The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of in-furrow insecticides for managing tobacco thrips, the dominant early season pest of peanuts in Alabama. This study was conducted at the Wiregrass Research and Extension Center, Clanton, AL. Peanut, GA O6-G, was planted on 9 May in single and twin rows (two rows with 9 inch between an overall 36 inch spacing). Eleven treatments, including the untreated check, were arranged in an RCB design with four replications. Peanut plots were 40 ft long with four treated rows per plot and 25 ft alleys. At-plant in-furrow liquid insecticides were applied on 9 May using a CO2 powered backpack sprayer with nozzles mounted to spray in-furrow at 3 mph 15 psi at 10 gpa using size 35 orifices for twin rows and size 52 orifices for the single rows. Ground-driven applicator boxes were used for applying granular insecticides. Thrips damage ratings were determined on 18 Jun by examining 10 random peanut terminal leaves using a 10-point damage rating (DR) system: 1 = no damage; 2 = 10% of emerging leaves infested or damaged; 3 = 20% of emerging leaves infested or damaged; 4 = 30% of emerging leaves infested or damaged; 5 = 40% of emerging leaves infested or damaged; 6 = 50% of emerging leaves infested or damaged; 7 = 60% of emerging leaves infested or damaged; 8 = 75% of emerging leaves infested or damaged; 9 = 90% of emerging leaves infested or damaged; 10 = 100% of emerging leaves infested or damaged + dead plants. Peanut plots were inverted on 24 Oct and picked on 28 Oct using a two-row peanut combine that weighed pod yield for each plot. The average DR and yield are reported in Table 1. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and means were separated using Fisher’s protected least significant difference (LSD, P < 0.05).

Thrips damage
Treatment/formulationRate per acrePlanting methodrating (1–10 scale)Yield (lb per acre)
Untreated checkTwin rows7.8a 5,028
Thimet 20G5.7aSingle row2.5e5,618
Thimet 20G2.85aTwin rows5.8b5,291
Admire Pro 4.6F10.5bSingle row2.5e4,828
Admire Pro 4.6F4.5bTwin rows4.3cd5,137
Velum Total 2.17F18.0bSingle row2.5e5,799
Velum Total 2.17F9.0bTwin rows4.0cd5,563
Orthene 75S12.0cSingle row2.5e5,191
Orthene 75S6.0cTwin rows4.8bc5,373
Advise Four 4F6.0bSingle row3.0ce5,309
Advise Four 4F3.0bTwin rows4.8bc5,182
P > F<0.01 0.13
Thrips damage
Treatment/formulationRate per acrePlanting methodrating (1–10 scale)Yield (lb per acre)
Untreated checkTwin rows7.8a 5,028
Thimet 20G5.7aSingle row2.5e5,618
Thimet 20G2.85aTwin rows5.8b5,291
Admire Pro 4.6F10.5bSingle row2.5e4,828
Admire Pro 4.6F4.5bTwin rows4.3cd5,137
Velum Total 2.17F18.0bSingle row2.5e5,799
Velum Total 2.17F9.0bTwin rows4.0cd5,563
Orthene 75S12.0cSingle row2.5e5,191
Orthene 75S6.0cTwin rows4.8bc5,373
Advise Four 4F6.0bSingle row3.0ce5,309
Advise Four 4F3.0bTwin rows4.8bc5,182
P > F<0.01 0.13

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P = 0.05.

alb form. per acre.

bfl oz form. per acre.

coz (wt) form. per acre.

Thrips damage
Treatment/formulationRate per acrePlanting methodrating (1–10 scale)Yield (lb per acre)
Untreated checkTwin rows7.8a 5,028
Thimet 20G5.7aSingle row2.5e5,618
Thimet 20G2.85aTwin rows5.8b5,291
Admire Pro 4.6F10.5bSingle row2.5e4,828
Admire Pro 4.6F4.5bTwin rows4.3cd5,137
Velum Total 2.17F18.0bSingle row2.5e5,799
Velum Total 2.17F9.0bTwin rows4.0cd5,563
Orthene 75S12.0cSingle row2.5e5,191
Orthene 75S6.0cTwin rows4.8bc5,373
Advise Four 4F6.0bSingle row3.0ce5,309
Advise Four 4F3.0bTwin rows4.8bc5,182
P > F<0.01 0.13
Thrips damage
Treatment/formulationRate per acrePlanting methodrating (1–10 scale)Yield (lb per acre)
Untreated checkTwin rows7.8a 5,028
Thimet 20G5.7aSingle row2.5e5,618
Thimet 20G2.85aTwin rows5.8b5,291
Admire Pro 4.6F10.5bSingle row2.5e4,828
Admire Pro 4.6F4.5bTwin rows4.3cd5,137
Velum Total 2.17F18.0bSingle row2.5e5,799
Velum Total 2.17F9.0bTwin rows4.0cd5,563
Orthene 75S12.0cSingle row2.5e5,191
Orthene 75S6.0cTwin rows4.8bc5,373
Advise Four 4F6.0bSingle row3.0ce5,309
Advise Four 4F3.0bTwin rows4.8bc5,182
P > F<0.01 0.13

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P = 0.05.

alb form. per acre.

bfl oz form. per acre.

coz (wt) form. per acre.

Year 2017 was marked by extremely wet weather. There were statistically significant differences between treatments for thrips DR (Table 1). The untreated peanut plots had the highest damage rating. Reduced rates of in-furrow insecticides in twin rows resulted in high thrips foliar damage rating. There was no effect of insecticide treatment on peanut yields in this test. This was possibly due to excessive rainfall and compensatory plant growth. No phytotoxicity was observed from any of the insecticide treatments.1

Footnotes

1

This research was funded by grant from the National Peanut Board and the Alabama Peanut Producers Association.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]
Section Editor: Donald Cook
Donald Cook
Section Editor
Search for other works by this author on: