
Contents
Cite
Extract
This is a book about the legitimacy and scope of constitutional review of primary legislation for its compatibility with fundamental rights. Some of its central claims have their origin in my DPhil thesis. There my primary ambition was to draw out some implications in the theory of law of the idea of institutional cooperation. That ambition was also at the heart of my first monograph, Shared Authority (Hart Publishing 2015). In the thesis constitutional review was treated as an extended illustration, an opportunity to descend from the conceptual abstraction of the debate over the nature of law and sharpen the normative edge of the anti-positivist theory I was developing.
When I started working on this book, Aleardo Zanghellini, my friend and colleague at Reading, pointed out that it was a good thing the two strands of my thesis had been disentangled and had become the subject of two separate books, with the jurisprudential one being written first. I can see now how right he was. For one thing, the audiences of the two books overlap only in part, as do their interests and theoretical concerns. Moreover, it was once I had put the jurisprudential debates behind me that the complexity of the issues I was about to explore came into full view. In grappling with the morally contentious aspects of constitutional review and trying to marry democracy and fundamental rights in sufficiently concrete institutional forms, legal theories can provide but little comfort. I do not mean by this to endorse the position that legal theory must remain detached from legal practice, though many legal philosophers hold just that position. Rather, I am thinking of the growing distance between the considerations that are commonly taken to be decisive in the theory of law and in constitutional theory. For this reason in this book I stay clear of jurisprudential controversies. Indeed, I go so far as to suggest that my account is compatible with both legal positivism and anti-positivism. That being said, there are undeniable continuities between the two books. Apart from the general claim that courts and the legislature should be understood to participate in a joint institutional project, there is the connection between separation of powers and political legitimacy—so central to my argument here—which I first elaborated in Shared Authority.
Sign in
Personal account
- Sign in with email/username & password
- Get email alerts
- Save searches
- Purchase content
- Activate your purchase/trial code
- Add your ORCID iD
Purchase
Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.
Purchasing informationMonth: | Total Views: |
---|---|
October 2022 | 4 |
November 2022 | 3 |
January 2023 | 1 |
March 2023 | 3 |
May 2023 | 5 |
June 2023 | 1 |
July 2023 | 4 |
August 2023 | 3 |
September 2023 | 1 |
February 2024 | 2 |
March 2024 | 3 |
May 2024 | 3 |
June 2024 | 3 |
January 2025 | 3 |
February 2025 | 3 |
Get help with access
Institutional access
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
IP based access
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Sign in through your institution
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Sign in with a library card
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society Members
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Sign in through society site
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Sign in using a personal account
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
Personal account
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Viewing your signed in accounts
Click the account icon in the top right to:
Signed in but can't access content
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
Institutional account management
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.