Amblyseius swirskii is a generalist predator, widely known for its biocontrol potential against multiple pests (mites, thrips, and whiteflies) of nursery and greenhouse crops. The objective of this study was to evaluate susceptibility of A. swirskii to conventional insecticides known to be effective against various greenhouse pests. The trial was conducted on an ornamental pepper cultivar “Masquerade” at U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Florida to identify A. swirskii- compatible pesticides. Pepper plants were grown from seed in Fafard Pro-Mix (Canadian Formula; Conrad Fafard, Inc., Agawam, MA 01001-2907) medium in seedling trays and transplanted in 10.1 cm-diameter plastic pots when seedlings were ∼5-wk old. Plants were watered as needed (approximately two times a wk) and fertilized weekly with 50 ml/pot of Peters Professional 20-10-20 (325 ppm) (Scotts Co., Marysville, OH). The greenhouse was maintained at 26 ± 3°C and 75–80% RH. Once host plants reached flowering stage, 10 A. swirskii adults were released on the top leaves of each plant. Two wks after predatory mite release, insecticide applications were made using a small hand held sprayer delivering 65.5 ml/ m 2 at 211 kPa (30.6 psi); treated potted plants were spaced at 1.5 × 1.5 ft. The trial was setup in a RCB design with five replicates. Treatment effects were evaluated by carefully inspecting five top leaves of each pepper plant using a 30× hand held lens. Count data were subjected to square root transformation prior to conducting ANOVA and mean separation procedures. The data presented are the untransformed means. Means separation was performed using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at the P < 0.05 level.

A. swirskii populations varied greatly, however significant reduction in mite numbers were observed in all the pesticide treatments compared to the untreated check. Overall Spintor, Epimek and Movento were found to be most lethal on the three life stages (eggs, nymphs, adults) of mites. No significant difference in number of mite eggs was observed 24-h post application of treatments ( Table 1 ). However, significant reduction in number of mite eggs was observed (compared with the untreated check) in Spintor (76–97%), Epimek (78–91%), and Movento (69–83%) on DAT 5, 10, and 15. Similar results were obtained while evaluating different treatments for A. swirskii nymphs and adults, where Spintor, Epimek, and Movento provided significant reduction in the number of compared with the untreated check on all sampling dates, except DAT 1 ( Tables 2 and 3 ). Overture was found to be most benign on three life stages of A. swirskii among all of the insecticide treatments. No significant difference in the number of any of the life stages was observed in Overture treated plants compared with the untreated control on DAT 1 and 15. No phyto-toxicity symptoms were observed following any of the insecticide treatments.

Mean no. of eggs/five leaves
Treatment/formulationRate amt product/acreDAT 0 (pre-spray)DAT 1DAT 5DAT 10DAT 15
Untreated check8.6010.20 (0)16.80a (0)33.0a (0)40.0a (0)
Movento5 oz13.206.40 (59.1)5.0b (80.6)15.60b (69.2)10.40bc (83)
Overture 35 WP8 oz11.806.80 (51.4)7.0b (69.6)10.40b (77)22.40ab (59.1)
Spintor6 oz8.805.40 (48.3)4.0b (76.8)1.0c (97)4.0c (90.2)
Epimek 0.15 EC15 oz10.209.20 (23.9)4.20b (78.9)3.40c (91.3)6.60c (86)
F value 0.851.014.4918.656.99
Pr > F0.51490.43290.0127<.00010.0019
Mean no. of eggs/five leaves
Treatment/formulationRate amt product/acreDAT 0 (pre-spray)DAT 1DAT 5DAT 10DAT 15
Untreated check8.6010.20 (0)16.80a (0)33.0a (0)40.0a (0)
Movento5 oz13.206.40 (59.1)5.0b (80.6)15.60b (69.2)10.40bc (83)
Overture 35 WP8 oz11.806.80 (51.4)7.0b (69.6)10.40b (77)22.40ab (59.1)
Spintor6 oz8.805.40 (48.3)4.0b (76.8)1.0c (97)4.0c (90.2)
Epimek 0.15 EC15 oz10.209.20 (23.9)4.20b (78.9)3.40c (91.3)6.60c (86)
F value 0.851.014.4918.656.99
Pr > F0.51490.43290.0127<.00010.0019

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different ( P > 0.05, LSD test)

Henderson-Tilton’s corrected percent mortality is presented in parentheses after each mean.

Mean no. of eggs/five leaves
Treatment/formulationRate amt product/acreDAT 0 (pre-spray)DAT 1DAT 5DAT 10DAT 15
Untreated check8.6010.20 (0)16.80a (0)33.0a (0)40.0a (0)
Movento5 oz13.206.40 (59.1)5.0b (80.6)15.60b (69.2)10.40bc (83)
Overture 35 WP8 oz11.806.80 (51.4)7.0b (69.6)10.40b (77)22.40ab (59.1)
Spintor6 oz8.805.40 (48.3)4.0b (76.8)1.0c (97)4.0c (90.2)
Epimek 0.15 EC15 oz10.209.20 (23.9)4.20b (78.9)3.40c (91.3)6.60c (86)
F value 0.851.014.4918.656.99
Pr > F0.51490.43290.0127<.00010.0019
Mean no. of eggs/five leaves
Treatment/formulationRate amt product/acreDAT 0 (pre-spray)DAT 1DAT 5DAT 10DAT 15
Untreated check8.6010.20 (0)16.80a (0)33.0a (0)40.0a (0)
Movento5 oz13.206.40 (59.1)5.0b (80.6)15.60b (69.2)10.40bc (83)
Overture 35 WP8 oz11.806.80 (51.4)7.0b (69.6)10.40b (77)22.40ab (59.1)
Spintor6 oz8.805.40 (48.3)4.0b (76.8)1.0c (97)4.0c (90.2)
Epimek 0.15 EC15 oz10.209.20 (23.9)4.20b (78.9)3.40c (91.3)6.60c (86)
F value 0.851.014.4918.656.99
Pr > F0.51490.43290.0127<.00010.0019

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different ( P > 0.05, LSD test)

Henderson-Tilton’s corrected percent mortality is presented in parentheses after each mean.

Mean no. of nymphs/five leaves
Treatment/formulationRate amt product/acreDAT 0 (pre-spray)DAT 1DAT 5DAT 10DAT 15
Untreated check1.60b2.40a (0)6.40a (0)6.40a (0)15.0a (0)
Movento5 oz1.80b0.60b (77.8)0.80b (88.9)2.0b (72.2)1.40b (91.7)
Overture 35 WP8 oz5.40a1.80ab (77.8)1.60b (92.6)1.40b (93.5)7.20a (85.8)
Spintor6 oz2.0b0.60b (80)0.40b (95)0.0c (100)1.0b (94.6)
Epimek 0.15 EC15 oz2.80b0.80ab (80.9)0.80b (92.8)0.60bc (94.6)0.80b (96.9)
F value 6.012.024.5012.035.66
Pr > F0.00380.01390.01260.00010.0049
Mean no. of nymphs/five leaves
Treatment/formulationRate amt product/acreDAT 0 (pre-spray)DAT 1DAT 5DAT 10DAT 15
Untreated check1.60b2.40a (0)6.40a (0)6.40a (0)15.0a (0)
Movento5 oz1.80b0.60b (77.8)0.80b (88.9)2.0b (72.2)1.40b (91.7)
Overture 35 WP8 oz5.40a1.80ab (77.8)1.60b (92.6)1.40b (93.5)7.20a (85.8)
Spintor6 oz2.0b0.60b (80)0.40b (95)0.0c (100)1.0b (94.6)
Epimek 0.15 EC15 oz2.80b0.80ab (80.9)0.80b (92.8)0.60bc (94.6)0.80b (96.9)
F value 6.012.024.5012.035.66
Pr > F0.00380.01390.01260.00010.0049

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different ( P > 0.05, LSD test)

Henderson-Tilton’s corrected percent mortality is presented in parentheses after each mean.

Mean no. of nymphs/five leaves
Treatment/formulationRate amt product/acreDAT 0 (pre-spray)DAT 1DAT 5DAT 10DAT 15
Untreated check1.60b2.40a (0)6.40a (0)6.40a (0)15.0a (0)
Movento5 oz1.80b0.60b (77.8)0.80b (88.9)2.0b (72.2)1.40b (91.7)
Overture 35 WP8 oz5.40a1.80ab (77.8)1.60b (92.6)1.40b (93.5)7.20a (85.8)
Spintor6 oz2.0b0.60b (80)0.40b (95)0.0c (100)1.0b (94.6)
Epimek 0.15 EC15 oz2.80b0.80ab (80.9)0.80b (92.8)0.60bc (94.6)0.80b (96.9)
F value 6.012.024.5012.035.66
Pr > F0.00380.01390.01260.00010.0049
Mean no. of nymphs/five leaves
Treatment/formulationRate amt product/acreDAT 0 (pre-spray)DAT 1DAT 5DAT 10DAT 15
Untreated check1.60b2.40a (0)6.40a (0)6.40a (0)15.0a (0)
Movento5 oz1.80b0.60b (77.8)0.80b (88.9)2.0b (72.2)1.40b (91.7)
Overture 35 WP8 oz5.40a1.80ab (77.8)1.60b (92.6)1.40b (93.5)7.20a (85.8)
Spintor6 oz2.0b0.60b (80)0.40b (95)0.0c (100)1.0b (94.6)
Epimek 0.15 EC15 oz2.80b0.80ab (80.9)0.80b (92.8)0.60bc (94.6)0.80b (96.9)
F value 6.012.024.5012.035.66
Pr > F0.00380.01390.01260.00010.0049

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different ( P > 0.05, LSD test)

Henderson-Tilton’s corrected percent mortality is presented in parentheses after each mean.

Mean no. of adults/five leaves
Treatment/formulationRate amt product/acreDAT 0 (pre-spray)DAT 1DAT 5DAT 10DAT 15
Untreated check3.802.80a (0)4.80a (0)5.0a (0)9.80a (0)
Movento5 oz3.401.20ab (52.1)1.60b (62.7)1.80bc (59.8)1.40b (89.6)
Overture 35 WP8 oz3.201.60ab (32.1)0.21c (94.8)2.0b (52.5)7.60a (43)
Spintor6 oz3.400.60b (76)0.0c (100)0.40c (91)0.20b (92.5)
Epimek 0.15 EC15 oz3.600.60b (77.3)0.0c (100)0.60c (87.3)0.80b (94.3)
F value 0.082.7915.927.2714.39
Pr > F0.98610.0622<0.00010.0015<0.0001
Mean no. of adults/five leaves
Treatment/formulationRate amt product/acreDAT 0 (pre-spray)DAT 1DAT 5DAT 10DAT 15
Untreated check3.802.80a (0)4.80a (0)5.0a (0)9.80a (0)
Movento5 oz3.401.20ab (52.1)1.60b (62.7)1.80bc (59.8)1.40b (89.6)
Overture 35 WP8 oz3.201.60ab (32.1)0.21c (94.8)2.0b (52.5)7.60a (43)
Spintor6 oz3.400.60b (76)0.0c (100)0.40c (91)0.20b (92.5)
Epimek 0.15 EC15 oz3.600.60b (77.3)0.0c (100)0.60c (87.3)0.80b (94.3)
F value 0.082.7915.927.2714.39
Pr > F0.98610.0622<0.00010.0015<0.0001

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different ( P > 0.05, LSD test)

Henderson-Tilton’s corrected percent mortality is presented in parentheses after each mean.

Mean no. of adults/five leaves
Treatment/formulationRate amt product/acreDAT 0 (pre-spray)DAT 1DAT 5DAT 10DAT 15
Untreated check3.802.80a (0)4.80a (0)5.0a (0)9.80a (0)
Movento5 oz3.401.20ab (52.1)1.60b (62.7)1.80bc (59.8)1.40b (89.6)
Overture 35 WP8 oz3.201.60ab (32.1)0.21c (94.8)2.0b (52.5)7.60a (43)
Spintor6 oz3.400.60b (76)0.0c (100)0.40c (91)0.20b (92.5)
Epimek 0.15 EC15 oz3.600.60b (77.3)0.0c (100)0.60c (87.3)0.80b (94.3)
F value 0.082.7915.927.2714.39
Pr > F0.98610.0622<0.00010.0015<0.0001
Mean no. of adults/five leaves
Treatment/formulationRate amt product/acreDAT 0 (pre-spray)DAT 1DAT 5DAT 10DAT 15
Untreated check3.802.80a (0)4.80a (0)5.0a (0)9.80a (0)
Movento5 oz3.401.20ab (52.1)1.60b (62.7)1.80bc (59.8)1.40b (89.6)
Overture 35 WP8 oz3.201.60ab (32.1)0.21c (94.8)2.0b (52.5)7.60a (43)
Spintor6 oz3.400.60b (76)0.0c (100)0.40c (91)0.20b (92.5)
Epimek 0.15 EC15 oz3.600.60b (77.3)0.0c (100)0.60c (87.3)0.80b (94.3)
F value 0.082.7915.927.2714.39
Pr > F0.98610.0622<0.00010.0015<0.0001

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different ( P > 0.05, LSD test)

Henderson-Tilton’s corrected percent mortality is presented in parentheses after each mean.

* This research was supported by the Floriculture and Nursery Research Initiative.

Author notes

Subject Editor: Carlos Bogran

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]