On 25 Oct 2012, an insecticide seed treatment trial was initiated on the R.R. Foil Plant Science Research Center in Starkville, MS. Two insecticidal seed treatments, Poncho and Cruiser, were evaluated against an untreated check (UTC) and a foliar insecticide, Karate Z, for control of green bug aphids. Plot size was four rows by 40 ft long on 38 in. centers. Statistical design was implemented as a randomized complete block with four replications. Wheat seed was treated at commercial rates by respective companies prior to planting. Foliar insecticide applications were made on 15 Feb 2013, when wheat was approximately at the tillering stage. Foliar applications were applied with a tractor-mounted sprayer calibrated to deliver 10.0 GPA at 60 psi using TX-6 Hollow Cone nozzles (two per row). Green bug aphid populations were evaluated at four sample timings of 17, 27, 37, and 52 days after treatment (DAT). Plots were sampled by counting all aphids present within five row feet. All means were log10 transformed. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and means were separated using Fisher’s Protected LSD (P 0.05).

At 17, 27, and 37 DAT there were no statistical differences among treatments for numbers of aphids per five row feet. At 52 DAT, Karate Z significantly reduced aphid densities compared with the UTC, Poncho, or Cruiser. There were no significant differences among treatments for yield (Table 1).

Treatment/formRate/acreAverage Aphids per five row feet
Yield*
17 DAT*27 DAT*37 DAT*52 DAT*Bu/Acre
UTC20.3a9.0a3.4a15.9a32a
Karate Z 2.08CS1.5 oz2.8a2.5a4.0a2.7b37a
Poncho 600FS0.8 fl oz/cwt15.3a16.3a11.2a34.4a43a
Cruiser 5FS1.0 fl oz/cwt17.0a16.3a13.3a34.7a39a
P > F0.11520.19270.07310.01610.1870
Treatment/formRate/acreAverage Aphids per five row feet
Yield*
17 DAT*27 DAT*37 DAT*52 DAT*Bu/Acre
UTC20.3a9.0a3.4a15.9a32a
Karate Z 2.08CS1.5 oz2.8a2.5a4.0a2.7b37a
Poncho 600FS0.8 fl oz/cwt15.3a16.3a11.2a34.4a43a
Cruiser 5FS1.0 fl oz/cwt17.0a16.3a13.3a34.7a39a
P > F0.11520.19270.07310.01610.1870

Means within a column sharing the same letter are not significantly different (LSD; P > 0.50).

*

Log10 (x + 1) transformed data used for analysis but actual means are reported.

Treatment/formRate/acreAverage Aphids per five row feet
Yield*
17 DAT*27 DAT*37 DAT*52 DAT*Bu/Acre
UTC20.3a9.0a3.4a15.9a32a
Karate Z 2.08CS1.5 oz2.8a2.5a4.0a2.7b37a
Poncho 600FS0.8 fl oz/cwt15.3a16.3a11.2a34.4a43a
Cruiser 5FS1.0 fl oz/cwt17.0a16.3a13.3a34.7a39a
P > F0.11520.19270.07310.01610.1870
Treatment/formRate/acreAverage Aphids per five row feet
Yield*
17 DAT*27 DAT*37 DAT*52 DAT*Bu/Acre
UTC20.3a9.0a3.4a15.9a32a
Karate Z 2.08CS1.5 oz2.8a2.5a4.0a2.7b37a
Poncho 600FS0.8 fl oz/cwt15.3a16.3a11.2a34.4a43a
Cruiser 5FS1.0 fl oz/cwt17.0a16.3a13.3a34.7a39a
P > F0.11520.19270.07310.01610.1870

Means within a column sharing the same letter are not significantly different (LSD; P > 0.50).

*

Log10 (x + 1) transformed data used for analysis but actual means are reported.

*

This study was supported by industry gifts of products and research funding.

Author notes

Section Editor: Donald Cook

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]