Abstract

Background

Fever is common in infective endocarditis (IE), yet little is known about fever duration in such patients. We aim to identify predictors of persistent fever in patients with suspected IE.

Methods

This study was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, from January 2014 to June 2023. All patients with suspected IE being febrile upon presentation were included. Fever (>38°C) was considered persistent if it continued for at least 96 hours from antimicrobial treatment initiation. A case was classified as IE by the Endocarditis Team.

Results

Among 1399 episodes with suspected IE, persistent fever was observed in 260 (19%) episodes. IE was diagnosed in 536 (41%) episodes, of which 82 (15%) had persistent fever. Among episodes with suspected IE, persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96 hours (P < .001), spondylodiscitis (P = .039), intrabdominal infection (P = .001) were associated with persistent fever. Conversely, bacteremia by streptococci (P = .049), or enterococci (P = .001), source control performed withing 96 hours (P = .015) and appropriate antimicrobial treatment within 48 hours (P = .018) were associated with early defervescence. No association between persistent fever and infective endocarditis was found (P = .207). Among 536 IE episodes, persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96 hours (P < .001), and native bone and joint infection (P = .020) were associated with persistent fever. Conversely, bacteremia by streptococci or enterococci (P = .001; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] .11–.58) were associated with early defervescence.

Conclusions

In episodes with suspected IE, persistent fever was associated with spondylodiscitis, inappropriate antimicrobial treatment and absence of source control interventions. Among IE patients, persistent fever was associated with native bone and joint infections.

Fever is the most prevalent clinical sign among the many clinical manifestations of infective endocarditis (IE) [1, 2]. Due to its high prevalence, fever was included as a minor criterion in the original Duke criteria for diagnosing IE and remains part of subsequent updates [3–5].

In patients with suspected IE, fever prevalence is similar in both those who are ultimately diagnosed with IE and those who are not [6]. However, in certain contexts, such as Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, persistent fever may indicate a more complicated disease and should raise the suspicion of IE [7, 8]. Despite this, a previous study from our institution found that persistent fever rates among patients with suspected IE did not significantly differ between those who were later confirmed to have IE and those who were not [9]. This indicates that in suspected cases of IE, persistent fever may be influenced by factors unrelated to IE.

The course of fever after the initiation of antimicrobial treatment among patients with diagnosed IE has not been adequately addressed. Retrospective studies conducted prior to 2000 found that persistent fever among IE patients, despite antimicrobial therapy, was associated factors to extensive cardiac involvement [10–12], and embolic events [12, 13]. Less common causes include extracardiac sources of infection, polymicrobial endocarditis, drug-induced fever, or nosocomial infections [10, 14]. Patients with persistent fever were significantly more likely to have life-threatening complications, such as paravalvular invasion, and large vegetations, leading to poorer clinical outcomes [10, 11, 13, 15–17].

Despite advancements in the diagnosis and management of IE, contemporary data on the duration and persistence of fever in patients with suspected or confirmed IE remain limited. This study aims to assess whether persistent fever is associated with IE in patients with suspected IE and to identify predictors of persistent fever in patients who are diagnosed with IE.

METHODS

Study Design

This single-center study was conducted at Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, from January 2014 to June 2023 (2014–17: retrospective cohort of IE patients; 2018 onward: prospective cohort of patients with suspected IE). The Ethics Committee of the Canton of Vaud has approved the study (CER-VD 2017-02137, CER-VD 2021-02516).

Patients

All adult patients (≥18 years old) with suspected IE (patients who had blood cultures drawn and an echocardiography performed specifically for the research of IE) and fever upon presentation were included. Exclusion criteria were absence of documentation of temperature measurements or death within 96 hours from antimicrobial treatment initiation without 24 hours of defervescence. Additional exclusion criteria were for the retrospective cohort refusal to use their data and for the prospective cohort the absence of written consent.

Demographic, clinical, microbiological, radiological, and surgical data were retrieved through patient's electronic health charts. Per internal guidelines, all suspected IE cases underwent infectious diseases (ID) consultation with a thorough physical examination. Follow-up blood cultures were taken every 24–48 hours until clearance. IE diagnosis was made by the Endocarditis Team based on clinical, laboratory, microbiological, imaging, surgical, and histopathological results. The determination of other foci of infection was based on the assessment by the ID consultant, taking into account clinical, radiological, microbiological, and operative findings. In case of fever, patients received paracetamol as needed.

Definitions

Fever was defined according to Duke criteria as a temperature superior to 38°C (>100.4°F). Persistent fever was defined as continuous fever for at least 96 hours from antimicrobial treatment initiation. Persistent bacteremia/candidemia was defined as continued positive blood cultures for at least 96 hours from antimicrobial treatment initiation. Cases were classified as definite, possible, and rejected IE based on the 2023 International Society of Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) version of the Duke criteria [5]. Sepsis and septic shock were defined as per the Sepsis-3 International Consensus [18]. Antimicrobial treatment was considered appropriate if the patient received within 48 hours at least 1 active antimicrobial agent for which the isolated pathogen was considered susceptible. Source control was considered warranted in the following situations: (1) removal of venous catheter in patients with catheter-related bacteremia or bacteremia of unknown origin with the presence of a venous catheter; (2) imaging-guided or surgical drainage of infected collections; (3) joint fluid drainage (arthrotomy, arthroscopy, needle aspiration); (4) cardiac surgery in endocarditis patients when indicated for heart failure [19]; (5) correction of urinary-tract obstruction.

Statistical Analyses

SPSS version 26.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA) software was used for data analyses. Patients were categorized according to fever duration as “no persistent fever” and “persistent fever.” Group differences were investigated using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and the χ2 [2] or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Univariable analyses were performed with persistent fever as dependent variable. Covariates were tested for multi-collinearity through variance inflation factor assessment: those not collinear and clinically relevant were used in multivariate logistic regression analyses. The strength of any association was calculated as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All tests were 2-tailed, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Cohort Composition

Among 2082 episodes with suspected IE, 1399 episodes were included (Figure 1); among different reasons of exclusion, 341 episodes of suspected IE were excluded due to absence of fever upon presentation (Figure 1). From 1399 included episodes, 536 (38%) had IE, and for 863 (62%) IE diagnosis was excluded. In total, 105 (8%) episodes had a non-infectious diagnosis (malignancy-related fever, auto-immune disease, fever of unknown origin, non-infective endocarditis, etc). Transthoracic, transesophageal echocardiography (TTE, TEE), 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT), and cardiac CT were performed in 1339 (96%), 694 (50%), 293 (21%), and 54 (4%) episodes, respectively. The first echocardiography was performed within a median of 3 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 1–5 days) from presentation. Among patients with S. aureus bacteremia first echocardiography was performed within a median of 3 days (interquartile range; IQR: 1–4 days).

Flowchart of patients. Abbreviation: IE, infective endocarditis.
Figure 1.

Flowchart of patients. Abbreviation: IE, infective endocarditis.

Persistent Fever Among Episodes With Suspected IE

Among 1399 episodes with suspected IE, persistent fever was observed in 260 (19%) episodes. Table 1 depicts predictors of persistent fever among patients with suspected IE. The median duration of fever was 1 day (IQR: 1–3 days) from antimicrobial treatment initiation. Spondylodiscitis (8% vs 5%; P = .050), intraabdominal infection (9% vs 3%; P = .001), persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96 hours (15% vs 5%; P < .001) and fungemia (5% vs 3%; P = .029) were more prevalent among episodes with persistent fever, compared to those without. In contrast, IE was more prevalent among episodes without persistent fever compared to those with (40% vs 32%; P = .013). Bacteremia by either streptococci (19% vs 12%; P = .005) or enterococci (12% vs 5%; P =.001) were less prevalent among episodes with persistent fever, compared to those with early defervescence. Of the 1278 (out of 1399; 91%) episodes requiring antimicrobial treatment, a smaller proportion of cases with persistent fever received within 48 hours an appropriate therapy compared to those without persistent fever (91% vs 95%; P = .004). Source control procedures were necessary in 583 episodes (42%); these interventions were less frequently performed within 96 hours in episodes with persistent fever compared to those without (24% vs 59%; P = .015).

Table 1.

Predictors of Persistent Fever Among Patients With Suspected Infective Endocarditis

 No Persistent Fever (n = 1139)Persistent Fever (n = 260)P
Demographics
 Male sex819 (72)175 (67).150
 Age (y)68 (54–78)65 (55–75).022
  Age >60 y751 (66)158 (61).130
Co-morbidities
 Malignancy (solid organ or hematologic)222 ()2077 (30).001
 Obesity289 (25)69 (27).694
 Immunosuppression367 (32)98 (38).094
Manifestations
 Sepsis431 (38)105 (40).480
  Septic shock125 (11)28 (11)1.000
Cardiac predisposing factors
 IV drug use69 (6)19 (7).479
 Prior endocarditis67 (6)10 (4).229
 Congenital disease82 (7)11 (4).097
 Prosthetic valve211 (19)34 (13).038
 Cardiac implantable electronic device152 (13)18 (7).003
Non-cardiac prosthetic material
 Vascular catheter (central or peripheral)440 (39)110 (42).291
 Prosthetic joint178 (16)45 (17).511
 Vascular graft93 (8)23 (9).709
Final diagnosis
 Non-infectious diagnosis74 (7)31 (12)
 Infectious diagnosis1065 (94)229 (88).004
 Bacteremia/candidemia of unknown origin96 (8)18 (7).530
 Catheter-related124 (11)28 (11)1.000
 Infective endocarditis454 (40)82 (32).013
 Skin and soft tissue infection112 (10)22 (9).560
 Bone and joint infection226 (20)62 (24).149
 Native bone and joint infection123 (11)39 (15).067
 Septic arthritis75 (7)22 (9).280
 Spondylodiscitis56 (5)21 (8).050
 Low-respiratory tract infection57 (5)17 (7).356
 Urinary tract infection49 (4)13 (5).617
 Intrabdominal infection39 (3)22 (9).001
 Other type of infection128 (11)25 (10).509
Microbiological data
 Bacteremia/candidemia930 (82)184 (71)<.001
S. aureus409 (36)99 (38).521
 Coagulase negative staphylococci71 (6)9 (4).102
 Streptococci215 (19)30 (12).005
 Enterococci137 (12)14 (5).001
 Other Gram-positive34 (3)6 (2).682
 HACEK13 (1)3 (1)1.000
 Other Gram-negative93 (8)22 (9).900
 Fungi30 (3)14 (5).029
 Polymicrobial bacteremia/candidemia80 (7)11 (4).124
 Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96h56 (5)99 (15)<.001
Source control warranted469 (41)114 (44).471
 Source control performed within 96ha275 (59)52 (24).015
 Antimicrobial treatment warranted1053 (93)225 (88).003
 Appropriate antimicrobial treatment within 48hb1005 (95)204 (91).004
 No Persistent Fever (n = 1139)Persistent Fever (n = 260)P
Demographics
 Male sex819 (72)175 (67).150
 Age (y)68 (54–78)65 (55–75).022
  Age >60 y751 (66)158 (61).130
Co-morbidities
 Malignancy (solid organ or hematologic)222 ()2077 (30).001
 Obesity289 (25)69 (27).694
 Immunosuppression367 (32)98 (38).094
Manifestations
 Sepsis431 (38)105 (40).480
  Septic shock125 (11)28 (11)1.000
Cardiac predisposing factors
 IV drug use69 (6)19 (7).479
 Prior endocarditis67 (6)10 (4).229
 Congenital disease82 (7)11 (4).097
 Prosthetic valve211 (19)34 (13).038
 Cardiac implantable electronic device152 (13)18 (7).003
Non-cardiac prosthetic material
 Vascular catheter (central or peripheral)440 (39)110 (42).291
 Prosthetic joint178 (16)45 (17).511
 Vascular graft93 (8)23 (9).709
Final diagnosis
 Non-infectious diagnosis74 (7)31 (12)
 Infectious diagnosis1065 (94)229 (88).004
 Bacteremia/candidemia of unknown origin96 (8)18 (7).530
 Catheter-related124 (11)28 (11)1.000
 Infective endocarditis454 (40)82 (32).013
 Skin and soft tissue infection112 (10)22 (9).560
 Bone and joint infection226 (20)62 (24).149
 Native bone and joint infection123 (11)39 (15).067
 Septic arthritis75 (7)22 (9).280
 Spondylodiscitis56 (5)21 (8).050
 Low-respiratory tract infection57 (5)17 (7).356
 Urinary tract infection49 (4)13 (5).617
 Intrabdominal infection39 (3)22 (9).001
 Other type of infection128 (11)25 (10).509
Microbiological data
 Bacteremia/candidemia930 (82)184 (71)<.001
S. aureus409 (36)99 (38).521
 Coagulase negative staphylococci71 (6)9 (4).102
 Streptococci215 (19)30 (12).005
 Enterococci137 (12)14 (5).001
 Other Gram-positive34 (3)6 (2).682
 HACEK13 (1)3 (1)1.000
 Other Gram-negative93 (8)22 (9).900
 Fungi30 (3)14 (5).029
 Polymicrobial bacteremia/candidemia80 (7)11 (4).124
 Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96h56 (5)99 (15)<.001
Source control warranted469 (41)114 (44).471
 Source control performed within 96ha275 (59)52 (24).015
 Antimicrobial treatment warranted1053 (93)225 (88).003
 Appropriate antimicrobial treatment within 48hb1005 (95)204 (91).004

Data are depicted as number (percentage) or median (interquartile range).

Abbreviation: HACEK, Haemophilus spp, Aggregatibacter spp, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, Kingella kingae; IV, intravenous; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus.

aAmong 583 episodes.

bAmong 1278 episodes.

Table 1.

Predictors of Persistent Fever Among Patients With Suspected Infective Endocarditis

 No Persistent Fever (n = 1139)Persistent Fever (n = 260)P
Demographics
 Male sex819 (72)175 (67).150
 Age (y)68 (54–78)65 (55–75).022
  Age >60 y751 (66)158 (61).130
Co-morbidities
 Malignancy (solid organ or hematologic)222 ()2077 (30).001
 Obesity289 (25)69 (27).694
 Immunosuppression367 (32)98 (38).094
Manifestations
 Sepsis431 (38)105 (40).480
  Septic shock125 (11)28 (11)1.000
Cardiac predisposing factors
 IV drug use69 (6)19 (7).479
 Prior endocarditis67 (6)10 (4).229
 Congenital disease82 (7)11 (4).097
 Prosthetic valve211 (19)34 (13).038
 Cardiac implantable electronic device152 (13)18 (7).003
Non-cardiac prosthetic material
 Vascular catheter (central or peripheral)440 (39)110 (42).291
 Prosthetic joint178 (16)45 (17).511
 Vascular graft93 (8)23 (9).709
Final diagnosis
 Non-infectious diagnosis74 (7)31 (12)
 Infectious diagnosis1065 (94)229 (88).004
 Bacteremia/candidemia of unknown origin96 (8)18 (7).530
 Catheter-related124 (11)28 (11)1.000
 Infective endocarditis454 (40)82 (32).013
 Skin and soft tissue infection112 (10)22 (9).560
 Bone and joint infection226 (20)62 (24).149
 Native bone and joint infection123 (11)39 (15).067
 Septic arthritis75 (7)22 (9).280
 Spondylodiscitis56 (5)21 (8).050
 Low-respiratory tract infection57 (5)17 (7).356
 Urinary tract infection49 (4)13 (5).617
 Intrabdominal infection39 (3)22 (9).001
 Other type of infection128 (11)25 (10).509
Microbiological data
 Bacteremia/candidemia930 (82)184 (71)<.001
S. aureus409 (36)99 (38).521
 Coagulase negative staphylococci71 (6)9 (4).102
 Streptococci215 (19)30 (12).005
 Enterococci137 (12)14 (5).001
 Other Gram-positive34 (3)6 (2).682
 HACEK13 (1)3 (1)1.000
 Other Gram-negative93 (8)22 (9).900
 Fungi30 (3)14 (5).029
 Polymicrobial bacteremia/candidemia80 (7)11 (4).124
 Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96h56 (5)99 (15)<.001
Source control warranted469 (41)114 (44).471
 Source control performed within 96ha275 (59)52 (24).015
 Antimicrobial treatment warranted1053 (93)225 (88).003
 Appropriate antimicrobial treatment within 48hb1005 (95)204 (91).004
 No Persistent Fever (n = 1139)Persistent Fever (n = 260)P
Demographics
 Male sex819 (72)175 (67).150
 Age (y)68 (54–78)65 (55–75).022
  Age >60 y751 (66)158 (61).130
Co-morbidities
 Malignancy (solid organ or hematologic)222 ()2077 (30).001
 Obesity289 (25)69 (27).694
 Immunosuppression367 (32)98 (38).094
Manifestations
 Sepsis431 (38)105 (40).480
  Septic shock125 (11)28 (11)1.000
Cardiac predisposing factors
 IV drug use69 (6)19 (7).479
 Prior endocarditis67 (6)10 (4).229
 Congenital disease82 (7)11 (4).097
 Prosthetic valve211 (19)34 (13).038
 Cardiac implantable electronic device152 (13)18 (7).003
Non-cardiac prosthetic material
 Vascular catheter (central or peripheral)440 (39)110 (42).291
 Prosthetic joint178 (16)45 (17).511
 Vascular graft93 (8)23 (9).709
Final diagnosis
 Non-infectious diagnosis74 (7)31 (12)
 Infectious diagnosis1065 (94)229 (88).004
 Bacteremia/candidemia of unknown origin96 (8)18 (7).530
 Catheter-related124 (11)28 (11)1.000
 Infective endocarditis454 (40)82 (32).013
 Skin and soft tissue infection112 (10)22 (9).560
 Bone and joint infection226 (20)62 (24).149
 Native bone and joint infection123 (11)39 (15).067
 Septic arthritis75 (7)22 (9).280
 Spondylodiscitis56 (5)21 (8).050
 Low-respiratory tract infection57 (5)17 (7).356
 Urinary tract infection49 (4)13 (5).617
 Intrabdominal infection39 (3)22 (9).001
 Other type of infection128 (11)25 (10).509
Microbiological data
 Bacteremia/candidemia930 (82)184 (71)<.001
S. aureus409 (36)99 (38).521
 Coagulase negative staphylococci71 (6)9 (4).102
 Streptococci215 (19)30 (12).005
 Enterococci137 (12)14 (5).001
 Other Gram-positive34 (3)6 (2).682
 HACEK13 (1)3 (1)1.000
 Other Gram-negative93 (8)22 (9).900
 Fungi30 (3)14 (5).029
 Polymicrobial bacteremia/candidemia80 (7)11 (4).124
 Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96h56 (5)99 (15)<.001
Source control warranted469 (41)114 (44).471
 Source control performed within 96ha275 (59)52 (24).015
 Antimicrobial treatment warranted1053 (93)225 (88).003
 Appropriate antimicrobial treatment within 48hb1005 (95)204 (91).004

Data are depicted as number (percentage) or median (interquartile range).

Abbreviation: HACEK, Haemophilus spp, Aggregatibacter spp, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, Kingella kingae; IV, intravenous; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus.

aAmong 583 episodes.

bAmong 1278 episodes.

Multivariable logistic regression among the 1399 episodes with suspected IE (Table 2) identified malignancy, either solid organ or hematological (P = .012; aOR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.15–3.12), persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96 hours (P < .001; aOR 2.55, 95% CI: 1.46–3.49), spondylodiscitis (P = .039; aOR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.03–3.12), intrabdominal infection (P = .001; aOR 2.86, 95% CI: 1.55–5.27) as factors associated with persistent fever. Conversely, bacteremia by streptococci (P = .049; aOR 064, 95% CI .41–.99), or enterococci (P = .001; aOR 0.37, 95% CI: .20–.69), source control performed within 96 hours (P = .015; aOR 0.58, 95% CI: .38–.90) and appropriate antimicrobial treatment within 48 hours (P = .018; aOR 0.60, 95% CI: .39–.92) were associated with early defervescence.

Table 2.

Bivariate and Multivariable Analyses of Predictors of Persistent Fever Among Patients With Suspected Infective Endocarditis

 Bivariate AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
 POR (95% CI)PaOR (95% CI)
Malignancy (solid organ or hematologic).0011.74 (1.28–2.36).0121.89 (1.15–3.12)
Immunosuppression.0941.27 (.96–1.68).309.79 (.49–1.25)
Bacteremia by streptococci.005.56 (.37–.84).049.64 (.41–.99)
Bacteremia by enterococci.001.42 (.24–.73).001.37 (.20–.69)
Fungemia.0292.10 (1.10–4.03).2421.52 (.75–3.07)
Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96ha<.0012.49 (1.69–3.69)<.0012.55 (1.46–3.49)
Spondylodiscitis.0501.70 (1.01–2.86).0391.79 (1.03–3.12)
Infective endocarditis.013.70 (.52–.93).207.80 (.57–1.13)
Intrabdominal infection.0012.61 (1.52–4.48).0012.86 (1.55–5.27)
Source control
 Warranted; not performed within 96hreferencereferencereferencereference
 Warranted; performed within 96h.015.59 (.39–.89).015.58 (.38–.90)
 Not warranted.030.68 (.49–.96).122.75 (.52–1.09)
Antimicrobial treatment
 Warranted; not appropriate within 48hareferencereferencereferencereference
 Warranted; appropriate within 48h.008.46 (.27–.79).018.60 (.39–.92)
 Not warranted1.000.99 (.51–1.94).9171.04 (.51–2.12)
 Bivariate AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
 POR (95% CI)PaOR (95% CI)
Malignancy (solid organ or hematologic).0011.74 (1.28–2.36).0121.89 (1.15–3.12)
Immunosuppression.0941.27 (.96–1.68).309.79 (.49–1.25)
Bacteremia by streptococci.005.56 (.37–.84).049.64 (.41–.99)
Bacteremia by enterococci.001.42 (.24–.73).001.37 (.20–.69)
Fungemia.0292.10 (1.10–4.03).2421.52 (.75–3.07)
Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96ha<.0012.49 (1.69–3.69)<.0012.55 (1.46–3.49)
Spondylodiscitis.0501.70 (1.01–2.86).0391.79 (1.03–3.12)
Infective endocarditis.013.70 (.52–.93).207.80 (.57–1.13)
Intrabdominal infection.0012.61 (1.52–4.48).0012.86 (1.55–5.27)
Source control
 Warranted; not performed within 96hreferencereferencereferencereference
 Warranted; performed within 96h.015.59 (.39–.89).015.58 (.38–.90)
 Not warranted.030.68 (.49–.96).122.75 (.52–1.09)
Antimicrobial treatment
 Warranted; not appropriate within 48hareferencereferencereferencereference
 Warranted; appropriate within 48h.008.46 (.27–.79).018.60 (.39–.92)
 Not warranted1.000.99 (.51–1.94).9171.04 (.51–2.12)

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratios; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Table 2.

Bivariate and Multivariable Analyses of Predictors of Persistent Fever Among Patients With Suspected Infective Endocarditis

 Bivariate AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
 POR (95% CI)PaOR (95% CI)
Malignancy (solid organ or hematologic).0011.74 (1.28–2.36).0121.89 (1.15–3.12)
Immunosuppression.0941.27 (.96–1.68).309.79 (.49–1.25)
Bacteremia by streptococci.005.56 (.37–.84).049.64 (.41–.99)
Bacteremia by enterococci.001.42 (.24–.73).001.37 (.20–.69)
Fungemia.0292.10 (1.10–4.03).2421.52 (.75–3.07)
Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96ha<.0012.49 (1.69–3.69)<.0012.55 (1.46–3.49)
Spondylodiscitis.0501.70 (1.01–2.86).0391.79 (1.03–3.12)
Infective endocarditis.013.70 (.52–.93).207.80 (.57–1.13)
Intrabdominal infection.0012.61 (1.52–4.48).0012.86 (1.55–5.27)
Source control
 Warranted; not performed within 96hreferencereferencereferencereference
 Warranted; performed within 96h.015.59 (.39–.89).015.58 (.38–.90)
 Not warranted.030.68 (.49–.96).122.75 (.52–1.09)
Antimicrobial treatment
 Warranted; not appropriate within 48hareferencereferencereferencereference
 Warranted; appropriate within 48h.008.46 (.27–.79).018.60 (.39–.92)
 Not warranted1.000.99 (.51–1.94).9171.04 (.51–2.12)
 Bivariate AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
 POR (95% CI)PaOR (95% CI)
Malignancy (solid organ or hematologic).0011.74 (1.28–2.36).0121.89 (1.15–3.12)
Immunosuppression.0941.27 (.96–1.68).309.79 (.49–1.25)
Bacteremia by streptococci.005.56 (.37–.84).049.64 (.41–.99)
Bacteremia by enterococci.001.42 (.24–.73).001.37 (.20–.69)
Fungemia.0292.10 (1.10–4.03).2421.52 (.75–3.07)
Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96ha<.0012.49 (1.69–3.69)<.0012.55 (1.46–3.49)
Spondylodiscitis.0501.70 (1.01–2.86).0391.79 (1.03–3.12)
Infective endocarditis.013.70 (.52–.93).207.80 (.57–1.13)
Intrabdominal infection.0012.61 (1.52–4.48).0012.86 (1.55–5.27)
Source control
 Warranted; not performed within 96hreferencereferencereferencereference
 Warranted; performed within 96h.015.59 (.39–.89).015.58 (.38–.90)
 Not warranted.030.68 (.49–.96).122.75 (.52–1.09)
Antimicrobial treatment
 Warranted; not appropriate within 48hareferencereferencereferencereference
 Warranted; appropriate within 48h.008.46 (.27–.79).018.60 (.39–.92)
 Not warranted1.000.99 (.51–1.94).9171.04 (.51–2.12)

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratios; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Persistent Fever Among Episodes With IE

Among 655 IE episodes with documented temperature upon presentation, 536 episodes were included, although 119 (18%) episodes were excluded due to absence of fever at presentation. Of the 536 included IE episodes, 82 (15%) exhibited persistent fever. The median duration of fever among IE episodes was 1 day (IQR: 1–3 days) from antimicrobial treatment initiation (Supplementary Table 1). Native bone and joint infections (27% vs 14%; P = .008), embolic events (51% vs 37%; P = .020), persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96 hours (39% vs 11%; P < .001) and bacteremia by S. aureus (67% vs 38%; P < .001) were more prevalent among episodes with persistent fever, compared to those without (Table 3). Bacteremia by either streptococci or enterococci (45% vs 12%; P < .001) was less prevalent among episodes with persistent fever, compared to those with early defervescence. Cardiac lesions (vegetations ≥10 mm, intracardiac abscess) or type of valve (native or prosthetic) were not associated with persistent fever. The median duration of fever among episodes with either vegetation ≥10 mm, or intracardiac abscess was 1 day (IQR: 1–3 days) (Supplementary Table 1); even by excluding the episodes that had cardiac surgery within 4 days from antimicrobial treatment initiation the duration of fever for patients with vegetation ≥10 mm was 1 day (IQR: 1–3 days), and for intracardiac abscess 1 day (IQR: 1–4 days).

Table 3.

Characteristics of Patients With and With no Persistent Fever Among Patients With Infective Endocarditis

 No Persistent Fever (n = 454)Persistent Fever (n = 82)P
Demographics
 Male sex348 (77)60 (73).485
 Age (y)68 (54–77)66 (51–76).257
 Age >60 y301 (66)50 (61).378
Comorbidities
 Congestive heart failure53 (12)6 (7).337
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease48 (11)14 (17).094
 Cirrhosis27 (6)6 (7).619
 Diabetes mellitus108 (24)23 (28).405
 Chronic kidney disease (moderate or severe)362 (20)15 (18).765
 Malignancy (solid organ or hematologic)54 (12)9 (11)1.000
 Obesity113 (25)21 (26).890
 Immunosuppression91 (20)19 (23).553
Cardiac predisposing factors291 (64)45 (55).136
Microbiological data
S. aureus173 (38)55 (67)<.001
 Coagulase negative staphylococci30 (7)4 (5).805
 Streptococci134 (30)10 (12).001
 Enterococci71 (16)0 (0)<.001
 Other Gram-positive13 (3)1 (1).706
 HACEK12 (3)3 (4).713
 Other Gram-negative13 (3)3 (4).722
 Intracellular bacteria4 (.9)0 (0)1.000
 Fungi5 (1)4 (5).035
 Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96h50 (11)32 (39)<.001
Manifestations
 Sepsis204 (45)49 (60).016
 Septic shock77 (17)19 (23).210
 Embolic events170 (37)42 (51).020
 Cerebral92 (20)19 (23).555
 Non-cerebral124 (27)32 (39).035
 Immunologic phenomena33 (7)12 (15).048
 Native bone and joint infection65 (14)22 (27).008
 Septic arthritis42 (9)14 (17).047
 Spondylodiscitis27 (6)11 (13).031
Type of diagnosisa
 Definite IE300 (66)59 (72).311
 Possible IE154 (34)23 (28)
Site of infection
 Aortic valve237 (52)40 (49).631
 Mitral valve182 (40)36 (44).543
 Tricuspid valve34 (8)11 (13).084
 Pulmonary valve9 (2)2 (2).679
 Multivalvular47 (10)11 (13).439
 CIED-IE61 (13)6 (7).147
 Other site of infection5 (1)2 (2).292
Type of valve
 Native299 (66)55 (67).899
 Prosthetic121 (27)24 (29).685
Intracardiac lesions
 Vegetation304 (67)55 (67)1.000
 Vegetation ≥10mm165 (36)33 (40).535
 Abscess83 (18)18 (22).444
 Other lesionsb79 (17)14 (17)1.000
Source control warranted172 (38)40 (49).067
 Source control performed within 96hc76 (17)15 (18).482
Appropriate antimicrobial treatment within 48h429 (95)75 (92).309
 No Persistent Fever (n = 454)Persistent Fever (n = 82)P
Demographics
 Male sex348 (77)60 (73).485
 Age (y)68 (54–77)66 (51–76).257
 Age >60 y301 (66)50 (61).378
Comorbidities
 Congestive heart failure53 (12)6 (7).337
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease48 (11)14 (17).094
 Cirrhosis27 (6)6 (7).619
 Diabetes mellitus108 (24)23 (28).405
 Chronic kidney disease (moderate or severe)362 (20)15 (18).765
 Malignancy (solid organ or hematologic)54 (12)9 (11)1.000
 Obesity113 (25)21 (26).890
 Immunosuppression91 (20)19 (23).553
Cardiac predisposing factors291 (64)45 (55).136
Microbiological data
S. aureus173 (38)55 (67)<.001
 Coagulase negative staphylococci30 (7)4 (5).805
 Streptococci134 (30)10 (12).001
 Enterococci71 (16)0 (0)<.001
 Other Gram-positive13 (3)1 (1).706
 HACEK12 (3)3 (4).713
 Other Gram-negative13 (3)3 (4).722
 Intracellular bacteria4 (.9)0 (0)1.000
 Fungi5 (1)4 (5).035
 Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96h50 (11)32 (39)<.001
Manifestations
 Sepsis204 (45)49 (60).016
 Septic shock77 (17)19 (23).210
 Embolic events170 (37)42 (51).020
 Cerebral92 (20)19 (23).555
 Non-cerebral124 (27)32 (39).035
 Immunologic phenomena33 (7)12 (15).048
 Native bone and joint infection65 (14)22 (27).008
 Septic arthritis42 (9)14 (17).047
 Spondylodiscitis27 (6)11 (13).031
Type of diagnosisa
 Definite IE300 (66)59 (72).311
 Possible IE154 (34)23 (28)
Site of infection
 Aortic valve237 (52)40 (49).631
 Mitral valve182 (40)36 (44).543
 Tricuspid valve34 (8)11 (13).084
 Pulmonary valve9 (2)2 (2).679
 Multivalvular47 (10)11 (13).439
 CIED-IE61 (13)6 (7).147
 Other site of infection5 (1)2 (2).292
Type of valve
 Native299 (66)55 (67).899
 Prosthetic121 (27)24 (29).685
Intracardiac lesions
 Vegetation304 (67)55 (67)1.000
 Vegetation ≥10mm165 (36)33 (40).535
 Abscess83 (18)18 (22).444
 Other lesionsb79 (17)14 (17)1.000
Source control warranted172 (38)40 (49).067
 Source control performed within 96hc76 (17)15 (18).482
Appropriate antimicrobial treatment within 48h429 (95)75 (92).309

Data are depicted as number (percentage) or median (interquartile range).

Abbreviations: CIED, cardiac implantable electronic devices; HACEK, Haemophilus spp, Aggregatibacter spp, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, Kingella kingae; IE, infective endocarditis; ISCVID, International Society of Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus.

aAccording to the 2023 ISCVID version of the Duke criteria.

bPerforation, dehiscence of prosthetic valve, fistula, pseudoaneurysm, aneurysm.

CAmong 212 episodes.

Table 3.

Characteristics of Patients With and With no Persistent Fever Among Patients With Infective Endocarditis

 No Persistent Fever (n = 454)Persistent Fever (n = 82)P
Demographics
 Male sex348 (77)60 (73).485
 Age (y)68 (54–77)66 (51–76).257
 Age >60 y301 (66)50 (61).378
Comorbidities
 Congestive heart failure53 (12)6 (7).337
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease48 (11)14 (17).094
 Cirrhosis27 (6)6 (7).619
 Diabetes mellitus108 (24)23 (28).405
 Chronic kidney disease (moderate or severe)362 (20)15 (18).765
 Malignancy (solid organ or hematologic)54 (12)9 (11)1.000
 Obesity113 (25)21 (26).890
 Immunosuppression91 (20)19 (23).553
Cardiac predisposing factors291 (64)45 (55).136
Microbiological data
S. aureus173 (38)55 (67)<.001
 Coagulase negative staphylococci30 (7)4 (5).805
 Streptococci134 (30)10 (12).001
 Enterococci71 (16)0 (0)<.001
 Other Gram-positive13 (3)1 (1).706
 HACEK12 (3)3 (4).713
 Other Gram-negative13 (3)3 (4).722
 Intracellular bacteria4 (.9)0 (0)1.000
 Fungi5 (1)4 (5).035
 Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96h50 (11)32 (39)<.001
Manifestations
 Sepsis204 (45)49 (60).016
 Septic shock77 (17)19 (23).210
 Embolic events170 (37)42 (51).020
 Cerebral92 (20)19 (23).555
 Non-cerebral124 (27)32 (39).035
 Immunologic phenomena33 (7)12 (15).048
 Native bone and joint infection65 (14)22 (27).008
 Septic arthritis42 (9)14 (17).047
 Spondylodiscitis27 (6)11 (13).031
Type of diagnosisa
 Definite IE300 (66)59 (72).311
 Possible IE154 (34)23 (28)
Site of infection
 Aortic valve237 (52)40 (49).631
 Mitral valve182 (40)36 (44).543
 Tricuspid valve34 (8)11 (13).084
 Pulmonary valve9 (2)2 (2).679
 Multivalvular47 (10)11 (13).439
 CIED-IE61 (13)6 (7).147
 Other site of infection5 (1)2 (2).292
Type of valve
 Native299 (66)55 (67).899
 Prosthetic121 (27)24 (29).685
Intracardiac lesions
 Vegetation304 (67)55 (67)1.000
 Vegetation ≥10mm165 (36)33 (40).535
 Abscess83 (18)18 (22).444
 Other lesionsb79 (17)14 (17)1.000
Source control warranted172 (38)40 (49).067
 Source control performed within 96hc76 (17)15 (18).482
Appropriate antimicrobial treatment within 48h429 (95)75 (92).309
 No Persistent Fever (n = 454)Persistent Fever (n = 82)P
Demographics
 Male sex348 (77)60 (73).485
 Age (y)68 (54–77)66 (51–76).257
 Age >60 y301 (66)50 (61).378
Comorbidities
 Congestive heart failure53 (12)6 (7).337
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease48 (11)14 (17).094
 Cirrhosis27 (6)6 (7).619
 Diabetes mellitus108 (24)23 (28).405
 Chronic kidney disease (moderate or severe)362 (20)15 (18).765
 Malignancy (solid organ or hematologic)54 (12)9 (11)1.000
 Obesity113 (25)21 (26).890
 Immunosuppression91 (20)19 (23).553
Cardiac predisposing factors291 (64)45 (55).136
Microbiological data
S. aureus173 (38)55 (67)<.001
 Coagulase negative staphylococci30 (7)4 (5).805
 Streptococci134 (30)10 (12).001
 Enterococci71 (16)0 (0)<.001
 Other Gram-positive13 (3)1 (1).706
 HACEK12 (3)3 (4).713
 Other Gram-negative13 (3)3 (4).722
 Intracellular bacteria4 (.9)0 (0)1.000
 Fungi5 (1)4 (5).035
 Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96h50 (11)32 (39)<.001
Manifestations
 Sepsis204 (45)49 (60).016
 Septic shock77 (17)19 (23).210
 Embolic events170 (37)42 (51).020
 Cerebral92 (20)19 (23).555
 Non-cerebral124 (27)32 (39).035
 Immunologic phenomena33 (7)12 (15).048
 Native bone and joint infection65 (14)22 (27).008
 Septic arthritis42 (9)14 (17).047
 Spondylodiscitis27 (6)11 (13).031
Type of diagnosisa
 Definite IE300 (66)59 (72).311
 Possible IE154 (34)23 (28)
Site of infection
 Aortic valve237 (52)40 (49).631
 Mitral valve182 (40)36 (44).543
 Tricuspid valve34 (8)11 (13).084
 Pulmonary valve9 (2)2 (2).679
 Multivalvular47 (10)11 (13).439
 CIED-IE61 (13)6 (7).147
 Other site of infection5 (1)2 (2).292
Type of valve
 Native299 (66)55 (67).899
 Prosthetic121 (27)24 (29).685
Intracardiac lesions
 Vegetation304 (67)55 (67)1.000
 Vegetation ≥10mm165 (36)33 (40).535
 Abscess83 (18)18 (22).444
 Other lesionsb79 (17)14 (17)1.000
Source control warranted172 (38)40 (49).067
 Source control performed within 96hc76 (17)15 (18).482
Appropriate antimicrobial treatment within 48h429 (95)75 (92).309

Data are depicted as number (percentage) or median (interquartile range).

Abbreviations: CIED, cardiac implantable electronic devices; HACEK, Haemophilus spp, Aggregatibacter spp, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, Kingella kingae; IE, infective endocarditis; ISCVID, International Society of Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus.

aAccording to the 2023 ISCVID version of the Duke criteria.

bPerforation, dehiscence of prosthetic valve, fistula, pseudoaneurysm, aneurysm.

CAmong 212 episodes.

In multivariable logistic regression (Table 4), persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96 hours (P < .001; aOR 2.71, 95% CI: 1.54–4.77), and native bone and joint infections (P = .020; aOR 2.07, 95% CI: 1.12–3.83) were associated with persistent fever among IE episodes. Conversely, bacteremia by streptococci or enterococci (P = .001; aOR 0.25, 95% CI: .11–.58) were associated with early defervescence.

Table 4.

Bivariate and Multivariable Analyses of Predictors of Persistent Fever Among Patients With Infective Endocarditis

 Bivariate AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
 POR (95% CI)PaOR (95% CI)
Bacteremia by S. aureus<.0013.31 (2.01–5.44).890.96 (.50–1.84)
Bacteremia by streptococci or enterococci<.001.17 (.09–.34).001.25 (.11–.58)
Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96h<.0015.17 (3.04–8.81)<.0012.71 (1.54–4.77)
Sepsis.0161.81 (.12–2.93).3431.30 (.76–2.21)
Embolic events.0201.75 (1.09–2.82).1201.54 (.89–2.67)
Native bone and joint infection.0082.19 (1.26–3.82).0202.07 (1.12–3.83)
Immunological phenomena.0482.19 (1.08–4.44).3311.52 (.66–3.52)
Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis.0841.91 (.93–3.95).996.99 (.45–2.23)
 Bivariate AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
 POR (95% CI)PaOR (95% CI)
Bacteremia by S. aureus<.0013.31 (2.01–5.44).890.96 (.50–1.84)
Bacteremia by streptococci or enterococci<.001.17 (.09–.34).001.25 (.11–.58)
Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96h<.0015.17 (3.04–8.81)<.0012.71 (1.54–4.77)
Sepsis.0161.81 (.12–2.93).3431.30 (.76–2.21)
Embolic events.0201.75 (1.09–2.82).1201.54 (.89–2.67)
Native bone and joint infection.0082.19 (1.26–3.82).0202.07 (1.12–3.83)
Immunological phenomena.0482.19 (1.08–4.44).3311.52 (.66–3.52)
Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis.0841.91 (.93–3.95).996.99 (.45–2.23)

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratios; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus.

Table 4.

Bivariate and Multivariable Analyses of Predictors of Persistent Fever Among Patients With Infective Endocarditis

 Bivariate AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
 POR (95% CI)PaOR (95% CI)
Bacteremia by S. aureus<.0013.31 (2.01–5.44).890.96 (.50–1.84)
Bacteremia by streptococci or enterococci<.001.17 (.09–.34).001.25 (.11–.58)
Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96h<.0015.17 (3.04–8.81)<.0012.71 (1.54–4.77)
Sepsis.0161.81 (.12–2.93).3431.30 (.76–2.21)
Embolic events.0201.75 (1.09–2.82).1201.54 (.89–2.67)
Native bone and joint infection.0082.19 (1.26–3.82).0202.07 (1.12–3.83)
Immunological phenomena.0482.19 (1.08–4.44).3311.52 (.66–3.52)
Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis.0841.91 (.93–3.95).996.99 (.45–2.23)
 Bivariate AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
 POR (95% CI)PaOR (95% CI)
Bacteremia by S. aureus<.0013.31 (2.01–5.44).890.96 (.50–1.84)
Bacteremia by streptococci or enterococci<.001.17 (.09–.34).001.25 (.11–.58)
Persistent bacteremia/candidemia for 96h<.0015.17 (3.04–8.81)<.0012.71 (1.54–4.77)
Sepsis.0161.81 (.12–2.93).3431.30 (.76–2.21)
Embolic events.0201.75 (1.09–2.82).1201.54 (.89–2.67)
Native bone and joint infection.0082.19 (1.26–3.82).0202.07 (1.12–3.83)
Immunological phenomena.0482.19 (1.08–4.44).3311.52 (.66–3.52)
Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis.0841.91 (.93–3.95).996.99 (.45–2.23)

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratios; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus.

DISCUSSION

In our cohort of episodes with suspected IE, persistent fever was observed in 19% of episodes, with no association between IE and persistent fever.

As previously reported, fever was a common clinical sign of IE [1, 2]. In our study, 81% of episodes with suspected IE and 82% of IE episodes presented with fever, consistent with findings from 2 large IE studies; 78% of IE cases had fever in the EURO-ENDO registry [1] and 96% in the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study [2]. Although fever is a minor Duke criterion for diagnosing IE [3–5], a study of 3127 episodes with suspected IE found the prevalence of fever to be similar among patients with confirmed IE (78%) and those whose suspicion of IE was ultimately ruled out (79%), indicating that fever alone lacks the discriminatory power to distinguish IE from non-IE cases [6].

As expected, among episodes with suspected IE in general and those with IE, persistent fever was associated with persistent bacteremia/candidemia, as both are hallmarks of uncontrolled infection. Successful management of infection relies on two core components: appropriate antimicrobial treatment and timely source control. In our study, most episodes with suspected IE requiring antimicrobial therapy received appropriate treatment within 48 hours, which was associated with early resolution of fever. Similarly, among episodes with suspected IE that necessitated source control, performing these interventions promptly was linked to early defervescence. As previously demonstrated in studies on S. aureus bacteremia, timely source control not only accelerated the clearance of bacteremia but also reduced mortality [20, 21]. This emphasizes the clinical importance of early fever resolution as an indicator of effective infection management. In cases of S. aureus bacteremia, fever persistence beyond 72 hours is a marker of complicated infection, along with persistent bacteremia and lack of source control. The presence of any of these criteria necessitates extending antibiotic therapy from 2 weeks to 4–6 weeks [7].

In suspected IE cases, certain infections, such as spondylodiscitis, were also linked to persistent fever in IE patients. Spondylodiscitis often coincides with paravertebral or epidural abscesses, which are typically small and do not cause progressive neurological deficits, spinal instability, or significant deformity, and therefore do not always require surgical intervention [22]. However, even small abscesses can continue to act as a source of bacterial spread due to reduced antimicrobial penetration. Persistent bacteremia despite appropriate antimicrobial therapy indicates the need for source control in patients with spondylodiscitis [22]. These findings align with the established association between spondylodiscitis and IE [23], as reflected in risk prediction models for S. aureus bacteremia (VIRSTA and LAUSTAPHEN scores) [24, 25].

In cases with diagnosed IE, few studies have examined the course of persistent fever, with none conducted in the past two decades. Historically, Douglas et al reported that 36% of 83 IE cases had persistent fever (>7 days), although they used a lower temperature threshold (37.1°C or >98.8°F) [10]. Other retrospective studies reported that fever persisted for more than 7 days in 28% of 123 and 36% of 193 IE cases [12, 13]. However, in the present study, only 15% of IE episodes presented with persistent fever (≥4 days). It is worth noting that in most of these earlier studies, IE was diagnosed using the von Reyn criteria, and the definition of persistent fever varied in terms of temperature cut-off and duration [10, 12, 13]. Despite these methodological differences, the duration of fever in all prior studies was significantly longer than in the present study, where the median duration was only 1 day. Interestingly, in contrast to older studies, large vegetations (≥10 mm), intracardiac abscesses, and embolic events were not associated with prolonged fever in our cohort, even after excluding patients that had early valve surgery [10, 11, 13]. For example, the median duration of fever was 1 day for patients with vegetations (IQR: 1–3 days), intracardiac abscesses (IQR: 1–3 days), and those with embolic events (IQR: 1–3 days). This is in stark contrast to the study by Lederman et al, which reported fever lasting 10 days in patients with vegetations and 9 days in those with embolic events [13]. Thus, early defervescence or early clearance of blood cultures, especially in non-staphylococcal IE cases [26], should not rule out the presence of intracardiac complications. A TEE should be performed on all patients with IE, or high suspicion of IE, even if there is rapid clinical improvement following the initiation of antimicrobial treatment [19]. The discrepancies in the duration of fever in the present study compared to those conducted previously could be explained by an advancements in diagnostic tools (microbiological and radiological) over the past three decades, allowing for earlier identification of patients with less advanced intracardiac invasion. In our study, patients with S. aureus bacteremia had the first echocardiography within 3 days of the first positive blood culture, compared to 5.7 days in a study conducted more than 20 years ago [27]. Earlier identification of IE patients has led to improved outcomes and reduced mortality by enabling earlier management of such patients [28].

Moreover, IE episodes caused by S. aureus were more likely to exhibit persistent fever, consistent with earlier findings [10, 12, 13], although this association was not confirmed in multivariable logistic regression. This suggests that other factors, such as persistent bacteremia or native bone and joint infections like spondylodiscitis, may mediate the relationship [24, 25]. Conversely, bacteremia caused by streptococci and enterococci was associated with a lower likelihood of persistent fever in both suspected IE and confirmed IE cases. Previous studies also demonstrated that fever duration was shorter in IE caused by enterococci and streptococci compared to S. aureus IE or culture negative IE [12, 13, 29].

This study has several limitations. First, it is a single-center study; however, to our knowledge, it is the largest study to date that explores persistent fever in patients with suspected IE and the only one conducted in the last 2 decades. Second, because this study was performed in a Swiss university hospital where ID specialists evaluate all suspected IE cases, with access to advanced imaging such as 18F-FDG PET/CT and cardiac CT for valvular and paravalvular lesions, as well as comprehensive imaging for embolic events, the findings may have limited generalizability to other healthcare systems. Third, due to the lack of a definitive gold standard for diagnosing IE, the Endocarditis Team's evaluation was used as the reference standard. Fourth, we did not account for medications such as paracetamol, anti-inflammatory drugs, or corticosteroids, which can affect body temperature. Fifth, we did not collect data on subfebrile temperatures (37.5–38°C), which in our study were considered afebrile. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that patients with cardiac complications may have remained subfebrile for a longer duration than those without such complications.

In conclusion, our study challenges the traditional association between persistent fever and IE, because no association between persistent fever and IE among patients with suspected IE was found, with most patients achieving defervescence withing 4 days of initiating antimicrobial treatment. Among episodes with suspected IE, persistent fever was linked to inappropriate antimicrobial treatment, lack of source control interventions, and spondylodiscitis, whereas among IE patients, it was associated with native bone and joint infections. Notably, in these patients, large vegetations (≥10 mm), intracardiac abscess, or embolic events were not associated with persistent fever. These findings underscore the importance of reassessing patients with persistent fever despite appropriate antimicrobial therapy, which may require repeated imaging and consideration of source control procedures. Identifying these predictors can guide necessary investigations and optimize intervention timing, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary materials are available at Clinical Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.

Notes

Author Contributions. M. P. O., P. M., and B. G. conceived the idea. E. S., P. M., G. T., N. I., P. T., M. K., B. G., and M. P. O. collected the patients' data. M. P. O. supervised the project. M. P. O. performed the analysis and interpreted the results. E. S. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision and read and approved the submitted version.

References

1

Habib
 
G
,
Erba
 
PA
,
Iung
 
B
, et al.  
Clinical presentation, aetiology and outcome of infective endocarditis: results of the ESC-EORP EURO-ENDO (European infective endocarditis) registry: a prospective cohort study
.
Euro Heart J
 
2019
;
40
:
3222
32
.

2

Murdoch
 
DR
,
Corey
 
GR
,
Hoen
 
B
, et al.  
Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the international collaboration on endocarditis-prospective cohort study
.
Arch Intern Med
 
2009
;
169
:
463
73
.

3

Durack
 
DT
,
Lukes
 
AS
,
Bright
 
DK
.
New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Duke Endocarditis Service
.
Am J Med
 
1994
;
96
:
200
9
.

4

Habib
 
G
,
Hoen
 
B
,
Tornos
 
P
, et al.  
Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009): the task force on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and the International Society of Chemotherapy (ISC) for infection and cancer
.
Euro Heart J
 
2009
;
30
:
2369
413
.

5

Fowler
 
VG
,
Durack
 
DT
,
Selton-Suty
 
C
, et al.  
The 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria for infective endocarditis: updating the modified Duke criteria
.
Clin Infect Dis
 
2023
;
77
(
4):
518
26
.

6

Papadimitriou-Olivgeris
 
M
,
Monney
 
P
,
Frank
 
M
, et al.  
Comparison of the 2015 and 2023 European Society of Cardiology versions of the Duke criteria among patients with suspected infective endocarditis
.
Clin Infect Dis
 
2025
;
80
:
777
83
.

7

Liu
 
C
,
Bayer
 
A
,
Cosgrove
 
SE
, et al.  
Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children
.
Clin Infect Dis
 
2011
;
52
:
e18
55
.

8

Fowler
 
VG
 Jr,
Olsen
 
MK
,
Corey
 
GR
, et al.  
Clinical identifiers of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
.
Arch Intern Med
 
2003
;
163
:
2066
72
.

9

Stavropoulou
 
E
,
Guery
 
B
,
Ianculescu
 
N
, et al.  
The role of early defervescence in ruling out infective endocarditis: a cohort study
.
Clin Microbiol Infect
 
2023
;
29
:
1087.e5
e8
.

10

Douglas
 
A
,
Moore-Gillon
 
J
,
Eykyn
 
S
.
Fever during treatment of infective endocarditis
.
Lancet
 
1986
;
1
:
1341
3
.

11

Blumberg
 
EA
,
Robbins
 
N
,
Adimora
 
A
,
Lowy
 
FD
.
Persistent fever in association with infective endocarditis
.
Clin Infect Dis
 
1992
;
15
:
983
90
.

12

Olaison
 
L
,
Hogevik
 
H
,
Alestig
 
K
.
Fever, C-reactive protein, and other acute-phase reactants during treatment of infective endocarditis
.
Arch Intern Med
 
1997
;
157
:
885
92
.

13

Lederman
 
MM
,
Sprague
 
L
,
Wallis
 
RS
,
Ellner
 
JJ
.
Duration of fever during treatment of infective endocarditis
.
Medicine
 
1992
;
71
:
52
7
.

14

Raucher
 
B
,
Dobkin
 
J
,
Mandel
 
L
,
Edberg
 
S
,
Levi
 
M
,
Miller
 
M
.
Occult polymicrobial endocarditis with Haemophilus parainfluenzae in intravenous drug abusers
.
Am J Med
 
1989
;
86
:
169
72
.

15

Iwama
 
T
,
Shigematsu
 
S
,
Asami
 
K
, et al.  
Tricuspid valve endocarditis with large vegetations in a non-drug addict without underlying cardiac disease
.
Intern Med
 
1996
;
35
:
203
6
.

16

Kietselaer
 
BL
,
Narula
 
J
,
Hofstra
 
L
.
The annexin code: revealing endocarditis
.
Eur Heart J
 
2007
;
28
:
948
.

17

Zabalgoitia-Reyes
 
M
,
Mehlman
 
DJ
,
Talano
 
JV
.
Persistent fever with aortic valve endocarditis
.
Arch Intern Med
 
1985
;
145
:
327
8
.

18

Singer
 
M
,
Deutschman
 
CS
,
Seymour
 
CW
, et al.  
The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3)
.
JAMA
 
2016
;
315
:
801
10
.

19

Delgado
 
V
,
Ajmone Marsan
 
N
,
de Waha
 
S
, et al.  
2023 ESC guidelines for the management of endocarditis
.
Euro Heart J
 
2023
;
44
(
39):
3948
4042
.

20

Minejima
 
E
,
Mai
 
N
,
Bui
 
N
, et al.  
Defining the breakpoint duration of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia predictive of poor outcomes
.
Clin Infect Dis
 
2020
;
70
:
566
73
.

21

Papadimitriou-Olivgeris
 
M
,
Caruana
 
G
,
Senn
 
L
,
Guery
 
B
.
Predictors of mortality of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia among patients hospitalized in a Swiss University Hospital and the role of early source control; a retrospective cohort study
.
Europ J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
 
2023
;
42
:
347
57
.

22

Berbari
 
EF
,
Kanj
 
SS
,
Kowalski
 
TJ
, et al.  
2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of native vertebral osteomyelitis in adults
.
Clin Infect Dis
 
2015
;
61
:
e26
46
.

23

Papadimitriou-Olivgeris
 
M
,
Guery
 
B
,
Monney
 
P
,
Senn
 
L
,
Steinmetz
 
S
,
Boillat-Blanco
 
N
.
Prevalence of infective endocarditis among patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and bone and joint infections
.
Microorganisms
 
2024
;
12
:
342
.

24

Papadimitriou-Olivgeris
 
M
,
Monney
 
P
,
Mueller
 
L
,
Senn
 
L
,
Guery
 
B
.
The LAUsanne STAPHylococcus aureus ENdocarditis (LAUSTAPHEN) score: a prediction score to estimate initial risk for infective endocarditis in patients with S. aureus bacteremia
.
Front Cardiovasc Med
 
2022
;
9
:
961579
.

25

van der Vaart
 
TW
,
Prins
 
JM
,
Soetekouw
 
R
, et al.  
Prediction rules for ruling out endocarditis in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
.
Clin Infect Dis
 
2022
;
74
:
1442
9
.

26

van der Vaart
 
TW
,
Stuifzand
 
M
,
Boekholdt
 
SM
, et al.  
The prevalence of persistent bacteraemia in patients with a non-staphylococcal infective endocarditis, a retrospective cohort study
.
Int J Cardiol
 
2022
;
367
:
49
54
.

27

Fowler
 
VG
 Jr,
Li
 
J
,
Corey
 
GR
, et al.  
Role of echocardiography in evaluation of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: experience in 103 patients
.
J Am College Cardiol
 
1997
;
30
:
1072
8
.

28

Jensen
 
AD
,
Ostergaard
 
L
,
Petersen
 
JK
, et al.  
Temporal trends of mortality in patients with infective endocarditis: a nationwide study
.
Euro Heart J Q Care Clin Outcomes
 
2022
;
9
:
24
33
.

29

Pesanti
 
EL
,
Smith
 
IM
.
Infective endocarditis with negative blood cultures: an analysis of 52 cases
.
Am J Med
 
1979
;
66
:
43
50
.

Author notes

Potential conflicts of interest. The authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Supplementary data