A field trial was conducted in a 25-yr-old ‘Parent’ navel orange orchard at the Lindcove Research and Extension Center, Exeter, California to compare the efficacy of various insecticides to protect fruit from citrus thrips rind scarring. Insecticides were applied at petal fall, on 25 Apr 2017, and all trees received a second application of the same or a different insecticide on 9 May. Treatments were diluted in 200 gal of water per acre and applied in an RCB design to four blocks of four-tree plots using a 100-gal high pressure D30 diaphragm pump sprayer with mechanical agitation and a hand wand with a D6 nozzle. Treatments were applied using 250 psi and combined with 0.50% Omni 6E oil. All outside fruit within reach were evaluated the week of 2 Aug 2017 and rated 0, 1–2 (slight), and 3–4 (severe) for the level of thrips scarring, and the mean % total fruit scared and the mean % severely scarred fruit were calculated. Treatment means were compared using ANOVA and means separated using Fisher’s LSD (P = 0.05) after arcsine (squareroot(x)) transformation of the proportions.

The untreated control trees had 17.8% citrus thrips-scarred fruit and 2.7% severely scarred fruit (Table 1). The mean number of fruit examined ranged from 23.2 to 33.1 per tree. The Delegate treatment significantly reduced the percentage of total fruit scarred and all three treatments reduced the percentage of severely scarred fruit that would be downgraded in the packinghouse.

Treatment/formulationRate-amt form/acre or v:v% fruit with thrips scarring% fruit with severe thrips scarringMean fruit examined/tree
Untreated control17.8a2.7a23.4bc
Sivanto Prime 200 SL + Omni 6E oil14 oz + 0.5%8.3ab0.0ab23.2bc
Delegate WG + Omni 6E oil6 oz + 0.5%5.2b0.7b33.1a
Movento 240 SC + Omni 6E oil10 oz + 0.5%5.3ab0.3ab28.5ab
Treatment/formulationRate-amt form/acre or v:v% fruit with thrips scarring% fruit with severe thrips scarringMean fruit examined/tree
Untreated control17.8a2.7a23.4bc
Sivanto Prime 200 SL + Omni 6E oil14 oz + 0.5%8.3ab0.0ab23.2bc
Delegate WG + Omni 6E oil6 oz + 0.5%5.2b0.7b33.1a
Movento 240 SC + Omni 6E oil10 oz + 0.5%5.3ab0.3ab28.5ab

Means in each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05). Proportions were transformed arcsine(squareroot(x)) prior to analysis. Untransformed means are listed.

Treatment/formulationRate-amt form/acre or v:v% fruit with thrips scarring% fruit with severe thrips scarringMean fruit examined/tree
Untreated control17.8a2.7a23.4bc
Sivanto Prime 200 SL + Omni 6E oil14 oz + 0.5%8.3ab0.0ab23.2bc
Delegate WG + Omni 6E oil6 oz + 0.5%5.2b0.7b33.1a
Movento 240 SC + Omni 6E oil10 oz + 0.5%5.3ab0.3ab28.5ab
Treatment/formulationRate-amt form/acre or v:v% fruit with thrips scarring% fruit with severe thrips scarringMean fruit examined/tree
Untreated control17.8a2.7a23.4bc
Sivanto Prime 200 SL + Omni 6E oil14 oz + 0.5%8.3ab0.0ab23.2bc
Delegate WG + Omni 6E oil6 oz + 0.5%5.2b0.7b33.1a
Movento 240 SC + Omni 6E oil10 oz + 0.5%5.3ab0.3ab28.5ab

Means in each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05). Proportions were transformed arcsine(squareroot(x)) prior to analysis. Untransformed means are listed.

This research was supported by a grant from the Citrus Research Board and industry gifts of pesticide and research funding.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]