
Contents
-
-
-
-
-
-
2 When Does the Lot Reflect the Will of the Gods? Lots, Oracles, Divination, and the Notion of Moira
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 The Mindset: Antiquity, Ubiquity, and Religion 1 The Mindset: Antiquity, Ubiquity, and Religion
-
2 Equality and fairness 2 Equality and fairness
-
3 Group definition 3 Group definition
-
4 The will of the gods 4 The will of the gods
-
5 Lot oracles 5 Lot oracles
-
6 Frequency, ubiquity, and sacrifice 6 Frequency, ubiquity, and sacrifice
-
7 Partible inheritance by lot 7 Partible inheritance by lot
-
8 New foundations 8 New foundations
-
9 Cleisthenes and the constitutive lottery 9 Cleisthenes and the constitutive lottery
-
10 Our modern democracies 10 Our modern democracies
-
-
-
-
-
Cite
Abstract
The conclusions refer to the first two parts and offer some general observations. Drawing lots served equality and fairness, expressed in distribution, procedure, selection, and mixture. Its salient features—randomness and unpredictability—guaranteed equal chances; Greeks often preferred equal outcomes too. A direct line leads fromisomoiria in the Iliad and the Odyssey to isonomia and democracy: from equal, concrete portions (booty, land, etc.) to equal, abstract portions of the law. Since Homer, we observed equal distribution of booty by lot combined with a significant role for the community. The gods also distribute their realms by lot. Their role in drawing lots existed on a spectrum from explicit divination (lot oracles) to a general invocation. Drawing lots defines, exclusively, the contours of the group or community, whether small (brothers sharing an inheritance by lot, with no primogeniture) or large (sharing portions of sacrificial meat or settlers founding a new polis). Archaic colonization, responsible for at least 30 percent of all Greek poleis, was limited to Greeks, thus enhancing the Small World effect of quickly sharing commonalities of mindset, conventions, and practice over vast geographical horizons. Conquered land was considered “empty” and available for distributing by lot equal kleroi. Even in imaginary accounts, Greeks could not conceive of any alternative. Settlers expected “equal and fair terms” concretely expressed in the First Lots that signified sharing in the polis and conforming to the ideal of “one man–one oikos–one kleros.” However, there was no cap on wealth, and elites in colonies—based rather on wealth than descent—would soon appear. A salient feature of ancient Greek history is the contrasting pulls of the elite, the top-down vector, and the egalitarian one. The drawing of lots was a concrete expression of the latter.
Sign in
Personal account
- Sign in with email/username & password
- Get email alerts
- Save searches
- Purchase content
- Activate your purchase/trial code
- Add your ORCID iD
Purchase
Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.
Purchasing informationMonth: | Total Views: |
---|---|
May 2024 | 4 |
June 2024 | 2 |
August 2024 | 8 |
September 2024 | 4 |
November 2024 | 2 |
December 2024 | 7 |
January 2025 | 5 |
February 2025 | 6 |
March 2025 | 1 |
Get help with access
Institutional access
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
IP based access
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Sign in through your institution
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Sign in with a library card
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society Members
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Sign in through society site
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Sign in using a personal account
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
Personal account
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Viewing your signed in accounts
Click the account icon in the top right to:
Signed in but can't access content
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
Institutional account management
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.