This trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of several rates and timings of various insecticides against Spotted Wing Drosophila (SWD) in Blueberry. Two-bush plots were established in a mature ‘Jersey’ blueberry planting (4 × 12 ft spacing) at the Nye farm, located approximately 3 miles South West of Trevor Nichols Research Center in Fennville, MI. Treatment plots were replicated four times and set up in an RCB design. Applications began 23 July at first SWD trap catch with ripe fruit and were re-applied on 3- and 7-day covers (Table 1). Test materials were applied with an FMC 1029 airblast sprayer calibrated to deliver 50 GPA at 2.5 mph. No foliar maintenance pesticides were applied to the test plots during the trial.

Treatment/formulationRate product/acreApplication timingSWD per lbSWD per lbSWD per lb
2 Aug16 Aug23 Aug
Untreated16a15.5a15a
Delegate 25 WG6 ozAB2.3a11.8a1.8b
Apta EC21 fl ozCD
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25% v: vCD
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Delegate 25 WG6 ozAB4a11.8a2.8b
Apta EC27 fl ozCD
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25 % v: vCD
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Delegate 25 WG6 ozAB1.8a11.3a3.5ab
Apta EC21 fl ozCD
 Exponent L8 fl ozCD
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25% v: vCD
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Delegate 25 WG6 ozA1.5a13.5a7ab
Pyrifluquinazon L 3.2 fl ozB
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25% v: vB
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Lannate LV 3 ptA4a7.5a5.5
MustangMaxx 0.8 EC4 fl ozBE
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbC
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galC
Brigade WS16 ozD
Grandevo 30% WDG3 lbABCDE5a7.8a5.5ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 10% Form A. WDG2 lbABCDE6a9.5a2b
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 10% Form A. WDG3 lbABCDE5.5a10.3a3.8ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 15% Form B. WDG2 lbABCDE8.8a5.3a2.3b
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 15% Form B. WDG3 lbABCDE8.5a9.8a6.8ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbA2.5a9a1.3b
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galA
Lannate LV3 ptB
Hero 1.24 EC10.3 ozC
Cormoran DC20 oz D
Grandevo WDG3 lbE
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vE
Grandevo WDG3 lbABCDE3a5a6.5ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Danitol 2.4 EC16 fl ozABCDE5.5a4.8a4.3ab
Entrust SC6 fl ozABCDE7a8.3a3ab
Argyle 2.52 OD6 fl ozABCDE2.5a3.3a4.5ab
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbAB4a6.3a3.3ab
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galAB
MustangMaxx 0.8 EC4 fl ozC
Verdepryn 100 SL8.2 fl ozDE
Treatment/formulationRate product/acreApplication timingSWD per lbSWD per lbSWD per lb
2 Aug16 Aug23 Aug
Untreated16a15.5a15a
Delegate 25 WG6 ozAB2.3a11.8a1.8b
Apta EC21 fl ozCD
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25% v: vCD
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Delegate 25 WG6 ozAB4a11.8a2.8b
Apta EC27 fl ozCD
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25 % v: vCD
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Delegate 25 WG6 ozAB1.8a11.3a3.5ab
Apta EC21 fl ozCD
 Exponent L8 fl ozCD
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25% v: vCD
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Delegate 25 WG6 ozA1.5a13.5a7ab
Pyrifluquinazon L 3.2 fl ozB
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25% v: vB
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Lannate LV 3 ptA4a7.5a5.5
MustangMaxx 0.8 EC4 fl ozBE
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbC
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galC
Brigade WS16 ozD
Grandevo 30% WDG3 lbABCDE5a7.8a5.5ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 10% Form A. WDG2 lbABCDE6a9.5a2b
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 10% Form A. WDG3 lbABCDE5.5a10.3a3.8ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 15% Form B. WDG2 lbABCDE8.8a5.3a2.3b
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 15% Form B. WDG3 lbABCDE8.5a9.8a6.8ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbA2.5a9a1.3b
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galA
Lannate LV3 ptB
Hero 1.24 EC10.3 ozC
Cormoran DC20 oz D
Grandevo WDG3 lbE
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vE
Grandevo WDG3 lbABCDE3a5a6.5ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Danitol 2.4 EC16 fl ozABCDE5.5a4.8a4.3ab
Entrust SC6 fl ozABCDE7a8.3a3ab
Argyle 2.52 OD6 fl ozABCDE2.5a3.3a4.5ab
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbAB4a6.3a3.3ab
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galAB
MustangMaxx 0.8 EC4 fl ozC
Verdepryn 100 SL8.2 fl ozDE

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P ≤ 0.05, Tukey’s HSD). ANOVA performed on square-root transformed data; data presented are actual counts. A = 23 Jul (First trap catch with ripe fruit), B = 27 Jul (A + 5–7 days), C = 3 Aug (B + 5–7 days), D = 10 Aug (C + 5–7 days), E = 17 Aug (D + 5–7 days).

Treatment/formulationRate product/acreApplication timingSWD per lbSWD per lbSWD per lb
2 Aug16 Aug23 Aug
Untreated16a15.5a15a
Delegate 25 WG6 ozAB2.3a11.8a1.8b
Apta EC21 fl ozCD
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25% v: vCD
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Delegate 25 WG6 ozAB4a11.8a2.8b
Apta EC27 fl ozCD
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25 % v: vCD
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Delegate 25 WG6 ozAB1.8a11.3a3.5ab
Apta EC21 fl ozCD
 Exponent L8 fl ozCD
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25% v: vCD
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Delegate 25 WG6 ozA1.5a13.5a7ab
Pyrifluquinazon L 3.2 fl ozB
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25% v: vB
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Lannate LV 3 ptA4a7.5a5.5
MustangMaxx 0.8 EC4 fl ozBE
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbC
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galC
Brigade WS16 ozD
Grandevo 30% WDG3 lbABCDE5a7.8a5.5ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 10% Form A. WDG2 lbABCDE6a9.5a2b
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 10% Form A. WDG3 lbABCDE5.5a10.3a3.8ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 15% Form B. WDG2 lbABCDE8.8a5.3a2.3b
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 15% Form B. WDG3 lbABCDE8.5a9.8a6.8ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbA2.5a9a1.3b
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galA
Lannate LV3 ptB
Hero 1.24 EC10.3 ozC
Cormoran DC20 oz D
Grandevo WDG3 lbE
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vE
Grandevo WDG3 lbABCDE3a5a6.5ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Danitol 2.4 EC16 fl ozABCDE5.5a4.8a4.3ab
Entrust SC6 fl ozABCDE7a8.3a3ab
Argyle 2.52 OD6 fl ozABCDE2.5a3.3a4.5ab
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbAB4a6.3a3.3ab
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galAB
MustangMaxx 0.8 EC4 fl ozC
Verdepryn 100 SL8.2 fl ozDE
Treatment/formulationRate product/acreApplication timingSWD per lbSWD per lbSWD per lb
2 Aug16 Aug23 Aug
Untreated16a15.5a15a
Delegate 25 WG6 ozAB2.3a11.8a1.8b
Apta EC21 fl ozCD
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25% v: vCD
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Delegate 25 WG6 ozAB4a11.8a2.8b
Apta EC27 fl ozCD
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25 % v: vCD
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Delegate 25 WG6 ozAB1.8a11.3a3.5ab
Apta EC21 fl ozCD
 Exponent L8 fl ozCD
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25% v: vCD
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Delegate 25 WG6 ozA1.5a13.5a7ab
Pyrifluquinazon L 3.2 fl ozB
 Superspread 7000 90 EC0.25% v: vB
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbE
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galE
Lannate LV 3 ptA4a7.5a5.5
MustangMaxx 0.8 EC4 fl ozBE
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbC
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galC
Brigade WS16 ozD
Grandevo 30% WDG3 lbABCDE5a7.8a5.5ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 10% Form A. WDG2 lbABCDE6a9.5a2b
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 10% Form A. WDG3 lbABCDE5.5a10.3a3.8ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 15% Form B. WDG2 lbABCDE8.8a5.3a2.3b
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Grandevo 15% Form B. WDG3 lbABCDE8.5a9.8a6.8ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbA2.5a9a1.3b
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galA
Lannate LV3 ptB
Hero 1.24 EC10.3 ozC
Cormoran DC20 oz D
Grandevo WDG3 lbE
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vE
Grandevo WDG3 lbABCDE3a5a6.5ab
 NuFilm P L0.125% v: vABCDE
Danitol 2.4 EC16 fl ozABCDE5.5a4.8a4.3ab
Entrust SC6 fl ozABCDE7a8.3a3ab
Argyle 2.52 OD6 fl ozABCDE2.5a3.3a4.5ab
Imidan 70 WP1.33 lbAB4a6.3a3.3ab
 TriFol L0.5 pt/ 100 galAB
MustangMaxx 0.8 EC4 fl ozC
Verdepryn 100 SL8.2 fl ozDE

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P ≤ 0.05, Tukey’s HSD). ANOVA performed on square-root transformed data; data presented are actual counts. A = 23 Jul (First trap catch with ripe fruit), B = 27 Jul (A + 5–7 days), C = 3 Aug (B + 5–7 days), D = 10 Aug (C + 5–7 days), E = 17 Aug (D + 5–7 days).

Fruits were hand-harvested on 2, 16, and 23 Aug. Samples were weighed in grams, with weights then converted to pounds. The fruit samples were evaluated through the Washington State Department of Agriculture brown sugar method as follows. Blueberries were crushed in a solution of 7 pounds brown sugar to 5 gallons water and floating SWD larvae were counted. Due to differences in sample sizes, data are presented as larvae per pound of fruit. All data were analyzed using ANOVA and means separation by Tukey’s HSD at P = 0.05.

All treatment programs provided significant fruit protection on the 2 Aug evaluation, compared to the untreated check (Table 1). Only Lannate LV/MustangMaxx/Imidan/Brigade, Grandevo (3lb) + NuFilm, Danitol, Entrust, Argyle, and Imidan/Verdepryn/MustangMaxx programs significantly reduced SWD infestation 16 Aug compared to the untreated check. All treatment programs provided significant fruit protection on the 23 Aug evaluation, compared to the untreated check.1

Footnotes

1

This research was supported by industry gifts of pesticides and research funding.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]
Section Editor: Jonathan Babcock
Jonathan Babcock
Section Editor
Search for other works by this author on: