Abstract

Funding Acknowledgements

None.

Introduction

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) is recommended for patients suffering from severe aortic stenosis (AoS) as an elective procedure. Taking into consideration that AoS is associated with acute heart failure and cardiogenic stroke resistant to pharmacotherapy, urgent TAVI might be a therapeutic option. However, a few data exist regarding its safety and efficacy against this background.

Purpose

Aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing urgent and elective TAVI.

Methods

We systematically screened three major databases (Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus) searching for studies comparing urgent versus elective TAVI. Primary endpoint of our systematic review and meta-analysis is the in-hospital mortality. Only studies provided data about in-hospital mortality were considered for our analysis. Secondary endpoints included acute kidney injury (AKI), permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM) and ischemic stroke. All the secondary endpoints were evaluated during the first 30-days after TAVI. Risk ratio (RR) was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a random-effects model (Mantel-Haenzel) was used to estimate the pooled RR.

Results

Twelve studies, all retrospective except one, published between 2014 and 2023 were included in our analysis. A total of 133,348 patients undergoing TAVI were included in our analysis; 110,606 had elective procedure and the 22,742 urgent intervention. Mortality rate was 5.1% in urgent and 2.2% in elective group. The risk of mortality is 2.38 times higher in the urgent TAVI group compared to the elective TAVI group (RR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.80, 3.15). Data about AKI, PPM and stroke during the first 30-days were available for 12, 11 and 11 studies, respectively. The risk for AKI is significantly higher in patients having undergone urgent TAVI (RR: 2.10, 95% CI:1.62, 2.73). No significant differences were observed in stroke incidence (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.18) and PPM (RR: 1.05, 95%CI: 0.99, 1.11) during 30-days follow-up.

Conclusion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis showing that urgent TAVI is associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality rates, compared to elective TAVI. Given these results, it is advisable to prefer an elective procedure, prior disease's worsening, in order to prevent the increased risk of in-hospital mortality associated with urgent TAVI.
In-hospital mortality

In-hospital mortality

This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.