The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of insecticides to control onion thrips in onions grown under central pivot irrigation in the Columbia Basin of Oregon.1 Field plots were established at the Hermiston Agricultural Research and Extension Center (HAREC) (45.8411° N, 119.2917° W). Experimental plots were laid out under center pivot irrigation system; commercial practices were followed. Soil was classified as an Adkins fine sandy loam (coarse-loamy, mixed mesic xerollic camborthid); soil was fumigated with sodium methyl-dithio-carbamate (Sectagon, Novasource, Phoenix, AZ) applied at 374.2 lph (40 gpa) in the fall. Preplant soil test results indicated that the soil pH was 6.8, organic matter 0.7 ppm, nitrate, P, K, Ca, and Mg was 40, 22, 263, 5, 2.1, respectively (meq/100 g); N was 230.9 k/ha (205 lb/acre). ‘Vision’ onions were seeded with a Monosem vacuum precision planter the first week of Apr. Onions were planted in 4-m (13 ft) beds with four rows per bed, and 0.86 m (2.8 ft) between beds. A 2.1-m (7 ft) buffer was left between beds. Wheat was used as buffer crop between plots. During the second week of Apr, dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (Dacthal, DCPA, AMVAC) was broadcast at 6.7 kg/ha (6 lb/acre) for weed control, and fertilizer (10-35-0; N-P2O5-K2O) was banded over the seeded rows. During planting, seed corn maggot, Delia platura Meigen (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), was controlled by banding chlorpyrifos (Lorsban 4EC, Dow AgroSciences) over the seeded rows at 1.42 L/acre since poor stand development as a result of seed corn maggots, resulted in plots being rototilled, and replanted during the first week of May. On early May, Dacthal was applied at 5.4 kg/ha (4.9 lb/acre). Plots were laid out as a randomized complete block design with four replications per insecticide rotation treatment. Insecticides, active ingredients, class, IRAC mode of action number, rate, and source information are listed in Table 1. Season-long rotation consisted of 2–3 insecticides sprayed 10–14 days apart (Table 2). Insecticides were applied with 3-XR8002 nozzles spaced at 50.8 cm (1.7 ft) at 206.84 kpa, and 4.02 km/h (2.5 mph) resulting in a 185.3 liter/ha (75 gpa). Eight insecticide rotations and an untreated control (UTC) were tested (Table 3); weekly applications started when 1–2 thrips per plant were present (Table 2); plots were taken to yield when 80% of the onion leaves lost their color and/or leaves were visibly weak and tips flopped over; at this point, onions were lifted above ground, and left in the ground for 2–4 days for the ‘curing’ or drying process; then, onions were harvested; yield was determined based on the weight and quality of onions. On a weekly basis, five entire plants were randomly removed from each plot, and thrips (adults and larvae) were counted under a compound microscope (Leica S8) a day before and 3 DAT following application. Data were log transformed (mean + 1) and were arcsine transformed prior to the ANOVA and F-protected LSD (P ≤ 0.05) to distinguish treatment mean differences.

Trade nameActive ingredientInsecticide classIRAC MoARateSource
Assail 30 SGAcetamipridNeonicotinoid4A0.094 lb/ai/acre (0.04 k/ai/ acre) and 0.15 lb/ai/ acre (6.8 k/ai/acre)United Phosphorus INC, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
BotaniGard ESBeauveria bassianaNAOMRI0.88 liter/ha (12 oz/acre)Bioworks, Victor, New York
Lannate SPMethomylCarbamate1A0.9 lb/acre (0.4 k/acre)DuPont, Wilmington, Delaware
Movento 2SCSpirotetramatTetramic acid derivative238.9 k/ha (8.0 fl oz/acre) + MSO 0.25% v/vBayer CropScience, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Radiant SCSpinetoramSpinosyn50.58 liter/ha (8.0 fl oz/acre)Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, Indiana
Success 2SCSpinosadSpinosyn50.44 liter/ha (6.0 fl oz/acre)Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, Indiana
Surround WPKaolineNAOMRI1.46 liter/ha (20 lb/acre)NovaSurce, Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. Phoenix, AZ
Vydate LOxamylCarbamate1A4.58 liter/ha (2 qt/acre)DuPont, Wilmington, Delaware
TriologyNeem oilNAOMRI2.81 liter/ha (2.4 pt/acre)Certis USA Columbia MD
Warrior IILambda-cyhalothrinPyrethroid3A0.22 liter/ha (3.0 fl oz/acre)Zeneca Ag Products, Wilmington, Delaware
Untreated ControlNANANANANA
Trade nameActive ingredientInsecticide classIRAC MoARateSource
Assail 30 SGAcetamipridNeonicotinoid4A0.094 lb/ai/acre (0.04 k/ai/ acre) and 0.15 lb/ai/ acre (6.8 k/ai/acre)United Phosphorus INC, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
BotaniGard ESBeauveria bassianaNAOMRI0.88 liter/ha (12 oz/acre)Bioworks, Victor, New York
Lannate SPMethomylCarbamate1A0.9 lb/acre (0.4 k/acre)DuPont, Wilmington, Delaware
Movento 2SCSpirotetramatTetramic acid derivative238.9 k/ha (8.0 fl oz/acre) + MSO 0.25% v/vBayer CropScience, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Radiant SCSpinetoramSpinosyn50.58 liter/ha (8.0 fl oz/acre)Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, Indiana
Success 2SCSpinosadSpinosyn50.44 liter/ha (6.0 fl oz/acre)Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, Indiana
Surround WPKaolineNAOMRI1.46 liter/ha (20 lb/acre)NovaSurce, Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. Phoenix, AZ
Vydate LOxamylCarbamate1A4.58 liter/ha (2 qt/acre)DuPont, Wilmington, Delaware
TriologyNeem oilNAOMRI2.81 liter/ha (2.4 pt/acre)Certis USA Columbia MD
Warrior IILambda-cyhalothrinPyrethroid3A0.22 liter/ha (3.0 fl oz/acre)Zeneca Ag Products, Wilmington, Delaware
Untreated ControlNANANANANA
Trade nameActive ingredientInsecticide classIRAC MoARateSource
Assail 30 SGAcetamipridNeonicotinoid4A0.094 lb/ai/acre (0.04 k/ai/ acre) and 0.15 lb/ai/ acre (6.8 k/ai/acre)United Phosphorus INC, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
BotaniGard ESBeauveria bassianaNAOMRI0.88 liter/ha (12 oz/acre)Bioworks, Victor, New York
Lannate SPMethomylCarbamate1A0.9 lb/acre (0.4 k/acre)DuPont, Wilmington, Delaware
Movento 2SCSpirotetramatTetramic acid derivative238.9 k/ha (8.0 fl oz/acre) + MSO 0.25% v/vBayer CropScience, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Radiant SCSpinetoramSpinosyn50.58 liter/ha (8.0 fl oz/acre)Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, Indiana
Success 2SCSpinosadSpinosyn50.44 liter/ha (6.0 fl oz/acre)Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, Indiana
Surround WPKaolineNAOMRI1.46 liter/ha (20 lb/acre)NovaSurce, Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. Phoenix, AZ
Vydate LOxamylCarbamate1A4.58 liter/ha (2 qt/acre)DuPont, Wilmington, Delaware
TriologyNeem oilNAOMRI2.81 liter/ha (2.4 pt/acre)Certis USA Columbia MD
Warrior IILambda-cyhalothrinPyrethroid3A0.22 liter/ha (3.0 fl oz/acre)Zeneca Ag Products, Wilmington, Delaware
Untreated ControlNANANANANA
Trade nameActive ingredientInsecticide classIRAC MoARateSource
Assail 30 SGAcetamipridNeonicotinoid4A0.094 lb/ai/acre (0.04 k/ai/ acre) and 0.15 lb/ai/ acre (6.8 k/ai/acre)United Phosphorus INC, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
BotaniGard ESBeauveria bassianaNAOMRI0.88 liter/ha (12 oz/acre)Bioworks, Victor, New York
Lannate SPMethomylCarbamate1A0.9 lb/acre (0.4 k/acre)DuPont, Wilmington, Delaware
Movento 2SCSpirotetramatTetramic acid derivative238.9 k/ha (8.0 fl oz/acre) + MSO 0.25% v/vBayer CropScience, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Radiant SCSpinetoramSpinosyn50.58 liter/ha (8.0 fl oz/acre)Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, Indiana
Success 2SCSpinosadSpinosyn50.44 liter/ha (6.0 fl oz/acre)Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, Indiana
Surround WPKaolineNAOMRI1.46 liter/ha (20 lb/acre)NovaSurce, Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. Phoenix, AZ
Vydate LOxamylCarbamate1A4.58 liter/ha (2 qt/acre)DuPont, Wilmington, Delaware
TriologyNeem oilNAOMRI2.81 liter/ha (2.4 pt/acre)Certis USA Columbia MD
Warrior IILambda-cyhalothrinPyrethroid3A0.22 liter/ha (3.0 fl oz/acre)Zeneca Ag Products, Wilmington, Delaware
Untreated ControlNANANANANA
TreatmentsRotations
1Lannate SPWarrior IIAssail SG 5 oz
2TriologySuccess 2SCBotanigard ES
3Success 2SCBotanigardSurround WP
4Botanigard ESRadiant SCTriology
5Warrior IIMovento2SCAssail SG 8 oz
6Radiant SCSurround WPBotanigard ES
7Surround WPTriologySuround WP
8Movento2SCAssail SG 8 ozVydate L
9Control
TreatmentsRotations
1Lannate SPWarrior IIAssail SG 5 oz
2TriologySuccess 2SCBotanigard ES
3Success 2SCBotanigardSurround WP
4Botanigard ESRadiant SCTriology
5Warrior IIMovento2SCAssail SG 8 oz
6Radiant SCSurround WPBotanigard ES
7Surround WPTriologySuround WP
8Movento2SCAssail SG 8 ozVydate L
9Control
TreatmentsRotations
1Lannate SPWarrior IIAssail SG 5 oz
2TriologySuccess 2SCBotanigard ES
3Success 2SCBotanigardSurround WP
4Botanigard ESRadiant SCTriology
5Warrior IIMovento2SCAssail SG 8 oz
6Radiant SCSurround WPBotanigard ES
7Surround WPTriologySuround WP
8Movento2SCAssail SG 8 ozVydate L
9Control
TreatmentsRotations
1Lannate SPWarrior IIAssail SG 5 oz
2TriologySuccess 2SCBotanigard ES
3Success 2SCBotanigardSurround WP
4Botanigard ESRadiant SCTriology
5Warrior IIMovento2SCAssail SG 8 oz
6Radiant SCSurround WPBotanigard ES
7Surround WPTriologySuround WP
8Movento2SCAssail SG 8 ozVydate L
9Control
Treatment no.DatesAverage OT/plantYield (kg/ha)
JunJulAug
132022252861320273101722
10.00.32.30.01.511.816.4 ab15.932.035.28.47.41.310.1737,430
20.00.01.00.03.214.722.0 a29.139.719.011.17.83.011.5838,630
30.00.01.50.04.311.815.3 b28.445.621.914.17.62.811.7956,920
40.01.80.86.44.517.826.7 a21.220.215.210.79.71.110.3647,080
50.00.01.60.03.110.617.1 b18.033.611.94.58.40.98.4444,610
60.00.00.80.02.711.511.2 ab22.560.516.98.86.310.611.6849,710
70.01.81.16.22.414.915.3 b30.747.616.63.02.97.411.4261,120
80.00.02.20.04.517.119.5 b34.636.320.07.68.42.711.7655,860
90.00.00.70.0a2.015.430.1 a23.254.228.36.55.32.313.9248,910
F0.4180.6130.0831.0630.8183.1611.4711.8161.2031.5190.6240.7360.7780.817
Pr ˃ F0.69690.75810.79160.41980.59400.01370.21940.12340.33870.20280.74960.65930.62570.5952
Treatment no.DatesAverage OT/plantYield (kg/ha)
JunJulAug
132022252861320273101722
10.00.32.30.01.511.816.4 ab15.932.035.28.47.41.310.1737,430
20.00.01.00.03.214.722.0 a29.139.719.011.17.83.011.5838,630
30.00.01.50.04.311.815.3 b28.445.621.914.17.62.811.7956,920
40.01.80.86.44.517.826.7 a21.220.215.210.79.71.110.3647,080
50.00.01.60.03.110.617.1 b18.033.611.94.58.40.98.4444,610
60.00.00.80.02.711.511.2 ab22.560.516.98.86.310.611.6849,710
70.01.81.16.22.414.915.3 b30.747.616.63.02.97.411.4261,120
80.00.02.20.04.517.119.5 b34.636.320.07.68.42.711.7655,860
90.00.00.70.0a2.015.430.1 a23.254.228.36.55.32.313.9248,910
F0.4180.6130.0831.0630.8183.1611.4711.8161.2031.5190.6240.7360.7780.817
Pr ˃ F0.69690.75810.79160.41980.59400.01370.21940.12340.33870.20280.74960.65930.62570.5952

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05, F-protected LSD).

Treatment no.DatesAverage OT/plantYield (kg/ha)
JunJulAug
132022252861320273101722
10.00.32.30.01.511.816.4 ab15.932.035.28.47.41.310.1737,430
20.00.01.00.03.214.722.0 a29.139.719.011.17.83.011.5838,630
30.00.01.50.04.311.815.3 b28.445.621.914.17.62.811.7956,920
40.01.80.86.44.517.826.7 a21.220.215.210.79.71.110.3647,080
50.00.01.60.03.110.617.1 b18.033.611.94.58.40.98.4444,610
60.00.00.80.02.711.511.2 ab22.560.516.98.86.310.611.6849,710
70.01.81.16.22.414.915.3 b30.747.616.63.02.97.411.4261,120
80.00.02.20.04.517.119.5 b34.636.320.07.68.42.711.7655,860
90.00.00.70.0a2.015.430.1 a23.254.228.36.55.32.313.9248,910
F0.4180.6130.0831.0630.8183.1611.4711.8161.2031.5190.6240.7360.7780.817
Pr ˃ F0.69690.75810.79160.41980.59400.01370.21940.12340.33870.20280.74960.65930.62570.5952
Treatment no.DatesAverage OT/plantYield (kg/ha)
JunJulAug
132022252861320273101722
10.00.32.30.01.511.816.4 ab15.932.035.28.47.41.310.1737,430
20.00.01.00.03.214.722.0 a29.139.719.011.17.83.011.5838,630
30.00.01.50.04.311.815.3 b28.445.621.914.17.62.811.7956,920
40.01.80.86.44.517.826.7 a21.220.215.210.79.71.110.3647,080
50.00.01.60.03.110.617.1 b18.033.611.94.58.40.98.4444,610
60.00.00.80.02.711.511.2 ab22.560.516.98.86.310.611.6849,710
70.01.81.16.22.414.915.3 b30.747.616.63.02.97.411.4261,120
80.00.02.20.04.517.119.5 b34.636.320.07.68.42.711.7655,860
90.00.00.70.0a2.015.430.1 a23.254.228.36.55.32.313.9248,910
F0.4180.6130.0831.0630.8183.1611.4711.8161.2031.5190.6240.7360.7780.817
Pr ˃ F0.69690.75810.79160.41980.59400.01370.21940.12340.33870.20280.74960.65930.62570.5952

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05, F-protected LSD).

Thrips tabaci population pressure was moderate during the trial. At the end of the season, the mean number of T. tabaci varied irrespective of rotation treatment. Only on 13 Jul, there were significant differences. Despite the use of insecticides, we found only modest numerical differences in yield among the insecticide programs. Rotations on treatments 3, 7, and 8 were numerically the highest (Table 3).

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

This research was supported in part by industry in-kind products.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]