The performance of selected foliar insecticides treatments against soybean looper infestations in soybean was evaluated at the Delta Research and Extension Center (Washington County). Soybean seed (Asgrow 46X6) were planted on a Bosket very fine sandy loam soil on 14 Jun at a seeding rate of 117,612 seeds/acre. Plot size was four rows (40 in centers) by 40 feet. Treatments were replicated four times in a RCB design. Foliar insecticide treatments were applied on 25 Aug with a high-clearance sprayer with a compressed air spray system calibrated to deliver 10 gpa through TX-12 hollow cone nozzles (2/row) at 5 mph. Soybean looper densities were determined by sampling one of the center two rows with a 15-inch diameter sweep net. A sample consisted of 25 sweeps per plot. Plots were sampled at 2, 5, 7, and 14 days after treatment (DAT). The same row in each plot was not sampled on consecutive sample dates. Data were subjected to ANOVA and means separated according to Fisher’s Protected Least Significant Difference.

No differences in looper densities were observed among treatments at 2 DAT (Table 1). All of the insecticides reduced looper densities compared to the untreated check at 5 DAT. Looper densities declined between 5 and 7 DAT, and no differences among treatments were observed at 7 or 14 DAT.1

TreatmentRate/acre (fl oz product)Soybean looper/25 sweeps
2 DAT5 DAT7 DAT14 DAT
Elevest 2.22SC6.714.24.2b3.47.9
Besiege 1.252CS7.212.84.9b2.26.5
Intrepid Edge 3SC5.016.35.0b2.56.5
Vanticor 5SC1.210.72.8b2.35.4
Vanticor 5SC1.714.55.4b3.44.4
Untreated check22.317.1a9.27.8
P > F0.53<0.010.60.76
TreatmentRate/acre (fl oz product)Soybean looper/25 sweeps
2 DAT5 DAT7 DAT14 DAT
Elevest 2.22SC6.714.24.2b3.47.9
Besiege 1.252CS7.212.84.9b2.26.5
Intrepid Edge 3SC5.016.35.0b2.56.5
Vanticor 5SC1.210.72.8b2.35.4
Vanticor 5SC1.714.55.4b3.44.4
Untreated check22.317.1a9.27.8
P > F0.53<0.010.60.76

Means within columns followed by a common letter are not significantly different (FPLSD, P = 0.05).

TreatmentRate/acre (fl oz product)Soybean looper/25 sweeps
2 DAT5 DAT7 DAT14 DAT
Elevest 2.22SC6.714.24.2b3.47.9
Besiege 1.252CS7.212.84.9b2.26.5
Intrepid Edge 3SC5.016.35.0b2.56.5
Vanticor 5SC1.210.72.8b2.35.4
Vanticor 5SC1.714.55.4b3.44.4
Untreated check22.317.1a9.27.8
P > F0.53<0.010.60.76
TreatmentRate/acre (fl oz product)Soybean looper/25 sweeps
2 DAT5 DAT7 DAT14 DAT
Elevest 2.22SC6.714.24.2b3.47.9
Besiege 1.252CS7.212.84.9b2.26.5
Intrepid Edge 3SC5.016.35.0b2.56.5
Vanticor 5SC1.210.72.8b2.35.4
Vanticor 5SC1.714.55.4b3.44.4
Untreated check22.317.1a9.27.8
P > F0.53<0.010.60.76

Means within columns followed by a common letter are not significantly different (FPLSD, P = 0.05).

Footnotes

1

This research was supported in part by industry gifts of pesticides, seed, and/or research funding and by the Mississippi Soybean Promotion Board.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]
Section Editor: Jawwad Qureshi
Jawwad Qureshi
Section Editor
Search for other works by this author on: