-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
John C. Wise, Anthony VanWoerkom, Larry J. Gut, Two-Spotted Spider Mite Control on Tart Cherry, 2016, Arthropod Management Tests, Volume 42, Issue 1, January 2017, tsx063, https://doi.org/10.1093/amt/tsx063
- Share Icon Share
This trial was conducted at the MSU Northwest Michigan Horticulture Research Center in Traverse City, MI. Treatment plots consisted of single tree plots with four replicates per treatment, arranged in RCB design in a 22-yr-old tart cherry block (row spacing 20 × 18 ft.). Maintenance materials were applied across the block and included Chlorothalonil, Captan, Actara, Admire Pro, Ethrel, Delegate, Syllit, Luna Sensation, Gem, Assail, Imidacloprid, Indar, and Asana. Princep, Roundup-Ultra, and Gramoxone were banded below trees for weed control. Test materials were applied at the TSSM threshold (3–5 mites per leaf) on 29 July. All applications were made with an FMC 1229 airblast sprayer calibrated to deliver at 120 GPA at 1.5 mph.
Pre-counts were conducted; with post-treatment counts made on 7-d intervals (see Table 1). Evaluations were conducted by picking a 25-random-leaf-sample per plot. Mites were removed from leaves with a mite-brushing machine and counted under a Stereo microscope. All mite data are reported as the mean number of mites per leaf. While actual counts are presented, ANOVA was run on log transformed data. Transformed treatment means were analyzed using ANOVA and means separation by Tukey’s HSD at P = 0.05.
Treatment/formulation . | Rate product/acre . | Appl. timing . | TSSM-number of motiles per leaf-per 25 leaves . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precount . | ||||||||
28-Jul . | 4-Aug . | 10-Aug . | 8-Auga . | 25-Aug . | 31-Aug . | |||
Untreated check | 9.5a | 15.3a | 47.2a | 34.7a | 26.0a | 17.7a | ||
Magister 1.6 SC | 24 fl oz/a | A | 13.1a | 4.4ab | 2.6b | 9.2ab | 2.7b | 5.8a |
Magister 1.6 SC | 32 fl oz/a | A | 5.0a | 5.5ab | 1.9b | 1.1c | 1.6b | 5.2a |
Nealta 200 SC | 13.7 fl oz/a | A | 1.7a | 1.5b | 2.8b | 5.3bc | 4.0b | 5.6a |
Sylgard 309 L | 10 fl oz/a | A |
Treatment/formulation . | Rate product/acre . | Appl. timing . | TSSM-number of motiles per leaf-per 25 leaves . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precount . | ||||||||
28-Jul . | 4-Aug . | 10-Aug . | 8-Auga . | 25-Aug . | 31-Aug . | |||
Untreated check | 9.5a | 15.3a | 47.2a | 34.7a | 26.0a | 17.7a | ||
Magister 1.6 SC | 24 fl oz/a | A | 13.1a | 4.4ab | 2.6b | 9.2ab | 2.7b | 5.8a |
Magister 1.6 SC | 32 fl oz/a | A | 5.0a | 5.5ab | 1.9b | 1.1c | 1.6b | 5.2a |
Nealta 200 SC | 13.7 fl oz/a | A | 1.7a | 1.5b | 2.8b | 5.3bc | 4.0b | 5.6a |
Sylgard 309 L | 10 fl oz/a | A |
Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P ≤ 0.05, Tukey’s HSD). ANOVA performed on log transformed data; data presented are actual counts. A = 29 Jul (threshold at 3–5 mites per leaf).
ANOVA may not be valid as the data failed Bartlett’s test for homogeneity
Treatment/formulation . | Rate product/acre . | Appl. timing . | TSSM-number of motiles per leaf-per 25 leaves . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precount . | ||||||||
28-Jul . | 4-Aug . | 10-Aug . | 8-Auga . | 25-Aug . | 31-Aug . | |||
Untreated check | 9.5a | 15.3a | 47.2a | 34.7a | 26.0a | 17.7a | ||
Magister 1.6 SC | 24 fl oz/a | A | 13.1a | 4.4ab | 2.6b | 9.2ab | 2.7b | 5.8a |
Magister 1.6 SC | 32 fl oz/a | A | 5.0a | 5.5ab | 1.9b | 1.1c | 1.6b | 5.2a |
Nealta 200 SC | 13.7 fl oz/a | A | 1.7a | 1.5b | 2.8b | 5.3bc | 4.0b | 5.6a |
Sylgard 309 L | 10 fl oz/a | A |
Treatment/formulation . | Rate product/acre . | Appl. timing . | TSSM-number of motiles per leaf-per 25 leaves . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precount . | ||||||||
28-Jul . | 4-Aug . | 10-Aug . | 8-Auga . | 25-Aug . | 31-Aug . | |||
Untreated check | 9.5a | 15.3a | 47.2a | 34.7a | 26.0a | 17.7a | ||
Magister 1.6 SC | 24 fl oz/a | A | 13.1a | 4.4ab | 2.6b | 9.2ab | 2.7b | 5.8a |
Magister 1.6 SC | 32 fl oz/a | A | 5.0a | 5.5ab | 1.9b | 1.1c | 1.6b | 5.2a |
Nealta 200 SC | 13.7 fl oz/a | A | 1.7a | 1.5b | 2.8b | 5.3bc | 4.0b | 5.6a |
Sylgard 309 L | 10 fl oz/a | A |
Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P ≤ 0.05, Tukey’s HSD). ANOVA performed on log transformed data; data presented are actual counts. A = 29 Jul (threshold at 3–5 mites per leaf).
ANOVA may not be valid as the data failed Bartlett’s test for homogeneity
All treatments significantly reduced the incidence of motile TSSM within 14 d of the threshold application (Table 1). A rate response was observed for Magister with significantly lower motile TSSM in the 18 Aug evaluation.
Author notes
This research was supported by industry gift(s) of pesticides and/or research funding.
Section Editor: Jonathan Babcock
This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of miticides for control of TSSM in tart cherries.