-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
John C. Wise, Anthony H. VanWoerkom, Larry J. Gut, Plum Curculio Control in Sweet Cherry, 2016, Arthropod Management Tests, Volume 42, Issue 1, January 2017, tsx059, https://doi.org/10.1093/amt/tsx059
- Share Icon Share
The objective of this trial was to test the efficacy of various compounds against PC in sweet cherry. Two-tree plots were established in a 19-yr-old “Hedelfingen” sweet cherry planting (Sweet Cherry 3, row spacing 20′ × 15′) located at the Trevor Nichols Research Center in Fennville, MI. Treatments were replicated four times in an RCB design. Test materials were applied with a tractor mounted FMC 1029 airblast sprayer calibrated to deliver 100 gpa at 2.5 mph. Applications began at petal fall on 17 May with a 7-day interval. Applications were made per Table 1. In addition, foliar maintenance applications of Kocide, Bravo Weather Stik, Rally, Orbit, Gem, and Indar were applied as covers across the entire block. 2, 4-D Weedar was banded below the trees for weed control.
. | PC . | PC . | PC sublethal . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment/formulation . | Rate product/acre . | Appl. timing . | % stings . | % stings . | # PC larvae per 2 lbs fruit . |
. | . | . | 9 Jun 2016 . | 22 Jun 2016 . | 17 Jun 2016 . |
Untreated check | 31.8 a | 36.0 a | 61.3 a | ||
Apta 15 SC | 24 fl oz/a | B | 7.8 b | 5.5 bc | |
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | B | |||
Actara 25 WDG | 5 oz/a | C | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | C | |||
Avaunt 30 WG | 5 oz/a | D | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | D | |||
Imidan 70 WP | 2.125 lb/a | B | 6.0 b | 4.3 c | |
TriFol L | 0.5 pt/100 gal | B | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | B | |||
Actara 25 WDG | 5 oz/a | C | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | C | |||
Avaunt 30 WG | 5 oz/a | D | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | D | |||
Harvanta 50 SL | 16.4 fl oz/a | BCD | 13.5 ab | 12.5 abc | |
Harvanta 50 SL | 22 fl oz/a | BCD | 12.8 ab | 14.3 abc | |
Dimilin 2 L | 16 fl oz/a | ACE | 26.5 ab | 25.0 abc | 8.5 b |
Rimon 0.83 EC | 20 fl oz/a | ACE | 25.3 ab | 26.5 abc | 2.3 b |
. | PC . | PC . | PC sublethal . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment/formulation . | Rate product/acre . | Appl. timing . | % stings . | % stings . | # PC larvae per 2 lbs fruit . |
. | . | . | 9 Jun 2016 . | 22 Jun 2016 . | 17 Jun 2016 . |
Untreated check | 31.8 a | 36.0 a | 61.3 a | ||
Apta 15 SC | 24 fl oz/a | B | 7.8 b | 5.5 bc | |
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | B | |||
Actara 25 WDG | 5 oz/a | C | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | C | |||
Avaunt 30 WG | 5 oz/a | D | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | D | |||
Imidan 70 WP | 2.125 lb/a | B | 6.0 b | 4.3 c | |
TriFol L | 0.5 pt/100 gal | B | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | B | |||
Actara 25 WDG | 5 oz/a | C | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | C | |||
Avaunt 30 WG | 5 oz/a | D | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | D | |||
Harvanta 50 SL | 16.4 fl oz/a | BCD | 13.5 ab | 12.5 abc | |
Harvanta 50 SL | 22 fl oz/a | BCD | 12.8 ab | 14.3 abc | |
Dimilin 2 L | 16 fl oz/a | ACE | 26.5 ab | 25.0 abc | 8.5 b |
Rimon 0.83 EC | 20 fl oz/a | ACE | 25.3 ab | 26.5 abc | 2.3 b |
Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P = 0.05, Tukey’s HSD).
ANOVA performed on square-root transformed data; original means are shown.
A = 17 May (Petal fall), B = 20 May (Shuck split), C = 26 May (B + 7 days), D = 3 Jun (C + 7 days), E = 10 Jun (C + 14 days).
. | PC . | PC . | PC sublethal . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment/formulation . | Rate product/acre . | Appl. timing . | % stings . | % stings . | # PC larvae per 2 lbs fruit . |
. | . | . | 9 Jun 2016 . | 22 Jun 2016 . | 17 Jun 2016 . |
Untreated check | 31.8 a | 36.0 a | 61.3 a | ||
Apta 15 SC | 24 fl oz/a | B | 7.8 b | 5.5 bc | |
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | B | |||
Actara 25 WDG | 5 oz/a | C | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | C | |||
Avaunt 30 WG | 5 oz/a | D | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | D | |||
Imidan 70 WP | 2.125 lb/a | B | 6.0 b | 4.3 c | |
TriFol L | 0.5 pt/100 gal | B | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | B | |||
Actara 25 WDG | 5 oz/a | C | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | C | |||
Avaunt 30 WG | 5 oz/a | D | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | D | |||
Harvanta 50 SL | 16.4 fl oz/a | BCD | 13.5 ab | 12.5 abc | |
Harvanta 50 SL | 22 fl oz/a | BCD | 12.8 ab | 14.3 abc | |
Dimilin 2 L | 16 fl oz/a | ACE | 26.5 ab | 25.0 abc | 8.5 b |
Rimon 0.83 EC | 20 fl oz/a | ACE | 25.3 ab | 26.5 abc | 2.3 b |
. | PC . | PC . | PC sublethal . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment/formulation . | Rate product/acre . | Appl. timing . | % stings . | % stings . | # PC larvae per 2 lbs fruit . |
. | . | . | 9 Jun 2016 . | 22 Jun 2016 . | 17 Jun 2016 . |
Untreated check | 31.8 a | 36.0 a | 61.3 a | ||
Apta 15 SC | 24 fl oz/a | B | 7.8 b | 5.5 bc | |
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | B | |||
Actara 25 WDG | 5 oz/a | C | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | C | |||
Avaunt 30 WG | 5 oz/a | D | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | D | |||
Imidan 70 WP | 2.125 lb/a | B | 6.0 b | 4.3 c | |
TriFol L | 0.5 pt/100 gal | B | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | B | |||
Actara 25 WDG | 5 oz/a | C | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | C | |||
Avaunt 30 WG | 5 oz/a | D | |||
SuperSpread 7000 70 EC | 0.25% v/v | D | |||
Harvanta 50 SL | 16.4 fl oz/a | BCD | 13.5 ab | 12.5 abc | |
Harvanta 50 SL | 22 fl oz/a | BCD | 12.8 ab | 14.3 abc | |
Dimilin 2 L | 16 fl oz/a | ACE | 26.5 ab | 25.0 abc | 8.5 b |
Rimon 0.83 EC | 20 fl oz/a | ACE | 25.3 ab | 26.5 abc | 2.3 b |
Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P = 0.05, Tukey’s HSD).
ANOVA performed on square-root transformed data; original means are shown.
A = 17 May (Petal fall), B = 20 May (Shuck split), C = 26 May (B + 7 days), D = 3 Jun (C + 7 days), E = 10 Jun (C + 14 days).
Field Evaluations consisted of inspecting 100 fruit per plot for the presence of PC stings. Evaluations were made on 9 and 22 Jun. On 17 Jun, a harvest time sublethal effects evaluation was performed for Rimon and Dimilin treatments, compared to the untreated check. Two-pound samples of fruit were randomly harvested from each plot. The fruits were then placed on wire racks. Mature larval PC emerged from the fruit and dropped into trays containing a quarter-inch layer of dry sand. On 13 Jul, sand was sifted through window screen and larvae were counted. Data are presented as mean number of larvae (Table 1). While actual counts are presented, ANOVA was conducted on square-root transformed data. Transformed treatment means were analyzed using ANOVA and means separation by Tukey’s HSD at P = 0.05.
The Apta/Actara/Avaunt and Imidan/Actara/Avaunt treatments showed significant fruit protection in terms of direct effects on PC, compared to the untreated check (Table 1). Rimon and Dimilin treatments significantly reduced the survival of PC larvae in stung fruit via sub-lethal effects.
Author notes
This research was supported by industry gift(s) of pesticides and/or research funding.
Subject Editor: Jonathan Babcock