A field trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of selected insecticides for managing cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover, in nonirrigated cotton crop at the Revels Farms near Everetts, NC. The field was planted with ‘Stoneville 5020GLT’ cotton on 5 May 2019 at a seeding rate of 50,000 seeds/acre. Individual plots were 4 rows by 30 ft long with a 36-inch spacing between row centers. The plots were arranged in an RCB design with 17 treatments including an untreated check (Table 1), and treatments were replicated four times. The plots received insecticide treatments on 18 Jul 2019. Insecticide treatments were carried out using a pressurized backpack and a spray boom, fitted with TeeJet TX-10 cone spray tips spaced 36 inches apart delivering 10 GPA carrier volume at 40 psi pressure above the canopy. Post treatment aphid counts were taken on 22 Jul, 25 Jul, and 1 Aug; 4, 7, and 14 DAT, respectively. To estimate the cotton aphid density, the fifth leaf from the plant top were sampled from 10 random plants per plot and total aphid counts were noted. To normalize the data distribution, A. gossypii counts from 4 DAT were square-root (x + 1) transformed, and 7 and 14 DAT were log10(x + 1) transformed before analysis. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (PROC MIXED, SAS v. 9.4), and mean separations were carried out using Fisher’s LSD (P ≤ 0.05). Untransformed means are presented (Table 1).

Treatment/formulationRate/acreMean aphid counts/10 leaves
22 Jula 4 DAT25 Jula 7 DAT
1. Untreated check478.20a110.80a
2. Brigade 2EC6.4b352.00ab100.50ab
3. Bidrin 8E 8.0b279.00abc35.00def
4. Fulfill 50WG2.75c168.75abc55.75abcd
5. Admire Pro 4.0F1.7b140.50abc60.50abcd
6. Exirel 0.83SE17.0b127.00abc39.75abcde
7. Movento 2SC5.0b125.25bc68.25abc
8. PQZ 20SC3.2b106.75bc33.00abcde
9. Venom 70SG3.0c83.00c33.75abcde
10. Carbine 50WG2.8c68.25c5.75g
11. Transform 50WG1.5c63.00c35.25bcde
12. Centric 40WG2.5c60.00c47.50abcde
13. Sivanto HL + LI-7007.0b + 0.125d35.00c34.00abcdef
14. Sefina 0.42DC3.0b29.75c9.50fg
15. Assail 70WP2.5c28.75c25.25cde
16. Sivanto HL + Dyne-Amic7.0b + 0.125d20.75c18.00def
17. Sivanto Prime 200SL14.0b20.75c15.00ef
P > F0.03900.0002
Treatment/formulationRate/acreMean aphid counts/10 leaves
22 Jula 4 DAT25 Jula 7 DAT
1. Untreated check478.20a110.80a
2. Brigade 2EC6.4b352.00ab100.50ab
3. Bidrin 8E 8.0b279.00abc35.00def
4. Fulfill 50WG2.75c168.75abc55.75abcd
5. Admire Pro 4.0F1.7b140.50abc60.50abcd
6. Exirel 0.83SE17.0b127.00abc39.75abcde
7. Movento 2SC5.0b125.25bc68.25abc
8. PQZ 20SC3.2b106.75bc33.00abcde
9. Venom 70SG3.0c83.00c33.75abcde
10. Carbine 50WG2.8c68.25c5.75g
11. Transform 50WG1.5c63.00c35.25bcde
12. Centric 40WG2.5c60.00c47.50abcde
13. Sivanto HL + LI-7007.0b + 0.125d35.00c34.00abcdef
14. Sefina 0.42DC3.0b29.75c9.50fg
15. Assail 70WP2.5c28.75c25.25cde
16. Sivanto HL + Dyne-Amic7.0b + 0.125d20.75c18.00def
17. Sivanto Prime 200SL14.0b20.75c15.00ef
P > F0.03900.0002

Means followed by the same letter in a column is not significantly different (P > 0.05, Tukey–Kramer). Aphid counts from 4 and 7 DAT were square-root (x + 1) and log10(x = 1) transformed, respectively, before analysis. Untransformed means listed.

aDate of observation.

bfl oz product per acre.

coz product per acre.

dv/v in %.

Treatment/formulationRate/acreMean aphid counts/10 leaves
22 Jula 4 DAT25 Jula 7 DAT
1. Untreated check478.20a110.80a
2. Brigade 2EC6.4b352.00ab100.50ab
3. Bidrin 8E 8.0b279.00abc35.00def
4. Fulfill 50WG2.75c168.75abc55.75abcd
5. Admire Pro 4.0F1.7b140.50abc60.50abcd
6. Exirel 0.83SE17.0b127.00abc39.75abcde
7. Movento 2SC5.0b125.25bc68.25abc
8. PQZ 20SC3.2b106.75bc33.00abcde
9. Venom 70SG3.0c83.00c33.75abcde
10. Carbine 50WG2.8c68.25c5.75g
11. Transform 50WG1.5c63.00c35.25bcde
12. Centric 40WG2.5c60.00c47.50abcde
13. Sivanto HL + LI-7007.0b + 0.125d35.00c34.00abcdef
14. Sefina 0.42DC3.0b29.75c9.50fg
15. Assail 70WP2.5c28.75c25.25cde
16. Sivanto HL + Dyne-Amic7.0b + 0.125d20.75c18.00def
17. Sivanto Prime 200SL14.0b20.75c15.00ef
P > F0.03900.0002
Treatment/formulationRate/acreMean aphid counts/10 leaves
22 Jula 4 DAT25 Jula 7 DAT
1. Untreated check478.20a110.80a
2. Brigade 2EC6.4b352.00ab100.50ab
3. Bidrin 8E 8.0b279.00abc35.00def
4. Fulfill 50WG2.75c168.75abc55.75abcd
5. Admire Pro 4.0F1.7b140.50abc60.50abcd
6. Exirel 0.83SE17.0b127.00abc39.75abcde
7. Movento 2SC5.0b125.25bc68.25abc
8. PQZ 20SC3.2b106.75bc33.00abcde
9. Venom 70SG3.0c83.00c33.75abcde
10. Carbine 50WG2.8c68.25c5.75g
11. Transform 50WG1.5c63.00c35.25bcde
12. Centric 40WG2.5c60.00c47.50abcde
13. Sivanto HL + LI-7007.0b + 0.125d35.00c34.00abcdef
14. Sefina 0.42DC3.0b29.75c9.50fg
15. Assail 70WP2.5c28.75c25.25cde
16. Sivanto HL + Dyne-Amic7.0b + 0.125d20.75c18.00def
17. Sivanto Prime 200SL14.0b20.75c15.00ef
P > F0.03900.0002

Means followed by the same letter in a column is not significantly different (P > 0.05, Tukey–Kramer). Aphid counts from 4 and 7 DAT were square-root (x + 1) and log10(x = 1) transformed, respectively, before analysis. Untransformed means listed.

aDate of observation.

bfl oz product per acre.

coz product per acre.

dv/v in %.

At 4 DAT, all insecticide treatments, except for Brigade, Bidrin, Fulfill, Admire Pro, and Exirel, significantly reduced aphid density on cotton compared with the untreated check (Table 1). At 7 DAT, seven insecticide treatments significantly lowered the aphid population compared with the untreated check (Table 1), and Carbine and Sefina resulted in the lowest density of cotton aphids in the plots. Treatments did not yield significant differences at 14 DAT (P = 0.6067), and therefore results were not presented in Table 1.1

Footnotes

1

This research is supported in part by industry gifts of products. We thank Clifton Moore, Lance Grimes, and Steven Roberson for their cooperation, Revels Farms and Cotton Inc. for support.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]
Section Editor: Clyde Sorenson
Clyde Sorenson
Section Editor
Search for other works by this author on: