Corrigendum to: Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study of the Cutaneous Effects of a Topical Body Treatment Compared to a Bland Moisturizer

In the article “Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study of the Cutaneous Effects of a Topical Body Treatment Compared to a Bland Moisturizer” by Carruthers et al in Aesthet Surg J., sjab161, https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab161, the order in which Figure 2 images A-D appeared did not match the figure captions. These are now corrected online. On page NP1189, the following sentence is being corrected to read: "This study evaluated the topical use of TFB compared to a bland moisturizer, Cetaphil Lotion (Galderma, Fort Worth, TX), on both the extensor (sun-exposed) and volar (non–sun-exposed) sides of the forearms over a 3-month period evaluated by photographic changes, dermatopathology changes, cutaneous elasticity measurements using 2 separate methods, skin thickness, and patient-reported outcomes." On page NP1190, the following sentence is being corrected to read: "Negative numbers indicate a faster retraction time at the end of the study (Figure 3).” The authors wish to correct the title of Figure 9 to read: "Recoil Speed Mean Change from BL at Week 12." These errors have been corrected online. The authors appreciate the opportunity to clarify this information and regret any prior oversights.