Skip to Main Content

Browse issues

Issue Cover
Volume 120, Issue 486
April 2005
ISSN 0013-8266
EISSN 1477-4534
Issue navigation

Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005

Articles

P. J. Broadhead
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 277–302, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei116
Jeremy Black
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 303–339, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei117
Martin Simpson
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 340–364, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei118
C. J. Bearman
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 365–397, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei119

Notes

W. M. Ormrod
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 398–415, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei120

Book Reviews

Susan Reynolds
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 416–417, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei127
James Howard-Johnston
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 417–419, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei128
Catherine Holmes
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 419–421, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei129
Jonathan Shepard
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 421–424, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei130
Nicholas Brooks
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 424–426, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei131
Edward James
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 426–428, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei132
Roger Collins
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 428–429, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei133
Susan Reynolds
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 429–431, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei134
Daniel H. Kaiser
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 431–433, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei135
David Bates
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 433–435, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei136
Janet L. Nelson
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 435–437, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei143
Dorothy Johnston
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 437–439, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei137
G.H. Martin
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 439–441, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei138
Tom Scott
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 441–443, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei139
Jonathan Sumption
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 443–445, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei237
Tom Scott
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 445–447, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei140
S.J. Payling
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 447–448, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei141
Gervase Rosser
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 448–450, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei142
Ralph A. Griffiths
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 450–453, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei144
Brendan Bradshaw
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 453–456, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei145
Neil Cuddy
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 456–458, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei146
Ronald Hutton
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 458–460, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei147
Andrew Pettegree
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 460–462, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei148
Jeremy Black
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 462–464, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei149
Robert Oresko
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 464–466, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei150
Joan Thirsk
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 466–468, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei151
Ian McBride
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 468–469, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei152
Guy Rowlands
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 470–474, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei153
Peter Nockles
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 474–476, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei154
James M. Brophy
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 476–479, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei155
Matthew Hilton
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 479–480, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei156
Colin Newbury
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 481–482, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei157
Allison Drew
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 482–485, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei158
Matthew Kelly
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 485–487, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei159
Andrew Chandler
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 487–489, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei160
G. Pritchard
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 489–491, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei161
Irvine Loudon
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 491–493, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei162

Shorter Notices

Richard Holt
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Page 494, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei163
J. Campbell
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Page 495, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei164
E. Christiansen
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 495–496, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei165
Robert Bartlett
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 496–497, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei166
Julia Barrow
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 497–498, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei167
G.A. Loud
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 498–499, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei168
J. Campbell
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 499–500, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei169
Frank Barlow
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Page 500, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei170
Bernard Hamilton
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 500–502, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei171
Jonathan Riley-Smith
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 502–503, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei172
Elizabeth A.R. Brown
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 503–504, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei173
Jean Dunbabin
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 504–505, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei174
Jean Dunbabin
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 505–506, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei175
A.J. Forey
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 506–507, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei176
J.R. Maddicott
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 507–508, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei177
Claire Donovan
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 508–510, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei178
John Larner
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Page 510, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei179
Peter Rycraft
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 510–511, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei180
D.M. Palliser
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 511–512, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei181
Christopher Allmand
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 512–513, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei182
Greg Walker
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 513–514, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei183
Anthony Tuck
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 514–515, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei184
Christopher Allmand
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Page 516, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei185
Colin Richmond
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 516–517, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei186
Hannes Kleineke
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 517–519, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei187
Jonathan Davies
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 519–520, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei188
R.J. Knecht
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 520–521, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei189
W.R.B. Robinson
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 521–522, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei190
Stuart Carroll
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 522–523, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei191
Sydney Anglo
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 524–525, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei192
C.S.L. Davies
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 525–526, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei193
A.D. Wright
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 526–527, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei194
Henry Ettinghausen
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 527–528, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei195
Michael Braddick
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 528–529, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei196
Christopher Brooks
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 529–530, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei197
William Lamont
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 530–531, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei198
Frank Cogliano
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 531–532, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei199
W.R. Ward
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 532–533, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei200
Peter Clark
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 533–535, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei201
Simon Dixon
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 535–536, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei203
Walter Eltis
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 536–537, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei204
David Allan
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 537–538, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei205
Norman Hampson
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 538–539, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei206
Norman Gash
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 539–540, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei207
Leslie Mitchell
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 540–541, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei208
Philip Bull
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 541–542, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei209
Brian Short
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 542–543, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei210
Edgar Feuchtwanger
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 543–544, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei211
R.D. Anderson
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 544–545, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei212
Jan Palmowski
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 545–546, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei213
R.A.H. Robinson
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 547–548, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei214
Roger Swift
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 548–549, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei215
Alan O'Day
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 549–551, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei216
J.M. Bourne
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Page 551, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei217
Catherine Hall
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 551–552, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei218
Jane McDermid
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 553–554, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei219
Richard Hoggart
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 554–555, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei220
David Arnold
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 555–556, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei221
Ian Copland
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 556–557, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei222
Donald Sassoon
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 557–559, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei223
Peter J. Beck
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 559–560, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei224
Martin Conway
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 560–561, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei225
A.J. Stockwell
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 561–563, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei226
Richard Reid
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 563–564, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei227
John W. Young
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 564–565, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei228
Josie McLellan
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 565–566, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei229
Rodney Barker
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 566–567, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei230
P. Burke
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 568–569, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei231
Diarmaid MacCulloch
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 569–570, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei232
John Derry
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 570–571, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei233
Richard C. Thurlow
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 572–573, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei234
D. Palfreyman
The English Historical Review, Volume 120, Issue 486, April 2005, Pages 573–575, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei235
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close