
Contents
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9.1 Introduction 9.1 Introduction
-
9.2 The Mere Addition Paradox 9.2 The Mere Addition Paradox
-
9.3 Temkin on the Mere Addition Paradox and the Non-transitivity of “Better Than” 9.3 Temkin on the Mere Addition Paradox and the Non-transitivity of “Better Than”
-
9.4 A Crucial Ambiguity 9.4 A Crucial Ambiguity
-
9.5 Doubts about the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives 9.5 Doubts about the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives
-
9.6 A Digression: The Fine-Grained Individuation Gambit 9.6 A Digression: The Fine-Grained Individuation Gambit
-
9.7 Why Injustice Makes an Outcome Worse 9.7 Why Injustice Makes an Outcome Worse
-
9.8 Comparison-Dependent vs Context-Dependent Goodness 9.8 Comparison-Dependent vs Context-Dependent Goodness
-
9.9 Dynamic Choice and Worries about Money-Pumping 9.9 Dynamic Choice and Worries about Money-Pumping
-
9.10 Conclusion 9.10 Conclusion
-
Appendix: Extending the Solution to “Non-Overlapping” Cases Appendix: Extending the Solution to “Non-Overlapping” Cases
-
References References
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9 Context-Dependent Betterness and the Mere Addition Paradox
Get access-
Published:January 2022
Cite
Abstract
This chapter proposes a new solution to Derek Parfit’s Mere Addition Paradox. It argues that the paradox trades on an ambiguity about the context of choice. There is a sense in which all three intuitive judgments about Parfit’s case are true, namely as pairwise comparisons in a two-possible case, i.e. in a choice situation where the option set contains only these two outcomes. The air of paradox arises from the assumption that these pairwise judgments carry over to a three-possible case, in which all three outcomes are possible. But this, the chapter argues, is not the case. If sound, this argument shows how we can make sense of each of our pairwise intuitions in the Mere Addition Paradox, without incurring the cost of intransitivity within an option set. This solves the Mere Addition Paradox and blocks the argument toward the Repugnant Conclusion. Parfit’s case also holds a general lesson about the nature of value, but one that is less revisionary than some had thought. Correctly understood, Parfit’s Mere Addition Case challenges not the transitivity of the “better than”-relation, as Larry Temkin has argued, but instead a different, and less sacrosanct, idea, namely the so-called Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives principle. What Parfit’s puzzle teaches us is that betterness is sometimes context-dependent: the relative goodness of two outcomes can depend on whether or not a third outcome could have instead been chosen.
Sign in
Personal account
- Sign in with email/username & password
- Get email alerts
- Save searches
- Purchase content
- Activate your purchase/trial code
- Add your ORCID iD
Purchase
Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.
Purchasing informationMonth: | Total Views: |
---|---|
October 2022 | 13 |
November 2022 | 5 |
December 2022 | 3 |
January 2023 | 3 |
February 2023 | 7 |
March 2023 | 8 |
April 2023 | 8 |
May 2023 | 2 |
June 2023 | 1 |
July 2023 | 9 |
August 2023 | 8 |
September 2023 | 7 |
October 2023 | 6 |
November 2023 | 7 |
December 2023 | 15 |
January 2024 | 8 |
February 2024 | 20 |
March 2024 | 19 |
April 2024 | 20 |
May 2024 | 3 |
June 2024 | 2 |
July 2024 | 7 |
August 2024 | 6 |
September 2024 | 8 |
October 2024 | 2 |
November 2024 | 9 |
December 2024 | 4 |
January 2025 | 5 |
February 2025 | 2 |
March 2025 | 6 |
April 2025 | 4 |
Get help with access
Institutional access
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
IP based access
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Sign in through your institution
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Sign in with a library card
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society Members
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Sign in through society site
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Sign in using a personal account
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
Personal account
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Viewing your signed in accounts
Click the account icon in the top right to:
Signed in but can't access content
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
Institutional account management
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.