Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to evaluate long-term outcomes of pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and to identify the factors associated with adverse clinical events (ACEs).

METHODS

A total of 190 patients who underwent PVR between 1998 and 2015 after repair of TOF were retrospectively analysed. ACE was defined as all-cause death, heart transplantation or new-onset sustained arrhythmia. Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with ACE after PVR.

RESULTS

The median age at PVR was 19 years. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 143 (75%) patients, and the median right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic and end-systolic volume index was 164 and 82 ml/m2, respectively. The follow-up completeness was 94%, and the median follow-up duration was 9.8 years. The transplantation-free survival and freedom from ACE at 15 years was 95% and 90%, respectively. The factors associated with ACE were older age at PVR, older age at TOF repair, New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, presence of tachyarrhythmias, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and concomitant arrhythmia surgery. In a subgroup analysis of 143 patients with preoperative MRI data, larger RV end-systolic volume index, larger left ventricular end-systolic volume index and lower left ventricular ejection fraction were associated with ACE.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes of PVR in patients with repaired TOF were satisfactory. Proactive PVR before the onset of advanced symptoms, tachyarrhythmias and ventricular dysfunction may further improve the long-term survival of this patient population.

INTRODUCTION

Repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) often results in pulmonary regurgitation (PR), which can lead to right ventricular (RV) dilatation, RV dysfunction, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, arrhythmias and sudden death [1–5]. Pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) is being performed with increasing frequency in patients with repaired TOF to prevent or reverse the deleterious consequences of PR. However, the optimal timing of PVR, especially in the asymptomatic patients, is not clearly defined. Several studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have addressed this issue by reporting cut-off values of preoperative RV volume for successful RV remodelling after PVR [6–10]. According to these studies, the cut-off RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume for successful RV remodelling after PVR is ∼160 and 80 ml/m2, respectively. These cut-off values are now included in the recently updated American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease [11].

Although the indications of PVR have been refined, it remains unknown whether PVR will lead to improved long-term survival. We have previously reported satisfactory mid-term outcomes of PVR in patients with repaired TOF [8]. However, data pertaining to the long-term outcomes are limited in the literature and the previously reported long-term survival rates after PVR are far from satisfactory [12–15]. Also, there is little information regarding predictors of adverse clinical outcomes such as death or sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) after PVR [9, 10, 15–17].

Since we started to perform PVR in patients with repaired TOF, we have maintained a proactive approach towards early PVR in the hope that this will preserve ventricular function and ultimately lead to improved long-term survival [8, 18]. The objectives of this study were to evaluate long-term outcomes of PVR in patients with repaired TOF and to identify the factors associated with adverse clinical events (ACEs) after PVR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical statement

The Institutional Review Board of Sejong General Hospital approved this study and waived the need for individual patient consent.

Study population

For this retrospective single-centre study, we identified 190 patients with repaired TOF and chronic PR who had undergone surgical PVR between January 1998 and December 2015. During the study period, transcatheter PVR was not available in our country. Patients with significant (peak pressure gradient ≥40 mmHg) valvar and/or subvalvar pulmonary stenosis, RV to pulmonary artery conduits and other significant cardiac anomalies (pulmonary atresia, absent pulmonary valve, atrioventricular septal defect, etc.) were excluded. Data were obtained by the review of medical records. When a patient was lost to hospital follow-up, we tried telephone contact with the patient or family to determine the survival status. Characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1:

Demographic and preoperative characteristics of the study population

VariablesValues
Male113 (59)
Age at TOF repair (years)2.0 (1.1–3.9)
Type of RVOT reconstruction
 Transannular patch150 (79)
 Pulmonary valvotomy23 (12)
 Monocusp valve17 (9)
Number of operations before PVR1 (1–1)
Age at PVR (years)19.0 (14.1–22.6)
NYHA functional classa
 I89 (47)
 II86 (45)
 III11 (6)
 IV1 (1)
TR gradeb
 None10 (5)
 Trivial72 (38)
 Mild90 (47)
 Moderate11 (6)
 Severe5 (3)
QRS duration (ms) (n = 112)150 (137–166)
Arrhythmiac18 (9)
 Atrial flutter5 (3)
 Atrial fibrillation3 (2)
 SA node dysfunction3 (2)
 Complete AV block2 (1)
 Ventricular tachycardia2 (1)
 Others3 (2)
Cardiopulmonary exercise test (n = 76)
 Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min)29 (25–34)
 Percent predicted peak VO2 (%)70 (55–77)
VariablesValues
Male113 (59)
Age at TOF repair (years)2.0 (1.1–3.9)
Type of RVOT reconstruction
 Transannular patch150 (79)
 Pulmonary valvotomy23 (12)
 Monocusp valve17 (9)
Number of operations before PVR1 (1–1)
Age at PVR (years)19.0 (14.1–22.6)
NYHA functional classa
 I89 (47)
 II86 (45)
 III11 (6)
 IV1 (1)
TR gradeb
 None10 (5)
 Trivial72 (38)
 Mild90 (47)
 Moderate11 (6)
 Severe5 (3)
QRS duration (ms) (n = 112)150 (137–166)
Arrhythmiac18 (9)
 Atrial flutter5 (3)
 Atrial fibrillation3 (2)
 SA node dysfunction3 (2)
 Complete AV block2 (1)
 Ventricular tachycardia2 (1)
 Others3 (2)
Cardiopulmonary exercise test (n = 76)
 Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min)29 (25–34)
 Percent predicted peak VO2 (%)70 (55–77)

Data are presented as n (%) or median (interquartile range).

a

Data not available in 3 patients.

b

Data not available in 2 patients.

c

Documented and sustained (lasting >30 s) arrhythmia.

AV: atrioventricular; NYHA: New York Heart Association; PVR: pulmonary valve replacement; RVOT: right ventricular outflow tract; SA: sinoatrial; TOF: tetralogy of Fallot; TR: tricuspid regurgitation; VO2: oxygen consumption.

Table 1:

Demographic and preoperative characteristics of the study population

VariablesValues
Male113 (59)
Age at TOF repair (years)2.0 (1.1–3.9)
Type of RVOT reconstruction
 Transannular patch150 (79)
 Pulmonary valvotomy23 (12)
 Monocusp valve17 (9)
Number of operations before PVR1 (1–1)
Age at PVR (years)19.0 (14.1–22.6)
NYHA functional classa
 I89 (47)
 II86 (45)
 III11 (6)
 IV1 (1)
TR gradeb
 None10 (5)
 Trivial72 (38)
 Mild90 (47)
 Moderate11 (6)
 Severe5 (3)
QRS duration (ms) (n = 112)150 (137–166)
Arrhythmiac18 (9)
 Atrial flutter5 (3)
 Atrial fibrillation3 (2)
 SA node dysfunction3 (2)
 Complete AV block2 (1)
 Ventricular tachycardia2 (1)
 Others3 (2)
Cardiopulmonary exercise test (n = 76)
 Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min)29 (25–34)
 Percent predicted peak VO2 (%)70 (55–77)
VariablesValues
Male113 (59)
Age at TOF repair (years)2.0 (1.1–3.9)
Type of RVOT reconstruction
 Transannular patch150 (79)
 Pulmonary valvotomy23 (12)
 Monocusp valve17 (9)
Number of operations before PVR1 (1–1)
Age at PVR (years)19.0 (14.1–22.6)
NYHA functional classa
 I89 (47)
 II86 (45)
 III11 (6)
 IV1 (1)
TR gradeb
 None10 (5)
 Trivial72 (38)
 Mild90 (47)
 Moderate11 (6)
 Severe5 (3)
QRS duration (ms) (n = 112)150 (137–166)
Arrhythmiac18 (9)
 Atrial flutter5 (3)
 Atrial fibrillation3 (2)
 SA node dysfunction3 (2)
 Complete AV block2 (1)
 Ventricular tachycardia2 (1)
 Others3 (2)
Cardiopulmonary exercise test (n = 76)
 Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min)29 (25–34)
 Percent predicted peak VO2 (%)70 (55–77)

Data are presented as n (%) or median (interquartile range).

a

Data not available in 3 patients.

b

Data not available in 2 patients.

c

Documented and sustained (lasting >30 s) arrhythmia.

AV: atrioventricular; NYHA: New York Heart Association; PVR: pulmonary valve replacement; RVOT: right ventricular outflow tract; SA: sinoatrial; TOF: tetralogy of Fallot; TR: tricuspid regurgitation; VO2: oxygen consumption.

Indications for pulmonary valve replacement

Indications for PVR were symptoms and signs attributable to RV volume overload, presence of significant residual lesions requiring surgical interventions such as branch pulmonary artery stenosis and tricuspid regurgitation. For asymptomatic patients, we have maintained a proactive approach towards PVR as evidenced by the median age of 19 years at PVR (Table 1). Since 2002, we have performed cardiac MRI as a part of routine preoperative evaluation, and 143 (75%) patients have undergone the examination (Table 2). The median RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume was 164 and 82 ml/m2, respectively. During the recent study period, based on the findings of our previous study [8], we used the RV end-diastolic volume of 163 ml/m2 and RV end-systolic volume of 80 ml/m2 as a guide to assist decisions regarding PVR in the asymptomatic patients.

Table 2:

Preoperative MRI data (n =143)

VariablesValues
RV EDVI (ml/m2)164 (144–190)
RV ESVI (ml/m2)82 (70–104)
RV EF (%)50 (46–54)
PR fractiona (%)47 (40–52)
LV EDVI (ml/m2)76 (69–86)
LV ESVI (ml/m2)30 (26–38)
LV EF (%)60 (55–65)
VariablesValues
RV EDVI (ml/m2)164 (144–190)
RV ESVI (ml/m2)82 (70–104)
RV EF (%)50 (46–54)
PR fractiona (%)47 (40–52)
LV EDVI (ml/m2)76 (69–86)
LV ESVI (ml/m2)30 (26–38)
LV EF (%)60 (55–65)

Data are presented as median (interquartile range).

a

Data not available in 1 patient.

EDVI: end-diastolic volume index; EF: ejection fraction; ESVI: end-systolic volume index; LV: left ventricular; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; PR: pulmonary regurgitation; RV: right ventricular.

Table 2:

Preoperative MRI data (n =143)

VariablesValues
RV EDVI (ml/m2)164 (144–190)
RV ESVI (ml/m2)82 (70–104)
RV EF (%)50 (46–54)
PR fractiona (%)47 (40–52)
LV EDVI (ml/m2)76 (69–86)
LV ESVI (ml/m2)30 (26–38)
LV EF (%)60 (55–65)
VariablesValues
RV EDVI (ml/m2)164 (144–190)
RV ESVI (ml/m2)82 (70–104)
RV EF (%)50 (46–54)
PR fractiona (%)47 (40–52)
LV EDVI (ml/m2)76 (69–86)
LV ESVI (ml/m2)30 (26–38)
LV EF (%)60 (55–65)

Data are presented as median (interquartile range).

a

Data not available in 1 patient.

EDVI: end-diastolic volume index; EF: ejection fraction; ESVI: end-systolic volume index; LV: left ventricular; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; PR: pulmonary regurgitation; RV: right ventricular.

Surgery

PVR was performed through median sternotomy and using cardiopulmonary bypass with mild hypothermia. Aortic cross-clamping depended on the surgeon’s preference or on concomitant procedures. Choice of prosthetic pulmonary valves was at the discretion of the surgeon. When deemed necessary, RV reduction was performed according to the surgeon’s preference [8]. Table 3 summarizes the surgical data.

Table 3:

Surgical data

VariablesValues
Type of prosthetic pulmonary valve
 Stented bovine pericardial valve70 (37)
 Stented porcine valve65 (34)
 PTFE bicuspid valve50 (26)
 Stentless porcine valve5 (3)
Size of prosthetic pulmonary valvea (mm)25 (25–27)
Concomitant procedures138 (73)
 PA angioplasty104 (55)
 RV reduction46 (24)
 TV repair24 (13)
 VSD closure14 (7)
 RVOT muscle resection7 (4)
 ASD closure6 (3)
 RA isthmus cryoablation4 (2)
 RVOT cryoablation4 (2)
 Right-sided maze procedure3 (2)
 Permanent pacemaker implantation3 (2)
 Biatrial maze procedure2 (1)
 TV replacement1 (1)
 MV repair1 (1)
CPB time (min)129 (101–176)
ACC time (min) (n = 90)75 (55–94)
VariablesValues
Type of prosthetic pulmonary valve
 Stented bovine pericardial valve70 (37)
 Stented porcine valve65 (34)
 PTFE bicuspid valve50 (26)
 Stentless porcine valve5 (3)
Size of prosthetic pulmonary valvea (mm)25 (25–27)
Concomitant procedures138 (73)
 PA angioplasty104 (55)
 RV reduction46 (24)
 TV repair24 (13)
 VSD closure14 (7)
 RVOT muscle resection7 (4)
 ASD closure6 (3)
 RA isthmus cryoablation4 (2)
 RVOT cryoablation4 (2)
 Right-sided maze procedure3 (2)
 Permanent pacemaker implantation3 (2)
 Biatrial maze procedure2 (1)
 TV replacement1 (1)
 MV repair1 (1)
CPB time (min)129 (101–176)
ACC time (min) (n = 90)75 (55–94)

Data are presented as n (%) or median (interquartile range).

a

Data not available in 2 patients.

ACC: aortic cross-clamp; ASD: atrial septal defect; CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass; MV: mitral valve; PA: pulmonary artery; PTFE: polytetrafluoroethylene; RA: right atrial; RV: right ventricle; RVOT: right ventricular outflow tract; TV: tricuspid valve; VSD: ventricular septal defect.

Table 3:

Surgical data

VariablesValues
Type of prosthetic pulmonary valve
 Stented bovine pericardial valve70 (37)
 Stented porcine valve65 (34)
 PTFE bicuspid valve50 (26)
 Stentless porcine valve5 (3)
Size of prosthetic pulmonary valvea (mm)25 (25–27)
Concomitant procedures138 (73)
 PA angioplasty104 (55)
 RV reduction46 (24)
 TV repair24 (13)
 VSD closure14 (7)
 RVOT muscle resection7 (4)
 ASD closure6 (3)
 RA isthmus cryoablation4 (2)
 RVOT cryoablation4 (2)
 Right-sided maze procedure3 (2)
 Permanent pacemaker implantation3 (2)
 Biatrial maze procedure2 (1)
 TV replacement1 (1)
 MV repair1 (1)
CPB time (min)129 (101–176)
ACC time (min) (n = 90)75 (55–94)
VariablesValues
Type of prosthetic pulmonary valve
 Stented bovine pericardial valve70 (37)
 Stented porcine valve65 (34)
 PTFE bicuspid valve50 (26)
 Stentless porcine valve5 (3)
Size of prosthetic pulmonary valvea (mm)25 (25–27)
Concomitant procedures138 (73)
 PA angioplasty104 (55)
 RV reduction46 (24)
 TV repair24 (13)
 VSD closure14 (7)
 RVOT muscle resection7 (4)
 ASD closure6 (3)
 RA isthmus cryoablation4 (2)
 RVOT cryoablation4 (2)
 Right-sided maze procedure3 (2)
 Permanent pacemaker implantation3 (2)
 Biatrial maze procedure2 (1)
 TV replacement1 (1)
 MV repair1 (1)
CPB time (min)129 (101–176)
ACC time (min) (n = 90)75 (55–94)

Data are presented as n (%) or median (interquartile range).

a

Data not available in 2 patients.

ACC: aortic cross-clamp; ASD: atrial septal defect; CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass; MV: mitral valve; PA: pulmonary artery; PTFE: polytetrafluoroethylene; RA: right atrial; RV: right ventricle; RVOT: right ventricular outflow tract; TV: tricuspid valve; VSD: ventricular septal defect.

Follow-up

The closing date for this study was 10 September 2017. Follow-up was considered complete if the patient’s status was determined after July 2016. Survival status of the patient who could not be followed by the review of medical records or telephone contact (n =33) was determined by data obtained from the Korea Statistics Promotion Institute, a government organization providing reliable administrative data regarding vital statistics. The median duration of follow-up was 9.8 years (range 1.0–19.6 years), and 94% of hospital survivors had complete follow-up. Follow-up completeness, as measured by calculating the index devised by Clark et al. [19], was 94%. The most recent electrocardiographic, echocardiographic and MRI data were used for analyses. If necessary, patients underwent Holter examinations to detect arrhythmias and cardiopulmonary exercise testing to determine exercise tolerance.

Definitions of outcomes

Prosthetic pulmonary valve dysfunction was defined as a peak pressure gradient ≥40 mmHg or at least moderate PR on the latest echocardiography. New-onset arrhythmia was defined as sustained (lasting >30 s) atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia or VT. ACE was defined as all-cause death, heart transplantation or new-onset arrhythmia. RV normalization was defined as normal RV volume (end-diastolic volume <108 ml/m2 and end-systolic volume <47 ml/m2) and function (ejection fraction ≥49%) [20].

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as frequencies with percentages, means with standard deviations or medians with interquartile ranges as appropriate. Comparisons between paired groups were performed using paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test as appropriate. Discrete variables were analysed using χ2 test. Survival and time-to-event analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with ACE after PVR. The proportional hazards assumption was evaluated by log minus log plots and Schoenfeld residual plots. No corrections were made for multiple testing. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 24 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

Clinical outcomes

There were 2 early deaths (30-day hospital mortality, 1%). A 10-year-old boy, who had undergone TOF repair at the age of 3 years, died of ischaemic brain injury 8 days after the seemingly uneventful operation. He had no intracardiac shunt, and the operation was performed with the aorta cross clamped. A 25-year-old man, who had undergone TOF repair at the age of 5 years, died of pre-existing severe RV dysfunction. At the time of PVR, he was severely symptomatic [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV] with severe tricuspid regurgitation and atrial fibrillation. Concomitant tricuspid valve replacement and maze procedure were performed. He could not be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass because of severe RV dysfunction, and RV assist device support was initiated. He died of uncontrollable bleeding on the day of operation. Two late deaths of unknown cause occurred during follow-up. One patient who had undergone PVR at the age of 20.3 years died 13.1 years postoperatively. The other patient who had undergone PVR at the age of 12.8 years died 8.6 years postoperatively. The overall survival at 10 and 15 years was 98% ± 1% and 96% ± 2%, respectively (Fig. 1A). One patient underwent heart transplantation 9 years after PVR owing to RV failure. This patient, who had undergone TOF repair at the age of 13 months, underwent PVR at the age of 19.3 years. At the time of PVR, the RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume was 352 and 314 ml/m2, respectively. The RV ejection fraction was 11%. The transplantation-free survival at 10 and 15 years was 97% ± 2% and 95% ± 2%, respectively (Fig. 1B). Twenty-four patients underwent repeat PVR surgically. The reasons for repeat PVR were combined pulmonary stenosis and regurgitation (n =12), pulmonary stenosis (n =6), endocarditis (n =3), PR (n =1) and not available (n =2). No death occurred after repeat PVR. Freedom from repeat PVR at 10 and 15 years was 88% ± 3% and 76% ± 5%, respectively (Fig. 1C). One hundred eighty-one patients (96% of the hospital survivors) underwent echocardiography at a mean interval of 7.2 ± 4.9 years after PVR. Freedom from repeat PVR and prosthetic pulmonary valve dysfunction at 10 and 15 years was 79% ± 4% and 52% ± 6%, respectively. The patients with tricuspid regurgitation grade ≥ moderate decreased with marginal statistical significance (9% vs 4%, P =0.060). Seven patients developed new-onset arrhythmias (atrial flutter in 4, atrial fibrillation in 2 and atrial tachycardia in 1). No patient developed VT. QRS duration did not change significantly (n =112, 147 ± 28 vs 148 ± 23 ms, P =0.64). Freedom from new-onset arrhythmia at 10 and 15 years was 95% ± 2%. Twelve patients experienced ACE (all-cause death in 4, transplantation in 1 and new-onset arrhythmia in 7), and the freedom from ACE at 10 and 15 years was 92% ± 3% and 90% ± 3%, respectively (Fig. 1D). NYHA functional class improved from 1.6 ± 0.6 to 1.1 ± 0.3 (n =171, P <0.001). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing showed no change in peak oxygen consumption (n =59, 30 ± 7 vs 31 ± 9 ml/kg/min, P =0.18).

Kaplan–Meier curves for clinical outcomes. (A) Overall survival. (B) Transplantation-free survival. (C) Freedom from repeat PVR. (D) Freedom from ACE. Numbers above the x-axis represent patients remaining at risk. ACE: adverse clinical event; PVR: pulmonary valve replacement.
Figure 1:

Kaplan–Meier curves for clinical outcomes. (A) Overall survival. (B) Transplantation-free survival. (C) Freedom from repeat PVR. (D) Freedom from ACE. Numbers above the x-axis represent patients remaining at risk. ACE: adverse clinical event; PVR: pulmonary valve replacement.

Changes in magnetic resonance imaging parameters

Among the 143 patients who underwent pre-PVR MRI, 90 patients underwent post-PVR MRI after a median interval of 1.6 years (interquartile range 1.0–6.5 years) after PVR. There was significant reduction in RV volumes without significant improvement in RV systolic function (Table 4). RV normalization was achieved in 28 of the 90 (31%) patients.

Table 4:

Changes in MRI parameters (n =90)

ParametersPre-PVRPost-PVRP-value
RV EDVIa (ml/m2)164 (146–188)108 (92–127)<0.001
RV ESVIa (ml/m2)83 (71–105)52 (44–67)<0.001
RV EF (%)50 (45–53)50 (46–54)0.15
PR fractiona (%)46 (41–51)5 (2–13)<0.001
LV EDVIa (ml/m2)76 (70–83)81 (73–90)<0.001
LV ESVIa (ml/m2)30 (26–37)32 (27–42)0.037
LV EF (%)60 (56–64)60 (55–65)0.98
ParametersPre-PVRPost-PVRP-value
RV EDVIa (ml/m2)164 (146–188)108 (92–127)<0.001
RV ESVIa (ml/m2)83 (71–105)52 (44–67)<0.001
RV EF (%)50 (45–53)50 (46–54)0.15
PR fractiona (%)46 (41–51)5 (2–13)<0.001
LV EDVIa (ml/m2)76 (70–83)81 (73–90)<0.001
LV ESVIa (ml/m2)30 (26–37)32 (27–42)0.037
LV EF (%)60 (56–64)60 (55–65)0.98

Data are presented as median (interquartile range).

a

Data not available in 1 patient.

EDVI: end-diastolic volume index; EF: ejection fraction; ESVI: end-systolic volume index; LV: left ventricular; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; PR: pulmonary regurgitation; PVR: pulmonary valve replacement; RV: right ventricular.

Table 4:

Changes in MRI parameters (n =90)

ParametersPre-PVRPost-PVRP-value
RV EDVIa (ml/m2)164 (146–188)108 (92–127)<0.001
RV ESVIa (ml/m2)83 (71–105)52 (44–67)<0.001
RV EF (%)50 (45–53)50 (46–54)0.15
PR fractiona (%)46 (41–51)5 (2–13)<0.001
LV EDVIa (ml/m2)76 (70–83)81 (73–90)<0.001
LV ESVIa (ml/m2)30 (26–37)32 (27–42)0.037
LV EF (%)60 (56–64)60 (55–65)0.98
ParametersPre-PVRPost-PVRP-value
RV EDVIa (ml/m2)164 (146–188)108 (92–127)<0.001
RV ESVIa (ml/m2)83 (71–105)52 (44–67)<0.001
RV EF (%)50 (45–53)50 (46–54)0.15
PR fractiona (%)46 (41–51)5 (2–13)<0.001
LV EDVIa (ml/m2)76 (70–83)81 (73–90)<0.001
LV ESVIa (ml/m2)30 (26–37)32 (27–42)0.037
LV EF (%)60 (56–64)60 (55–65)0.98

Data are presented as median (interquartile range).

a

Data not available in 1 patient.

EDVI: end-diastolic volume index; EF: ejection fraction; ESVI: end-systolic volume index; LV: left ventricular; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; PR: pulmonary regurgitation; PVR: pulmonary valve replacement; RV: right ventricular.

Factors associated with adverse clinical events after pulmonary valve replacement

Older age at PVR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.01/year, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00–1.01; P =0.030], older age at TOF repair (HR 1.01/year, 95% CI 1.00–1.01; P =0.020), NYHA functional class III or IV (HR 7.59, 95% CI 2.21–26.03; P =0.001), presence of atrial or ventricular tachyarrhythmias (HR 6.53, 95% CI 1.76–24.15; P =0.010), longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (HR 1.01/min, 95% CI 1.00–1.01; P <0.001) and concomitant arrhythmia surgery (HR 5.53, 95% CI 1.50–20.49; P =0.010) were associated with ACE after PVR (Table 5). In a subgroup analysis of 143 patients with pre-PVR MRI data, larger RV end-systolic volume (HR 1.01/ml/m2, 95% CI 1.00–1.02; P =0.030), larger LV end-systolic volume (HR 1.06/ml/m2, 95% CI 1.01–1.11; P =0.030) and lower LV ejection fraction (HR 0.91/%, 95% CI 0.84–0.99; P =0.030) were associated with ACE (Table 5).

Table 5:

Factors associated with ACE after PVR

VariablesHR95% CIP-value
Patient and surgical characteristics (n = 190)
 Female gender0.280.06–1.270.10
 Age at PVR (years)1.011.00–1.010.030
 Age at TOF repair (years)1.011.00–1.010.020
 Transannular repair2.020.26–15.690.50
 Number of operations before PVR0.700.19–2.620.59
 NYHA class III or IVa7.592.21–26.030.001
 Moderate or severe TRb1.890.41–8.650.41
 Presence of tachyarrhythmiac6.531.76–24.150.010
 CPB time (min)1.011.00–1.01<0.001
 Cardioplegic arrest1.220.38–3.910.74
 Concomitant RV reduction0.990.30–3.320.99
 Concomitant TV surgery3.000.90–9.990.070
 Concomitant arrhythmia surgeryd5.531.50–20.490.010
Pre-PVR MRI parametere (n = 143)
 RV EDVI (ml/m2)1.011.00–1.030.13
 RV EDVI >160 ml/m20.550.10–3.000.49
 RV ESVI (ml/m2)1.011.00–1.020.030
 RV ESVI >80 ml/m21.120.24–5.820.85
 RV EF (%)0.950.89–1.030.20
 PR fraction (%)0.980.90–1.060.62
 LV EDVI (ml/m2)1.020.98–1.070.37
 LV ESVI (ml/m2)1.061.01–1.110.030
 LV EF (%)0.910.84–0.990.030
VariablesHR95% CIP-value
Patient and surgical characteristics (n = 190)
 Female gender0.280.06–1.270.10
 Age at PVR (years)1.011.00–1.010.030
 Age at TOF repair (years)1.011.00–1.010.020
 Transannular repair2.020.26–15.690.50
 Number of operations before PVR0.700.19–2.620.59
 NYHA class III or IVa7.592.21–26.030.001
 Moderate or severe TRb1.890.41–8.650.41
 Presence of tachyarrhythmiac6.531.76–24.150.010
 CPB time (min)1.011.00–1.01<0.001
 Cardioplegic arrest1.220.38–3.910.74
 Concomitant RV reduction0.990.30–3.320.99
 Concomitant TV surgery3.000.90–9.990.070
 Concomitant arrhythmia surgeryd5.531.50–20.490.010
Pre-PVR MRI parametere (n = 143)
 RV EDVI (ml/m2)1.011.00–1.030.13
 RV EDVI >160 ml/m20.550.10–3.000.49
 RV ESVI (ml/m2)1.011.00–1.020.030
 RV ESVI >80 ml/m21.120.24–5.820.85
 RV EF (%)0.950.89–1.030.20
 PR fraction (%)0.980.90–1.060.62
 LV EDVI (ml/m2)1.020.98–1.070.37
 LV ESVI (ml/m2)1.061.01–1.110.030
 LV EF (%)0.910.84–0.990.030
a

Three patients with 1 ACE were excluded from the analysis owing to missing data.

b

Two patients without ACE were excluded from the analysis owing to missing data.

c

Atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia.

d

Except permanent pacemaker implantation.

e

Six patients experienced ACE.

ACE: adverse clinical event; CI: confidence interval; CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass; EDVI: end-diastolic volume index; EF: ejection fraction; ESVI: end-systolic volume index; HR: hazard ratio; LV: left ventricular; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; NYHA: New York Heart Association; PR: pulmonary regurgitation; PVR: pulmonary valve replacement; RV: right ventricular; TOF: tetralogy of Fallot; TR: tricuspid regurgitation; TV: tricuspid valve.

Table 5:

Factors associated with ACE after PVR

VariablesHR95% CIP-value
Patient and surgical characteristics (n = 190)
 Female gender0.280.06–1.270.10
 Age at PVR (years)1.011.00–1.010.030
 Age at TOF repair (years)1.011.00–1.010.020
 Transannular repair2.020.26–15.690.50
 Number of operations before PVR0.700.19–2.620.59
 NYHA class III or IVa7.592.21–26.030.001
 Moderate or severe TRb1.890.41–8.650.41
 Presence of tachyarrhythmiac6.531.76–24.150.010
 CPB time (min)1.011.00–1.01<0.001
 Cardioplegic arrest1.220.38–3.910.74
 Concomitant RV reduction0.990.30–3.320.99
 Concomitant TV surgery3.000.90–9.990.070
 Concomitant arrhythmia surgeryd5.531.50–20.490.010
Pre-PVR MRI parametere (n = 143)
 RV EDVI (ml/m2)1.011.00–1.030.13
 RV EDVI >160 ml/m20.550.10–3.000.49
 RV ESVI (ml/m2)1.011.00–1.020.030
 RV ESVI >80 ml/m21.120.24–5.820.85
 RV EF (%)0.950.89–1.030.20
 PR fraction (%)0.980.90–1.060.62
 LV EDVI (ml/m2)1.020.98–1.070.37
 LV ESVI (ml/m2)1.061.01–1.110.030
 LV EF (%)0.910.84–0.990.030
VariablesHR95% CIP-value
Patient and surgical characteristics (n = 190)
 Female gender0.280.06–1.270.10
 Age at PVR (years)1.011.00–1.010.030
 Age at TOF repair (years)1.011.00–1.010.020
 Transannular repair2.020.26–15.690.50
 Number of operations before PVR0.700.19–2.620.59
 NYHA class III or IVa7.592.21–26.030.001
 Moderate or severe TRb1.890.41–8.650.41
 Presence of tachyarrhythmiac6.531.76–24.150.010
 CPB time (min)1.011.00–1.01<0.001
 Cardioplegic arrest1.220.38–3.910.74
 Concomitant RV reduction0.990.30–3.320.99
 Concomitant TV surgery3.000.90–9.990.070
 Concomitant arrhythmia surgeryd5.531.50–20.490.010
Pre-PVR MRI parametere (n = 143)
 RV EDVI (ml/m2)1.011.00–1.030.13
 RV EDVI >160 ml/m20.550.10–3.000.49
 RV ESVI (ml/m2)1.011.00–1.020.030
 RV ESVI >80 ml/m21.120.24–5.820.85
 RV EF (%)0.950.89–1.030.20
 PR fraction (%)0.980.90–1.060.62
 LV EDVI (ml/m2)1.020.98–1.070.37
 LV ESVI (ml/m2)1.061.01–1.110.030
 LV EF (%)0.910.84–0.990.030
a

Three patients with 1 ACE were excluded from the analysis owing to missing data.

b

Two patients without ACE were excluded from the analysis owing to missing data.

c

Atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia.

d

Except permanent pacemaker implantation.

e

Six patients experienced ACE.

ACE: adverse clinical event; CI: confidence interval; CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass; EDVI: end-diastolic volume index; EF: ejection fraction; ESVI: end-systolic volume index; HR: hazard ratio; LV: left ventricular; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; NYHA: New York Heart Association; PR: pulmonary regurgitation; PVR: pulmonary valve replacement; RV: right ventricular; TOF: tetralogy of Fallot; TR: tricuspid regurgitation; TV: tricuspid valve.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest single-centre study with the longest follow-up duration, which examined long-term outcomes of PVR in patients with repaired TOF. The transplantation-free survival and freedom from ACE at 15 years was 95% and 90%, respectively. Older age at PVR, NYHA functional class III or IV, atrial or ventricular tachyarrhythmias, larger RV and LV end-systolic volumes and LV systolic dysfunction were associated with ACE.

Long-term outcomes of pulmonary valve replacement

Surgical PVR is being performed with increasing frequency in patients with repaired TOF. Cuypers et al. [21], in a longitudinal cohort study consisting of 144 patients with repaired TOF, reported that the cumulative incidence of PVR was 40% at 35 years. Although PVR can lead to the improvement of functional class and successful RV remodelling [6–8], it remains unknown whether such benefits of PVR will translate into improved long-term survival.

Data pertaining to the long-term outcomes of PVR are limited in the literature, and most of the reported outcomes are far from satisfactory (Table 6). Reported survival rates at 15 years after PVR range between 70% and 80% [13–15]. On the contrary, survival of our patients was excellent with 96% at 15 years. This difference in survival may be interpreted in terms of optimal timing of PVR. For instance, Sabate Rotes et al. [15] reported that the mean age at PVR was 31 years and 42% of the patients had advanced symptoms. In their study, survival was 80% at 15 years and NYHA class III/IV was identified as one of the independent risk factors for death. In our study, the median age at PVR was 19 years and only 6% of the patients had NYHA class III/IV. Harrild et al. [13] also reported unsatisfactory outcomes of PVR with freedom from death or VT of only 41% at 10 years. Notably, the mean RV end-diastolic volume before PVR was 196 ml/m2, which was much larger than that of our study (164 ml/m2). These differences imply that a proactive approach towards PVR before it is too late may be beneficial in improving long-term survival of the patients with repaired TOF and PR. Although current guideline recommends PVR in asymptomatic patients with severe RV dilatation (RV end-diastolic volume ≥160 ml/m2 or RV end-systolic volume ≥80 ml/m2) [11], we believe that proactive PVR before these cut-off values are exceeded may translate into better clinical outcomes in these patients. To this end, judicious follow-up of the patients may be important. Wald et al. [25] reported that the optimal time interval between MRI examinations for the detection of rapidly progressive RV dilatation and dysfunction was a 3-year interval.

Table 6:

Reported outcomes of PVR in patients with repaired TOF

StudyPatientsAge at TOF repairAge at PVRFollow-upSurvival or events
Therrien et al. [22]707.028.24.786% at 10 years
Oosterhof et al. [23]1586.328.34.298% at 10 years
Gengsakul et al. [12]829.027.98.890% at 20 years
Harrild et al. [13]982.020.71.170% at 15 years
van de Woestijne et al. [14]1267.228.18.180% at 15 years
Lee et al. [8]1702.016.75.998% at 10 years
Sabate Rotes et al. [15]2784.031.47.380% at 15 years
Babu-Narayan et al. [24]220NA32.0NA92% at 10 years
Bokma et al. [16]1295.032.98.45 deaths, 7 VT
Heng et al. [10]574.035.8NA4 deaths, 5 VT
Geva et al. [17]452NA25.8NA36 deaths or VT
StudyPatientsAge at TOF repairAge at PVRFollow-upSurvival or events
Therrien et al. [22]707.028.24.786% at 10 years
Oosterhof et al. [23]1586.328.34.298% at 10 years
Gengsakul et al. [12]829.027.98.890% at 20 years
Harrild et al. [13]982.020.71.170% at 15 years
van de Woestijne et al. [14]1267.228.18.180% at 15 years
Lee et al. [8]1702.016.75.998% at 10 years
Sabate Rotes et al. [15]2784.031.47.380% at 15 years
Babu-Narayan et al. [24]220NA32.0NA92% at 10 years
Bokma et al. [16]1295.032.98.45 deaths, 7 VT
Heng et al. [10]574.035.8NA4 deaths, 5 VT
Geva et al. [17]452NA25.8NA36 deaths or VT

Age and follow-up are expressed as years and presented as mean or median values.

NA: not available; PVR: pulmonary valve replacement; TOF: tetralogy of Fallot; VT: ventricular tachycardia.

Table 6:

Reported outcomes of PVR in patients with repaired TOF

StudyPatientsAge at TOF repairAge at PVRFollow-upSurvival or events
Therrien et al. [22]707.028.24.786% at 10 years
Oosterhof et al. [23]1586.328.34.298% at 10 years
Gengsakul et al. [12]829.027.98.890% at 20 years
Harrild et al. [13]982.020.71.170% at 15 years
van de Woestijne et al. [14]1267.228.18.180% at 15 years
Lee et al. [8]1702.016.75.998% at 10 years
Sabate Rotes et al. [15]2784.031.47.380% at 15 years
Babu-Narayan et al. [24]220NA32.0NA92% at 10 years
Bokma et al. [16]1295.032.98.45 deaths, 7 VT
Heng et al. [10]574.035.8NA4 deaths, 5 VT
Geva et al. [17]452NA25.8NA36 deaths or VT
StudyPatientsAge at TOF repairAge at PVRFollow-upSurvival or events
Therrien et al. [22]707.028.24.786% at 10 years
Oosterhof et al. [23]1586.328.34.298% at 10 years
Gengsakul et al. [12]829.027.98.890% at 20 years
Harrild et al. [13]982.020.71.170% at 15 years
van de Woestijne et al. [14]1267.228.18.180% at 15 years
Lee et al. [8]1702.016.75.998% at 10 years
Sabate Rotes et al. [15]2784.031.47.380% at 15 years
Babu-Narayan et al. [24]220NA32.0NA92% at 10 years
Bokma et al. [16]1295.032.98.45 deaths, 7 VT
Heng et al. [10]574.035.8NA4 deaths, 5 VT
Geva et al. [17]452NA25.8NA36 deaths or VT

Age and follow-up are expressed as years and presented as mean or median values.

NA: not available; PVR: pulmonary valve replacement; TOF: tetralogy of Fallot; VT: ventricular tachycardia.

One of the concerned aspects of a proactive approach is an issue of repeat PVR due to structural valve deterioration of the bioprosthetic valves [26, 27]. In our study, the freedom from repeat PVR at 15 years was 76%, which was similar to those of previous studies (70–75% at 15 years) [14, 15, 23]. Other valve substitutes such as polytetrafluoroethylene valves used in some of our patients may be promising [28]. Importantly, the role of transcatheter PVR for dysfunctional surgical bioprostheses is expanding and changing the treatment paradigm for patients with PR [29]. We have to emphasize that the operative mortality (1%) was not negligible, and this should be considered when assessing the risk/benefit balance of PVR.

Predictors of adverse clinical outcomes after pulmonary valve replacement

Predictors of adverse clinical outcomes after PVR such as death, VT, heart failure or supraventricular tachycardia have been reported in previous studies [9, 10, 15–17, 30]. These include older age at PVR, older age at TOF repair, NYHA class III/IV, severe tricuspid regurgitation, larger RV end-systolic volume, RV or LV systolic dysfunction and so on. These are in line with those identified in our study. Bokma et al. [9] reported that patients with preoperative RV end-systolic volume >95 ml/m2 were at increased risk for ACE, and this was probably the first study showing an association between larger preoperative RV volume and adverse clinical outcomes after PVR. Geva et al. [17] found that age at PVR ≥28 years was one of the predictors of death and sustained VT after PVR. Of note, we found that atrial/ventricular tachyarrhythmias, concomitant arrhythmia surgery and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time were associated with ACE. These seem to be closely related to variables, which can act as confounders for outcomes. Not being able to perform multivariable analysis to account for confounding because of an insufficient number of ACE is a significant limitation of our study. According to the study by Khairy et al. [2], the prevalence of atrial/ventricular tachyarrhythmias increases as the age of the patients increases. Again, all these findings support the potentially beneficial role of proactive PVR in improving long-term survival of the patients with repaired TOF and PR.

Limitations

The present study was limited by its retrospective nature, absence of a control group and incomplete follow-up (94%). The causes of 2 late deaths, which were ascertained by data obtained from the Korea Statistics Promotion Institute, were unknown. Also, information regarding other outcomes (heart transplantation, new-onset arrhythmia, etc.) was not available in 33 patients whose vital status had been ascertained through the Korea Statistics Promotion Institute. Multivariable analysis to identify predictors of ACE was not performed due to an insufficient number of ACE in our patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes of surgical PVR in patients with repaired TOF were satisfactory. Proactive PVR before the onset of advanced symptoms, tachyarrhythmias and ventricular dysfunction may further improve the long-term survival of this patient population.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

Author contributions

Cheul Lee: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Methodology; Writing—original draft. Eun Seok Choi: Data curation; Writing—review & editing. Chang-Ha Lee: Writing—review & editing.

REFERENCES

1

Nollert
G
,
Fischlein
T
,
Bouterwek
S
,
Böhmer
C
,
Klinner
W
,
Reichart
B.
Long-term survival in patients with repair of tetralogy of Fallot: 36-year follow-up of 490 survivors of the first year after surgical repair
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
1997
;
30
:
1374
83
.

2

Khairy
P
,
Aboulhosn
J
,
Gurvitz
MZ
,
Opotowsky
AR
,
Mongeon
FP
,
Kay
J
et al.
Alliance for Adult Research in Congenital Cardiology (AARCC). Arrhythmia burden in adults with surgically repaired tetralogy of Fallot: a multi-institutional study
.
Circulation
2010
;
122
:
868
75
.

3

Valente
AM
,
Gauvreau
K
,
Assenza
GE
,
Babu-Narayan
SV
,
Schreier
J
,
Gatzoulis
MA
et al.
Contemporary predictors of death and sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot enrolled in the INDICATOR cohort
.
Heart
2014
;
100
:
247
53
.

4

Lee
C
,
Lee
CH
,
Kwak
JG
,
Kim
SH
,
Shim
WS
,
Lee
SY
et al.
Does limited right ventriculotomy prevent right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction in patients who undergo transannular repair of tetralogy of Fallot? Matched comparison of magnetic resonance imaging parameters with conventional right ventriculotomy long-term after repair
.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2014
;
147
:
889
95
.

5

Lee
C
,
Lee
CH
,
Kwak
JG
,
Kim
SH
,
Shim
WS
,
Lee
SY
et al.
Factors associated with right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction in patients with chronic pulmonary regurgitation after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: analysis of magnetic resonance imaging data from 218 patients
.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2014
;
148
:
2589
95
.

6

Oosterhof
T
,
van Straten
A
,
Vliegen
HW
,
Meijboom
FJ
,
van Dijk
AP
,
Spijkerboer
AM
et al.
Preoperative thresholds for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot using cardiovascular magnetic resonance
.
Circulation
2007
;
116
:
545
51
.

7

Geva
T
,
Gauvreau
K
,
Powell
AJ
,
Cecchin
F
,
Rhodes
J
,
Geva
J
et al.
Randomized trial of pulmonary valve replacement with and without right ventricular remodeling surgery
.
Circulation
2010
;
122
:
S201
8
.

8

Lee
C
,
Kim
YM
,
Lee
CH
,
Kwak
JG
,
Park
CS
,
Song
JY
et al.
Outcomes of pulmonary valve replacement in 170 patients with chronic pulmonary regurgitation after relief of right ventricular outflow tract obstruction: implications for optimal timing of pulmonary valve replacement
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
2012
;
60
:
1005
14
.

9

Bokma
JP
,
Winter
MM
,
Oosterhof
T
,
Vliegen
HW
,
van Dijk
AP
,
Hazekamp
MG
et al.
Preoperative thresholds for mid-to-late haemodynamic and clinical outcomes after pulmonary valve replacement in tetralogy of Fallot
.
Eur Heart J
2016
;
37
:
829
35
.

10

Heng
EL
,
Gatzoulis
MA
,
Uebing
A
,
Sethia
B
,
Uemura
H
,
Smith
GC
et al.
Immediate and midterm cardiac remodeling after surgical pulmonary valve replacement in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: a prospective cardiovascular magnetic resonance and clinical study
.
Circulation
2017
;
136
:
1703
13
.

11

Stout
KK
,
Daniels
CJ
,
Aboulhosn
JA
,
Bozkurt
B
,
Broberg
CS
,
Colman
JM
et al.
2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
2019
;
73
:
e81
192
.

12

Gengsakul
A
,
Harris
L
,
Bradley
TJ
,
Webb
GD
,
Williams
WG
,
Siu
SC
et al.
The impact of pulmonary valve replacement after tetralogy of Fallot repair: a matched comparison
.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
2007
;
32
:
462
8
.

13

Harrild
DM
,
Berul
CI
,
Cecchin
F
,
Geva
T
,
Gauvreau
K
,
Pigula
F
et al.
Pulmonary valve replacement in tetralogy of Fallot: impact on survival and ventricular tachycardia
.
Circulation
2009
;
119
:
445
51
.

14

van de Woestijne
PC
,
Mokhles
MM
,
de Jong
PL
,
Witsenburg
M
,
Takkenberg
JJ
,
Bogers
AJ.
Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with an allograft conduit in patients after tetralogy of Fallot correction: long-term follow-up
.
Ann Thorac Surg
2011
;
92
:
161
6
.

15

Sabate Rotes
A
,
Eidem
BW
,
Connolly
HM
,
Bonnichsen
CR
,
Rosedahl
JK
,
Schaff
HV
et al.
Long-term follow-up after pulmonary valve replacement in repaired tetralogy of Fallot
.
Am J Cardiol
2014
;
114
:
901
8
.

16

Bokma
JP
,
Winter
MM
,
Oosterhof
T
,
Vliegen
HW
,
van Dijk
AP
,
Hazekamp
MG
et al.
Severe tricuspid regurgitation is predictive for adverse events in tetralogy of Fallot
.
Heart
2015
;
101
:
794
9
.

17

Geva
T
,
Mulder
B
,
Gauvreau
K
,
Babu-Narayan
SV
,
Wald
R
,
Hickey
K
et al.
Preoperative predictors of death and sustained ventricular tachycardia after pulmonary valve replacement in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot enrolled in the INDICATOR cohort
.
Circulation
2018
;
138
:
2106
15
.

18

Lim
C
,
Lee
JY
,
Kim
WH
,
Kim
SC
,
Song
JY
,
Kim
SJ
et al.
Early replacement of pulmonary valve after repair of tetralogy: is it really beneficial?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
2004
;
25
:
728
34
.

19

Clark
TG
,
Altman
DG
,
De Stavola
BL.
Quantification of the completeness of follow-up
.
Lancet
2002
;
359
:
1309
10
.

20

Rominger
MB
,
Bachmann
GF
,
Pabst
W
,
Rau
WS.
Right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction with fast cine MR imaging in breath-hold technique: applicability, normal values from 52 volunteers, and evaluation of 325 adult cardiac patients
.
J Magn Reson Imaging
1999
;
10
:
908
18
.

21

Cuypers
JA
,
Menting
ME
,
Konings
EE
,
Opić
P
,
Utens
EM
,
Helbing
WA
et al.
Unnatural history of tetralogy of Fallot: prospective follow-up of 40 years after surgical correction
.
Circulation
2014
;
130
:
1944
53
.

22

Therrien
J
,
Siu
SC
,
Harris
L
,
Dore
A
,
Niwa
K
,
Janousek
J
et al.
Impact of pulmonary valve replacement on arrhythmia propensity late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot
.
Circulation
2001
;
103
:
2489
94
.

23

Oosterhof
T
,
Meijboom
FJ
,
Vliegen
HW
,
Hazekamp
MG
,
Zwinderman
AH
,
Bouma
BJ
et al.
Long-term follow-up of homograft function after pulmonary valve replacement in patients with tetralogy of Fallot
.
Eur Heart J
2005
;
27
:
1478
84
.

24

Babu-Narayan
SV
,
Diller
GP
,
Gheta
RR
,
Bastin
AJ
,
Karonis
T
,
Li
W
et al.
Clinical outcomes of surgical pulmonary valve replacement after repair of tetralogy of Fallot and potential prognostic value of preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing
.
Circulation
2014
;
129
:
18
27
.

25

Wald
RM
,
Valente
AM
,
Gauvreau
K
,
Babu-Narayan
SV
,
Assenza
GE
,
Schreier
J
et al.
Cardiac magnetic resonance markers of progressive RV dilation and dysfunction after tetralogy of Fallot repair
.
Heart
2015
;
101
:
1724
30
.

26

Lee
C
,
Park
CS
,
Lee
CH
,
Kwak
JG
,
Kim
SJ
,
Shim
WS
et al.
Durability of bioprosthetic valves in the pulmonary position: long-term follow-up of 181 implants in patients with congenital heart disease
.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2011
;
142
:
351
8
.

27

Lee
C
,
Lee
CH
,
Kwak
JG.
Outcomes of redo pulmonary valve replacement for bioprosthetic pulmonary valve failure in 61 patients with congenital heart disease
.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
2016
;
50
:
470
5
.

28

Lee
C
,
Lee
CH
,
Kwak
JG.
Polytetrafluoroethylene bicuspid pulmonary valve replacement: a 5-year experience in 119 patients with congenital heart disease
.
Ann Thorac Surg
2016
;
102
:
163
9
.

29

Cabalka
AK
,
Asnes
JD
,
Balzer
DT
,
Cheatham
JP
,
Gillespie
MJ
,
Jones
TK
et al.
Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement using the melody valve for treatment of dysfunctional surgical bioprostheses: a multicenter study
.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2018
;
155
:
1712
24
.

30

Egbe
AC
,
Miranda
WR
,
Said
SM
,
Pislaru
SV
,
Pellikka
PA
,
Borlaug
BA
et al.
Risk stratification and clinical outcomes after surgical pulmonary valve replacement
.
Am Heart J
2018
;
206
:
105
12
.

Abbreviations

     
  • ACE

    Adverse clinical event

  •  
  • CI

    Confidence interval

  •  
  • HR

    Hazard ratio

  •  
  • MRI

    Magnetic resonance imaging

  •  
  • NYHA

    New York Heart Association

  •  
  • PR

    Pulmonary regurgitation

  •  
  • PVR

    Pulmonary valve replacement

  •  
  • RV

    Right ventricular

  •  
  • TOF

    Tetralogy of Fallot

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)