This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of selected insecticides for control of sugarcane aphid (SCA) on sorghum. The test began when the plots were planted on 18 Apr and was conducted at the Beaumont Center. Four treatments with four replications were arranged in an RCB. Plots consisted of four 30-ft long rows with 30-inch row spacing. Seeds were drill planted at 1 seed/2 inches into League soil (pH 5.5, sand 3.2%, silt 32.4%, clay 64.4%, and organic matter 3.8–4.8%). Plots were fertilized by hand with urea at 38 lb N/acre on 19 Apr and immediately flush irrigated. Thereafter, plots were irrigated or drained as needed. Foliar insecticide treatments were applied on 28 Jun with a 3-nozzle spray boom (800067 nozzles, 50 mesh screens, 27 gpa final spray volume) while sorghum was heading. SCAs were not detected in significant numbers until this time. SCAs were counted on 10 upper and 10 lower leaves from the center rows at specified intervals starting with a pretreatment count on 27 Jun. Seed heads were collected 36 days after treatment (DAT) from center rows and wet weight measured. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and means separated by LSD (P = 0.05).

Pretreatment SCA counts on the upper and lower leaves were similar among treatments (Tables 1 and 2). Pre- and posttreatment counts were typically higher on lower leaves. At 4 and 8 DAT, counts were significantly lower in all treated plots relative to the untreated check on upper and lower leaves. Sivanto 200SL provided the best control on lower leaves. At 12 and 15 DAT, SCA populations had declined on the upper leaves in the untreated plots. On lower leaves starting at 12 DAT, increasing populations of SCA were observed in the Endigo ZCX-treated plots. We do not have an explanation for the increase, but there is prior evidence that pyrethroids can flare aphid populations. The other treatments resulted in lower SCA populations on lower leaves compared with the untreated check. All insecticide treatments significantly increased wet weights of sorghum heads compared with the untreated check (Table 3). Sivanto 200SL provided the best control followed by Centric 40WG and Endigo ZCX, although there were no significant differences in wet weight of heads among insecticide treatments. No phytotoxicity was observed.1

Treatment/formRate (oz/A)No. of SCA/upper leaf
PREa4 DAT8 DAT12 DAT15 DAT
Untreated check183.0367.6a198.6a32.9a7.3
Endigo ZCX 2.7CSb5.0c173.90.7b3.6b7.3b18.9
Centric 40WGb2.5d177.30.6b0.5b4.0bc7.4
Sivanto 200SL10.0c202.41.8b0.6b0.1c0.0
P>FNS<.0001<.00010.0002NS
Treatment/formRate (oz/A)No. of SCA/upper leaf
PREa4 DAT8 DAT12 DAT15 DAT
Untreated check183.0367.6a198.6a32.9a7.3
Endigo ZCX 2.7CSb5.0c173.90.7b3.6b7.3b18.9
Centric 40WGb2.5d177.30.6b0.5b4.0bc7.4
Sivanto 200SL10.0c202.41.8b0.6b0.1c0.0
P>FNS<.0001<.00010.0002NS

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05, ANOVA and LSD).

aPRE = pretreatment.

bNonionic surfactant included at 0.25% v/v.

cfl. oz product per acre.

doz product (wt.) per acre.

Treatment/formRate (oz/A)No. of SCA/upper leaf
PREa4 DAT8 DAT12 DAT15 DAT
Untreated check183.0367.6a198.6a32.9a7.3
Endigo ZCX 2.7CSb5.0c173.90.7b3.6b7.3b18.9
Centric 40WGb2.5d177.30.6b0.5b4.0bc7.4
Sivanto 200SL10.0c202.41.8b0.6b0.1c0.0
P>FNS<.0001<.00010.0002NS
Treatment/formRate (oz/A)No. of SCA/upper leaf
PREa4 DAT8 DAT12 DAT15 DAT
Untreated check183.0367.6a198.6a32.9a7.3
Endigo ZCX 2.7CSb5.0c173.90.7b3.6b7.3b18.9
Centric 40WGb2.5d177.30.6b0.5b4.0bc7.4
Sivanto 200SL10.0c202.41.8b0.6b0.1c0.0
P>FNS<.0001<.00010.0002NS

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05, ANOVA and LSD).

aPRE = pretreatment.

bNonionic surfactant included at 0.25% v/v.

cfl. oz product per acre.

doz product (wt.) per acre.

Treatment/form.Rate(oz/A)No. of SCA/lower leaf
PREa4 DAT8 DAT12 DAT15 DAT
Untreated check306.1412.0a312.6a156.3ab55.9b
Endigo ZCX 2.7CSb5.0c268.867.8b38.6b224.4a220.1a
Centric 40WGb2.5d364.251.0b27.6bc59.3bc88.5b
Sivanto 200SL10.0c308.86.4b1.2c0.7c0.5b
P > FNS<.0001<.00010.00350.0251
Treatment/form.Rate(oz/A)No. of SCA/lower leaf
PREa4 DAT8 DAT12 DAT15 DAT
Untreated check306.1412.0a312.6a156.3ab55.9b
Endigo ZCX 2.7CSb5.0c268.867.8b38.6b224.4a220.1a
Centric 40WGb2.5d364.251.0b27.6bc59.3bc88.5b
Sivanto 200SL10.0c308.86.4b1.2c0.7c0.5b
P > FNS<.0001<.00010.00350.0251

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05, ANOVA and LSD).

aPRE = pretreatment.

bNonionic surfactant included at 0.25% v/v.

cfl. oz product per acre.

doz product (wt.) per acre.

Treatment/form.Rate(oz/A)No. of SCA/lower leaf
PREa4 DAT8 DAT12 DAT15 DAT
Untreated check306.1412.0a312.6a156.3ab55.9b
Endigo ZCX 2.7CSb5.0c268.867.8b38.6b224.4a220.1a
Centric 40WGb2.5d364.251.0b27.6bc59.3bc88.5b
Sivanto 200SL10.0c308.86.4b1.2c0.7c0.5b
P > FNS<.0001<.00010.00350.0251
Treatment/form.Rate(oz/A)No. of SCA/lower leaf
PREa4 DAT8 DAT12 DAT15 DAT
Untreated check306.1412.0a312.6a156.3ab55.9b
Endigo ZCX 2.7CSb5.0c268.867.8b38.6b224.4a220.1a
Centric 40WGb2.5d364.251.0b27.6bc59.3bc88.5b
Sivanto 200SL10.0c308.86.4b1.2c0.7c0.5b
P > FNS<.0001<.00010.00350.0251

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05, ANOVA and LSD).

aPRE = pretreatment.

bNonionic surfactant included at 0.25% v/v.

cfl. oz product per acre.

doz product (wt.) per acre.

Treatment/form.Rate (oz/A)Wet wt. of heads from middle two rows (g)
Untreated check5,748.5b
Endigo ZCX 2.7CSa5.0b9,278.0a
Centric 40WGa2.5c7,929.0a
Sivanto 200SL10.0b8,795.0a
P>F0.0065
Treatment/form.Rate (oz/A)Wet wt. of heads from middle two rows (g)
Untreated check5,748.5b
Endigo ZCX 2.7CSa5.0b9,278.0a
Centric 40WGa2.5c7,929.0a
Sivanto 200SL10.0b8,795.0a
P>F0.0065

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05, ANOVA and LSD).

aNonionic surfactant included at 0.25% v/v.

bfl. oz product per acre.

coz product (wt.) per acre.

Treatment/form.Rate (oz/A)Wet wt. of heads from middle two rows (g)
Untreated check5,748.5b
Endigo ZCX 2.7CSa5.0b9,278.0a
Centric 40WGa2.5c7,929.0a
Sivanto 200SL10.0b8,795.0a
P>F0.0065
Treatment/form.Rate (oz/A)Wet wt. of heads from middle two rows (g)
Untreated check5,748.5b
Endigo ZCX 2.7CSa5.0b9,278.0a
Centric 40WGa2.5c7,929.0a
Sivanto 200SL10.0b8,795.0a
P>F0.0065

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05, ANOVA and LSD).

aNonionic surfactant included at 0.25% v/v.

bfl. oz product per acre.

coz product (wt.) per acre.

Footnotes

This research was supported in part by an industry gift of research funding.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]
Section Editor: Donald Cook
Donald Cook
Section Editor
Search for other works by this author on: