The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of miticides to control twospotted spider mite (TSM), the dominant mite species on peanuts in Alabama. This study was completed at the Chilton Regional Research and Extension Center, Clanton, AL. ‘Virginia’ peanut was planted on 31 May under a high tunnel to exclude rainfall. Spider mites were induced by four applications of synthetic pyrethroids zeta-cypermethrin (Mustang Maxx, FMC Corporation, Philadelphia, PA) on 8 Aug and 22 Aug followed by bifenthrin (Tundra, Winfield Solutions, St. Paul, MN) on 5 Sep and 12 Sep. Five treatments (including untreated check) were replicated six times in an RCB design. Peanut plots were 25 ft long with one treated row separated by 5 ft alleys. Insecticide treatments were applied using a CO2 backpack sprayer with three TX-VS12 hollow cone nozzles mounted on a boom operated at 30 psi and 32 gpa. Miticide treatment dates were 26 Sep and 4 Oct. Spider mite densities were determined by sampling 10 terminal leaves from 10 plants per plot and washing them in alcohol. Spider mites were counted in the laboratory and converted to average mites per leaf. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and means were separated using Fisher’s Protected LSD (P < 0.05).

Year 2017 was a very wet year that resulted in the need for four pyrethroid applications for inducing spider mites for this study. This is different from drought year when only one or two applications of synthetic pyrethroids result in spider mite induction in research plots. Untreated check had the highest spider mite density (Table 1) that resulted in extensive webbing of peanut terminals. TSM counts from plots treated with Comite (registered on peanuts), Portal, and Agrimek were significantly lower compared to the untreated check. Alternative miticide Aramite + Bemix mixture did not provide significant control of spider mites compared to the untreated check. No phytotoxicity was observed from any of the miticide treatments.1

Treatment/formulationRate per acreApplication datesSpider mite counts / leaf
3 Oct11 Oct
Untreated check--19.7a24a
Portal 0.4EC2c26 Sep0.4b2.3b
Agrimek SC3.5d26 Sep0.2b3.1b
Aramite 50a + Bemix 87b32d + 18d26 Sep, 4 Oct28.2a25.8a
Comite 6.55EC32d26 Sep1.4b4.9b
P<0.01<0.01
Treatment/formulationRate per acreApplication datesSpider mite counts / leaf
3 Oct11 Oct
Untreated check--19.7a24a
Portal 0.4EC2c26 Sep0.4b2.3b
Agrimek SC3.5d26 Sep0.2b3.1b
Aramite 50a + Bemix 87b32d + 18d26 Sep, 4 Oct28.2a25.8a
Comite 6.55EC32d26 Sep1.4b4.9b
P<0.01<0.01

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P = 0.05.

aAramite is a 50% active liquid formulation.

bBemix is a 87% active liquid formulation.

cpt form. per acre.

dfl oz form. per acre.

Treatment/formulationRate per acreApplication datesSpider mite counts / leaf
3 Oct11 Oct
Untreated check--19.7a24a
Portal 0.4EC2c26 Sep0.4b2.3b
Agrimek SC3.5d26 Sep0.2b3.1b
Aramite 50a + Bemix 87b32d + 18d26 Sep, 4 Oct28.2a25.8a
Comite 6.55EC32d26 Sep1.4b4.9b
P<0.01<0.01
Treatment/formulationRate per acreApplication datesSpider mite counts / leaf
3 Oct11 Oct
Untreated check--19.7a24a
Portal 0.4EC2c26 Sep0.4b2.3b
Agrimek SC3.5d26 Sep0.2b3.1b
Aramite 50a + Bemix 87b32d + 18d26 Sep, 4 Oct28.2a25.8a
Comite 6.55EC32d26 Sep1.4b4.9b
P<0.01<0.01

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P = 0.05.

aAramite is a 50% active liquid formulation.

bBemix is a 87% active liquid formulation.

cpt form. per acre.

dfl oz form. per acre.

Footnotes

1

This research was funded by grant from the National Peanut Board and the Alabama Peanut Producers Association and industry gift of products.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]
Section Editor: Jawwad Qureshi
Jawwad Qureshi
Section Editor
Search for other works by this author on: