This scientific commentary refers to ‘Heterozygous PINK1 p.G411S increases risk of Parkinson’s disease via a dominant-negative mechanism’, by Puschmann et al. (doi:10.1093/brain/aww261).

The pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease, in keeping with other common neurodegenerative diseases, is a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Significant progress has been made in dissecting the genetic architecture of both rare monogenic and more common sporadic forms of the disease. Mutations in three genes, SNCA, LRRK2 and VPS35, cause autosomal dominant Parkinson’s disease, while mutations in six genes cause autosomal recessive Parkinson’s disease/parkinsonism: PINK1, PARK7/DJ-1, PARK2/PARKIN, PLA2G6, ATP13A2, and FBXO7. Taken together, monogenic forms of Parkinson’s disease account for 30% of cases of familial disease and 3–5% of sporadic disease. Nonetheless much of our knowledge of the pathogenic pathways that lead to neuronal dysfunction and death has emerged from the identification of these genes. The discovery of the monogenic forms naturally posed the question of whether these genes also influence the risk of sporadic disease. If the same genes that can harbour highly penetrant mutations in Parkinson’s disease also contain risk variants for sporadic disease, this would provide a genetic and pathophysiological link between the mendelian and sporadic forms (Lesage and Brice, 2012). Several genome-wide association studies have independently identified SNCA and LRRK2 as risk loci for sporadic disease, thus linking the risk of sporadic Parkinson’s disease to that of the autosomal dominant forms (Nalls et al., 2014). However, the mechanism by which a risk variant alters biological function and confers susceptibility to disease remains an essential missing piece of the puzzle. In this issue of Brain, Puschmann and co-workers examine whether a genetic variant in PINK1 contributes to the risk of sporadic disease, and explore the biological mechanism by which it may do so (Puschmann et al., 2016).

Homozygous and compound heterozygous mutations in PINK1 are the second most frequent cause of autosomal recessive Parkinson’s disease. PINK1-associated autosomal recessive Parkinson’s disease resembles sporadic Parkinson’s disease with an akinetic rigid syndrome with good response to levodopa, levodopa-induced dyskinesias, and occasionally dystonia. Many heterozygous putative pathogenic mutations in PINK1 have been observed in sporadic and familial Parkinson’s disease, which has led to the hypothesis that they may be a susceptibility factor in the development of the sporadic form. However, heterozygous PINK1 mutations have also been discovered in apparently healthy controls, and relatives who are heterozygous carriers in pedigrees with PINK1 homozygous mutations do not always show parkinsonism (Klein et al., 2007). If the hypothesis is true, one would expect heterozygous mutations to be more common in patients than in controls; the mean age of onset would be predicted to be intermediate between the state of the homozygous mutations and no mutation; there may be preclinical manifestations of disease in neuroimaging of heterozygous mutation carriers; and there should be evidence that the heterozygous mutation affects the biological function of PINK1, either through haploinsufficiency, or through dominant negative or dominant effects.

This study focuses on one particular PINK1 variant p.G411S, which has occasionally shown dominant inheritance, leading Puschmann et al. to propose that a single risk allele may present sizeable risk and may have a pathological effect distinct from other variants. They performed a case control study on five different Caucasian series, studying a total of 2560 patients with Parkinson’s disease and 2145 controls. Heterozygous PINK1 p.G411S variants were present in 19 cases (0.74%) and five controls (0.23%), confirming a significant association of the heterozygous p.G411S variant with risk of Parkinson’s disease with an odds ratio of 2.92 (P = 0.032), which remained significant in a meta-analysis incorporating previous published studies. Interestingly the median age of disease onset was significantly younger in the PINK1 heterozygous carriers, compared to non-carrier status (59 years versus 64 years, P = 0.012). These findings are in contrast to the largest previous meta-analysis (Marongiu et al., 2008), which studied 1100 patients and 400 controls for heterozygous variants in the PINK1 gene and reported no significant difference in frequencies (1.8% versus 1.5%) between cases and controls. However, this study was smaller than that of Puschmann et al. and considered all PINK1 variants rather than only the p.G411S variant. Variation at the PINK1 locus was not identified in genome-wide association study meta-analyses either, although this may be due to the low frequency of the p.G411S variant in non-Scandinavian populations.

Puschmann et al. then address how the p.G411S variant exerts its effect on PINK1. PINK1 is a ubiquitously expressed serine/threonine kinase with a mitochondrial targeting sequence. Relevant to this study is the emergence of a critical role for PINK1 in the regulation of mitochondrial quality control through the selective elimination of damaged mitochondria via mitophagy (Pickrell and Youle, 2015). Mitochondrial depolarization leads to accumulation of a PINK1 dimer on the outer membrane of damaged mitochondria. Crucially PINK1 phosphorylates residue Ser65 of ubiquitin (p-ser65-ub) and ubiquitin chains conjugated to mitochondrial proteins (Durcan and Fon, 2015), increasing the level of p-ser65-ub from undetectable to 20% of total ubiquitin in mitochondria (Ordureau et al., 2014). One function of p-ser65-ub is to serve as a receptor for binding and recruitment of autophagy receptors and parkin (Lazarou et al., 2015). Together with the PINK1-dependent Ser65 phosphorylation of the Ubl domain in parkin, binding of p-ser65-ub to parkin converts it from the inactive conformation to the fully active conformation. This results in ubiquitination of many outer mitochondrial membrane proteins by the parkin E3 ligase, and the triggering of mitophagy.

Puschmann et al. first analysed skin fibroblasts, and induced neurons, from two patients with heterozygous p.G411S, and compared them to controls, and furthermore to cells with the Q456X homozygous (patients) and Q456X heterozygous mutations (unaffected carriers). The Q456X mutation provides a useful comparison as in the homozygous state the PINK1 protein is absent and thus kinase function is absent, while in the heterozygous state, intermediate levels of PINK1 protein are present; if the heterozygous state is functionally significant, the effect must reflect haploinsufficiency. Of note, levels of PINK1 protein are the same in the heterozygous p.G411S state as in controls. Next, as a measure of the kinase function of PINK1, Puschmann et al. tested phosphorylation of ser65-ubiquitin using two methods: an ELISA-based approach and an automated high content imaging approach. Using prolonged treatment with valinomycin to induce mitochondrial depolarization, and subsequent mitophagy, they demonstrate that the p-ser65-ub signal, and hence PINK1 kinase activity, is significantly reduced in cells with p.G411S heterozygous compared to controls or the Q456X heterozygous state. This confirms that the p.G411S heterozygous state does indeed result in impaired PINK1 function in neurons, but that the effect is not recapitulated in a model of haploinsufficiency.

To dissect the mechanism of action of the p.G411S variant, the authors performed theoretical molecular modelling of the PINK1 protein, and molecular dynamics simulation of the effect of the p.G411S variant. In the PINK1 monomer, p.G411S induces mispositioning of ubiquitin in the active site, which increases the distance between the Ser65 residue on ubiquitin and ATP, and reduces kinase activity. However, the modelling of the heterodimer formed between wild-type PINK1 and PINK1 p.G411S suggests that the p.G411S mutant PINK1 poisons the wild-type PINK1 so that it adopts the same misalignment of ubiquitin and ATP at the active site, impairing kinase function. While the conclusions from the 3D modelling must be interpreted cautiously without experimental structural data, this nonetheless represents key evidence that through dimerization p.G411S may exert a dominant negative effect.

Finally the authors confirmed that wild-type and p.G411S can dimerize when overexpressed in Hela cells, and that the heterodimer displays reduced kinase activity with respect to wild-type homodimers. Overexpression of wild-type PINK1 in this model is able to activate parkin translocation to the mitochondria. However co-expression of p.G411S (but not Q456X) with wild-type PINK1 significantly reduces mitochondrial translocation of parkin, confirming that the dominant negative effect of the p.G411S variant in reducing PINK1 kinase function also translates into downstream impairment of parkin recruitment.

In summary, this study proposes that a heterozygous variant in the PINK1 gene is a genetic risk factor in certain populations for sporadic Parkinson’s disease, and describes a putative dominant negative mechanism by which it leads to reduction in PINK1 kinase function impairing mitophagy, and contributing to neuronal loss (Fig. 1). In this study, the major challenge of dissecting the mechanism underpinning genetic variants has been overcome by recent discoveries in PINK1 biology, notably, the role of PINK1 as a ubiquitin kinase. This yielded a target with which to measure PINK1 activity, enabling the effect of the variant to be ascertained directly, rather than relying on indirect downstream assays of mitochondrial dysfunction or neuronal loss. Future work will confirm whether PINK1 does indeed need to dimerize for activation, whether wild-type PINK1 and p.G411S PINK1 dimerize at the endogenous level, and whether the putative endogenous heterodimer also exhibits impaired kinase function. Overall this study further supports the hypothesis that variability in the genes that cause mendelian Parkinson’s disease may act as genetic risk factors for the sporadic form, and strengthens the proposition that pathways affected in autosomal recessive Parkinson’s disease such as mitochondrial quality control, are of significance in the development of sporadic Parkinson’s disease.
Putative mechanism of p.G411S variant.Top: Function of wild-type PINK1. Damage to mitochondria results in the formation of PINK1 homodimers at the mitochondria. The kinase function of PINK1 induces ubiquitin phosphorylation, as well as phosphorylation and activation of parkin, which is translocated to the mitochondria, culminating in engulfment of damaged mitochondria by autophagosomes and degradation by lysosomes. Bottom: The dominant negative mechanism of the heterozygous PINK1 p.G411S mutation. Damage to mitochondria results in the formation of dimers at the mitochondria that may be heterodimers consisting of wild-type PINK1 and G411S PINK1. The mutation confers a dominant negative effect disrupting the normal kinase function of the wild-type PINK1, leading to reduced ubiquitin phosphorylation, and reduced parkin activation and translocation. Ultimately this would lead to impaired mitophagy and accumulation of damaged mitochondria. WT = wild-type.
Figure 1

Putative mechanism of p.G411S variant.Top: Function of wild-type PINK1. Damage to mitochondria results in the formation of PINK1 homodimers at the mitochondria. The kinase function of PINK1 induces ubiquitin phosphorylation, as well as phosphorylation and activation of parkin, which is translocated to the mitochondria, culminating in engulfment of damaged mitochondria by autophagosomes and degradation by lysosomes. Bottom: The dominant negative mechanism of the heterozygous PINK1 p.G411S mutation. Damage to mitochondria results in the formation of dimers at the mitochondria that may be heterodimers consisting of wild-type PINK1 and G411S PINK1. The mutation confers a dominant negative effect disrupting the normal kinase function of the wild-type PINK1, leading to reduced ubiquitin phosphorylation, and reduced parkin activation and translocation. Ultimately this would lead to impaired mitophagy and accumulation of damaged mitochondria. WT = wild-type.

Glossary

Dominant negative: A single mutant allele exerts a negative effect on the normal DNA, RNA or protein resulting in impaired protein function

Haploinsufficiency: A single mutant allele results in 50% activity of the encoded protein, which is insufficient to maintain normal function

Mitophagy: The selective targeting and elimination of defective mitochondria by autophagy in order to avoid the accumulation of toxic mitochondria PINK1: PTEN-induced kinase 1

Ubiquitin kinase: An enzyme with the ability to transfer phosphate groups to the protein ubiquitin

References

Durcan
TM
,
Fon
EA
.
The three ‘P's of mitophagy: PARKIN, PINK1, and post-translational modifications
.
Genes Dev
2015
;
29
:
989
99
.
doi: 10 1101 /gad 262758 115 2015; 29: 989-999
.

Klein
C
,
Lohmann-Hedrich
K
,
Rogaeva
E
,
Schlossmacher
MG
,
Lang
AE
.
Deciphering the role of heterozygous mutations in genes associated with parkinsonism
.
Lancet Neurol
2007
;
6
:
652
62
.

Lazarou
M
,
Sliter
DA
,
Kane
LA
,
Sarraf
SA
,
Wang
C
,
Burman
JL
, et al.
The ubiquitin kinase PINK1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy
.
Nature
2015
;
524
:
309
14
.
doi: 10 1038 /nature14893 Epub 2015 Aug 12 2015; 524: 309-314
.

Lesage
S
,
Brice
A
.
Role of mendelian genes in “sporadic” Parkinson's disease
.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord
2012
;
18
(
Suppl 1
):
S66
70
.
doi: 10 1016 /S1353 -8020 (11)70022 -0 2012; 18 Suppl 1: S66-S70
.

Marongiu
R
,
Ferraris
A
,
Ialongo
T
,
Michiorri
S
,
Soleti
F
,
Ferrari
F
, et al.
PINK1 heterozygous rare variants: prevalence, significance and phenotypic spectrum
.
Hum Mutat
2008
;
29
:
565
.
doi: 10 1002 /humu 20719 2008; 29: 565
.

Nalls
MA
,
Pankratz
N
,
Lill
CM
,
Do
CB
,
Hernandez
DG
,
Saad
M
, et al.
Large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies six new risk loci for Parkinson's disease
.
Nat Genet
2014
;
46
:
989
93
.
doi: 10 1038 /ng 3043 Epub 2014 Jul 27 2014; 46: 989-993
.

Ordureau
A
,
Sarraf
SA
,
Duda
DM
,
Heo
JM
,
Jedrychowski
MP
,
Sviderskiy
VO
, et al.
Quantitative proteomics reveal a feedforward mechanism for mitochondrial PARKIN translocation and ubiquitin chain synthesis
.
Mol Cell
2014
;
56
:
360
75
.
doi: 10 1016 /j molcel 2014 09 007 Epub 2014 Oct 2 2014; 56: 360-375
.

Pickrell
AM
,
Youle
RJ
.
The roles of PINK1, parkin, and mitochondrial fidelity in Parkinson's disease
.
Neuron
2015
;
85
:
257
73
.
doi: 10 1016 /j neuron 2014 12 007 2015; 85: 257-273
.

Puschmann
A
,
Fiesel
FC
,
Caulfield
TR
,
Hudec
R
,
Ando
M
,
Truban
C
, et al.
Heterozygous PINK1 p.G411S increases risk of Parkinson's disease via a dominant negative mechanism
.
Brain
2016
;
140
:
98
117
.