Abstract

This article challenges Tony Lawson’s claim (Lawson, 2016) that his ontology of money as the ‘social positioning’ of ‘prior value’ is more sustainable than prominent existing theories and is able therefore to reconcile their putative incompatibility.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)
You do not currently have access to this article.