-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Donald R Cook, Whitney Crow, Jeffrey Gore, Performance of Selected Insecticides Against Soybean Looper in Soybean 4, 2021, Arthropod Management Tests, Volume 47, Issue 1, 2022, tsac103, https://doi.org/10.1093/amt/tsac103
- Share Icon Share
The performance of selected foliar insecticides treatments against soybean looper infestations in soybean was evaluated at the Delta Research and Extension Center (Washington County). Soybean seed (Asgrow 46X6) were planted on a Bosket very fine sandy loam soil on 14 Jun at a seeding rate of 117,612 seeds/acre. Plot size was four rows (40 in centers) by 40 feet. Treatments were replicated four times in a RCB design. Foliar insecticide treatments were applied on 25 Aug with a high-clearance sprayer with a compressed air spray system calibrated to deliver 10 gpa through TX-12 hollow cone nozzles (2/row) at 5 mph. Soybean looper densities were determined by sampling one of the center two rows with a 15-inch diameter sweep net. A sample consisted of 25 sweeps per plot. Plots were sampled at 2, 5, 7, and 14 days after treatment (DAT). The same row in each plot was not sampled on consecutive sample dates. Data were subjected to ANOVA and means separated according to Fisher’s Protected Least Significant Difference.
No differences in looper densities were observed among treatments at 2 DAT (Table 1). All of the insecticides reduced looper densities compared to the untreated check at 5 DAT. Looper densities declined between 5 and 7 DAT, and no differences among treatments were observed at 7 or 14 DAT.1
Treatment . | Rate/acre (fl oz product) . | Soybean looper/25 sweeps . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 DAT . | 5 DAT . | 7 DAT . | 14 DAT . | ||
Elevest 2.22SC | 6.7 | 14.2 | 4.2b | 3.4 | 7.9 |
Besiege 1.252CS | 7.2 | 12.8 | 4.9b | 2.2 | 6.5 |
Intrepid Edge 3SC | 5.0 | 16.3 | 5.0b | 2.5 | 6.5 |
Vanticor 5SC | 1.2 | 10.7 | 2.8b | 2.3 | 5.4 |
Vanticor 5SC | 1.7 | 14.5 | 5.4b | 3.4 | 4.4 |
Untreated check | — | 22.3 | 17.1a | 9.2 | 7.8 |
P > F | 0.53 | <0.01 | 0.6 | 0.76 |
Treatment . | Rate/acre (fl oz product) . | Soybean looper/25 sweeps . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 DAT . | 5 DAT . | 7 DAT . | 14 DAT . | ||
Elevest 2.22SC | 6.7 | 14.2 | 4.2b | 3.4 | 7.9 |
Besiege 1.252CS | 7.2 | 12.8 | 4.9b | 2.2 | 6.5 |
Intrepid Edge 3SC | 5.0 | 16.3 | 5.0b | 2.5 | 6.5 |
Vanticor 5SC | 1.2 | 10.7 | 2.8b | 2.3 | 5.4 |
Vanticor 5SC | 1.7 | 14.5 | 5.4b | 3.4 | 4.4 |
Untreated check | — | 22.3 | 17.1a | 9.2 | 7.8 |
P > F | 0.53 | <0.01 | 0.6 | 0.76 |
Means within columns followed by a common letter are not significantly different (FPLSD, P = 0.05).
Treatment . | Rate/acre (fl oz product) . | Soybean looper/25 sweeps . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 DAT . | 5 DAT . | 7 DAT . | 14 DAT . | ||
Elevest 2.22SC | 6.7 | 14.2 | 4.2b | 3.4 | 7.9 |
Besiege 1.252CS | 7.2 | 12.8 | 4.9b | 2.2 | 6.5 |
Intrepid Edge 3SC | 5.0 | 16.3 | 5.0b | 2.5 | 6.5 |
Vanticor 5SC | 1.2 | 10.7 | 2.8b | 2.3 | 5.4 |
Vanticor 5SC | 1.7 | 14.5 | 5.4b | 3.4 | 4.4 |
Untreated check | — | 22.3 | 17.1a | 9.2 | 7.8 |
P > F | 0.53 | <0.01 | 0.6 | 0.76 |
Treatment . | Rate/acre (fl oz product) . | Soybean looper/25 sweeps . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 DAT . | 5 DAT . | 7 DAT . | 14 DAT . | ||
Elevest 2.22SC | 6.7 | 14.2 | 4.2b | 3.4 | 7.9 |
Besiege 1.252CS | 7.2 | 12.8 | 4.9b | 2.2 | 6.5 |
Intrepid Edge 3SC | 5.0 | 16.3 | 5.0b | 2.5 | 6.5 |
Vanticor 5SC | 1.2 | 10.7 | 2.8b | 2.3 | 5.4 |
Vanticor 5SC | 1.7 | 14.5 | 5.4b | 3.4 | 4.4 |
Untreated check | — | 22.3 | 17.1a | 9.2 | 7.8 |
P > F | 0.53 | <0.01 | 0.6 | 0.76 |
Means within columns followed by a common letter are not significantly different (FPLSD, P = 0.05).
Footnotes
This research was supported in part by industry gifts of pesticides, seed, and/or research funding and by the Mississippi Soybean Promotion Board.