Abstract

Background

The cornerstone of treatment in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is to achieve early reperfusion, either with pharmaco-invasive strategy (PhI) or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). No meaningful differences in clinical outcomes were shown with either reperfusion strategy. TheTAPSE/sPAP ratio as an echocardiographic estimation of RV/PA coupling has a prognostic role in multiple cardiovascular conditions, notwithstanding, its clinical role across reperfusion strategies in STEMI is scarce. Global longitudinal Strain (GLS) provides independent and incremental prognostic information regarding long-term risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Both are part of modern non-invasive indices of cardiac function. Their interaction in determining prognosis in STEMI patients is not well established.

Purpose

To assess the performance of advanced echocardiographic ventricular analysis and risk of MACE following an ACS, as a proof -of-concept explanation of the non-inferiority clinical results of the PhI strategy compared to primary PCI.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 160 patients diagnosed with STEMI and ischemic time <24h, transthoracic echocardiography study was done by specialists on admission and the follow up was for 700 days. There were 2 groups according to the reperfusion strategy (PhI and PCI), in both cases TAPSE/sPAP was >0.32 mm/mmHg and GLS >15%. Kaplan-Meier methods with log-rank tests were employed to assess the presence of MACE defined as heart failure, bleeding, stroke, shock and death.

Results

At final analysis 87.5% were male, the median age was 58 years, and 77% were treated by pharmacoinvasive strategy, 47.5% had hypertension, 41.2% had diabetes, 45% was anterior wall myocardial infarction, 95% had TAPSE/sPAP ratio >=0.32 mm/mmHg, 74.7% had GLS >-15% and 37.5% presented MACE. Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank test showed no significant differences for presence of MACE between patients with normal values of RV/PA (>0.32mm/mmHg) and optimal GLS (>-15%) with a p-value<0.384 in both groups of reperfusion strategy.

Conclusions
Our study has shown that despite a trend towards an increased rate of major adverse cardiovascular events observed, there are no significant differences in echocardiographic advanced mechanical ventricular analysis in STEMI patients independently of the reperfusion strategy that was performed. These findings suggest that both strategies are effective for an improvement of myocardial macro and microvascular circulation, both as key components for improving the prognosis of STEMI patients. Echocardiographic analysis may explain from a mechanistic point of view why achieving early and optimal reperfusion by either strategy should be keen. Further research is warranted to focus on the long-term implications of these findings.
This content is only available as a PDF.

Author notes

Funding Acknowledgements: None.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.