Pump thrombosisa1.9981.031-3.8720.040
Major bleedinga1.1040.450-2.7070.829
a

Time varying covariate.

BiVAD: biventricular assist device; BSA: body surface area; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; fDCM: familial dilated cardiomyopathy; iDCM: idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy; INTERMACS: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support; LVAD: left ventricular assist device; mDCM: myocarditis dilated cardiomyopathy; oDCM: other dilated cardiomyopathy; RCM: restrictive cardiomyopathy; RVAD: right ventricular assist device.

Table 3:

Univariable Cox proportional hazard regression model: associated factors for developing a cardiovascular accident

Hazard ratio95% CIP-value
Era: II versus era I0.5660.267-1.2000.138
Era: III versus era I0.7310.372-1.4370.364
Male sex0.8990.488-1.6540.726
Age 1.0460.976-1.1220.198
BSA1.7560.754-4.0890.186
Primary diagnosis: DCM versus CHD1.8830.787-4.5040.150
Primary diagnosis: RCM versus CHD3.2620.872-12.2060.078
Creatinine0.9970.984-1.0090.588
Albumin1.0001.000-1.0000.447
NT-pro-BNP1.0001.000-1.0000.624
INTERMACS: II versus INTERMACS I1.0110.486-2.1020.976
INTERMACS: III-V versus INTERMACS I2.5620.999-6.5690.050
Previous intubation1.6620.866-3.1890.123
Previous ECMO1.0610.468-2.4080.885
Previous cardiac surgery0.7180.331-1.5580.394
Previous cardiac arrest1.1610.510-2.6420.716
Device strategy: Bridge to recovery versus bridge to transplant1.2580.491-3.2250.625
Type of support: BiVAD versus LVAD1.2380.592-2.5890.562
Type of support: LVAD + RVAD versus LVAD11.3001.172-108.9270.037
Major infectiona1.1041.420-32.2980.866
Cumulative major Infection0.2541.044-4.5630.133
Pump thrombosisa1.9981.031-3.8720.040
Major bleedinga1.1040.450-2.7070.829
Hazard ratio95% CIP-value
Era: II versus era I0.5660.267-1.2000.138
Era: III versus era I0.7310.372-1.4370.364
Male sex0.8990.488-1.6540.726
Age 1.0460.976-1.1220.198
BSA1.7560.754-4.0890.186
Primary diagnosis: DCM versus CHD1.8830.787-4.5040.150
Primary diagnosis: RCM versus CHD3.2620.872-12.2060.078
Creatinine0.9970.984-1.0090.588
Albumin1.0001.000-1.0000.447
NT-pro-BNP1.0001.000-1.0000.624
INTERMACS: II versus INTERMACS I1.0110.486-2.1020.976
INTERMACS: III-V versus INTERMACS I2.5620.999-6.5690.050
Previous intubation1.6620.866-3.1890.123
Previous ECMO1.0610.468-2.4080.885
Previous cardiac surgery0.7180.331-1.5580.394
Previous cardiac arrest1.1610.510-2.6420.716
Device strategy: Bridge to recovery versus bridge to transplant1.2580.491-3.2250.625
Type of support: BiVAD versus LVAD1.2380.592-2.5890.562
Type of support: LVAD + RVAD versus LVAD11.3001.172-108.9270.037
Major infectiona1.1041.420-32.2980.866
Cumulative major Infection0.2541.044-4.5630.133
Pump thrombosisa1.9981.031-3.8720.040
Major bleedinga1.1040.450-2.7070.829
a

Time varying covariate.

BiVAD: biventricular assist device; BSA: body surface area; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; fDCM: familial dilated cardiomyopathy; iDCM: idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy; INTERMACS: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support; LVAD: left ventricular assist device; mDCM: myocarditis dilated cardiomyopathy; oDCM: other dilated cardiomyopathy; RCM: restrictive cardiomyopathy; RVAD: right ventricular assist device.

In total, 126 patients (56.0%) survived to transplant with a 6-month transplant rate of 30.0% and a 1-year transplant rate of 44.4%. The overall event rate for a transplant was 1.15 per patient-year. In 32 children (14.2%), the BHE could be explanted due to recovery, with most explants occurring in the first half-year after the VAD was implanted (84.4%). The overall event rate for an explant due to recovery was 0.29 per patient-year. Overall mortality was 25.3% (57 patients) with a 6-month mortality of 21.7% and a 1-year mortality of 24.5%. The event rate for mortality decreased significantly over the eras (P = 0.019) (Table 2; Fig. 2).

Competing outcomes.
Figure 2:

Competing outcomes.

DISCUSSION

In our population, 46 (20.0%) patients suffered from a CVA, with 55 events in total (event rate 0.50 per patient-year) (Table 2). Our North American colleagues reported a comparable incidence of 16.9% CVAs in patients supported by a pulsatile paracorporeal device [13]. However, their reported event rate of 6.4 per 100 patient months, which equals an event rate of 0.77 per patient-year, was higher [13]. This result could be partially explained by the higher overall rates of paediatric transplants at 1 year (62.4% in the United States vs 46.7% in Europe) and therefore a shorter median time on support, while most of the CVAs occur in the first months of VAD support [3, 4]. In single-centre cohort studies, CVA rates differ widely from 25.0 to 50.0% [6–8, 14]. These differences can be explained by multiple factors, for example, differences in follow-up time and patient characteristics.

Associated factors

Because the incidence of CVA is related to VAD therapy and the concomitant need for anticoagulation, most CVAs are reported in the early support period [8, 13, 15, 16]. In the first week of VAD support, anticoagulation therapy must be carefully initiated. Overdosing anticoagulation shortly after the operation can cause bleeding requiring reoperation, but a too small dose exposes the patient to a higher risk of thromboembolic events. Therefore, most bleeding and thromboembolic events occur in this period when this delicate balance is being achieved [15, 17, 18]. Surprisingly, our analyses showed only 38.2% of the CVAs occurring in the first 30 days after the VAD is implanted. However, 70.9% occurred in the first 90 days after the VAD was implanted. Furthermore, 37 of the 49 major bleeding events (75.5%) occurred in the first 30 days of VAD support. The Edmonton protocol is historically the most used anticoagulation protocol in paediatric VAD-supported patients [11]. This protocol has of yet not been thoroughly analysed, because clinicians often deviate from it, resulting in wide intercentre variability [12, 19]. Unfortunately, the EUROMACS database does not contain information on the precise anticoagulation strategy used. More research is warranted to optimize anticoagulation therapy in children supported by a BHE.

Another associated factor for CVA found in this study is the need for a secondary RVAD (HR 11.300, P = 0.037) compared to univentricular support alone. However, biventricular support from the beginning—that is, if the LVAD and RVAD were placed during the first operation—versus univentricular support alone did not reach statistical significance. This finding is interesting, since to our knowledge, this has not been explored in great detail by other major studies. It may reflect a clinical deterioration (as there was initially no need to support both ventricles) accompanied by a disturbance in the delicate balance between coagulation and anticoagulation, during which a higher risk for CVA appears to emerge. Although the placement of an secondary RVAD compared to an univentricular support alone was significantly associated with CVA, this result should be interpreted with caution because the confidence interval is wide and the number of patients supported by the placement of a second RVAD is low.

Additionally, other investigators found a later era to be a protective factor against CVA in the children supported with a paracorporeal pulsatile VAD (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05–0.45, P = 0.0006), which could indicate a learning curve of the participating centres [13]. In our population, event rates for CVA were highest in era I, but the trend was not significant (P = 0.458) (Table 2, and support in a later era was not proven to be a protective factor against developing a CVA (P = 0.129, P = 0.364) (Table 3).

Another variable often reported as a risk factor for a worse outcome is CHD as an initial diagnosis compared to other aetiologies such as cardiomyopathies [4, 20]. For example, survival at 12 months after a VAD implant was significantly lower in the CHD group compared to the cardiomyopathy group in the analysis of the North American registry (60.9% vs 76.8%, P < 0.0001) [4], and CHD was an independent predictor of waiting list mortality (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.9–3.0) . In this study, cardiomyopathy as the primary diagnosis was not a significant predictive factor (HR 1.883, P = 0.150; HR 3.262, P = 0.078) (Table 3). Our North American colleagues also did not find an association between CHD and CVA in VAD-supported children [13]. CHD appears, therefore, to be a predictive factor for overall mortality but not for CVA.

Lastly, younger age has been reported to predict higher mortality and lower transplant rates in VAD-supported children [4]. In small single-centre studies, incidence rates of CVA between 14% and 38% have been reported in patients under 1 year of age supported by a BHE [21–23]. In our population, 31.7% of the patients were below 1 year of age and only 14.3% were above 10 years of age. Age was not a predictive factor for developing a CVA (HR 1.046, P = 0.198) (Table 3).

Relationship to comorbidities

Pump thrombosis was found to be associated with CVA (HR 1.998, P = 0.040), in accordance with previously published results [18]. The relationship between infection and CVA was also considered. In total, 51 infections occurred in 34 patients, with 45.1% occurring within 30 days after a VAD was implanted. Similarly, in the Pedimacs registry, 17% of the reported adverse events were infections, which occurred mostly in the first 30 days after the VAD was implanted. A history of prior non-infectious major adverse events such as neurological dysfunction was associated with infection (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0–3.8, P = 0.05) [24]. This interesting association between infectious complications and CVA is to be expected, because CVA prolongs the hospital stay and therefore the risk of hospital-acquired infections. Furthermore, inflammation can cause hypercoagulation by influencing certain clotting factors and, likewise, coagulation products can stimulate an inflammatory response [25]. Byrnes et al. [17], therefore, reported administering steroids to patients with a systemic inflammatory response syndrome, without a positive blood culture and with a fibrinogen blood level >600 mg/dl. This protocol may have contributed to the decreased incidence of CVAs. However, our study did not show an association between (recurrent) infections and the occurrence of CVA. Furthermore, major bleeding was, surprisingly, also not associated with CVA, even though one might expect that a patient at risk for a major bleeding event elsewhere in the body is probably also more at risk for a haemorrhagic CVA. Moreover, a patient with major bleeding might receive less anticoagulants after the event, increasing the risk of an ischaemic CVA.

Final outcomes

In our population, 44.4% of the patients survived to transplant. In 11.8%, the BHE could be explanted due to myocardial recovery at 1 year of follow-up. Our colleagues report a higher transplant rate at 1 year in patients supported with a paracorporeal pulsatile device of 74.4%, but a lower 1-year recovery rate of 4.7% [4]. The trend, however, is comparable: Almost all episodes of VAD explants happened in the first 6 months, whereas around 15% of the transplants in both populations took place between 0.5 and 1.0 years [4]. Additionally, the event rate for mortality was highest in era I (0.63 per patient-year) and declined over the years that followed (P = 0.019), suggesting a possible learning curve of the health care provided to these children. A certain learning curve has been suggested in the literature [8].

Limitations

This study has some limitations. Firstly, this study was limited by missing data, including a lack of detailed information on the type of CVA (i.e. ischaemic or haemorrhagic), the severity and duration of the symptoms and information regarding the antithrombotic therapy used, which would have been of great value. To minimize the impact of missing data in the statistical analyses, we used multiple imputation with chained equations. Secondly, since this is a registry-based study, we received information on the included patients from various centres from different people. Detection bias might have influenced the data we used. We made an effort to minimalize this by providing extensive adverse event definitions to every participating centre. Lastly, despite only considering children with a BHE, significant interpopulation variance was still observed. For example, we included patients from 0 to 18 years old with INTERMACS patient profiles from I to V. It is clear that despite selecting for this narrow population, several aspects of their clinical courses differ widely, including aspects that could potentially influence CVA rates (e.g. organ availability, therapy compliance, mortality, morbidity).

CONCLUSION

This study is of great importance because it covers the complete EUROMACS experience of children supported with a BHE. This study shows that paediatric VAD support is associated with adverse events, including CVAs, most of which occur in the early support period. Pump thrombosis and type of support were found to be associated with CVA. Surprisingly, (recurrent) infections and major bleeding as potential factors associated with CVA did not achieve statistical significance. At the 1- year follow-up, more than half of our included patients had undergone a transplant or had recovered. Ensuring future comprehensive data entry into the registry will optimize research output, which in turn will provide a basis on which further research and subgroup analysis in the paediatric VAD population can be performed. In particular, strategies for anticoagulation therapy should be studied further.

FUNDING

The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery supported this study and made resources available to execute this work. No funding was received for this work.

Conflict of interest: None of the authors have conflicts of interest to disclose.

Data availability statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

REFERENCES

1

Zafar
F
,
Castleberry
C
,
Khan
MS
,
Mehta
V
,
Bryant
R
,
Lorts
A
et al.
Pediatric heart transplant waiting list mortality in the era of ventricular assist devices
.
J Heart Lung Transplant
2015
;
34
:
82
8
.

2

Dipchand
AI
,
Kirk
R
,
Naftel
DC
,
Pruitt
E
,
Blume
ED
,
Morrow
R
et al.
Ventricular Assist Device Support as a Bridge to Transplantation in Pediatric Patients
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
2018
;
72
:
402
15
.

3

de By
T
,
Antonides
CFJ
,
Schweiger
M
,
Sliwka
J
,
Davies
B
,
Berger
F
et al.
The European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS): second EUROMACS Paediatric (Paedi-EUROMACS) report
.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
2020
;
57
:
1038
50
.

4

Morales
DLS
,
Adachi
I
,
Peng
DM
,
Sinha
P
,
Lorts
A
,
Fields
K
,
Pedimacs Investigators
et al.
Fourth Annual Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs) Report
.
Ann Thorac Surg
2020
;
110
:
1819
31
.

5

Kormos
RL
,
Cowger
J
,
Pagani
FD
,
Teuteberg
JJ
,
Goldstein
DJ
,
Jacobs
JP
et al.
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database Annual Report: evolving Indications, Outcomes, and Scientific Partnerships
.
Ann Thorac Surg
2019
;
107
:
341
53
.

6

Conway
J
,
St Louis
J
,
Morales
DLS
,
Law
S
,
Tjossem
C
,
Humpl
T.
Delineating survival outcomes in children <10 kg bridged to transplant or recovery with the Berlin Heart EXCOR Ventricular Assist Device
.
JACC Heart Fail
2015
;
3
:
70
7
.

7

Hetzer
R
,
Kaufmann
F
,
Delmo Walter
EM.
Paediatric mechanical circulatory support with Berlin Heart EXCOR: development and outcome of a 23-year experience
.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
2016
;
50
:
203
10
.

8

Rohde
S
,
Antonides
CFJ
,
Muslem
R
,
de Woestijne
PCV
,
der Meulen
MHV
,
Kraemer
US
et al.
Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Support in the Netherlands
.
World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg
2020
;
11
:
275
83
.

9

de By
T
,
Schweiger
M
,
Waheed
H
,
Berger
F
,
Hubler
M
,
Ozbaran
M
,
Contributing clinicians
et al.
The European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS): first EUROMACS Paediatric (Paedi-EUROMACS) report
.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
2018
;
54
:
800
8
.

10

Rosenthal
DN
,
Almond
CS
,
Jaquiss
RD
,
Peyton
CE
,
Auerbach
SR
,
Morales
DR
et al.
Adverse events in children implanted with ventricular assist devices in the United States: data from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PediMACS)
.
J Heart Lung Transplant
2016
;
35
:
569
77
.

11

Singh
TP.
Prospective trial of a pediatric ventricular assist device
.
N Engl J Med
2012
;
367
:2159; author reply
60
. 1.

12

Miera
O
,
Schmitt
KL
,
Akintuerk
H
,
Boet
A
,
Cesnjevar
R
,
Chila
T
et al.
Antithrombotic therapy in pediatric ventricular assist devices: multicenter survey of the European EXCOR Pediatric Investigator Group
.
Int J Artif Organs
2018
;
41
:
385
92
.

13

Niebler
RA
,
Amdani
S
,
Blume
B
,
Cantor
RS
,
Deng
L
,
Kirklin
JK
et al.
Stroke in pediatric ventricular assist device patients-a pedimacs registry analysis
.
J Heart Lung Transplant
2021
;
40
:
662
70
.

14

Cassidy
J
,
Dominguez
T
,
Haynes
S
,
Burch
M
,
Kirk
R
,
Hoskote
A
et al.
A longer waiting game: bridging children to heart transplant with the Berlin Heart EXCOR device–the United Kingdom experience
.
J Heart Lung Transplant
2013
;
32
:
1101
6
.

15

Huang
JY
,
Ignjatovic
V
,
Sheridan
BJ
,
Mathew
J
,
D'Udekem
Y
,
Brink
J
et al.
Bleeding and thrombotic events occur early in children on durable ventricular assist devices
.
Thromb Res
2019
;
173
:
65
70
.

16

Steiner
ME
,
Bomgaars
LR
,
Massicotte
MP
,
Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric VAD IDE study investigators
Antithrombotic Therapy in a Prospective Trial of a Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device
.
Asaio j
2016
;
62
:
719
27
.

17

Byrnes
JW
,
Prodhan
P
,
Williams
BA
,
Schmitz
ML
,
Moss
MM
,
Dyamenahalli
U
et al.
Incremental reduction in the incidence of stroke in children supported with the Berlin EXCOR ventricular assist device
.
Ann Thorac Surg
2013
;
96
:
1727
33
.

18

Jordan
LC
,
Ichord
RN
,
Reinhartz
O
,
Humpl
T
,
Pruthi
S
,
Tjossem
C
et al.
Neurological complications and outcomes in the Berlin Heart EXCOR® pediatric investigational device exemption trial
.
J Am Heart Assoc
2015
;
4
:
e001429
.

19

May
LJ
,
Lorts
A
,
VanderPluym
C
,
Conway
J
,
Massicotte
MP
,
Millar
MM
et al.
Marked Practice Variation in Antithrombotic Care with the Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device
.
Asaio J
2019
;
65
:
731
7
.

20

Morales
DLS
,
Zafar
F
,
Almond
CS
,
Canter
C
,
Fynn-Thompson
F
,
Conway
J
et al.
Berlin Heart EXCOR use in patients with congenital heart disease
.
J Heart Lung Transplant
2017
;
36
:
1209
16
.

21

Maeda
K
,
Rosenthal
DN
,
Reinhartz
O.
Ventricular Assist Devices for Neonates and Infants
.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu
2018
;
21
:
9
14
.

22

Amodeo
A
,
Brancaccio
G
,
Michielon
G
,
Filippelli
S
,
Ricci
Z
,
Morelli
S
et al.
Pneumatic pulsatile ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation in pediatric patients
.
Artif Organs
2010
;
34
:
1017
22
.

23

Davis
LM
,
Lee
MGY
,
Sheridan
BJ
,
d'Udekem
Y
,
Brizard
CP
,
Konstantinov
IE
et al.
Berlin Heart EXCOR Support in the First Year of Life: a Single Centre Experience
.
Heart Lung Circ
2021
;
30
:
446
53
.

24

Auerbach
SR
,
Richmond
ME
,
Schumacher
KR
,
Lopez-Colon
D
,
Mitchell
MB
,
Turrentine
MW
et al.
Infectious complications of ventricular assist device use in children in the United States: data from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs)
.
J Heart Lung Transplant
2018
;
37
:
46
53
.

25

van der Poll
T
,
de Boer
JD
,
Levi
M.
The effect of inflammation on coagulation and vice versa
.
Curr Opin Infect Dis
2011
;
24
:
273
8
.

Author notes

Sofie Rohde and Eugen Sandica contributed equally to this study.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Supplementary data