A trial was conducted to evaluate foliar insecticides for control of cotton fleahopper in cotton. This test was conducted on a dryland commercial cotton field near Plainview, TX. The field was planted on 3 May on 40-inch row spacing. The experiment was designed as an RCB with seven treatments and four replications. The plots were four-rows wide × 40 ft. in length. Treatments were applied on 19 July during the peak bloom stage of cotton. Insecticide applications were made with a CO2 pressurized hand-boom sprayer calibrated to deliver 11.5 GPA through hollow cone TeeJet TXVS6 spray tip nozzles (two per row) at 30 psi. Wind speed was ~9 mph during spray applications. Two drop-cloth samples (average of five plants/sample) were taken from the middle two rows of each plot at 7 DAT and 14 DAT. Numbers of CFH nymphs and adults were counted in each drop cloth sample. Data are reported as mean number of CFHs per 100 plants per plot. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and means were separated by Tukey’s mean separation.

Insecticide application had a significant impact on CFH population (Table 1). All the insecticide treatments resulted in significantly fewer CFHs compared to the untreated check on both the sample dates. No significant differences were observed among insecticide treatments.1

Treatment/ formulationRate amt product/acreTotal CFHs per 100 plants
7 DAT14 DAT
Untreated check-60.0a50.0a
Sefina 0.42DC3 fl oz17.5b27.5b
Sefina 0.42DC6 fl oz10.0b20.0b
Sefina 0.42DC + Orthene 97S3 fl oz + 4 oz wt7.5b15.0b
Transform 50WG1 oz wt2.5b5.0b
Centric 40WG2 oz wt2.5b2.5b
Admire Pro 4.6F1.5 fl oz2.5b7.5b
Treatment/ formulationRate amt product/acreTotal CFHs per 100 plants
7 DAT14 DAT
Untreated check-60.0a50.0a
Sefina 0.42DC3 fl oz17.5b27.5b
Sefina 0.42DC6 fl oz10.0b20.0b
Sefina 0.42DC + Orthene 97S3 fl oz + 4 oz wt7.5b15.0b
Transform 50WG1 oz wt2.5b5.0b
Centric 40WG2 oz wt2.5b2.5b
Admire Pro 4.6F1.5 fl oz2.5b7.5b

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey’s HSD, P = 0.05).

Treatment/ formulationRate amt product/acreTotal CFHs per 100 plants
7 DAT14 DAT
Untreated check-60.0a50.0a
Sefina 0.42DC3 fl oz17.5b27.5b
Sefina 0.42DC6 fl oz10.0b20.0b
Sefina 0.42DC + Orthene 97S3 fl oz + 4 oz wt7.5b15.0b
Transform 50WG1 oz wt2.5b5.0b
Centric 40WG2 oz wt2.5b2.5b
Admire Pro 4.6F1.5 fl oz2.5b7.5b
Treatment/ formulationRate amt product/acreTotal CFHs per 100 plants
7 DAT14 DAT
Untreated check-60.0a50.0a
Sefina 0.42DC3 fl oz17.5b27.5b
Sefina 0.42DC6 fl oz10.0b20.0b
Sefina 0.42DC + Orthene 97S3 fl oz + 4 oz wt7.5b15.0b
Transform 50WG1 oz wt2.5b5.0b
Centric 40WG2 oz wt2.5b2.5b
Admire Pro 4.6F1.5 fl oz2.5b7.5b

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey’s HSD, P = 0.05).

Footnotes

1

This research was supported in part by industry gifts of pesticides and research funding.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]
Section Editor: Clyde Sorenson
Clyde Sorenson
Section Editor
Search for other works by this author on: