
Contents
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unpacking Legitimacy Unpacking Legitimacy
-
The Legitimacy of Regional Institutions: A Question of Standards The Legitimacy of Regional Institutions: A Question of Standards
-
Legitimacy Standards and the EU’s Democratic Deficit Legitimacy Standards and the EU’s Democratic Deficit
-
Legitimacy Standards and Non-EU Regional Institutions: Another Category Mistake? Legitimacy Standards and Non-EU Regional Institutions: Another Category Mistake?
-
-
The Legitimacy of Regional Institutions: Empirical Perspectives The Legitimacy of Regional Institutions: Empirical Perspectives
-
Political Expediency and a Normative Pretext: Legitimation Strategies in ASEAN as an Example Political Expediency and a Normative Pretext: Legitimation Strategies in ASEAN as an Example
-
Competition for External Support: Legitimation Behavior in African and Central Asian Regionalism Competition for External Support: Legitimation Behavior in African and Central Asian Regionalism
-
Emulating External Templates: Legitimizing Regional Institutions Through Parliamentary Assemblies Emulating External Templates: Legitimizing Regional Institutions Through Parliamentary Assemblies
-
Internal Drivers and Competing Logics of Action: Legitimizing the EU Through Parliamentarization Internal Drivers and Competing Logics of Action: Legitimizing the EU Through Parliamentarization
-
-
Conclusion Conclusion
-
References References
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
25 The Legitimacy of Regional Institutions
Get accessBerthold Rittberger Professor of International Relations, Geschwister-Scholl-Institute of Political Science, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Philipp Schroeder is PhD candidate at the University College London, United Kingdom.
-
Published:07 April 2016
Cite
Abstract
Regional institutions exercise influence and impact constituent states and citizens both inside and outside their respective regions. As a consequence, regional institutions are increasingly confronted with concerns that the power wielded is deemed legitimate. This chapter uses the distinction between normative and empirical conceptions of legitimacy to discuss and compare strands of scholarship on the legitimacy of regional institutions. It contends that existing work assessing the legitimacy of regional institutions by employing normative legitimacy standards has proven to be a dead end in research on comparative regionalism. A shift in focus to explore how political actors in regional institutions define and address legitimacy gaps provides new insights to the study of the empirical legitimacy of regional institutions. The authors develop a typology and a set of preliminary conjectures to analyze the conditions and processes through which the institutional architecture of regional institutions is designed and transformed to confront legitimacy challenges.
Sign in
Personal account
- Sign in with email/username & password
- Get email alerts
- Save searches
- Purchase content
- Activate your purchase/trial code
- Add your ORCID iD
Purchase
Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.
Purchasing informationMonth: | Total Views: |
---|---|
October 2022 | 8 |
November 2022 | 15 |
December 2022 | 11 |
January 2023 | 11 |
February 2023 | 13 |
March 2023 | 35 |
April 2023 | 14 |
May 2023 | 4 |
June 2023 | 13 |
August 2023 | 4 |
September 2023 | 6 |
October 2023 | 13 |
November 2023 | 12 |
December 2023 | 5 |
January 2024 | 14 |
February 2024 | 22 |
March 2024 | 7 |
April 2024 | 13 |
May 2024 | 11 |
June 2024 | 4 |
July 2024 | 3 |
August 2024 | 2 |
September 2024 | 7 |
October 2024 | 6 |
November 2024 | 11 |
December 2024 | 8 |
January 2025 | 5 |
February 2025 | 12 |
March 2025 | 18 |
April 2025 | 17 |
May 2025 | 6 |
Get help with access
Institutional access
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
IP based access
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Sign in through your institution
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Sign in with a library card
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society Members
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Sign in through society site
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Sign in using a personal account
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
Personal account
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Viewing your signed in accounts
Click the account icon in the top right to:
Signed in but can't access content
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
Institutional account management
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.